|
681
|
Economy / Services / Re: LEGENDARY MEMBER Offering TRUSTED BITCOIN ESCROW services (NO ACCOUNTS, NO FIAT)
|
on: February 24, 2016, 01:52:51 AM
|
I just received this message but address is different from your Post # 1 now want to confirm is this OK or this person trying to scam thanks
[img ]https://i.imgur.com/7lecugg.jpg?1[/img]
Scam, see the link actually redirects outside bitcointalk. Please confirm that it is indeed so, so that I can tag him appropriately I've left the user a tag aswell. Same thing seems to be happening with monbux and other escrows right now also. He made a post about it in his escrow thread, aswell as here. Tagged as well. Pretty sure it's the same person doing this over and over again. People should be careful and also request for a signed pgp message. Entrusting your bitcoins to a quoted message is .. well, pretty dumb |
|
|
|
|
690
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: {HALTED} BitEnlarge.com - 5% Daily For 7 Days, Principle Back - Transparent
|
on: February 23, 2016, 08:43:10 AM
|
Okay guys, this thread has had enough attention, let it die now ...
It has attention because the admin just made the lamest scapegoat attempt in the history of this forum. Not only that, this thread is nominated for the funniest endings of a Ponzi in Investor-based games for the year 2016. reading all this is .... hilarious  yes very funny reason to end this scam  make investor blame others, smit is very genious Just a bunch of mindless sheep yelling at each other while the bandit runs off with the coins lmao , so pathetic how uneducated people operate. Better talk for yourself and not for the others. "Mindless sheeps" and "uneducated"? You say that when you look in the miror? Pretty sure it was meant to you and the rest as that's what you guys are. Mindless sheeps who base jump from cliffs. Now that rhymed |
|
|
|
|
691
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: Calling Blazed to Remove Lutpin from his trustlist
|
on: February 23, 2016, 05:29:19 AM
|
Lutpin does not deserved to be on Default Trust.
He is abusive and immature.
I haven't done anything wrong.
I'm just selling my lbc account but Lupin and his alt give me a negative feedback.
Why would someone buy a LBC account other than to scam? If someone needs to buy a large sum of BTC then a trusted account would make a trade more possible/easier A real trusted member and not a phony one pretending to be trusted with a purchased account. Irl, the new owner might not have even traded once. |
|
|
|
|
694
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: YachtoGage - BTC investment solutions for success.
|
on: February 22, 2016, 09:00:11 AM
|
I can see front-end coding errors without even browsing the site for a minute.
Also, the color contrast is very bad. I looks like a traffic light on steroids.
I will do a full security scan on this one, and report back.
Thank you, Devsoft™.
Lol you mean you gonna scam the admin scammer ? |
|
|
|
|
695
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: BTC Doubler
|
on: February 22, 2016, 02:16:58 AM
|
Bitcoin Magic Doubler 2xSecret BugExploit Easy To Start You will Receive Double 2x amount your deposit Send Minimum 0.01 BTC To 13iPCDcmdDDpzhVw1WyuoifAQ6qtrMWLxc YouGet 2x BTC Activator You Must ACT NOW
exploit my ass.. it's just another scam attempt. |
|
|
|
|
696
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: User Lutpin abusing DT power
|
on: February 22, 2016, 02:07:19 AM
|
I'm not buying lol, I'm selling. I saw some users buying multiple accounts but they don't negative feedback like user model.
I meant it in general what users do with lbc accounts. LBC warns it's users against working outside of escrow. From what I can tell, the vast majority of LBC scams involve users not properly using the escrow system (or due to successful phishing attempts). Yeap they do, but most of them get scammed because they say they will offer a better rate if they were to deal off-site (evading LBC's escrow fee). I've had this happened to me one too many times now and every-time i insist on using LBC's escrow they go cold. |
|
|
|
|
697
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: User Lutpin abusing DT power
|
on: February 22, 2016, 01:59:39 AM
|
I got a negative rating from him, because I'm selling my localbitcoin account.
This user is a hypocrite. What is the difference between selling bitcointalk account and lbc account?
Localbitcoin is more secure because it has a built in escrow service while bitcointalk has not. And he allow bitcointalk account selling.
Unfortunately I am going to have to make Lutpin go 0-2 on this one and agree with the OP. Escrow should not be released on LBC until funds are secured/received by the bitcoin seller, and funds should be in escrow prior to the bitcoin buyer sending any kind of fiat. LBC warns it's users against working outside of escrow. From what I can tell, the vast majority of LBC scams involve users not properly using the escrow system (or due to successful phishing attempts). Established LBC accounts do however potentially allow for people to get their ads more premonitory displayed, potentially allowing more people to trade with an established account, potentially allowing for more favorable rates (and more profits) for the owner of an established LBC account. There is no need to buy an "established" account. LBC has a good escrow system, even as a newbie it isnt a real problem to sell hundreds of BTC. Also LBC will ban the acc (in most of the cases afaik) if they get a hint that the acc was sold. You don't allow selling secure accounts, while you allow selling of high risk bitcointalk accounts. What is your point there? Are you an hyprocrite and alt of lutpin? I doubt you're buying the account to do trades on LBC. Most of them buy it to flaunt and scam. Seen users here saying things like 'i have a high trade history on lbc so you send first' and what not. When i ask them to trade on LBC, they dont reply, as usual. |
|
|
|
|
700
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: {HALTED} BitEnlarge.com - 5% Daily For 7 Days, Principle Back - Transparent
|
on: February 21, 2016, 07:11:12 PM
|
User Date Risked BTC amount Reference Comments
Lutpin 7: -0 / +4 2016-02-21 0.00000000 Reference Promoting a ponzi scheme with a referral link in their signature.
mexxer-2 13: -0 / +5 2016-02-21 0.00000000 Promoting a ref link to a ponzi site in his signature.
here's why criticize you: you guys know judging others
you guys do not have proof that the site is to promote ponzi
make assumption
it is true that mining in the cloud profit is very little and this has
and this company does not show their equipment and there's a lot that does not confer.
but you two gave me negative
and even seeing now that you guys pulled out the signature link with still this negative what is called that?
how can we trust you two when we know that you guys judge people and when they try to correct you guys not correct too?
I have sent PM to ask them to remove this negative but you guys refuse
then sent to the PM moderator for him to do something
Dude you're as pathetic as they come. People like you deteriorate the bitcoin community ... States that you hate scammers on your profile, yet you offer your coins to scammers and not only that , on many threads, you beggars ask for coins to in intent to 'test' . It's been known for long that anyone who promotes a ponzi by either starting a site or wearing a signature will get tagged. This is not to bring them down but its to serve as a notice to other 'naive' newbies here in the community. edit :
how old you guys have?
I say this because I can imagine that you guys have 2 more than 35 years and I'm much lower than that
Can imagine you being 15 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
