Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
ugh I am getting spammed by MEE6bot as well.
|
|
|
I will only believe it when he moves a bitcoin. Hopefully with a text string identifying his "real name" in the extended data of the transaction.
|
|
|
Regarding ownership of topics - I'd ideally like to see the ownership transferred to the "new" witcoin, wherever that may be.
Either that or (as a poor second option) get the topics cashed out to the value of the bitcoin invested in their creation to the topic creator so that the topics may be re-created by said creator.
I'd hate to have to pay to create topics twice, or lose the bitcoin involved, or jeopardise the opportunity to help grow the community.
|
|
|
So what are the outcomes for people who "own" topics under the proposed future plans?
Do people who own topics continue to get a share of future posts in those topics?
|
|
|
Thanks again,
I downgraded from openssl 1.0 to 9.x and now the whole project builds perfectly
|
|
|
Thanks!
downgrading to boost-static-devel has made most of the errors go away, now it's only complaining about boost's context_service.hpp
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -I"/usr/local/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/local/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" -I"/usr/local/ssl/include/" -o obj/nogui/rpc.o rpc.cpp In file included from /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/context_service.hpp:31, from /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/context.hpp:23, from /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl.hpp:20, from rpc.cpp:13: /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp: In member function âvoid boost::asio::ssl::detail::openssl_context_service::create(SSL_CTX*&, boost::asio::ssl::context_base::method)â: /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:74: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:77: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:80: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:83: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:86: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:89: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:92: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:95: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:98: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:101: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:104: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:107: error: invalid conversion from âconst SSL_METHOD*â to âSSL_METHOD*â make: *** [obj/nogui/rpc.o] Error 1
|
|
|
Hi All, I'm trying to apply the getblock patch http://yyz.us/bitcoin/patch.bitcoin-getblockto the source of Bitcoin 0.3.20, and I've successfully merged the changes to rpc.cpp in. I'm running fedora core 12, with kernel 2.6.30, openssl 1.0.0 (installed by hand), and boost version 1.45. unfortunately I had to change some of the static linked libraries to dynamic linked libraries for boost and db_cxx (I seem to be lacking .a files, I've only got .so files so I had to change the linker flags in the Makefile) now I'm running into problems with building bitcoind eg: /usr/local/include/boost/system/error_code.hpp:214: undefined reference to `boost::system::generic_category()' please help! Cheers, nos
|
|
|
dannyjpw, I've been spending a lot of time at witcoin.com.
I pays my bitcoins to vote and post, and the content is usually fun.
|
|
|
I agree with TiagoTiago. And if the receiving addresses are known to belong to lost wallet.dat files then the coins will never be spent and those dirty blocks cannot be pruned. it would be pretty easy to encode the offending data in the message part of a transaction, and the data (when concatenated together) could be verified as "evil" using a hash set database like the NSRL Software, or the NCMEC database, or HashKeeper. http://computer-forensics.sans.org/blog/2010/02/22/extracting-known-bad-hashset-from-nsrl/http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=stephen_hoffmanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HashKeeperThis means that you wouldn't need a program to decode it. It would be, as em3rgentOrdr pointed out, an illegal number. Write it in binary to disk, change the filename to jpg and anyone would be able to see it. hmm. the success of this attack on the network relies on our inability to change the block chain, and the block chain's stability is what drives the trust that we have in the impossibility of double spending.
|
|
|
Hi Themyos,
I just cloned a fresh copy of the bitcoin development tree from github, and then tried to patch in the rpc.cpp getblock patch
I got two successful hunk applications and one fail
--- rpc.cpp +++ rpc.cpp @@ -1926,6 +2040,8 @@ if (strMethod == "sendfrom" && n > 2) ConvertTo<double>(params[2]); if (strMethod == "sendfrom" && n > 3) ConvertTo<boost::int64_t>(params[3]); if (strMethod == "listtransactions" && n > 1) ConvertTo<boost::int64_t>(params[1]); + if (strMethod == "getblock" && n > 0) ConvertTo<boost::int64_t>(params[0]); + if (strMethod == "getblockbycount" && n > 0) ConvertTo<boost::int64_t>(params[0]);
// Execute Object reply = CallRPC(strMethod, params);
I tried patching 0.3.19 and got three fails.
Should I try patching 0.3.20? I'm downloading it now.
Cheers, Jin
|
|
|
nice hack.
I'd still like to see a free java android app though - that would result in an explosive uptake when everyone can get bitcoin in their pocket without jumping through configuration hoops.
|
|
|
Ah thanks. getblock in 0.3.19 is also coming up with an error.
the -printblock flag seems to work, but I don't have my gui turned on on my server so I can't see the output.
$ bitcoind getblock error: {"code":-32601,"message":"Method not found"}
$ bitcoin -printblock Error: Unable to initialize GTK+, is DISPLAY set properly?
$ bitcoin getblock error: {"code":-32601,"message":"Method not found"}
is there another way to do it?
|
|
|
Awesome!
When will it be ready to use?
|
|
|
Somebody should write a distopian science fiction story where it costs you 1 United States Union for a tank of gas.
and all other transactions are expressed in unions, leading to "old west" prices - Five unions for that horse? Way too high. Plus I need 50 Unions to hire a US marshal to find out who killed my poppa for his two california gold pieces.
|
|
|
heh. "Dearly Beloved, It greaves me to discover that Your husband, an avid gamer and techie died of a heart attack. By accessing public ally available records we have determined that he had a fortune of $100BILLION USD in bitcoins. Permit me to inform you of my desire of going into business relationship with you. I got your contact from the International web site directory. I prayed over it and selected your name among other names due to it's esteeming nature and the recommendations given to me as a reputable and trust worthy person I can do business with and by the recommendations I must not hesitate to confide in you for this simple and sincere business. I am able to recover theis monies for you and convert them to USD but in order to do so I am honourably seeking your assistance in the following ways. 1) To provide a Bank account where this money would be transferred to. 2) To serve as the guardian of this since I am a girl of 26 years. 3) a file called wallet.dat which I will use to find the funds Moreover Madam, I are willing to offer you a 1% fee as compensation for effort input after the successful transfer of this fund to your designate account overseas. please feel free to contact ,me via this email address wumiabdul419@nigeria.comAnticipating to hear from you soon. Thanks and God Bless. Best regards. Miss Wumi Abdul PLEASE FOR PRIVATE AND SECURITY REASONS,REPLY ME VIA EMAIL: wumiabdul419@nigeria.com"
|
|
|
how do you move the slider to change your guess?
|
|
|
|