|
This thread is an example of why you never trust idiots to make predictions like these without any research. Interested in what OP has to say about his mathematical models LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
You are contradicting yourself quite a lot. You can't have staff/admins and being decentralized at the same time. Having someone moderate the content is the opposite of decentralization. Same goes for Tor hidden services or servers in general, you can't have those as well. I suggest spending some time researching the terms etc before starting any project.
|
|
|
|
|
In my mind, if company produces a product (iphone) they have the right to do with it as they see fit. Don't want to allow apps from sources other than app store? Fine. Ban the app? Fine. Now, why is this fine to me, no one is forced to use the iphone or use the app store. Don't like how apple does things? Buy android. You and others (Epic, other ios developers) are complaining how apple does things but you want access to their users...
In summary, I personally don't like their policy as well, but no one put a gun to my head and said you have to buy it. Same in your case.
|
|
|
|
So basically you will just resell Google cloud or azure services?
What is your budget to have a platform developed?
i got way sell 500+ vps per months thats about $5000 or even more $150 platform develop we already have many source let you design them into a website so this is hassle free like we will just clone another website after website and background system up running we keep hire you as database manager we pay every month we work as a team share profit I don’t know what you’re doing, but it doesn’t sound legit and I don’t think you can guarantee your customers safety and reliability. As for 150$ budget, just lol. You can try to get a front page designed for that, or user login or something. |
|
|
|
|
So basically you will just resell Google cloud or azure services?
What is your budget to have a platform developed?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get what exactly brand new here?
|
|
|
|
It's clear you're overstretching if you're thinking a 50 member team is going to be achieved. You're saying you'll build a project from bottom up and you'll have your own coin but it isn't a practical business idea.
Why do think this is not achievable? I have seen projects raise up to 100 team members easily before. Is your drop shipping business connected to this thread No it isn't. Its achievable if you have money to pay them. Not one person will work for free (or for promise of shitcoin payment), let alone 50. Why are you developing a custom token? Just use Bitcoin or something else... |
|
|
|
Right now I make 100 Doge coins a day from my referrals on the faucets I use.
How long does it take to make 100 Doge with a miner?
Should I keep investing in referrals or start mining, that's the thoughts.
You can look up pricing of asics in your area, check the electricity costs etc then input your data into something like whattomine and see how much you will be earning with current difficulty and price. As for what you should be doing, faucets don't really have a what you would say sustainable business model, so they are going to go belly up eventually. As for investing in dogecoin miner... I guess if you believe in it... My humble opinion: Dogecoin is a shitcoin that is currently being pumped and I would avoid any long term investments in it. |
|
|
|
|
For a "semi-dencetralized" app, you are collecting a lot of information. From app store page:
Data Used to Track You
Identifiers
Data Linked to You
Contact Info
Contacts
User Content
Search History
Identifiers
Usage Data
Also question I just love to ask, why do you need custom token for this? Its not doing anything that can't be done with eth/btc/whatever other token/coin there is out there.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you need a custom token for that? Why not just use BTC/ETH?
|
|
|
|
sorry I was contacted by people interested to produce this device and for now they want me to erase all my answers
yeah right... I thought about a device that can encrypt what you type character after character! You type a character it is encrypted directly between your keyboard and your computer. What you see on your screen is another character.
<>
So even if you have a keylogger malware you can send secure messages.
Are you saying that if I typed "x" that something other than "x" would be displayed? Or would the screen display "x"? If it is the former, you may as well not display anything. And the arguments about the time to decrypt would be moot. If it is the latter, it would not actually prevent keyloggers. Someone with access to your computer would be able to know that you pressed "x". The decryption key would also need to be stored in RAM, so an attacker would be able to obtain the decryption key and decrypt messages. The only thing this setup would protect against would be a device that a keyboard is plugged into that plugs into your computer. I don't think its any use of explaining that to the OP. If you take a look at the thread, a few different people tried to explained why it won't work for different reasons but OP doesn't understand any of the answers. He is obviously not a developer, and doesn't have a technical background. This is just a wild imagination. |
|
|
|
I had an idea about my device: offer plans to build it yourself. Buy your components, and build it. Reading about Anom today makes me upset that simple multiplication on a device could have prevented all this. Seeing also that so much money is put into security... I don't understand why nobody has built such thing yet.
My device has the convenience to work immediately with no previous data/key shared between the protagonists, with an en/decryption key by key (you can chat live and decrypt any word real time). But a scheme with shared data/key and the whole message encrypted and then decrypted is much simpler to realize and as safe (just less cool)
How do you plan to accomplish that without key exchange? One of the most important elements of secure communication is key exchange, there are even algorithms developed to do just that. If you are not going to do that, then you must set a pre shared key when you ship this so called device. Even if you don't do that, and want users to generate keys themselves, what are you going to do then? How are you going to input the public key of other party into the device securely? (Assuming you are talking about asymmetric encryption) Both generate their own secret and public keys. Then the devices can listen and extract a number from the same source on the internet: like NIST beacon or any blockchain. This is how you can start chatting right away with any one owning the same device. If the device is connected to the internet, and is getting keys from internet, that defeats purpose of it. Man in the middle attacks are much simpler to perform than breaking the encryption. I think your imagination got away from you, you need to be more realistic. |
|
|
|
I had an idea about my device: offer plans to build it yourself. Buy your components, and build it. Reading about Anom today makes me upset that simple multiplication on a device could have prevented all this. Seeing also that so much money is put into security... I don't understand why nobody has built such thing yet.
My device has the convenience to work immediately with no previous data/key shared between the protagonists, with an en/decryption key by key (you can chat live and decrypt any word real time). But a scheme with shared data/key and the whole message encrypted and then decrypted is much simpler to realize and as safe (just less cool)
How do you plan to accomplish that without key exchange? One of the most important elements of secure communication is key exchange, there are even algorithms developed to do just that. If you are not going to do that, then you must set a pre shared key when you ship this so called device. Even if you don't do that, and want users to generate keys themselves, what are you going to do then? How are you going to input the public key of other party into the device securely? (Assuming you are talking about asymmetric encryption) |
|
|
|
|
Do they need their own token? Can the same thing be achieved with already existing currency (BTC, ETH etc)? If they first make the token, then find the uses for it its most likely scam. Not in a way that they blatantly take your money, but they just issue token as a get rich quick scheme for themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
I just took a look at your website (Company > About) section, and I couldn't find any information about your company. Like, where is it registered, who is behind it, whats the physical address? I personally wouldn't even consider using your service for my project without information like that publicly available.
|
|
|
|
|
What is the point of your token? How will it get value? If you are using it only for payments, why not use already established crypto?
|
|
|
|
You should throw all your savings into a massive short position and kill it.
Exactly! There has never been a more obvious short win in human history. So you are saying that you are shorting Bitcoin currently? |
|
|
|
Not possible. I think you are not a software engineer yourself, so maybe you should talk to one. If you take a look at the big companies you mentioned and their flagship super scalable database solutions (DynamoDB, Firebase, Cosmos DB) they are all nosql (document databases) and not sql database. Thats because of the simple reason, that relational databases are harder to scale across multiple instances, which is exactly what you plan to do.
Second and most notable thing, performance. One of the reasons people like sql databases is strong consistency for writes. That means that if you send a write request and right after that a read request for same data you would instantly get what you wrote. Beforementioned solutions by big companies usually sacrifice that for performance. In short, for each request you would need to propagate data across all the nodes responsible for hosting the users data, and you'd need to have consensus protocol. Thats all slow. Expected response time for query is in milliseconds not seconds.
I hope you find a solution for this, if you do be sure to message me and I'll be the first one to use your product. I'm also sure you'll get a big fat paycheck by one of the big companies for that solution.
Good luck.
In addition to the nosql solutions you mentioned, there are also SQL solutions directly. For example Amazon RDS https://aws.amazon.com/tr/rds/Azure SQL https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/azure-sql/Google Cloud SQL https://cloud.google.com/sqlI know very well the difficulty of the subject I am talking about. You are talking about the consistency of the select query following Insert/update from a different peer. As I said at the beginning of the topic, I believe we can do it and I wonder if it is worth the effort. I'm well aware of those, but that services are not marketed as extremely scalable solutions. Yeah its worth the effort if you can make that. If you crack this and make a distributed sql storage that responds in milliseconds, you'll be a millionaire easily. No one has been able to do that so far. Thats the reason big guys invented nosql, so it can scale easily across many instances. Consistency is just one of the issues, your sql db needs to be acid compliant otherwise, there is no point in using it. You can’t just reuse mysql/postgres for this, you need to make your own db. |
|
|
|
|
Not possible. I think you are not a software engineer yourself, so maybe you should talk to one. If you take a look at the big companies you mentioned and their flagship super scalable database solutions (DynamoDB, Firebase, Cosmos DB) they are all nosql (document databases) and not sql database. Thats because of the simple reason, that relational databases are harder to scale across multiple instances, which is exactly what you plan to do.
Second and most notable thing, performance. One of the reasons people like sql databases is strong consistency for writes. That means that if you send a write request and right after that a read request for same data you would instantly get what you wrote. Beforementioned solutions by big companies usually sacrifice that for performance. In short, for each request you would need to propagate data across all the nodes responsible for hosting the users data, and you'd need to have consensus protocol. Thats all slow. Expected response time for query is in milliseconds not seconds.
I hope you find a solution for this, if you do be sure to message me and I'll be the first one to use your product. I'm also sure you'll get a big fat paycheck by one of the big companies for that solution.
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you are a bit confused. Cloud mining should have pretty simple business model. They buy the rigs, you rent the hash power, they pay you out from their mining profits. What you are describing looks like a way to make ponzi scheme (scam) viable short term. Real cloud mining doesn't need ads or any other stuff like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
