just a hint but update your client?

http://byteball.org

get 1.9.3

when the client says new version available download it run it and install over the top

for tony - maybe time to add an auto client update...

impossible they took extra time to ensure the api was secure

dont avoid my question with a question. answer mine and ill answer yours

how much did that xpy cost on average to convert to ion. not at the end when it was 8 for 10 cents.

im unsure how its abuse of the trust system. should someone blindly supporting a project because they get paid be trusted? if i see high posts and think hey high posts i can trust his advice when they've promoted two shady projects? reputation is a level of trust on ones actions. with getting paid there is conflict of interest. i think if you promote something you should research and stake your reputation.

people can be wrong not on purpose so maybe the neg rating should stand for 6 months to discourage blind paid shilling. in neg trust add date then remove after. would be nice if trust had decay where you could set a date to auto remove.

i dont understand the use or design of trust if it cant be used for a purpose such as this. in that case its just semi trust ruled by a select small government of forum people.

when investing how do you come to a decision on if you think its valid or not?

apply this same logic to sig campaigns you manage or join.  without risk youd say who cares as i get paid anyway.

reputation is something for investors like warren buffet etc. would he invest or promote something he didnt think legit?

so you are saying everyone in esports should use skincoin cause they said skincoin is the coin to use?, wow nice logic.

no im saying there is money in esports but esports can use bitcoin, litecoin and many others and that skincoin has no reason to exist because it adds no value.

also to the person about admin paper work... if it was happening why not ages ago. because it isnt dumbass. poloniex diesnt want it and bittrex will i think if you pay 4btc. so either skincoin didnt pay it or bittrex thinks its shit and didnt add it for free. watch the value drop!

i post in other forums been here for couple of years.

i meant after the fact its proven scam go back and neg them theres records of members.

whilst you are renting your space i agree, just like renting real life space you are accountable that it doesnt cause damage. i just think it would cut back on fake canpaign posts. at present they dont care for what they support and its once paid move to the next.

by vetting what they support it adds to integrity by putting their account onthe line as well

Simple thought for accountability and integrity.

If an ico/project doesnt deliver then should the campaign manager and members getting paid for their sigs and profile pic be neg rating for spreading the word?

icos are rampant many scams and account farming for this. is it time to neg them if the ico or proj is a scam later? it makes people accountable for their account and posts.

skincoin for example
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1944508.0

the whole topic is mainly sig members promoting it as they arent going to say anything not positive as they get paid. this falsely drags people in to invest. the sig member likely doesnt even have the coin.

by neging their account if it doesnt deliver or scam results that sig wearer cant use account for another sig campaign and ensures they vet what they are being paid to promote.

should campaign managers be responsible in the same way so they run reputable campaigns? or should campaign managers be responsible to neg members if the campaign results in lies or not delivering?

thoughts?

seems to be a way to police the rampant icos and campaigns.

its not on bittrex cause its a shitcoin with no real purpose. its only on mercatox etc cause they can pay to have it listed. they got $3m so 1btc isnt going to hurt them. if the coin was so great itd be listed on bittrex and polo without paying.

even other scam icos get to poli. this coin is pure garbage it has no reason to exist. its a skin used coin only because they say so. if i ran my own site why would i use it? why wouldnt i just clone my own coin and sell an ico like they did. the coin solves no problem and exists only to collect money in an ico

it "is" relevant as you say xpy was 8 for 10 cents ion now 62 cents. however if someone paid eg 4$ per xpy then your steller deal is 8x$4 = $32 now becoming 62cents. you have to compare averages korvas not just figured that look to be in your favour. show how its irrelevant as you say or do you just not like it when its not in your favour?

ps wheres your buddy wildshark. did he do his due dilligence or see where he forgot to carry the 1 and realised its a shit investment and ran from ion.

so how much did those 8 xpy originally cost you. you know so we're comparing apples to apples.

looks like 135 to me korvas

xpy wasnt 10 cents for 8 on average. use a median cost that was between the float sale price and end price. you tend to always use the lowest values on buy graphs then highest on sells. its misleading as it doesnt represent what actually happens!

wheres kermy? does he ie carlos still think his brother wont spend a day in jail? maybe carloser can keep his bros wife company while hes in the slammer keeping bubba company.

i just wish someone could get video footage of him saying guilty

what is a legacy account and how is it different from unverified or basic verified?

its funny how 90% of the posters in the thread have skincoin signature and profile pic. its a conflict of interest and misleading to anyone coming here as those in the sig campaign are only going to spam nice things regardless.

ill give my part though.

skincoin adds nothing new. if the devs have sites like they say and currently make profit like they say then they could accept bitcoin or many other coins that exist. also they could issue the coin from their site rather than ico.

they double sell you. they take coins for a token they make then when you use it on their site they dump back in the market. like 99% of icos this coin has no reason to exist. its preying on people hoping for a quick profit whilst devs have their free ico money from tokens with only a loose promise they'll follow through like all icos. unregulated and no legal recourse and they know this.

remember when people spent their time making great products released and made cash? their time was motivation to succeed. now any person writes some white paper because they are all the rage and puts their hand out for money. let me condense skincoins whitepaper for you

1. videogamers have lots of money and industry worrh billions
2. we are going to make an eth token like others and sell you it because its called skincoin and its going to be big cause we say so
3. pay us eth for coins and we'll get rich

once ico done and they are rich they could retire close their site and you guys have tokens aka funny money nobody wants. think opskins would want this shit? what incentive do they have over usd and btc? you sig members only want btc anyway.

no your conversations highlight your disdain for each other. discuss your issues without brining your bets and arguments into it. explain how your bet in btc actually relates to byteball? your experiment might but your btc bet and arguing on terms doesnt.

so its merits are its a dash copy with a gaming focus except its 1/2 a game.

why wouldnt you just buy dash? there is no merit korvas. the whitepaper like most icos bullshits about stuff excites users to spend cash. then once ico collect devs either dont deliver or take forever and deliver half arsed.

ion is no different to 80% of the cloned coins which also have no merit.

i looked at the business model. it lists games and api. api not available to devs and 1 game. explain to me the business model as its not fulfilled from white paper.

heres your chance... what merit does ion have that cant be gotten from dash?

ignore is only appropraite when you want to filter posts going by forum rules. offtopic responses to thread are against forum rules. take it to offtopic please