I presume the "cpu 4-pin" is the square P4 cable, right? Otherwise yes, it may be the cpu or mem.

I had the same issue when I first used the 5970...  you have to plug the monitor into the top vga port of the first card. I have the exact same mother board and cpu

I now have 2 rigs with 4 of these cards each

Therefore, Bitcoin is:

B  Boron ( 5 )
I  Iodine ( 53 )
TC  Technetium ( 43 )
O  Oxygen ( 8 )
IN  Indium ( 49 )

When you add the numbers of the atomic weights, you get 158.

Financial Accounting Standards Board summary of statement No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan.

try both cards separately in EVERY slot - whilst doing this, try both DVI ports on each.

Maybe try a CMOS reset ?

Also try another DIMM - and try moving it to each slot

best I can do atm

human beings are rather similar. your neighbour isn't a gerbil

Really? All the social-democrats in Europe have secret death-camps where they kill off the intellectual class as soon as they come to power? Good to know, I might have to watch out.

Or is it perhaps that certain authoritarian governments, regardless of ideology, have a tendency to kill off opponents?

+1 I can't stand people who benefit so greatly from our current system, seeking to destroy it for everyone else. Disgusting selfishness is what I call it.

Good news for you fagtoid!
Those assjammers at SA are doing just that!

What a beautiful hack it was. Very funny, and possibly not even malicious. Am I the only one contemplating a bitcoin donation to the perpetrator if nothing bad comes of this?

I am very saddened by your response. We are human beings not animals, its not survival of the fittest and if you were in that situation you would be thinking differently.

If someone profits so greatly from our country, they start their own business and work there way up and become a millionaire or billionaire, they should not contribute something back to the country that helped make them who they are?

but it's ok for billion dollar a year corporations to destroy the earth, pay less taxes than some mother of 4 who works at walmart and get richer and richer off the backs of hard working lower / middle class Americans.

We are human beings, our country was founded by Christians. If we ever get to the point where we will refuse to show the love of Christ and refuse to take care of the disabled, and the old I will move.

The notion that you would rather let someone die than pay taxes to have health care for those who cant afford it is absolutely disgusting and revolting.

Maybe we define comforts differently, but the females of Iceland are hot.

Your first responsibility is to take care of yourself, so you won't be a burden to other people. If you don't do at least that, how can you be so arrogant as to think you can help others? You make progress by adapting to your own nature. In Rabelais' Gargantua the Abbey of Theleme had the motto: Fay ce que vouldras, or "Do as you will." Rabelais (unlike the Book of Judges) treats this in a very positive light. The implication is: Don't go seeking after some ideal far removed from your own needs. Don't get involved in some crusade to save the human race--because you falsely think that is the noble thing to do--when what you may really want to do, if you are honest with yourself, is to stay home, grow vegetables, and sell them in a roadside market. (Growing vegetables is, after all, real growth--more so than some New Age conceptions.) You have no obligation under the sun other than to discover your real needs, to fulfill them, and to rejoice in doing so.

In this approach you give other people the right to make their own choices, but you also hold them responsible for the consequences. Most social "problems", after all, are a function of the choices people make, and are therefore insolvable in principle, except by coercion. One is not under any obligation to make up for the effects of other people's decisions. If, for example, people (poor or rich, educated or not) have children they can't care for or feed, one has no responsibility to make up for their negligence or to take on one's own shoulders responsibility for the consequent suffering. You can, if you wish, if you want to become a martyr. If you are looking to become a martyr, the world will gladly oblige, and then calmly carry on as before, the "problems" unaltered.

One may, of course, choose to help the rest of the world to the extent that one is able, assuming one knows how. But it is a choice, not an obligation. Modern political correctness and prostituted religion have tried to turn all of what used to be considered virtues into social obligations. Not that anyone is expected to really practice what they preach; rather it is intended they feel guilty for not doing so, and once the guilt trip is underway, their behavior can be manipulated for political purposes.

Much of the argument here boils down to semantics. I want to understand if you object to the big government, or simply to the bad government...?