0.029BTC

0.026BTC

51 - digicoinuser

Thanks!   

41 - digicoinuser

Thanks!   

40, 41, 42 - digicoinuser

Thanks!   

50 - digicoinuser

Thanks! 

50 - digicoinuser

Happy Birthday Hhampuz!   

Very nice Eppo Leemburg!  Anyone else see that table and think of a possible bitcoin air hockey setup?

50 - digicoinuser

Thanks MJ! 

50 - digicoinuser

LOT 1 @ 0.001BTC

LOT 1 @ 0.0002BTC

50 - digicoinuser

Thanks AM!   

50 - digicoinuser

Thanks!   

52 - digicoinuser

Thanks!   

44 - digicoinuser

40 - digicoinuser

Sweet BTC grenade!! 

Random please, GPGL!   

This is in regards to a response I had to make for clarification:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233577.msg54049935#msg54049935

I was a bit puzzled why no more orders came in for these certificates in ~3 years time and yesterday perceived it has everything to do with the leadership issues surrounding the NastyFans project.  The attitude and public leadership are toxic and I can't support it going forward with experiencing OgNasty's reaction.

Og was not satisfied with my response to the linked thread and decided to remove positive trading feedback from previous transactions and remove/ban me from the NastyFans slack as payback for not blindly supporting his behavior.  Nothing negative was said on my end and I even had appreciation for minor input Og provided for a project in the past.  I'm a Minted Seat set owner and have been involved for many years with NastyFans slack as shown by Og's deleted response on this thread a couple days ago.


Going from being a great example of his "organization" to banned doesn't really phase me, I cut my losses a long time ago when I found out the seats aren't worth the investment.  The Minted Seat/Seats issues have been brought up by many members in the past and I agree the coins and seats aren't worth purchasing.  Voting with my wallet is one reason I believe Og is sour; I purchased quite a few NastyFans items before figuring out it wasn't worth it anymore.

I've decided supporting NastyFans in any capability is not something I want to do moving forward and I advise all users reading this to do the same.  OgNasty is not someone I wish to keep contact with since they seemingly feel the need to be able to abuse anyones trust based on "association" (you can't be associated or work with someone they don't like).  This certificate thread wasn't meant to be closed with the recent activity but he's shown me community projects like these are not valuable to him or the "Fan Club"/"Organization"/whatever he decides it is.

To the others in the "Bitcoin Enthusiasts"/Nasty Fans Slack, I have no issue with you and hope we can keep our associations intact unless the NastyFans Fan Club trumps the ability to maintain that.  You can also verify the history of the messages in the public NF slack channel to see what was said and if you support Og's authoritative removal of me from the group.

Best of luck Og, you handled this like a champ and I expected no less.  Thankfully this is the internet and you've already won before I typed the first word to this response, keep up the crazy bruh and burn more bridges.  

I didn't want to have to post on this thread but I feel a couple things need to be clarified.

1. No worries about derailing the certificate thread.  It was a fun project and I would still field orders today if they came in but the cards were a very low value to time effort and weren't the easiest to make.  If more refining/automation was done they could have been profitable but that just wasn't the case.  I do believe anonymousminer's initial question of whether Og had purchased a card was valid and went unanswered but the way it was delivered had a negative tone and I could see why it was avoided.

2. I had no problem with Og bumping my thread, although I did not specifically ask him to bump it.  The message could have been interpreted as such since no one else was participating in the slack at the time and I stated the following with the intention of bumping it myself in the next day or so:
"That certificate thread could use a bump but making those cards was a very low value for my time put into them, I was glad to offer it when it was around but I wouldn't want to field even 10 orders ATM"
Even though I did not directly ask him to bump it, I thought Og's bump was fine and I didn't have any issue with it.

3. The "Haha" moment from when AM and myself were speaking was a response to seeing the messages deleted on my thread.  I found it funny that there was some drama playing out and then posts were deleted but I was not laughing at Og, specifically the thread and how it looks chopped up now.  Internet speak is quite subjective and I see how it could be misconstrued I was laughing at Og and not the thread.

4. I would respectfully ask that screenshots of conversations including me would be asked for permission before being used.  AM asked to use some of my conversation with them and I kindly asked that they refrain so I could speak on my behalf to clarify.  In the image Og posted my words were a bit twisted since I specifically stated "I don't want to get involved in the drama" in reference to my own thread.  Also in that screenshot it brings up the issue that AM had stated some very bad things were said via PM that made AM upset and I may have not heard the whole truth from Og.  I'm not interested in getting involved between the two so I didn't want to ask anything further.


In regards to the drama going on, I hope I can stay out of it after I make this post.  I don't have any ill will towards Og nor AM and hope they can resolve their issues.  Both users have been helpful with some of my projects and I appreciate the assistance and input they've provided.