I am real. Slush's pool sees the same thing....
http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/?history=1000

Besides, your 74330 getworks and 135 submitted shares isn't worth crying over like you're doing.
The amount of resources you used is enough to support 10+ more efficient miners.
There is no lose to me with you leaving the pool, in fact, it's a gain for me and everyone else because a inefficient CPU miner just bogs down the server.

Was there a question in there somewhere?
No......
bobR == TROLL
Future posts from you will be ignored.

Forgive me for not being able to see your question behind all that bitching and moaning.
Their is something called punctuation. You might want to look into that. 
End you questions with a "?" when you ask them...it let's the skimming eyes note that their is a question being asked.

Now if you can properly form a question, and state it plainly without all the bitching surrounding it, then my mental "trolling" filters will not trigger and I might actually to read it.

I am real. Slush's pool sees the same thing....
http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/?history=1000

Besides, your 74330 getworks and 135 submitted shares isn't worth crying over like you're doing.
The amount of resources you used is enough to support 10+ more efficient miners.
There is no lose to me with you leaving the pool, in fact, it's a gain for me and everyone else because a inefficient CPU miner just bogs down the server.

An answer for what? You said you left the pool.

More BS
200,000  plus shares to find !!!!!
GET REAL

Because our pool is at a slower speed, it takes longer to get that many shares....like 2 days.
More users == more speed

And if 200,000 shares per unit is crap....
1966   2011-03-13 13:24:55   2:35:54   266129
1955   2011-03-13 04:15:49   3:34:04   330211
1930   2011-03-12 09:12:41   2:15:59   203318
1919   2011-03-12 00:07:20   2:39:24   233007

We're not the only ones seeing that high number of shares.
In any case, bye bye CPU miner. 
You'll still get your 0.03 cents when we do find a block.

Because our pool is at a slower speed, it takes longer to get that many shares....like 2 days.
More users == more speed

And if 200,000 shares per unit is crap....
1966   2011-03-13 13:24:55   2:35:54   266129
1955   2011-03-13 04:15:49   3:34:04   330211
1930   2011-03-12 09:12:41   2:15:59   203318
1919   2011-03-12 00:07:20   2:39:24   233007

We're not the only ones seeing that high number of shares.
In any case, bye bye CPU miner. 
You'll still get your 0.03 cents when we do find a block.

It works with any other pool but his, and I'll explain why.

When we first proposed our modified miner to help reduce the load and resources used on slush's pool, he argued with us and said that it was pointless and useless, while at the same time switching over to a forced donations (which technically isn't donating, it's taxing) because of the excess load on his VPS server, or so he claimed.

When we kept debating him about the role of efficiency on a server's load, he kept going back to the excuse that you must have a lower askrate to make sure that you're getwork doesn't go stale.  We proposed other ways of solving this problem (which is now in the modified miner), but slush didn't want to hear it, and insisted people keep pounding his server with a lower askrate.  Then, he called us trolls, and started to really give us a bunch of shit....for trying to help him reduce the amount of resources his server was using.  That was the breaking point for me.

There we were (Geebus and I) working away on m0mchill's miner to try and help slush, and then he turned around and called us Trolls.  So, fuck him, we started our own pool.  Then, after we start our own pool, slush's begins trolling and attempting to put words in our mouth, words we never said, and expects us to play well with his pool?!

So let me put this as simply as possible: Fuck slush.  He is not selfless, he's selfish.

If he wants to force donations because his pool is inefficient and uses more resources than necessary, that's his decision.  If he wants to apologize for calling us trolls on his thread, then coming over and trolling on ours, I'll consider taking that part of the code out.  But don't hold your breath that it'll ever happen...I'm not.

Seems fairuser & geebus don't want any one to use their modified miners to mine from slush.
By using the new modified pocblm miner to connect slush pool gives error & tells to connect to bitcoinpool.

***** ATTENTION CPU USERS  *****

I know someone at some point told you a lower askrate is better...they were wrong.  We are asking you to please increase your askrate from 1 to at least 10 seconds, we'd prefer 60 seconds, or we will ban your accounts in 24 hours.

The two accounts I'm watching closely are:

cd311 - Requesting 3 getworks/sec FROM 3 different IP's total.
Getwork Efficiency -
# Requested:    54081
# Submitted:    111

RobertRibbeck - Requesting 3-5 getworks/sec FROM 4 different IP's total.
Getwork Efficiency -
# Requested:    17893
# Submitted:    35


     I understand what is going on here, as I too at one point got as many CPU's as I possibly could (18 total) running on a pool.  Boy that sure was a waste, cause 1 GPU was waaaaay faster and far more efficient.  Another thing you must consider as a CPU user using a low askrate, you are not even getting 0.10% through the entire getwork before get another and try again.  I've been logging my getwork's, and out of the 18,500 getworks I have logged on my GPU, only 22 of those have an shares found in the first 1% of the getwork.  What this tells me is that you CPU miner's would find more shares if you tried to raise you ask rate from 1 to 20 or more seconds. 

Failure to do this on your part will result in your accounts being banned (you will still be paid though).  If you come back and have not fixed this problem, your IP's will be banned next.  Please fix this ASAP.  You have 24 hours to comply.

Thank you for your understanding and help with this matter,

Fairuser

Let's discuss about bitcoinpool.org on it's own thread, thank you.

Btw you can use fairuser's miner with my pool too. It is m0mchil's miner with few bullshits around. Then you can achieve the same 'high efficiency' also with my pool. But I don't recommend this to anybody not because I'm jealous to fairuser's pool, but simply because it is bad for YOU and using this modified miner, you are shooting to your leg. It is mathematically approved.

bobR, Bitcoin seems to be a currency very much based on trust right now. I don't trust you, because you seem to be unstable in this forum. I hope in the future, you can show me I'm wrong.

Congratulations bobR, you've just managed to alienate me, and I have no plans to ever do business with you until you learn some basic social skills.

So you *hadn't* read every post in this thread? Or had you just missed that one? Are there any others that you may have missed? If so, you can Google for them, like the rest of us do when we don't understand something.

After all of your bitching about how slush's pool is unfair, you're still using it? Then you get an attitude with the people who try to answer your question? The question that you would know the answer to if you had read the thread?