 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
|
so are you going to be posting here, or require subscription?
You say No Subscription, but then give prices. Which one is it?
|
|
|
|
I sent 1.122 BTC to last 24h, but it doesn't show up on the website
txID: 2413569e3530f82112fac01f3a5c1dfe7779a4c0c881a2a47ebdff5c6380dc81
It was recieved by blockchain at :01 but did not get paid, although people after :01 got paid.
I hope he pays the people who got not paid because of wrong order.
He is not gonna pay, as he told me. Your two problems are different, yours is related to when the IPN service notified the site, there is no ordering as network propagation impacts it so best one can do is agree on a time from someone... This user's problem is a complete failure of the IPN service to notify the site of the TX, different issues.. So he was talking about the people " who got not paid because of wrong order", so I think that counts me in. |
|
|
|
I sent 1.122 BTC to last 24h, but it doesn't show up on the website
txID: 2413569e3530f82112fac01f3a5c1dfe7779a4c0c881a2a47ebdff5c6380dc81
It was recieved by blockchain at :01 but did not get paid, although people after :01 got paid.
I hope he pays the people who got not paid because of wrong order.
And i hope this is finally fixed.
thanks
He is not gonna pay, as he told me. |
|
|
|
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?
It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions. Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain. There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses. Maybe they exist differently for a very long time. Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions. There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain. The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds. Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain. At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random. ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits. In his twitter, he mentioned he is going to use the blockchain timestamp, so that should fix the issue. but today everything was a mess. im not gonna make any deposits tomorrow. gonna monitor first. i think that's a good idea. |
|
|
|
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?
It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions. Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain. There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses. Maybe they exist differently for a very long time. Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions. There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain. The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds. Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain. At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random. ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits. In his twitter, he mentioned he is going to use the blockchain timestamp, so that should fix the issue. but today everything was a mess. |
|
|
|
|
I think OP is right about that this game should not last 3 seconds. If people would reinvest, everyone would make more profit, as other people would also be willing to put money if there is a circulation.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok OP emailed me saying that he fixed the script for the next rounds. See below
"... the good news is I just managed to read the time from Blockchain
in the API. So basically, starting from tomorrow's round payments will be
paid according EXACTLY to the blockchain time. You can let the thread know
that I have changed the code to read the time from blockchain.info
EXACTLY.
These issues will never occur again.
"
|
|
|
|
If some of you guys put some of your profits, that will also help  But the most fair thing to do is add some donations to the round from the OP. You can count on that! Op is so wonderful! I hope he is reading this forum. I emailed him couple of times, no answer yet. [Irony Off]Don't expect any answers, since the first weekly he never dignified me of an answer to my pms or emails...[/Irony Off] yeah that fucks me out. i hope some of you guys reinvest to help me out. Transactions have been in the wrong order since his very first ponzi (it happened to me), it's just more obvious now that they are all bunched together. At this point you'd be better ask people to donate directly to your address because investing would be the same... yeah i agree , how much did you lose ? edit: which transaction ? I don't remember the transactions but I don't invest much, it was about 0.1-0.2btc. I lost 3 BTC with these two. They are the next two addresses that are going to be paid, so investing will also help as it will pay to me eventually. But you can send any donations to 1LKYPqjhJWmxYKFDxLGX5yx7maxQv9NGAd. I'd appreciate any help, as this can happen to any of you. I'd like to continue playing the game but it should be fair. 1F5TeEYRQi1ujafp4hznAo1LULV8qACdzY 1.5 BTC 1.95 BTC Transaction Hash Transaction Confirmed 1LKYPqjhJWmxYKFDxLGX5yx7maxQv9NGAd 1.5 BTC 1.95 BTC Transaction Hash Transaction Confirmed These two are at 00.00.00 https://blockchain.info/tx/b8c60fce425ccbfc4ebd88212ad01ef132f56c5b07b4a9dbca8323e3042cbc01https://blockchain.info/tx/de353202b30cc1a472bc0fd68c9da84c74cfbb0e925378e9ee3430ee19e89a60 |
|
|
|
If some of you guys put some of your profits, that will also help But the most fair thing to do is add some donations to the round from the OP. You can count on that! Op is so wonderful! I hope he is reading this forum. I emailed him couple of times, no answer yet. [Irony Off]Don't expect any answers, since the first weekly he never dignified me of an answer to my pms or emails...[/Irony Off] yeah that fucks me out. i hope some of you guys reinvest to help me out. |
|
|
|
If some of you guys put some of your profits, that will also help But the most fair thing to do is add some donations to the round from the OP. You can count on that! Op is so wonderful! I hope he is reading this forum. I emailed him couple of times, no answer yet. |
|
|
|
If some of you guys put some of your profits, that will also help But the most fair thing to do is add some donations to the round from the OP. |
|
|
|
Getting to the point now where the location on the network factors into it since the propagation times between nodes seems to impact it. Not really. Those timers are blockchain timers. That's a problem with his script. |
|
|
|
Wow the list is really scrambled. There are many payments not in order. Wow. I wouldn't have played if I knew this script is buggy. I hope he refunds those not paid in order. |
|
|
|
|
Wow he paid in wrong order, and my 00.00.00 deposits are out now.
This is not fair.
|
|
|
|
|
He is sending in wrong order.
There are earlier deposits waiting...
|
|
|
|
|
HE didn't count the early sent I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
I think website is not in order. There are 2 payments made at 00:00:00 and they seem to be above 1MVivb3Wt8AaTyFskyPmugqT3YXYMKXMd6
So it might not even be that address..
|
|
|
|
|
