105
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping
|
on: June 18, 2016, 05:54:27 PM
|
Is it necessary, however, to choose between traditional investors and people like myself? Surely we could be privately informed under promises not to tell others, at least if we have some kind of title like Community Leader and are well known enough to be trusted. Then I might have been able to hold onto my Factoids, in which case I would continue to provide free marketing services. Now rational self interest requires me to give those services to others, which is fine because they are equally deserving of support.
Factom certainly doesn't need me, of course, but I'm not useless and do provide measurable value.
If it was determined that Factom was communicating privately with people on a forum like you describe and providing information that wasn't available to the public at large, it would create a huge credibility, trust, and potentially even legal issue. These are the guys who are going to be trusted to, "Make the world's systems honest". To say that their i's need dotted and t's crossed is the understatement of the year. Some of the early choices Factom made such as all the, "Community Leaders" (and some other things) made me worry that this was an amateur operation. It would appear to me that some seasoned businessmen have since got involved and are working to cross those t's and i's. I wouldn't take it personally that they aren't actively communicating with you and giving you inside info. However, if they are moving away from utilizing community leaders, a well-worded email to each of you would have likely paid dividends.
|
|
|
106
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping
|
on: June 18, 2016, 05:34:36 PM
|
To those who are upset with the lack of communication from Factom, if I was a seed round investor or performing due diligence in anticipation of taking part in a series A round, I assure you, after reading some of the earlier communication from them, they would have gotten a phone call along the lines of, "You guys need to learn to shut the fuck up."
I suspect something along those lines has transpired. I realize it would be comforting to have some degree of reassurance from Factom, but their current approach is better for those of us in this for the long haul.
|
|
|
107
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping
|
on: June 18, 2016, 05:30:53 PM
|
Well, now I'm kinda annoyed that I sold my FCT, but I'm not gonna buy them back. I sold because the Factom team never talks to me or lets me know what they're really doing, even though I'm one of the Community Leaders. I don't know if M2 is next week or next year, or really anything about who they're talking to in China, and that's not only scary but annoying. Even if I miss out on bigger rallies and my wins are relatively smaller, I'll be correct more often if I am knowledgeable and informed, which plenty of other development teams are willing to do--at least for me. It's almost an issue of respect. I'm definitely happy with all the gains I made up until now, though! I too sold my Factom, but you can be sure, I would have sold it once I saw they are working with the Department of Homeland Security. Maybe they can shut down sports streaming sites together? lol I would have sold on principle. I realize many in the Cryptosphere aren't big fans of the government and regulation and I can understand why. But what Factom is developing is a bit different and they're smart to take a more middle-ground approach. These aren't people creating a something like a digital currency for pot growers. These are people creating a means for data, especially data created by business and governments, to be secured and auditable. As such, to sell on news that they're working with the government would imply that there isn't an understanding of what Factom is being designed to do.
|
|
|
111
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping
|
on: May 29, 2016, 04:47:06 PM
|
All software has bugs that need fixed. No big deal as long as the team has the capability to fix them. I'm no programmer but I've had a couple analysts check the code and they assure me Factom programmers know what they're doing.
While there are areas Factom could improve and if I was a VC investing with them that would happen, overall, I'd say they're doing a good job and I see no reason to question their honesty.
*edit* I see you ninja edited so my response doesn't make as much sense. But I'll leave it as is.
|
|
|
112
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping
|
on: May 29, 2016, 01:39:19 PM
|
BTW, thx a lot Factom team. Due to your incompetence to deliver M2 on time, u ve cost us all a lot of money.
THANK YOU FOR THAT.
Actually, it's your incompetence as a trader/investor. It's pretty easy to setup a hedge to protect yourself against moves contrary to your primary position. Dude, this is fucking crypto investment, not fortune 500 $6 million investment. Who the fuck sets up a hedge for this unless u invest big time? I m no day trader or speculator like you, I structured and based my whole investment on Factom idea and the ability of the people behind this idea to deliver it. Also on the fact M2 will be delivered Q1. When it was not delivered within that date, the next promise was "just around the corner" after the end of Q1. Where are we now? 3 months after the end of Q1 is a bit too long. Early in my career I made similar mistakes to you. However, rather than blame others, I took responsibility and evaluated how I could improve and even profit from the same or like scenarios in the future. Lesson 1: Software is never released on time.
|
|
|
113
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping
|
on: May 28, 2016, 11:23:51 PM
|
BTW, thx a lot Factom team. Due to your incompetence to deliver M2 on time, u ve cost us all a lot of money.
THANK YOU FOR THAT.
Actually, it's your incompetence as a trader/investor. It's pretty easy to setup a hedge to protect yourself against moves contrary to your primary position. No one hedges alrcoins. That defeats the entire purpose of trading swing coins. This isn't a 401k I do. I've cost-averaged into a large long position as fundamentals have dictated. As technicals tell me downturns are imminent, I take short positions to hedge my position and close those as price action improves all the while lowering my cost basis. It's not rocket science.
|
|
|
116
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping
|
on: May 25, 2016, 08:37:25 PM
|
I appreciate the weak hands providing such a buying opportunity. Not much. There is plenty of room for multiple players in this space. I like the approach Factom is taking by employing an altcoin. It opens up a world of possibilities that aren't possible with Tierion. In fact, this price drop allowed me to accumulate enough Factoids that I feel comfortable elaborating on why I'm so excited about Factom. In the past, many forms of currency were BACKED by something valuable such as gold or silver. Today, fiat currency isn't backed by anything. Factoids are backed by data. Factoids are backed by something much more valuable than even gold. Information. And one could argue that it works both ways in that Factom also backs data. Factom is backed by data and backs data. Remember, the creators of Factom want 1 Entry Credit to cost the same and back a specific amount of data. What is the definition of Gold Standard? "A gold standard is a monetary system in which the standard economic unit of account is based on a fixed quantity of gold." What could the Factom Standard be? "A Factom standard is a monetary system in which the standard economic unit of account (Entry Credit) is based on a fixed quantity of data." Bitcoin is backed by an ever-decreasing number of mining operations. Factoids are backed by and back an ever-increasing amount of data looking to be verified, secured, and easily auditable. What do you forsee the future global currency being backed by? Nothing? Gold? Silver? Electricity? Or information. We ARE in the Information Age after all. Maybe it's time for our currency to join the times.
|
|
|
|