Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 07:18:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 »
781  Economy / Securities / Re: [Investment fund] Gamma Bitcoin Fund [Closing] on: October 17, 2012, 01:10:51 AM
I am happy to report that I have now received the BTC we had deposited at GLBSE Smiley
//DeaDTerra

Great news!

So, how are things looking now regarding a payout?
We currently have about 450 Bitcoins in total liquid BTC,
The rest is in debt or illiquid assets.
//DeaDTerra

Will you be using that 450 in the bot for now?
I will spread it out across the margin bots and arbitrage bot until we reach a more substantial amount.
//DeaDTerra
Yes very good news indeed! Is there any risk of loss here or counterparty risk? I would suggest that we try to preserve what capital we have and use it for paying people back rather than engaging in additional speculative risks at this time. Smiley
782  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Open Transactions and Moneychanger on: October 13, 2012, 12:39:55 PM
Just playing around with the client a bit although I don't really fully understand it yet. It crashed when I tried to deposit cash:

OTAPI_Wrap::Message_GetSuccess: ** FYI, server reply was received, and it said '
Yes.' (Status = success). RequestNum: 136
Utility.getMessageSuccess(): Reply received: success == TRUE.
Utility.getInboxLowLevel: The hashes already match (skipping Inbox download.)
Utility.getOutboxLowLevel: The hashes already match (skipping Outbox download.)
inbox:12
outbox.getColumnCount:10
IN populateOTDetails
OTPurse::LoadPurse: File does not exist: purse/wmY1B8o94PFENzqPVK6wLOLvkog9TvA3G
DxZuAMGCpW/fCS3eNU5kboAhzHByRnWpQdGD8GO6G50jxA6vx6PcSf/3odM2J7BF3wbqvrfsN7FHVpzH
YMVUajQC8WE8P1tqqg
OTAPI_Wrap::LoadPurse: received null when called OT_API::LoadPurse().
Server: wmY1B8o94PFENzqPVK6wLOLvkog9TvA3GDxZuAMGCpW Asset Type: 3odM2J7BF3wbqvrf
sN7FHVpzHYMVUajQC8WE8P1tqqg
OTAPI_Wrap::Purse_GetTotalValue: Null: THE_PURSE passed in!
OT_ASSERT in ..\..\src\otapi\OTAPI_Wrapper.cpp at line 7246
OT_ASSERT in ..\..\src\otapi\OTAPI_Wrapper.cpp at line 7246
783  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Open Transactions and Moneychanger on: October 13, 2012, 12:23:17 PM
Whoops, thanks!

EDIT: Below was due to OpenSSL not being installed correctly. I must have made a mistake (too early in the morning for this!)

I installed the x84 and x64 versions of both C++ redistributable packages (2008 and 2012) and receive this when I try to run the batch:

"Found JAVA in: C:\Program Files\Java\jre7"


amd64
Oct 13, 2012 8:15:55 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Load InitNative
INFO: null
Oct 13, 2012 8:15:55 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Atempting to load libzmq
Oct 13, 2012 8:15:55 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Success loading libzmq
Oct 13, 2012 8:15:55 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Atempting to load chaiscript
Oct 13, 2012 8:15:55 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Success loading chaiscript
Oct 13, 2012 8:15:55 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Atempting to load otlib
amd64
Oct 13, 2012 8:16:01 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Load InitNative
INFO: null
Oct 13, 2012 8:16:01 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Atempting to load libzmq
Oct 13, 2012 8:16:01 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Success loading libzmq
Oct 13, 2012 8:16:01 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Atempting to load chaiscript
Oct 13, 2012 8:16:01 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Success loading chaiscript
Oct 13, 2012 8:16:01 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools loadNative
INFO: Atempting to load otlib
Oct 13, 2012 8:16:01 AM org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Load InitNative
SEVERE: null
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: C:\Users\keystroke\Desktop\da2ce7-Moneychanger\data\
lib\x64\Release\otlib.dll: Can't find dependent libraries
        at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary1(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
        at org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Tools.loadNative(Tools.java:105)
        at org.opentransactions.jni.utility.Load.InitNative(Load.java:94)
        at com.moneychanger.app.Moneychanger$Loader.Load(Moneychanger.java:107)
        at com.moneychanger.app.Moneychanger.main(Moneychanger.java:98)


This is under Windows 7 x86. I also have 32bit and 64bit Java installed as well as 32bit and 64bit SSL as linked in the readme. I started by running install_userdata.
784  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Open Transactions and Moneychanger on: October 13, 2012, 05:23:44 AM
Ok.... New Testing Version  Shocked Shocked Shocked

Please only for testing... There has been SOMANY changes.

New Password Callback System.

New OT Java Lib (now all the JNI code is in a separate library so any Java project can take advantage of it)
https://github.com/da2ce7/opentransactions-jni

Fixed up the "Password Image" issues.

Oh yeah... and Massive Swig changes...  (but no end-user cares about that)

Try at your own risk:

https://github.com/downloads/da2ce7/Moneychanger/da2ce7-Moneychanger_00.11.00.7z

Code:
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)

owGbwMvMwCHIMl/GwHjr82uMpwuSGAJKmLiDPRyNTM00UhKNklPNdX3z81IrkzMS
89JTi+INDPQMDfWApHmVpq2CqblRaqJFanJicpKJuVFimqVhUpKFaZJRioWFiVFq
clqSkYlxoiFQOs0kLdkoxTwp1cIAqNYi0cjENNEgJYWrI46FQZCDgY2VCWQvAxen
AMwxn/cx/GZ5fHiaQdaN3/dMFifntCwp/RV3nPkSs1ieT8A05evpJR6MDGeOB0ge
fXH5qXp+4dwf6zZq6WgtO77pS+AaGUsF4+nlDrUA
=yjH+
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

Awesome, going to check this out soon! Small thing I just noticed, haha, but can you "Don't use smileys" when posting? I think it probably interferes with your GnuPG signatures!
785  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); STRATUM=ASIC ready, low stales on: October 13, 2012, 12:13:00 AM
Ok, downloaded, running. whuz da changes at?

Changelog is here: https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxy/commits/master

The biggest difference between 0.9.0 (used by majority of people now) and latest 1.1.1 is proxying of Stratum protocol itself, instead of proxying only getwork->stratum. Thanks to this, you can connect your exahash/s mining operation to the pool with single connection, transfering up to 20kB per minute.

Latest version also fixes many smaller bugs in connection management; the most important is bugfix in client.reconnect() which allow miner to reconnect to another pool backend if pool need to do some maintenance on current one.

Great, just upgraded my 2.9Ghash to the latest proxy. Looks good. Next stop, ASIC.
786  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 11, 2012, 04:38:47 AM
Just submitted my claim as well. Hope I remembered to check that box at the bottom Wink Otherwise didn't have any BTC in there but once friedcat has the shareholder info it will be possible to clean things up.
787  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is it possible to script a contract for committed savings in the blockchain? on: October 10, 2012, 05:12:57 AM
I haven't read everything yet but I think this is an excellent idea and I would definitely participate if it existed. I would be glad to put some Bitcoins into a bounty to get this implemented.
788  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 10, 2012, 04:24:51 AM
will you guys provide your AML information so to get the bitcoin and assets on GLBSE?

Sure, why not? I provide my information whenever I use my credit card. The only catch is, I expect GLBSE to provide privacy policy outlining how they collect, use, and safeguard my personal information.

Could there be any liability for purchasing unregulated securities? I couldn't imagine this but you never know these days....
789  Economy / Securities / Re: [Investment fund] Gamma Bitcoin Fund [Closing] on: October 10, 2012, 04:21:04 AM
User #100 account currently 188.782 will sell for 90 BTC - PM if interested

I am investor #30, 139.929999039115 BTC. Please PM offers if interested.
790  Economy / Securities / Re: [Investment fund] Gamma Bitcoin Fund [Closing] on: October 10, 2012, 04:18:34 AM
I got a question about selling GBF accounts/debts, I am all for this and if you would rather sell of your account then wait for the liquidation then I can just rewrite the balance over to someone else, that's fine as long as you clearly state under what conditions GBF is closing and liquidating Smiley
//DeaDTerra

I'm sorry, but I don't understand this.

Are you saying that you will buy back my GBF account?

If that is so, then I would be really happy to get the balance when you closed the GBF on 02 October 2012- 75% of the sum I "invested" with you.

I'm pretty sure this isn't what you are offering, though.
No, he means if you find someone who is willing to buy your account (at a discount). Then you can transfer the ownership to someone else and DT will pay that person instead.
791  Economy / Securities / Re: [Investment fund] Gamma Bitcoin Fund [Closing] on: October 08, 2012, 04:39:39 AM
Hi DeadTerra

Disaster upon disaster.

it would be great if you can post anything you find out here.

Thanks.
Indeed Sad
He has yet to respond to my text or when I called him, I will try again tomorrow.
//DeaDTerra
I hope we all get back our GLBSE shares... so that we can continue moving to other investments.
I hope so as well, once we get them back, I will do my best to try to liquidate them either by direct contact with the issuer or by private deals with third parties.
//DeaDTerra

Best of luck to everyone during these tough times. Bitcoin will prevail.
792  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Nefario on: October 06, 2012, 05:15:02 PM
However, if Nefario is being compelled to do these things under threat of force (govt), should he still be given the scammer tag? Normally the burden of proof would be on him to prove he's under duress, but what if he's not allowed to, again under threat of force? That was one of my first concerns with the situation with Nefario/Goat, and it still is now.

He was behaving illegally and when he decided to stop being illegal, shit came to a halt.

He's not a scammer because, AFTER he took the money and created a mini Gordian knot of asset exchanges, he decided to go legit, never letting people know he was not legit for months.

So the statute of limitations on being a scammer is...a day, because bitcoin?

The scammer tag is there to remind people not to to business with someone because they are a risk due to factors under their control and refuse to make reparation.  It's not a "punishment" as much as an ostracization.

Maybe we need a new tag -- tried to run a legit-business which couldn't be legit given the regulatory environment and thus exposed all users to exchange-going-down-risk. Someone should leak GLBSE code and then set it up on a TOR hidden service so then we can actually get scammed by a real scammer! What a world.
793  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Nefario on: October 06, 2012, 04:24:26 PM
Quote
losing Bitcointalk would be a calamity.
My advise is to setup Osiris serverless portal and figure out how to replicate content of the forum there. If something bad happen, we can continue there.
Bitcointalk getting subpoenaed is the next logical step as far as this GLBSE and Pirate things go.  IMO.
Makes sense. At the minimum they'll want it for forensics to get IPs (which probably won't be there) and whatnot...
794  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Nefario on: October 06, 2012, 04:12:50 PM
Quote
losing Bitcointalk would be a calamity.
My advise is to setup Osiris serverless portal and figure out how to replicate content of the forum there. If something bad happen, we can continue there.
Every week the DB should be dumped, stripped of personally identifying info (PWs, emails), and sent out on a bittorrent Cheesy That would help...
795  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 06, 2012, 03:58:29 PM
Does anyone really want to send glbse their email address, etc. ?

This might lead to some liabilty.

What a crappy situation.

Doesnt glbse already have our email addresses? that is how you log in...
Yea that's what I was about to post Wink They have mine at least yea. Sometimes I stay anonymous but other times I don't. This is a case where I didn't try.
796  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Nefario on: October 06, 2012, 04:18:08 AM
So why do people want to hide their identities?
They value their privacy.

Edit: And what firefop said below Smiley
797  Economy / Securities / Re: GLBSE Info About the Offline Situation (Summary) on: October 06, 2012, 03:38:43 AM
He's bitter because he can't find a good way to kill time while GLBSE is down (so he resorted to trolling).

Hey! He could just head your way, and find seven to play with, for just 55$ each!  Wink

Or he could get an Open Transactions client running and start enjoying trades without a percentage trading fee.

-MarkM-

Are people currently using Open Transactions? How do I get started? Smiley
798  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 06, 2012, 03:32:12 AM
friedcat - Do you have a plan if GLBSE doesn't come back on line or if (for whatever reason) you're de-listed?

I'm not attacking, but truly curious as to what you've thought about.

It's too early to ask this - let's see what Nefario says first.

GLBSE is not coming back online. ASICMINER will have to go through a delisting procedure.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=115669.0

The delisting is actually good news. Because it allows us to properly resolve shareholder claims.
However, it may take a few days to decide how the shares will get managed in the near future.
I suspect the next action will be a board meeting.
Yea this is actually good news. friedcat wrote me back and said he would process my contract for getting my shares off of the GLBSE in a batch with everyone else. So it looks as though something is starting to happen.

PS, from www.glbse.com:


GLBSE has been closed

I'm sorry to inform all our users that GLBSE is no longer able to continue operating, and has now closed.

Q: What does this mean if I'm an issuer?

We will do everything in our power to make the process of moving off GLBSE as smooth as possible, we are currently working on a simple, safe, and easy to use method that will allow you to continue your relationship with your asset holders

Q:I'm a GLBSE user, what about my assets and my bitcoin?

You will be able to get back your bitcoin, and if you want to reveal your username, email, and a bitcoin address to accept payments with, you can continue your relationship with the issuer of any assets you hold.

We will begin retuning bitcoin once we have recieved all coins from the GLBSE treasurer that manages the GLBSE cash reserves. BitcoinGlobal (GLBSE's partent company) shareholders and board voted for them to be returned immediately, we are awaiting compliance with this order.
799  Economy / Securities / Re: [Investment fund] Gamma Bitcoin Fund [Closing] on: October 06, 2012, 03:28:25 AM
Anyone that feels like I have misbehaved or just want to talk to me, call me on skype. My Skype alias is Terragubben Smiley
Lets have a chat.
//DeaDTerra

Hey DT, any word on what can be done now given that GLBSE is probably shutting down? I guess we will know more tomorrow, but this post doesn't look great: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=115669.0

PS, from www.glbse.com:


GLBSE has been closed

I'm sorry to inform all our users that GLBSE is no longer able to continue operating, and has now closed.

Q: What does this mean if I'm an issuer?

We will do everything in our power to make the process of moving off GLBSE as smooth as possible, we are currently working on a simple, safe, and easy to use method that will allow you to continue your relationship with your asset holders

Q:I'm a GLBSE user, what about my assets and my bitcoin?

You will be able to get back your bitcoin, and if you want to reveal your username, email, and a bitcoin address to accept payments with, you can continue your relationship with the issuer of any assets you hold.

We will begin retuning bitcoin once we have recieved all coins from the GLBSE treasurer that manages the GLBSE cash reserves. BitcoinGlobal (GLBSE's partent company) shareholders and board voted for them to be returned immediately, we are awaiting compliance with this order.
800  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 05, 2012, 10:49:57 PM
Friedcat:

Did you guys take all the BTC out of GLBSE after the IPO was closed ? I hope you have the remaining BTC somewhere safe in an offline wallet !
Like every other assets on GLBSE the IPO btc are sent to the owner.

In this case, not only are they in Friedcat hands, they have been sold at ~8 and spend on ASIC production. (most / not all)

I knew they had sold a significant amount.
Good to know the remainder does not reside on glbse
Tthanks for the info

Yea, thanks to deeplink in this thread for calling it. I was suspicious of GLBSE when the vulnerability from 0.6.3 came out I think - GLBSE went down for a bit to download the blockchain again. They had not upgraded to 0.6.3 when it came out and it took the known exploit to be released for them to do the upgrade. My memory could be a bit fuzzy here but that's basically what happened...
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!