That is always a good thing to hear someone rather 'important' say he does believe in Bitcoin. It helps building credibility. (Well most of the time, McAfee is an exception to this I think!  ) 2023 is roughly three years and a half away from now. Price is actually 11 370$. Reaching 250 000$ by would mean a 238 630 US dollar price increase. Is it feasible? Yes it is. It is something certain? Definitely not. I was quite deceived by the krach that followed the 20k$ bull run back in 2017. Hence, I am a bit more pessimist about the future, but still this is just my random opinion, and anything could happen in the tech sector. If I came back to Bitcoin after some time away, this is because after thinking for a while about the underlying tech, I came to the definitive conclusion, that it is promised to success. Bitcoin is the next step in the development of technology that started after we entered in the dot-com era at the turn of the century. So for sure 250 000$ will come some day, probably in the next decade. But 2023 may still be a bit too early. But anything can happen! And markets are not an exact science so only time will tell! |
|
|
|
|
Based on what I am used to hear, I would have first said that it is not possible to change the total supply.
But after thinking a bit about it, two things came to my mind, and at the same time, the answer to your question.
1) Total supply is just a parameter, so according to me (as I said, I have never thought about this precise issue before, nor heard anyone talking about it!), the sole people who would have the power to change it are the miners, and no one else.
That is for the your answer.
2) But now let's go a bit further.
On the other hand, I am pretty sure this is a situation that will never happen. Just see how simpler improvements led to great debates!
So the only way for the total supply to be realistically increased, is through a hard fork.
How would it be possible for the total supply to be increased: through a miner vote.
Will it ever happen on the main chain? No, that is sure at 99.99%.
|
|
|
|
|
#JOIN
Bitcointalk username: Losvienleg
Forum rank: Hero Member
Posts count: 744
ETH address: 0x4CEE92D0007Aa7a6A0A9d393783a13F9C4Ec23A1
|
|
|
|
There are a few things to consider, Macron was pushed forward by the elite whereas Le Pen opposes a lot of it. It all depends on whether the people can see through. Of course Le Pen could always be a decoy.
You forgot to clarify who is sponsoring Marie Le pen. The French understand that everywhere where on the horizon looms the shadow of Putin need to wait for traps. There is not a single rich country which is located in the halo of influence of Russia. Do you have any proof that Front National is russian foreign service? Or is that just more nwo propaganda, that youve catched on? Macron is openly supported by german industry, muslim imams and George Soros Antifa thugs. You can call the latter ones "mainstream" in western Europe aswell. There was good analysis awhile back, that investigated 70% of german journalists vote Green Party, another 20% Social democrats. So all in all, you have 90% of the media supporting marxism and communism being in bed with corporations (who need cheap slave labor). Nice picture of status quo. All of those traits meet nicely in Macron, who is self-professed fan of Che Guevera on hand, yet his professional resume reads: Investment banker. By the way, Le Pen is also not right of the spectrum as most of her policies have socialist vibe. The difference is, she puts interests of her voters before those of her donors. She is local as opposed to supranational. Look at the money trail. FN and le pen got directly funded by the kreml. They got millions from russia  Le pen is repeating the nazi germany propaganda except this time is not jews but muslims. Muslims this is only the beginning. Then she and the Jews will get. And end all that the streets will attract crowds of supporters and shout France only for the French. This is a bit what is happening. I was watching her meeting some minutes ago, and people were repedetly shouting "We are in our home !". Macron must win, because Le Pen means the destructions of what took so much time to be build and the end of foreign policy and partnership. If we do not sell planes, tanks and ships anymore, the debt will be astronomous. |
|
|
|
|
I can tell you that I am far from being so sure. Each day that passes, I am more and more afraid that Le Pen wins. That would be disastreous for the country.
|
|
|
|
pfff...
tes photos ne veulent rien dire.
tu peux faire ce que tu veux, macron sera élu. un coup pour rien.
au premier tour, j'ai voté fillon, car c'était le moins étatiste de tous.
au second tour, que choisir ? entre un socialiste de gauche et une socialiste de droite, que choisir ?
je n'ai jamais voté à gauche, et ce n'est pas à 45 ans que je vais commencer. donc entre un socialiste de gauche et un socialiste de droite, entre un étatiste de gauche et une étatiste de droite, que choisir ?
pour ma part, sans aucune hésitation, je voterai pour la pen (je dit la pen car c'est une fille).
j'espère que que la pen atteindra au moins les 40 %, juste pour emmerder ceux du camp du bien, mais je n'y crois pas un instant, si elle dépasse les 30 %, ça sera déjà bien.
macron sera élu.
et la france continuera son lent déclin socialoïde.
(le déclin serait plus rapide avec la pen et le collectiviste pédé philippot)
Si Macron est élu, on aura peut-être cinq années pas géniale, mais par contre si Le Pen est élue, c'est fini pour toujours. Réfléchissez-y bien avant de voter. Moi ce sera Macron sans aucune hésitation. Pas parce que je l'aime, il est même selon moi le troisième pire derrière Le Pen et Arthaud, mais Le Pen, c'est un aller sans retour vers le chaos et plein de mauvaises choses. |
|
|
|
Nothing. I am sure that it will not become the next President of France. If this Nazi wins the election it will be in the same situation as Trump. Only she'll have less room for manoeuvre. I hope the French will not make the same mistakes as the Americans.
I've never been one to understand in the least how you can call someone a Nazi just because they're conservative and on the far-right when it comes to policies and issues. America didn't make a mistake in the least and if you think Clinton would've been a better choice I don't know what you're missing in your brain but you should fix it. You're probably one of those people that think all of those Republica, White, Males, are horrible Nazis based on their skin color and hate everyone. Get the fuck outta here ya Liberal scum, ACTUALLY ANTI-FAC would love ya please join bud. Loved to see based stick man kick ya ass. I am sharing your positing in these leftists are not very intelligent to call nazi everyone that does not agree with you. But in other way, I truly hope she will not be elected President, and hopefully it seems it will not be the case. |
|
|
|
|
So far, we have Macron ranking 1st, Le Pen 2nd, Fillon, 3rd, Mélenchon 4th, Hamon 5th, Dupont-Aignan 6th. Sadly the two I disliked the most will battle for the presidency... Hopefully Macron will win over Le Pen.
Feel free to discuss the topic, I am open to discussion on this subject.
|
|
|
|
If its true,its a great news.
I think the time to know the truth that which countries had assisted him to start such a group has come.
I don't think that it is true. Even if Abu Bakr al Baghdadi is captured, he will be quickly eliminated by the American backed troops. Else, he will spill out secrets about the Clinton crime family's links with the ISIS. US troops have no love for the Clintons. I wouldn't count on that happening. US troops are making what they are ordrered to do. And yet Hilary Clinton lost the election, all the administration that does not change at every election is still acquired to them. |
|
|
|
|
Yes of course it is. I can maybe understand something like 10-15% to make the state run, but when you are taxed on everything, even the fact that you live in your house or do not live in it, that becomes organised theft.
|
|
|
|
|
So I see you are supporting the USA and South Korea. Why ? Who needs to win here is North Korea. Someone need to destroy the United States at some moment or another, so better early than late. And if South Korea perish too, that will not be a big casualty...
|
|
|
|
|
I love it, and I think it should be reintroduced in all the countries of the World. There is some people that do not merit to leave, and we must sentence them.
|
|
|
|
Yes Women, Children and Old People, The rest should go and fight for their homes. Those that are accepted should be monitored extensively.
I also agree with you. Men should fight for their country. They are not refugees they are cowards. Why let undeserving people? Wife should not receive benefits, and should be provided with job and to support themselves. This is exact. They are not at war, they simply want money. They are said to be hungry to death but yet they have smartphones. Look at the Kurds, they fight because they do not want to leave their homeland, they will not sacrifice their ancestors' legacy for some money ! I would not mind welcoming families if the males are fighting. Democratic values are not able to withstand modern threats. The latest survey showed that only 18% of Germans are ready with arms to fight for their country. So I guess they felt sorry for these cowards. Germany is kinda an extreme exemple. All what is bad in the modern society can be found in extreme proportions in Germany. This situation is typical for almost all of Europe. The more stable the economy, the more people get used to comfort and have lost the will to participate in military action, even if it involves the protection of the country That is true. But not only in this field of things. They are totally brainwashed, ashamed of imaginary crimes their grand-parents or parents would have commited, their natality is incredibly low etc. |
|
|
|
Yes Women, Children and Old People, The rest should go and fight for their homes. Those that are accepted should be monitored extensively.
I also agree with you. Men should fight for their country. They are not refugees they are cowards. Why let undeserving people? Wife should not receive benefits, and should be provided with job and to support themselves. This is exact. They are not at war, they simply want money. They are said to be hungry to death but yet they have smartphones. Look at the Kurds, they fight because they do not want to leave their homeland, they will not sacrifice their ancestors' legacy for some money ! I would not mind welcoming families if the males are fighting. Democratic values are not able to withstand modern threats. The latest survey showed that only 18% of Germans are ready with arms to fight for their country. So I guess they felt sorry for these cowards. Germany is kinda an extreme exemple. All what is bad in the modern society can be found in extreme proportions in Germany. |
|
|
|
You mean dangerous for us because of the local fauna or regarding the treatment of the animals ?
I think that wild animals did not pose the same danger as a person. There are many African countries where there are constant civil war, there are Muslim countries in which implanted the Sharia law. This does not mean that because there is a greater danger animals are all peaceful. I believe that in some countries wild animals are a real threat. Wild animals can be dangerous only when a person invades their territory. Why is he doing it? If you're someone invade the house? But people are more dangerous because the attack in any territory. Some people rely on hunt to live, so they are hunting small games, or gathering fruits, and they sometimes get attacked. |
|
|
|
Mike Pence proposed an electroshocks treatment. I think that this might be a possibility. There must be something that gets activated in the brain or that do not work correctly, so we might also fix this.
This generation is not possible already to return to reason. Propaganda destroys the ability to think. You can only re-grandchildren. The same situation in Russia. Propaganda is doing its job and people believe that the life of a slave is normal. So you would kill them all ? I would not be against this proposition, as they can turn other people to their illness. This means that they are a danger in themselves. Why kill them? Need economic means to overthrow the dictatorship, to destroy the propaganda and teach their children to think. They are completely re-educated because they will affect the parents, but their children will have thinking people, if not restored the dictatorship. They can not help you to destroy the judeo-sodomite propaganda if they are protesting against our attacks against this dictatorship, so either we disable them either we send them away where they can not hurt. |
|
|
|
What is worst is that even if there is a bad psychological effect it also have a bad biological effect because it emits electromagnetical waves, and this is not a good thing for health.
I do not see this effect. Do electromagnetic waves are considered to be harmful, but statistics says that the average life expectancy is constantly growing. Perhaps this suggests that it is not so simple. Because the quality of the other things grows faster. There is a great increase of cancers, and you can input this to vaccines, electromagnetic waves and bad food. |
|
|
|
Mike Pence proposed an electroshocks treatment. I think that this might be a possibility. There must be something that gets activated in the brain or that do not work correctly, so we might also fix this.
This generation is not possible already to return to reason. Propaganda destroys the ability to think. You can only re-grandchildren. The same situation in Russia. Propaganda is doing its job and people believe that the life of a slave is normal. So you would kill them all ? I would not be against this proposition, as they can turn other people to their illness. This means that they are a danger in themselves. |
|
|
|
You mean dangerous for us because of the local fauna or regarding the treatment of the animals ?
I think that wild animals did not pose the same danger as a person. There are many African countries where there are constant civil war, there are Muslim countries in which implanted the Sharia law. This does not mean that because there is a greater danger animals are all peaceful. I believe that in some countries wild animals are a real threat. |
|
|
|
|
Mike Pence proposed an electroshocks treatment. I think that this might be a possibility. There must be something that gets activated in the brain or that do not work correctly, so we might also fix this.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
