Latest posts of: stoppots

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 »

161

Economy / Gambling / Re: BitcoinToss No Payment Received(RESPONSE RECEIVED)

on: May 25, 2012, 10:29:52 PM

Think its pretty obvious wat was/is going on here. Once another poster brought up the potential violation of TOS and the info with whom the sites are now registered being posted. He finally felt it was best to make an appearance and appease the minute amount of BTC that had recently been complained about. Maybe saving the year long renewal and the money spent doing that and perhaps with hopes of regaining some trust for the sites generating income. If only the winning players not receiving a payment was the only inclination of being defrauded and of those how many would decide to post about it? How many made an effort to locate or track who scammed them? Of those how many complained with emails and private messages that did not post about it? Yet nothing was ever mentioned about those peoples bitcoins. The amount paid out now is so miniscule to how much is being taken in that it would of been asinine to not renew and attempt this weak effort to refute wats been revealed.

162

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [LTC] An (even more) optimized version of cpuminer

on: May 25, 2012, 09:55:52 PM

So I removed the --quiet parameter and can now see the separate threads and the speed per thread. I am not getting any work accepted though. I check my stats with the pool and it shows no shares being accepted either. This happens for both a Q9650 and also a Q9400, both running windows 7. Very nice improvement by the way, the speeds showing here are the same when mining litecoin. Nearly doubled for both processors from a 2.1 version I had used previously Quote C:\minerd>minerd.exe --url http://pool_I_use.com:8337 --userpass XXX:XXX --threads 4 --debug [2012-05-25 16:14:39] 4 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm. [2012-05-25 16:14:39] Long-polling activated for http://pool_I_use.com:8337/LP [2012-05-25 16:14:39] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:14:40] thread 1: 4104 hashes, 6.86 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:14:40] thread 2: 4104 hashes, 6.86 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:14:40] thread 0: 4104 hashes, 6.83 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:14:40] thread 3: 4104 hashes, 5.59 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:15:38] thread 3: 329868 hashes, 5.71 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:15:38] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:15:38] thread 1: 404892 hashes, 6.95 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:15:38] thread 0: 402876 hashes, 6.91 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:15:38] thread 2: 404892 hashes, 6.92 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:16:27] thread 3: 342516 hashes, 6.87 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:16:27] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:16:38] thread 0: 414312 hashes, 6.92 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:16:38] thread 2: 415320 hashes, 6.90 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:16:48] thread 1: 417096 hashes, 5.93 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:17:22] thread 1: 231288 hashes, 6.80 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:17:22] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:17:27] thread 0: 339264 hashes, 6.88 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:17:27] thread 2: 337896 hashes, 6.90 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:17:45] thread 3: 412272 hashes, 5.34 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:18:22] thread 0: 378384 hashes, 6.91 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:18:22] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:18:24] thread 2: 379476 hashes, 6.69 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:18:24] thread 1: 407916 hashes, 6.56 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:18:27] thread 3: 197508 hashes, 4.65 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:19:09] thread 2: 310536 hashes, 6.91 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:19:09] thread 3: 231612 hashes, 5.54 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:19:09] thread 1: 306660 hashes, 6.87 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:19:09] thread 0: 327336 hashes, 6.95 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:19:09] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:20:09] thread 1: 412440 hashes, 6.87 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:20:09] thread 2: 414528 hashes, 6.91 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:20:09] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:20:09] thread 0: 417156 hashes, 6.94 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:20:09] thread 3: 332340 hashes, 5.50 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:21:08] thread 3: 330168 hashes, 5.66 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:21:08] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:21:09] thread 1: 412440 hashes, 6.91 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:21:09] thread 0: 416484 hashes, 6.95 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:21:09] thread 2: 414360 hashes, 6.87 khash/s If I add the --protocol-dump parameter I get back this Quote C:\minerd>minerd.exe --url http://pool_I_use.com:8337 --userpass XXX:XXX --threads 4 --debug --protocol-dump [2012-05-25 16:24:04] 4 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm. [2012-05-25 16:24:04] JSON protocol request: {"method": "getwork", "params": [], "id":0} * timeout on name lookup is not supported * About to connect() to pool_I_use.com port 8337 (#0) * Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx... * TCP_NODELAY set * connected * Connected to pool_I_use.com (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) port 8337 (#0) * Server auth using Basic with user 'XXX' > POST / HTTP/1.1 Authorization: Basic c3RvcHBvdHNfQ1BVMjpteW1pbnI= Host: pool_I_use.com:8337 Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 45 User-Agent: cpuminer 2.2 X-Mining-Extensions: midstate < HTTP/1.1 200 OK < X-Source-Code: /src/ [2012-05-25 16:24:05] HTTP hdr(X-Source-Code): /src/ < Content-Length: 542 [2012-05-25 16:24:05] HTTP hdr(Content-Length): 542 < X-Roll-NTime: expire=120 [2012-05-25 16:24:05] HTTP hdr(X-Roll-NTime): expire=120 < X-Long-Polling: /LP [2012-05-25 16:24:05] HTTP hdr(X-Long-Polling): /LP < Server: Eloipool [2012-05-25 16:24:05] HTTP hdr(Server): Eloipool < Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 21:24:09 GMT [2012-05-25 16:24:05] HTTP hdr(Date): Fri, 25 May 2012 21:24:09 GMT < Content-Type: application/json [2012-05-25 16:24:05] HTTP hdr(Content-Type): application/json < * Connection #0 to host pool_I_use.com left intact [2012-05-25 16:24:05] Long-polling activated for http://pool_I_use.com:8337/LP [2012-05-25 16:24:05] JSON protocol response: { "error": null, "result": { "hash1": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000", "data": "000000013bea60ae4a218fa782c09a94dc389a89ef9b47e31223f86b0000091a0 0000000f80c20f32283698687a959a38e156c04d396fecf09f0ef1d8beec2bfbb24e8c44fbff879 1 a0a8b5f456c6f690000008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0000000000000000000000080020000", "target": "ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff0000000 0", "submitold": true }, "id": 0 } [2012-05-25 16:24:05] JSON protocol request: {"method": "getwork", "params": [], "id":0} [2012-05-25 16:24:05] DEBUG: got new work * timeout on name lookup is not supported * About to connect() to pool_I_use.com port 8337 (#0) * Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx... * TCP_NODELAY set * connected * Connected to pool_I_use.com (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) port 8337 (#0) * Server auth using Basic with user 'XXX' > POST /LP HTTP/1.1 Authorization: Basic c3RvcHBvdHNfQ1BVMjpteW1pbnI= Host: pool_I_use.com:8337 Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 45 User-Agent: cpuminer 2.2 X-Mining-Extensions: midstate [2012-05-25 16:24:05] thread 3: 4104 hashes, 6.93 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:24:05] thread 1: 4104 hashes, 6.92 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:24:05] thread 0: 4104 hashes, 6.89 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:24:05] thread 2: 4104 hashes, 5.90 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:24:57] thread 2: 354288 hashes, 6.91 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:24:57] JSON protocol request: {"method": "getwork", "params": [], "id":0} * Re-using existing connection! (#0) with host (nil) * Connected to (nil) (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) port 8337 (#0) * Server auth using Basic with user 'XXX' > POST / HTTP/1.1 Authorization: Basic c3RvcHBvdHNfQ1BVMjpteW1pbnI= Host: pool_I_use.com:8337 Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 45 User-Agent: cpuminer 2.2 X-Mining-Extensions: midstate < HTTP/1.1 200 OK < X-Source-Code: /src/ < Content-Length: 542 < X-Roll-NTime: expire=120 < X-Long-Polling: /LP < Server: Eloipool < Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 21:25:01 GMT < Content-Type: application/json < * Connection #0 to host (nil) left intact [2012-05-25 16:24:57] JSON protocol response: { "error": null, "result": { "hash1": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000", "data": "000000013bea60ae4a218fa782c09a94dc389a89ef9b47e31223f86b0000091a0 0000000739f2f40b89200c995cac8382d7a044bc4ab8e52f09cbcb1b34606d59a57bb014fbff8ad 1 a0a8b5f456c6f690000008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0000000000000000000000080020000", "target": "ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff0000000 0", "submitold": true }, "id": 0 } [2012-05-25 16:24:57] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:25:05] thread 3: 415932 hashes, 6.94 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:25:06] thread 1: 415224 hashes, 6.84 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:25:20] thread 0: 413136 hashes, 5.55 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:25:49] thread 0: 205248 hashes, 6.93 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:25:49] JSON protocol request: {"method": "getwork", "params": [], "id":0} * Re-using existing connection! (#0) with host (nil) * Connected to (nil) (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) port 8337 (#0) * Server auth using Basic with user 'XXX' > POST / HTTP/1.1 Authorization: Basic c3RvcHBvdHNfQ1BVMjpteW1pbnI= Host: pool_I_use.com:8337 Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 45 User-Agent: cpuminer 2.2 X-Mining-Extensions: midstate < HTTP/1.1 200 OK < X-Source-Code: /src/ < Content-Length: 542 < X-Roll-NTime: expire=120 < X-Long-Polling: /LP < Server: Eloipool < Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 21:25:54 GMT < Content-Type: application/json < * Connection #0 to host (nil) left intact [2012-05-25 16:25:49] JSON protocol response: { "error": null, "result": { "hash1": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000", "data": "000000013bea60ae4a218fa782c09a94dc389a89ef9b47e31223f86b0000091a0 00000000a7599aefcd104a49f73a339a5ab5f0979f50b038b5af9c2dd464bdb183442504fbff8e2 1 a0a8b5f456c6f690000008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0000000000000000000000080020000", "target": "ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff0000000 0", "submitold": true }, "id": 0 } [2012-05-25 16:25:49] DEBUG: got new work [2012-05-25 16:25:56] thread 2: 414468 hashes, 6.94 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:25:57] thread 3: 360852 hashes, 6.98 khash/s [2012-05-25 16:26:00] thread 1: 348756 hashes, 6.44 khash/s

163

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [LTC] An (even more) optimized version of cpuminer

on: May 25, 2012, 12:54:56 AM

Yeah neither algorithm will work for me. Doesn't come back with an error or anything, just loads and sits there with a blinking cursor. Quote C:\minerd>minerd.exe --algo scrypt --threads 4 --url http://my.pool.com:8337 --userpass XXX:XXX --quiet [2012-05-24 19:45:53] 4 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm. [2012-05-24 19:45:53] Long-polling activated for http://my.pool.com:8337/LP _ Quote C:\minerd>minerd.exe --algo sha256d --threads 4 --url http://my.pool.com:8337 --userpass XXX:XXX --quiet [2012-05-24 19:52:05] 4 miner threads started, using 'sha256d' algorithm. [2012-05-24 19:52:05] Long-polling activated for http://my.pool.com:8337/LP _ If I add the --debug I get an extra line and it will continue repeating that line of "got new work" Quote C:\minerd>minerd.exe --algo sha256d --threads 4 --url http://my.pool.com:8337 --userpass XXX:XXX --quiet [2012-05-24 19:52:05] 4 miner threads started, using 'sha256d' algorithm. [2012-05-24 19:52:05] Long-polling activated for http://my.pool.com:8337/LP [2012-05-24 19:59:31] DEBUG: got new work

164

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [LTC] An (even more) optimized version of cpuminer

on: May 24, 2012, 06:33:16 PM

Is it my understanding that this cpu miner is able to mine bitcoins now? If so wat commands must be used to do so?

165

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [396 GH/s] EMC: 0 Fee/PPS/DGM/Merged Mining/PayPal Payout/SMS/Yubikey/More

on: May 24, 2012, 12:52:39 AM

EH OH!

166

Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: How Thermal Compound Spreads

on: May 22, 2012, 05:55:38 AM

Another piece of broken glass will also cut or better to say score the glass. Get the pressure right and angle using the broken edge feels like grinding the glass because the broken piece will crumble sometimes. Once you get the score started try to continue along that path. Once deep enough you should be able to complete the break by snapping the glass. If you have a dremel around look to see if you have a diamond tipped cutting wheel or bits. Work it the same way. Just all about getting that pressure enough so that you grind a score onto the glass your trying to cut. Think walmart sells a cutter, home depot or lowes would for sure. If your gonna make that trip take your glass with you and see if they still cut glass. The hardware stores use to last I heard.

167

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [396 GH/s] EMC: 0 Fee/PPS/DGM/Merged Mining/PayPal Payout/SMS/Yubikey/More

on: May 21, 2012, 04:34:03 PM

Of all things that make EMC the most impressive pool to mine at. What stands out most about Inabas pool is his effort and time spent being involved, improving, and staying on top of any concern or need that arises or is asked by the miners. Doesn't matter if the problem is big or small, minute or of major concern. Anytime situations occur time and time again Inaba is always on top of it. This along with the transparency of his pool are things you will have a hard time finding elsewhere, not to mention all of the various features all here in one place and free. Other pools may offer one of these features and they also may provide you with some stats here or there, but not one is voluntary and completely forthcoming in offering the information miners need and want to see. Thanks Inaba! Your doing a terrific job in offering a great service to us all. Thanks for being one of the good guys!

168

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [396 GH/s] EMC: 0 Fee/PPS/DGM/Merged Mining/PayPal Payout/SMS/Yubikey/More

on: May 21, 2012, 10:42:32 AM

Having same connection issues as yesterday. Same time and everything. Can see the pools H/R has dropped so appears to be reoccurring.

169

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [396 GH/s] EMC: 0 Fee/PPS/DGM/Merged Mining/PayPal Payout/SMS/Yubikey/More

on: May 19, 2012, 10:39:03 AM

Was starting to think I fuq'd something up, couldn't figure out wat the hell I did. Guess I am not the only one having issues

170

Economy / Gambling / Re: BitcoinToss No Payment Received(RESPONSE RECEIVED)

on: May 15, 2012, 01:18:38 AM

I would not be so quick he needs to explain things. As well as answer any question that may arise. i have a feeling he will chose not to though.

171

Economy / Gambling / Re: BitcoinToss No Payment Received

on: May 14, 2012, 11:37:20 AM

So about 2hrs after making my post above I receive this PM. Quote I am posting this here now so any continued dialog will be transparent and informative for anyone interested to see. I feel at this point complete transparency is needed on behalf of Alex if he wishes to respond to my concerns about his website which for me began 3 months ago with the starting of this thread post #1. However post #13 on the previous page is the main bulk of the issue at hand and it is this mainly that the transparency in his response is needed. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63615.msg848521#msg848521 In the private message sent to me it was signed Alex so that is wat I will refer to you as and if you wish to do so you may respond here.

172

Economy / Gambling / Re: BitcoinToss No Payment Received

on: May 14, 2012, 06:48:26 AM

Quote from: elux on May 14, 2012, 12:32:18 AM Quote Please submit issues regarding the abuse of our services including, but not limited to; illegal activity, the exploitation of children, spam, phishing and malware. This from: https://supportcenter.godaddy.com/Abuse/SpamReport.aspx?ci=22420 Outright fraud is an illegal activity and should clearly qualify as an abuse of their services. Yes? When registered previously it was through Godaddy with the registrar being Domains By Proxy which is a subsidiary of Godaddy. Since being renewed doood has decided to do business with more unknown names. Less reputable entities which more than likely don't mind his class of character or the theft he perpetrates. However I am not familiar with their business practices and that may very well not be the case.

173

Economy / Gambling / Re: BitcoinToss No Payment Received

on: May 14, 2012, 05:57:14 AM

Also renewed for another year

174

Economy / Gambling / Re: BitcoinToss No Payment Received

on: May 13, 2012, 09:49:07 AM

Yeah unfortunately unsuspecting bitcoin supporters are going to continue losing their coins. Whois now shows a new registrar has registered the domain name for another year. I'm sure the other affiliated domains will be renewed as they expire also. Spends $5 and can make that back with just 1 coin. http://www.robtex.com/dns/bitcointoss.com.html http://www.robtex.com/dns/btcriches.com.html http://www.robtex.com/dns/bitcoindouble.com.html http://www.robtex.com/dns/bitcoinbalance.com.html http://www.robtex.com/dns/bitcoinsafety.com.html http://www.robtex.com/dns/bitcoinsecurity.com.html http://www.robtex.com/dns/btcflip.com.html http://www.robtex.com/dns/flipforbits.com.html

175

Economy / Services / Re: thebitcoinreview.com -Pays you bitcoins for completing tasks! Earn Free Bitcoins

on: May 13, 2012, 09:21:09 AM

thanks man

176

Economy / Services / Re: thebitcoinreview.com -Pays you bitcoins for completing tasks! Earn Free Bitcoins

on: May 12, 2012, 07:08:45 PM

Hi Adam, I would like to request a payment of my balance from my account on thebitcoinreview.com. The site reports my balance at 0.285BTC, however I have made several news feeds additions in this thread that have not yet reflected on the current balance. Thanks

177

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [450 GH/s] EMC: 0 Fee/PPS/DGM/Merged Mining/PayPal Payout/SMS/Yubikey/More

on: April 30, 2012, 09:30:56 PM

Yeah pretty sweet huh, 4 blocks within an hour.

178

Economy / Services / Re: thebitcoinreview.com -Pays you bitcoins for completing tasks! Earn Free Bitcoins

on: April 17, 2012, 10:13:36 PM

Added news feed. Bitcoin - The Libertarian Introduction

179

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [450 GH/s] EMC: 0 Fee/DGM/Merged Mining/PayPal Payout/SMS/Yubikey/More

on: April 14, 2012, 12:41:00 PM

Guess really thats the answer then. Those that are running good and finding blocks are proud and don't mind being known. Those who are not proud decide to stay private. #25 Private 9638341 / 1 = 9,638,341 If I was this guy here I would be keeping my shit private to.

180

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [450 GH/s] EMC: 0 Fee/DGM/Merged Mining/PayPal Payout/SMS/Yubikey/More

on: April 14, 2012, 12:23:08 PM

Code: 1 Inaba 59431448 / 42 = 1,415,034 2 Private 52664637 / 23 = 2,289,766 3 Private 48347524 / 22 = 2,197,614 4 ocminer 41197840 / 26 = 1,584,532 5 Private 32048612 / 21 = 1,526,124 6 jjiimm_64 25815926 / 20 = 1,290,796 7 exahash 22412684 / 18 = 1,245,149 8 sgravina 21033386 / 7 = 3,004,769 9 wowe 19524184 / 6 = 3,254,030 10 Private 18688279 / 12 = 1,557,356 11 sveetsnelda 18638297 / 13 = 1,433,715 12 Private 18402599 / 3 = 6,134,199 13 coran007 15655886 / 9 = 1,739,542 14 gfaust 15395224 / 8 = 1,924,403 15 Private 15218092 / 10 = 1,521,809 16 RPM 14084727 / 14 = 1,006,051 17 Private 13057093 / 11 = 1,187,008 18 CigarPuller3 12302956 / 7 = 1,757,565 19 Dissi 11536161 / 6 = 1,922,693 20 cobracom 10788258 / 10 = 1,078,825 21 catfish 10502848 / 10 = 1,050,284 22 BillHicks 10283152 / 19 = 541,218 23 cuz72 10230630 / 2 = 5,115,315 24 jjshabadoo2 9838017 / 10 = 983,801 25 Private 9638341 / 1 = 9,638,341 Just one pool of many so extremely small sample and its safe to assume miners have mined elsewhere at times so total shares are not exact. Sure difficulty makes up for some especially any that have been mining since the early days. Surprised meni hasn't been by yet, he's usually johnny on the spot with math. Dam look at BillHicks he must of sold his soul to get luck like that. Bill show us pictures of wat you going on over there. Miner and settings??? Wat ever your doing don't change a thing. Seal that room off and hope the power never goes out.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 »