Bitcoin Forum
July 01, 2022, 04:20:03 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 58 »
1  Other / Meta / Re: Theymos OUT OF CONTROL !!! on: March 07, 2019, 03:11:52 PM
@theymos, please note, an example of merits awarded on political basis

Hope you react to this as you said.
2  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: February 07, 2019, 04:10:02 AM
I don't care how hard he worked on it.

As a merit source, I think you should care.

I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.

As far as rickbig41's post goes, it got merits because it was a good response
It was not a good response as his response and solution suggested to leave the forum.

Didn't know you got removed as a merit source.  Maybe someone here can explain that.  Were you given a reason?
Yes, got this reason from theymos in PM.

This is egregious abuse of merit, awarding merit for political reasons rather than any idea of quality. You are no longer a merit source, and your recent sends have been effectively undone.
3  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/5/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 07, 2019, 03:54:39 AM
Another very bad abuse happening here.

just after a post from the ass-licker suchmoon;

Is stingers still a merit source? Sending merits to pad H8's gang to 10 merits so that they would have votes. Not sure if that counts as "strategic".

Theymos just removed me from merit source, That is such an instant action by theymos I mean. Any other case where there is such an instant action, even after sufficient proves are provided by us?

Why don't we see such immediate changes when we have already provided enough proves about DT merit-cycle, all of that also comes under trust abuse and should be handled by theymos instantly as my case was.

I think this is partiality in judgment and this also stopped us form having a merit giver for people under abuse. Cryptohunter is posting a large amount of content from months here, if trust system and merit system was working correctly his efforts in posting should have received many numbers of merits for him to become a Lambo member here.

4  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: February 07, 2019, 03:36:33 AM
Is stingers still a merit source?
Not anymore. That's clear abuse, awarding merit for political reasons rather than any idea of quality.
Awarding merits for political reasons, this is totally partiality while judging peoples here.

There are many examples of such merit abuse made by merit source and even some DTs to support a political opinion and you know that.

For example:
This post shows that there is a lot of efforts put into explaining a situation by a low-ranked member and receives zero merits for his effort-full post. On the other side, just an arrogant and unuseful answer to this here gets 11 merits. Also, the reply of rickbig4 suggests to an active person here to leave the forum, which is worth 0 merits.

There are many such cases of merits abuse happing to support the political discussion.

OO what I am saying there is a whole merit-circle out there, But still no action on the abuse from theymos. While I was removed from being a merit source within some hour of sending merits to the people who are working hard to stop the trust abuse. Great judgment Huh
5  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/2/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 04:36:52 AM
No, not a single user in your army of miscreants has 250 earned merits. If you had any you'd have them hooked up to your trust lists already because the "election" could happen any minute now. You have ~20 or so 10-merit votes and you're gonna waste them all. Good show, will watch again.
Nice to hear you take this as an entertaining show about the abusive behavior you personally support in these days.

Only this sentence of yours show's that you want to have control of the trust system and you know most of the people are ass lickers here and afraid to speak against your abusive activities.

You should not worry anyway as this will surely stop when theymos realizes you're manipulative tack-ticks on trust.

Yeah, I'm quaking in my boots. Please aim between the eyes and make my suffering short. Thank you.
I would be very happy to do so. Tongue
6  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/2/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 04:08:09 AM
To make this work you're gonna need at least a couple of 250-merit accounts. And you don't need more than eight 10-merit votes for each pair of 250-merit votes. But don't get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoy watching how you morons waste your merits in this scheme.
Are you afraid anyone will get there very soon and put all of you lauda ass-lickers down ?

I can feel your fear by the way! Cheesy

stingers added to list
Its a pleasure! Wink
7  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/2/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 03:18:58 AM
Sorry, for late support but I am also a victim of the trust abuse in the past. You can check my case on my trust feedback. It was a total harassment by DT and especially Lauda on me to put me down and out of this business.

A contribution from my side would be a bunch of merits, as per the discussion in this thread merit is one of the most important part to vote for the DT and change it. I have some smerits to award for all the trust abuse supportive here.

You need 10 earned merits to vote right?

I can provide you with that to be eligible for voting. Not many but some of the supportive and abused, Jr.member and newbies can vote because of my help which is an honour for me.
8  Other / Meta / Re: THEYMOS - FACTS BASED POST - only interested in hearing HIS OPINION . Thanks. on: January 12, 2019, 11:48:42 AM
- Lauda has engaged in some behavior which I consider unethical or sub-optimal, but she's also done several good things.
You consider Lauda unethical or sub-optimal, also there nothing much good done by her here rather than just gaining trusts with exhortations and scamming or threatening users here.

It's not for me to decide how her actions weigh out on net.
Yes, you are not the one to decide her actions on the net, but you should judge her here on the forum and show what you think about here on here trust ratings. Also, you should take care that scammer should not gain power in the forums trust system which is totally ignored by you here.
9  Other / Meta / Re: Concerns with new DT1 logic on: January 12, 2019, 11:40:38 AM
There is no logic in getting Lauda in the DT list. It looks too stupid to see a scammer having many numbers of green trusts. Huh
10  Other / Meta / Re: IS THE MERIT SYSTEM being used correctly by a small clique of individuals here on: November 10, 2018, 06:49:42 AM
From what I can tell, merit is very frequently given for posts that the merit sender agrees with. This is the circle jerking the OP is referring to. This will lead to new users mirroring the opinions of those in power. This diminishes the free flow of ideas and makes it more difficult to dissent from popular opinions. Even in this very thread, multiple posts have merit that fairly little effort was put into said post, but that the merit sender likely agreed with what the post said.

I also suspect that people send merit to those who are believed to have a lot of merit to send in the hopes of receiving merit in return. This results in merit sources having abnormal amounts of merit.

Quote from: qwk
But keep in mind: a large share of freely available merit comes from merit sources.
Merit sources are (if not by definition) people who usually also receive a decent amount of merit.
Why? Because that's how you become a merit source in the first place.
To become a merit source, you'll have to have a history of actually giving away merit.
Merit sources are people who have the capacity to send more merit than than they can spend with the sMerit they get from the merits they receive. They demonstrate this by pointing out posts that should have more merit than they have.

Also, merit sources should be sending 1/2 of the merit spent. This ignores the merit that can be spent from the airdrop. Everyone doesnít spend all the sMerit they have so the percentage will be somewhat below 50%.
I truly support your opinion. In fact I have already made a thread related to it here

I would like getting your opinion there.

Sorry, for doing it buy sending a merits to you but your opinion was worth considering.
11  Economy / Reputation / Re: OGnasty and KWH REMOVE NEG TRUST [ INNOCENT PROVED] on: October 11, 2018, 05:12:43 PM
Thatís the thing, it wasnít a loan. He said he would sell goods and then disappeared once he got paid. After being given negative trust and presumably realizing he cannot get paid for signature campaigns, suddenly he repaid and demands to have his account trust restored.
This is not for the signature campaign, but I just want to maintain a good repo here.
12  Economy / Reputation / Re: OGnasty and KWH REMOVE NEG TRUST [ INNOCENT PROVED] on: October 09, 2018, 03:58:46 AM
Your image doesn't say scammer.  It says warning.  Your continued pleas of innocence are hurting your case, as they don't really show remorse for the victim here and instead expect us to sympathize with the culprit.  
Just you have such views about the neg trust but rest of the forum think any red trusted member is a scammer.

Hurting my case,  Grin there is just nothing remained in the case, as even if you remove the red trust, there are 10 more who followed you and would not bother to listen to my case.
13  Economy / Reputation / Re: OGnasty and KWH REMOVE NEG TRUST [ INNOCENT PROVED] on: October 08, 2018, 05:49:51 PM
My opinion is that what you deserve is for your account to carry a warning to others stating, "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!" as it has been demonstrated that you are capable of taking someone's money and not delivering on your promise. 
Even after such a big story, still, you think I deserve the tag that just means that if you feel that I don't deserve it you will not remove it in any consequences. I am just tired of telling the same thing again and again and the answer I get every time is I deserve it for late payments. I think even if any stupid person reads the issue here will say that I have something serious and for which I did a late recovery but I repaid it.

This does not mean that you can't participate here.
Still, I just could not do anything here as this is forum is just becoming more centralized and leaving its main moto of decentralization. Just most of the people here are supporting your views as they think if they do so they will gain you trust and which surely is an indication of centralization. It does not mean that someone is forcing them to do so but they are doing this to protect them selfs from going off to the views of a trusted person like you. 

I don't have an option that says, "Warning: This user may steal your funds, but if he sees it as beneficial to himself he may repay you down the line." or I would have gone that route.
I respect your views and also I am glad that my case was investigated by a person Like you. But still, you are offending every statement of mine as my image has just turned as a scammer to you. Even if I prove my innocence 100 times here it would not change.
14  Economy / Reputation / Re: OGnasty and KWH REMOVE NEG TRUST [ INNOCENT PROVED] on: October 08, 2018, 05:02:26 PM
Scammers have their own greed- and stupidity-driven logic.  I hear this constantly here, and I've heard it a lot in real life:  "If I was going to cheat you, would I have done ____?".  And the fact is, that's a scammer tactic.  How do you think con men are able to scam people?  They have to gain your confidence first!
Yes, all the logic you say here is right and my logic is wrong, that's a great thinking of you. ( I guess you are a logical programmer)

I would like to here your thought about who should decide what logic is right or wrong?

And how do you know a scammers logic are you expert at it ?

And then there's the whole pity party part of your post.  Dude, just give it up.  From the little I've read here, these guys have good reason to have left you those negatives.  You're pretty untrustworthy and nothing you've written here has convinced me that removing a feedback is justified.
I just don't want any pity bud, I am just asking for what I deserve in first case.
15  Economy / Reputation / Re: OGnasty and KWH REMOVE NEG TRUST [ INNOCENT PROVED] on: October 08, 2018, 04:53:09 PM
You obviously can't be trusted with money.
I would even not trust you with it.
16  Economy / Reputation / Re: OGnasty and KWH REMOVE NEG TRUST [ INNOCENT PROVED] on: October 08, 2018, 04:41:04 PM
Sir, I guess there is no one here who thinks if a person is trying to get back and solve all the issues he should atlest be given one chance.
I guess there is nothing remained in my fight now as every day I am getting new negative trust from users who have just not studied the case. They are just coping others trust without going through the issue. And I need to explain this to every one to just prove my innocence. Its just like begging for trust !
Its just a simple logic, no one would just loose his years old developed account, and also a merit source which already had many positive trusts under untrusted feedback for just 150$. Still I know the amount should not matter in any scam but I have repaid it which is a thing which none of a intended scammer will do.

But still I am just loosing hope now, and there is no one who will just respect my repayment. Still I am glad that the person got his money back and is happy with it.

Again I have just been appointed here to award merits to people who are worthy of it and I will keep doing so.
17  Other / Meta / Re: OVER 300 days with no answer from THEYMOS OR CYRUS? // stolen account on: October 08, 2018, 12:48:50 PM
You are truly motivated to regain your account, I think it is a big shame that no one here can help you from 300+ days Huh in it instead of people who are just not interested in your issue.

Still a BUMP from my side.
18  Economy / Reputation / Re: OGnasty and KWH REMOVE NEG TRUST [ INNOCENT PROVED] on: October 08, 2018, 12:19:13 PM
I have thought about asking stingers about his situation previously, asking him why he hasn't been able to get the reds removed from him..

If OG blocked his PMs their may be more to it than I know..

It seems like the lender is somewhat satisfied with the outcome..

Thank you for at least trying to get the truth out instead of just reg tagging someone without any knowledge about the case.
I appreciate your way of judging people on the forum.

I have made this thread for in attempt the remove my neg trust and also PMed all the members who have red-tagged me. But, as you already know many of the members just put the trust and leave it unverified even if the issue is solved. still, I have got red trust for this issue from 3 DT members just one of them was active and removed it from my profile. Rest are also active on the forum but never replied me or any of my reputation thread.

Maybe he should have his red removed? By time I noticed that he, someone I have a + on, had a scam accusation against him, the thread was over with and I think I was under the impression that the situation was resolved with stingers being in the clear for the most part..
Yes, I have cleared all the issues, and also started getting up to this forum in a better way, But I have started thinking that some of the members here just don't like people getting forward.

I would also like to see a good explanation and a good conclusion of this subject..
To tell you again I was engaged in my real life problem and so I was away from here for some time. Still, I came back, repaid all my depth. If I was a scammer, I just would have never returned here to pay back the money.

19  Economy / Reputation / Re: OGnasty and KWH REMOVE NEG TRUST [ INNOCENT PROVED] on: October 08, 2018, 12:00:33 PM
Are you going to publicize those reasons or are we to believe that they are reasonable purely off the merit of your word?
I do not see why you could not have made up something in order to try and dispel the negative feedback. Especially considering the fact that you ceased communication abruptly.
As I already said, I was locked up in a medical situation ( Do you need a medical certificate about it from my doctor Huh, Just use to do it in school to prove my innocence for absence ) 

One more thing, please also review the neg trust you have left on my profile for supporting a scammer like LAUDA. I hope you are not a part of his/her team which gives a negative tag without just studying the issue properly.
20  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Just got scammed by a "Legendary" member ! on: October 07, 2018, 06:20:47 AM
I am here to remind OGnasty and KWH that please remove the red trust or at least make it to neutral as I have proved my innocence here.

I would be open to hearing more opinions on this.
Thank you for giving me a chance,
As I already explained the @mikeywith about the issues I was facing, and I prefer keeping it private. I can tell you I had a medical issue and due to which I was unable to solve the problem created here but still when I came back here just repaid him for his loss, as you can check it by his statements above and also apologized him for the inconvenience cause. He agreed to my issue and found it genuine.

I am also apologizing here for late reply but my real life conditions kept me away from it. Still I have repaid the depth and am now looking forward to work in legit way the help the forum.

@OGnasty and @KWH please remove the red tag from my profiles as I have resolved the issue here. And also working here for the betterment.

Thank you!
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 58 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!