|
Is there a restriction on the number of tokens for one wallet?
|
|
|
|
|
Where will the system receive the exchange rate from the exchange operations?
|
|
|
|
|
How soon after the ICO will the investors see the launch of the platform for the planned number of countries?
|
|
|
|
Hi. As far as I understand, it will be possible to get the BitReward tokens credited to a special card. What is it necessary for?
In order to be able to spend tokens in offline sales outlets. This will allow increase the coverage of the audience considerably. Hmm, it seemed to me that the platform was going to cooperate with online sellers only. Yes, but the partners aren’t prevented from owing physical sales outlets, they’re even encouraged to have them. After all, it’ll be very convenient and most likely will draw a lot of attention to your project. Well, let’s hope that such a reward option will become wide spread. |
|
|
|
Hi. As far as I understand, it will be possible to get the BitReward tokens credited to a special card. What is it necessary for?
In order to be able to spend tokens in offline sales outlets. This will allow increase the coverage of the audience considerably. Hmm, it seemed to me that the platform was going to cooperate with online sellers only. |
|
|
|
|
Hi. As far as I understand, it will be possible to get the BitReward tokens credited to a special card. What is it necessary for?
|
|
|
|
Why do you develop such complex charity projects, albeit with good intentions? How can I increase donations for charity from individuals through a remote platform? I doubt, because all funds usually operate from some person - a person with a reputation and merit.
Do you doubt about the success of the project? Or in the approach to its promotion? Look closely, the project already has not even a face, but faces of people who not only have active partnership with them, but also gave a positive assessment to it. In particular, in Russia they are very respected people. I'm used to the fact that usually funds also have someone's name. But since media people are, then everything should be in order. There are not only persons, but also in the partners of the project you can find large companies that have already responded to the start-up work. Therefore, we can safely say that the project does not start from scratch, but already has a sufficient foundation for success. I also saw that it is planned to invest a lot of money from fees in community involvement - in the bounty program. That's right! 5% of the collected funds will go for these purposes. The amount of funds corresponds to the average in the field of crypto projects. Is not that too much? Philanthropists should not waste unnecessary tokens. Am I mistaken? |
|
|
|
Why do you develop such complex charity projects, albeit with good intentions? How can I increase donations for charity from individuals through a remote platform? I doubt, because all funds usually operate from some person - a person with a reputation and merit.
Do you doubt about the success of the project? Or in the approach to its promotion? Look closely, the project already has not even a face, but faces of people who not only have active partnership with them, but also gave a positive assessment to it. In particular, in Russia they are very respected people. I'm used to the fact that usually funds also have someone's name. But since media people are, then everything should be in order. There are not only persons, but also in the partners of the project you can find large companies that have already responded to the start-up work. Therefore, we can safely say that the project does not start from scratch, but already has a sufficient foundation for success. I also saw that it is planned to invest a lot of money from fees in community involvement - in the bounty program. |
|
|
|
Why do you develop such complex charity projects, albeit with good intentions? How can I increase donations for charity from individuals through a remote platform? I doubt, because all funds usually operate from some person - a person with a reputation and merit.
Do you doubt about the success of the project? Or in the approach to its promotion? Look closely, the project already has not even a face, but faces of people who not only have active partnership with them, but also gave a positive assessment to it. In particular, in Russia they are very respected people. I'm used to the fact that usually funds also have someone's name. But since media people are, then everything should be in order. |
|
|
|
|
Why do you develop such complex charity projects, albeit with good intentions? How can I increase donations for charity from individuals through a remote platform? I doubt, because all funds usually operate from some person - a person with a reputation and merit.
|
|
|
|
I read the WhitePaper and something began to doubt the figures that are given there. Especially with regard to the advertising market as a whole. I heard that at a recent final in American football in the US, the cost of advertising was enormous - millions for short videos. I imagined that the total capitalization is trillions !!!
You are right. And this applies just SuperBowl. However, in the draft we are talking, most likely, about the profile advertising markets. Here their capitalization is about 563 billion dollars. Clearcoin is able to create and approve new rules of the game in this industry and to attract the majority of these funds into their hands. For this, the platform should give market players just the exhaustive functionality, become the most client-oriented ... Clearcoin is a platform for promoting a product based on blocking technology, which is aimed at solving problems associated with digital advertising. Here publishers cooperate with advertisers, and any transactions between them are recorded with a history confirmation. This service no one else gives. Moreover, this approach gives significant advantages and benefits in the future, because works at a lower cost than others. In my opinion, it is important for a client to conduct an advertising campaign and see the result. What can be different here? Special attention is paid to ensuring the reliability and exclusion of advertising fraud. Customers will like that you can check the entire history of the work and find out what and how it was done. All this will give a powerful analytical apparatus. I heard somewhere that the advertising market carries a lot. There are official estimates? |
|
|
|
I read the WhitePaper and something began to doubt the figures that are given there. Especially with regard to the advertising market as a whole. I heard that at a recent final in American football in the US, the cost of advertising was enormous - millions for short videos. I imagined that the total capitalization is trillions !!!
You are right. And this applies just SuperBowl. However, in the draft we are talking, most likely, about the profile advertising markets. Here their capitalization is about 563 billion dollars. Clearcoin is able to create and approve new rules of the game in this industry and to attract the majority of these funds into their hands. For this, the platform should give market players just the exhaustive functionality, become the most client-oriented ... Clearcoin is a platform for promoting a product based on blocking technology, which is aimed at solving problems associated with digital advertising. Here publishers cooperate with advertisers, and any transactions between them are recorded with a history confirmation. This service no one else gives. Moreover, this approach gives significant advantages and benefits in the future, because works at a lower cost than others. In my opinion, it is important for a client to conduct an advertising campaign and see the result. What can be different here? |
|
|
|
I read the WhitePaper and something began to doubt the figures that are given there. Especially with regard to the advertising market as a whole. I heard that at a recent final in American football in the US, the cost of advertising was enormous - millions for short videos. I imagined that the total capitalization is trillions !!!
You are right. And this applies just SuperBowl. However, in the draft we are talking, most likely, about the profile advertising markets. Here their capitalization is about 563 billion dollars. Clearcoin is able to create and approve new rules of the game in this industry and to attract the majority of these funds into their hands. For this, the platform should give market players just the exhaustive functionality, become the most client-oriented ... |
|
|
|
|
I read the WhitePaper and something began to doubt the figures that are given there. Especially with regard to the advertising market as a whole. I heard that at a recent final in American football in the US, the cost of advertising was enormous - millions for short videos. I imagined that the total capitalization is trillions !!!
|
|
|
|
Hi there. Are you sure that the process that you’ve described is called mining? It doesn’t have that close connection with it.
Today any process of earning cryptocurrency is called mining, so, broadly speaking, this can also be called mining. At the same time, the process of creation of cryptocurrency itself happens on real computing powers and the users only confirm the transactions in the game. This is about 2 different cryptocurrencies. For example, when you mine in DragonGlass tokens due to confirmation of transactions rather than using physical capacities, the ETH are created. One more interesting point: do I receive any share from ETH created on these farms? |
|
|
|
Hi there. Are you sure that the process that you’ve described is called mining? It doesn’t have that close connection with it.
Today any process of earning cryptocurrency is called mining, so, broadly speaking, this can also be called mining. At the same time, the process of creation of cryptocurrency itself happens on real computing powers and the users only confirm the transactions in the game. |
|
|
|
|
Hi there. Are you sure that the process that you’ve described is called mining? It doesn’t have that close connection with it.
|
|
|
|
I saw several times that people asked here how rating of each lead were formed, but unfortunately none of them got fulfilling answer. I will try to ask this question again, maybe it will be answered.
Yes, no one really pays any attention to these questions, because it was said a hundred times, that the moderators had been going to set the rating of each lead by themselves. What?? Who are these moderators, who do not sleep for 3 years and who have five pairs of hands? Don't be silly, the system will automatically rank each lead. Finally, a sensible answer. Now I would like to find out on what basis the system will generate rank each lead? Each lead will be ranked according to several parameters. The biggest influence will have the number of days since lead’s creation. It’s less likely that a lead will be relevant, if it stays in the system without being claimed for too long. What other parameters will be taken into account? |
|
|
|
I saw several times that people asked here how rating of each lead were formed, but unfortunately none of them got fulfilling answer. I will try to ask this question again, maybe it will be answered.
Yes, no one really pays any attention to these questions, because it was said a hundred times, that the moderators had been going to set the rating of each lead by themselves. What?? Who are these moderators, who do not sleep for 3 years and who have five pairs of hands? Don't be silly, the system will automatically rank each lead. Finally, a sensible answer. Now I would like to find out on what basis the system will generate rank each lead? |
|
|
|
|
I saw several times that people asked here how rating of each lead were formed, but unfortunately none of them got fulfilling answer. I will try to ask this question again, maybe it will be answered.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
