I would like to request a manual payout username is the same used here

thanks

 
With my post above addressing that, I prefer a separate post for addressing regraded/voided wagers.

I also had 2 bets regraded this past weekend, although in my situation I actually came out ahead. I think it would be easier for me to show rather than try to explain since neither of them were just a straight bet.


Both wagers are 3 leg parlays, 2 legs of each wager are identical with the only difference being a single leg one of which is ravens +3.5(full game) and ravens +3.5 1st Half



#10100 ravens +3.5(full game) risking .80 to win back 1.80, potential profit 1.00btc



#10101 ravens +3.5 1st Half risking .86 to win back 1.87, this wager was a loss and was graded a loss, losing .86btc



again #10100 this wager was originally graded a winner crediting me back 1.80btc (.80 risked + 1.00 won)
After being regraded and voiding the ravens bet, it then becomes a 2 leg parlay and paying odds reduce from the original +125 to the now -250. Now risking .80 to win 1.12, profit .32 but also the initial credit of 1.80 after winning was then deducted



#10101 after being regraded and voiding the ravens bet, my losing 3 leg parlay then became a winning 2 leg parlay. Winning odds reduced from +118 to -250, Now risking .86 to win 1.20, profit .34 + .86 which I originally lost but am now credited back.






So prior to regrading I had risked 1.66 on 2 wagers, losing one and winning the other after which I received 1.80 back. 1.80-1.66=.14btc

After regrading the same risk of 1.66 on 2 wagers both of which were winners at reduced odds which returned 2.32-1.66=.66


Regardless of how this situation turned out for me, I was never made aware of corrections being made to my account or wagers being modified. I still have no idea why exactly the bets for the ravens were voided. Never was an explanation given. In fact had I not noticed this myself I may never of saw and never have been told.

I have not yet contact anonibet concerning this however I did have a misgraded wager once before on a baseball game that was rained and played the next day. Any and all attempts of contact at that time were all responded too and also corrected the wager in question and credited the BTC.

 

Well a few key things immediately come to mind:

Betting options per event are numerous 99% of the time, also parlays and round robins are offered. Not just spread, moneyline, and O/U offered elsewhere.

Bet amounts can be as little as .1 on most wagers and can be made as precisely as you may want down to .01. Compared to a 1btc minimum or .5btc minimum required by the sister sites.

I prefer to lock in a line and know for sure my wager has been accepted, rather than wondering if someone will eventually come along and take the opposite side I am wanting. When using btcsportsmatch if the line moves after I post up my side the current line is wat you get. Would like to see more traffic especially on the 1st half and 2nd half pages, I have never seen people posted up on either of those.
 

 
 
Still getting the same response every thirty seconds, except this time I managed to find a block during that 30 seconds.

 [2012-11-28 01:50:58] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from server
 [2012-11-28 01:50:59] Accepted e2d7d668 Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 0
 [2012-11-28 01:50:59] GPU0  53.0C 3286RPM | (5s):299.5M (avg):299.6Mh/s | A:3975 R:53 HW:0 U:4.1/m I:12
 [2012-11-28 01:51:00] (5s):326.8M (avg):299.6Mh/s | Q:3402  A:3975  R:53  HW:0  E:117%  U:4.1/m
 [2012-11-28 01:51:05] (5s):120.0M (avg):299.6Mh/s | Q:3402  A:3975  R:53  HW:0  E:117%  U:4.1/m
 [2012-11-28 01:51:11] Found block for pool 0!
 [2012-11-28 01:51:11] (5s):419.7M (avg):299.6Mh/s | Q:3402  A:3975  R:53  HW:0  E:117%  U:4.1/m
 [2012-11-28 01:51:11] Accepted 00000009 Diff 430M/1 BLOCK! GPU 0 pool 0
 [2012-11-28 01:51:11] GPU0  53.5C 3290RPM | (5s):299.5M (avg):299.6Mh/s | A:3976 R:53 HW:0 U:4.1/m I:12
 [2012-11-28 01:51:14] Rejected 1a5cc607 Diff 9/1 GPU 0 pool 0
 [2012-11-28 01:51:14] GPU0  53.5C 3269RPM | (5s):299.5M (avg):299.6Mh/s | A:3976 R:54 HW:0 U:4.1/m I:12
 [2012-11-28 01:51:16] (5s):375.4M (avg):299.6Mh/s | Q:3402  A:3976  R:54  HW:0  E:117%  U:4.1/m
 [2012-11-28 01:51:17] New block: 0009fa6b96ff63ef37e3cd40...
 [2012-11-28 01:51:17] Stratum from pool 1 detected new block
 [2012-11-28 01:51:22] (5s):347.7M (avg):299.6Mh/s | Q:3405  A:3976  R:54  HW:0  E:117%  U:4.1/m
 [2012-11-28 01:51:27] (5s):330.2M (avg):299.6Mh/s | Q:3405  A:3976  R:54  HW:0  E:117%  U:4.1/m
 [2012-11-28 01:51:29] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from server

 
Nice addition you have given to the community. Would it be possible to have a dark version of the page? So then the back ground would be black or a similiar darker type theme instead of white?

Also when trying to register it says "username invalid - this username already" no matter wat is enter.

Thanks for your time and contribution
 

 
I am getting a message from CGMiner every 30 seconds.
 
Any one have this same occurrence or know how to resolve this issue?

Is there an API available?

I somehow overlooked it. Received and in my wallet even before I made the initial post.

Sorry for wasting your time and for also being a dumbass.

Check your power settings on your computer. It sounds as if it may be going to the sleep setting and that can cause the screen asking for your password. When this occurs I believe the AMD Display Library or ADL is disabled which may cause your fans to no longer be controled properly.

This would then cause your display driver to crash along with possibly damaging your card although it should shut itself down at point prior to that occuring. I caught this same type of behaviour when using the switch user feature which also results in the password screen. Luckily I had my fans set high enough so that it was obvious that something had was not right when they reduced speeds immediately.

 
Check into running your GPU on a 1x slot instead of the 16x slot. I have a couple of boards with onboard intel graphics and neither are utilizing the 16x slot available, instead I have used the 1x slots to run GPU's and using the onboard graphics for display. Any time a card is plugged into 16x it disables the onboard.

Using 1x to 16x extenders will allow you to run your gpus in the 1x slot. Even a 1x to 1x extender notched out will allow 16x card to run as well. Give it a shot it has worked just fine in my situation.

 
CoinLab, could you check on my account and see about getting a payment sent out? Same username as I am here.
 
Thanks

It would be alot more user friendly if workers payment method could be changed all at the same time rather than changing each one individually the way it is now. This image is wat i am trying to describe.

THIS +1

Any pool with a lack of transparency is a shady pool in that it avoids being up front with its miners for watever reason.

Some pools have big flashy pages while disregarding the info miners want to see most. Others are very basic but have no problem providing its miners more of the stats and info they want to see and need to see.

Can you post your cgminer.conf file? From wat I can tell you've been starting cgminer from the command line.

To get these cards running more efficiently it would help to start cgminer using a configuration (.conf) file. That way you can set your clocks on each card individually as well as undervolt those that are able to be under volted. This would help bigtime with running more cards on your PSU as well as lower your electric bill.

To write a config file, (while cgminer is running) press (S) then (W) confirm to write as cgminer.conf. Then post that file and we'll get it edited and configure your 5830's to mine more efficiently.

After writing the config file (cgminer.conf) if you wish to continue starting from command line just change the config file name to something like cgminer.con_ or else cgminer will automatically try to automatically load the cgminer.conf by default.

EDIT:
Also if you can specify the brand and model of each card this will be needed also as there are many different variations of this card some vary in its capabilities.

Also if you can state which opencl version your running.

I'd like to get more info on the boards if possible. Looking to upgrade possibly, concerned with my current processor(s) and memory being compatible with no problems as everything works perfect now but looking to do the same type of potential crossfire with a few of my cards. Only have a single 16x on the 2 boards I have now.

If you can get the model numbers so I can check out the specs. Pics would be nice and wat kinda price are you talking? Wat kinda setups/usage field did these come out of?

thanks for your time

could I get the 2 1x-16x still packaged shipped for 1.25btc

Wat kinda boards you got laying around? Got ram?

Thanks for the help in understanding. Thats seems to make sense with wat I am seeing. The rejects are occuring mostly with the long polls and sometimes worse than others. Especially when close together. Updated to latest cgminer and not if that helped a little or if the pool traffic reduced slightly. I think a restarting of cgminer every so often will help too.

Be nice to see some more transparency in worker stats and block stats. Work and earnings per block, Have not yet found a litecoin pool that shares this information with its miners and we all like to see those things when choosing a pool.

Thanks for your help and time.


Edit: nearly forgot, My rejected shares are currently showing closer to 3-4%

Is the LTC pool seeing an increase in hashrate since the reduction in difficulty?

With so many different mining pools being offered I suspect traffic to be problem and this is the reason for the higher difficulty shares on the LTC pool. Having them all directed to the same coinotron.com address with a choice in ports 8322 or 9322, is one prefered over the other whether it is scrypt or SHA miners are mining for? Would one of these be better to connect to in terms of traffic?

Would the higher difficulty shares on the LTC pool be expected to cause an increase or decrease in the amount of rejected and stale shares produced?

Mining LTC I have been getting about 10% rejected on 2 different miners. I switched them over today to PPS. When I was on RBPPS I was getting a little over 3% rejected.

stoppots.1 and stoppots.2