Sharecoin is the best, most equal and professionaly developed coin around 2014 year. I do hope it will succeed beyond anyone's imagination.
|
|
|
What you are trying to do here, is succeed on litecoin's success.
|
|
|
I believe there already was a topic considering that coin. However, I wish you all the best with your project!
|
|
|
I did everything was asked last time. I have not received any coins back then and I doubt I will receive any this time. More over, dev has never replied to my PM, nor did he answer within a topic thread. Sorry to say that, but I believe this is just a waste of time.
|
|
|
Nice you guys are trying to make something. I believe you could tell us, what is new in this coin? What's the innovation here?
|
|
|
Good luck, however I am affraid I have already seen a color coin somewhere.
|
|
|
Good luck with the coin, mates!
|
|
|
Good luck, mates! You do have a nice logotype. I like it.
|
|
|
Mates, I have a question. Please take a look at screen below: Yesterday my balance was around 60500 coins. Today I can see a new block minted, but it only shows 0,9 value and within its description it gives me a negative net ammount of -938,895 coins. Does anyone know whether this is normal or not? It's in the staked balance. It will go back to available balance once staked block matures. Thank you, Sir! You've been very helpful!
|
|
|
Mates, I have a question. Please take a look at screen below: Yesterday my balance was around 60500 coins. Today I can see a new block minted, but it only shows 0,9 value and within its description it gives me a negative net ammount of -938,895 coins. Does anyone know whether this is normal or not?
|
|
|
I just got a PM from the DEV. Yea!
It's official you DO NOT need to keep your wallet open to earn stake rewards. But, as was just said, if no one runs their wallets then there are no transactions. But, I assume the dev will get several nodes going all the time to ensure that doesn't happen. It wouldn't be good.
So, the dev should do anything right? You can just wait for the coin to worth more. Keeping the wallet open its just a hard job.... Pff...I can't believe this... Ppl, just keep your wallets open, support the network... Exacly! Keep your wallets opened, mates, and support the sharecoin network!
|
|
|
It would be wise to collect all those questions and help devs make a FAQ out of them.
good idea. There have been frequently asked questions about the following subjects: -ShareCoin Specifications -FeeShare Specifications -POS -Sharexcoin and the info is spread across this thread, the OP, the coin website and the exchange website. I actually offered to create one for the Dev, and asked him a question or two in PM, but he never replied. I'm sure it's mostly because he is busy. Yes, he is. I sent three PM so far and always got my replay, so keep trying!
|
|
|
It would be wise to collect all those questions and help devs make a FAQ out of them.
|
|
|
I have received 938 coins. Is it from multimining pool? Could any of the devs confirm that please?
|
|
|
My coins minted for the first time. Awesome!
|
|
|
True, those GOG games work fine with fraps, or rather should I say fraps works fine with them. The issue with Postal is that the game works fine, no blackscreens, unwanted closing etc. However, fraps does not record any image after the proper gameplay starts. I will give it a look later on. For now I'm going to check that Open Broadcaster Software. Perhaps this will allow me to record videos from NES emulator games.
Anyway, good to know there are people rised in the 90's, who still believe in the games from those years. Great period, imo.
|
|
|
Aaaaaand the train is gone!
|
|
|
I have no doubt the developers of this coin have put a lot of work in and have nothing but good intentions for this coin. Obviously they are out to make some money (as we all are). I believe the exchange is their end game goal. Popular exchanges make a lot of money which is why they do not need to gain anything from the ShareCoins themselves. There is nothing wrong with this strategy, in fact this is better for us, because it means we get a fair coin distribution and they get an active exchange.
It is win-win for all of us.
This is why I have faith that the developers will look into the connection between the coins and the exchange, which currently does not work for anyone. People are interested in the future potential of the coin because of the connection with the coin exchange. The connection is the FeeShares.
The FeeShares' value needs to increase or decrease based on the value of the exchange (not the value of ShareCoins). They need to be on a market where the price increases or drops just like any other coin. People may sell their feeShares for a profit if the exchange starts growing, or they may sell FeeShares at a loss if the exchange is in decline. The FeeShares also need to start on the market at a viable price. it makes no difference to the Devs if the FeeShares sell out at a cheap price as it is the regular punters who will be fighting to buy / sell the FeeShares between ourselves. Someone buys the shares for cheap, the exchange value rises and they sell the shares to someone for a profit. The new owner is happy because they are getting a sustained income from the exchange and the old owner is happy because they made a profit on the shares themselves. This is in the Dev's interest as it means the exchange becomes much more popular.
As it stands, the people who have bought into FeeShares will realistically never see a profit, and the FeeShares will never get sold out unless the coin is devalued all the way down to 1 satoshi (and even then they will struggle to sell). The ratio of coins to FeeShares is all wrong. The price is wrong. The inability to exchange FeeShares means that once someone is invested, they are stuck there for good.
I'm sticking around to see how this coin goes as the Dev's have been spot on up until this point. I just hope they know how to react to things like this correctly or they will end up with a dead exchange as we end up with a dead coin.
great explanation, nice one Change the ratio then.
|
|
|
|