|
Wat is causing the greater amount of rejected shares I am seeing today?
|
|
|
|
|
PP's booth says "enabling commerce" seems more like governing, restricting, leeching commerce
|
|
|
|
I found a bug in the block processing this morning... a wayward comma in some very rarely used code was causing the processing to fail and get backed up. Unfortunately, the specific share information for each block was lost due to it. The only thing this means is that all the affected blocks are listed as 0 shares and they have no information on who found the block. Everyone is basically paid as if the blocks are super short blocks, so you haven't lost any payments. You'll notice your payment column basically has the same amount for each block as the previous block... I apologize for this problem and it shouldn't happen in the future. It was triggered by a change I made yesterday that sent it down the path of this rarely used code and things started getting backed up after I went to bed. All stats should be correct now and only 5 blocks were affected, but the good news is our luck isn't nearly as bad as it appeared a few hours ago  wow that was fast, just saw it and wanted to report to you  well done and dont be upset, your doing perfect  AGREED! Try to find such transparency at another pool. Instead the only time you will see operators posting about an issue being found and fixed is if a miner/discussion brings it to their attention. Inaba = good guy/bitcoin role model MVitaliyB = piece of shit Wow, so I just got this from Vitaliy Maxorin: Good day!
I myself am a programmer and I know for myself that for financial losses incurred due to errors in the source code the programmers are paid out of his pocket. I myself have several times carried a financial loss because of their mistakes. But no I will not reimburse my losses. I understand your request as a man, but I think it is not appropriate as a colleague. Excuse me, but I do not return the money you lost. His email is MVitaliyB@mail.ru, he was over paid 47.30350378 BTC. Too bad there are so many thieves in the world... sad. WTG breaking that Russian stereotype to boot! Seems this person took a page out of the bulanula playbook and thinks rationalising keeping the funds due to someone elses indirect mistake is justifiable. Since bitcoins isnt directly refundable without the receiver having some grain of decency it doesnt mean people should ignore decency/good faith just because of this feature of bitcoin, absolutely disgusting. same goes for any of these others listed anonymousguymandude 25.19686011 BTC
bobo 38.49488714 BTC
devnull 16.71986074 BTC
escobar 11.51102329 BTC
floeti 4.79997169 BTC
kimitobo 138.10382552 BTC
scsynthesis 18.74108405 BTC
Thanks to kimitobo also a good guy doing the right thing. Others should all be tagged scammers if not already. |
|
|
|
minerd.exe --threads 4 --url http://coinotron.com:8322 --userpass user:pass --quiet this is using minerd for cpu mining (scrypt) on intel Q9650 and Q9400 cpu's cpuminer 2.2.2 libcurl/7.26.0 zlib/1.2.5 |
|
|
|
|
A shame this thread went off topic and for so many pages
|
|
|
|
I am seem to be unable to connect with one of my workers. Any idea how to fix this?
[2012-10-12 14:42:34] 4 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2012-10-12 14:42:35] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
[2012-10-12 14:42:35] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2012-10-12 14:43:05] HTTP request failed: necessary data rewind wasn't possible
[2012-10-12 14:43:05] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2012-10-12 14:43:35] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
[2012-10-12 14:43:35] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2012-10-12 14:44:05] HTTP request failed: necessary data rewind wasn't possible
[2012-10-12 14:44:05] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
401, looks like you'r URL, worker or pass is wrong Very strange, it just a particular worker. On any machine the same worker came back with that error. I deleted the worker and created another with the exact same name and password and now it works. |
|
|
|
I am seem to be unable to connect with one of my workers. Any idea how to fix this? [2012-10-12 14:42:34] 4 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2012-10-12 14:42:35] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
[2012-10-12 14:42:35] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2012-10-12 14:43:05] HTTP request failed: necessary data rewind wasn't possible
[2012-10-12 14:43:05] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2012-10-12 14:43:35] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 401
[2012-10-12 14:43:35] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2012-10-12 14:44:05] HTTP request failed: necessary data rewind wasn't possible
[2012-10-12 14:44:05] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
|
|
|
|
|
think you could post that pic of the memory?
|
|
|
|
|
Sent a PM and requested pics of an item
|
|
|
|
Can any miners validate the speeds posted on the hardware comparison page as being achievable. Also if they are using APP/SDK 2.6 or 2.7 Model kHash/s Watts Clock Mem Clock Miner Notes
5830 282 ? 850 MHz 1250 MHz cgminer 2.6.4 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
fan=auto memclock=1250 engine=950
lookup-gap=2 threads=1 intensity=20
5830 290 ? 875 MHz 1200 MHz Reaper v13 Beta Worksize 64, Aggression 18
|
|
|
|
|
Bought a 5830 some time ago from spotter. Arrived safe and sound and was impressed with the condition of the card. Still was shiny under a little dust. Been mining away ever since without a single issue or hardware error.
Thanks Spotter
|
|
|
|
|
I got some issues to resolve then. Started with my slowest and getting just over half that, about 170kh/s I'm sure those listed may be xtremes but didn't want to start with those cause downtime seems inevitable every time I jack with SDK's.
Thanks for the response
|
|
|
|
|
Could some miners using 5830's chime in and share wat speeds you have been able to achieve. Both xtremes and the others. Be nice to know wat I should be shooting for.
Thank for your time.
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have the glbse account address so we can check it against blockchain and find that tx?
http://blockchain.info/address/1FX22c76vybHJSJdCCjKHDHhcMDhDX87nwMy 50 BTC deposit is still sitting in this address. I believe this is the small fund that Theymos controls (or a part of it). Earlier Theymos was very careful to say that these are anonymous user funds and do not belong to any user in particular, and that if he ends up distributing them to users, that it will be a fair and equitable distribution among all users. This seems fair to me. I will not insist that my deposit be returned to me in full while other users go empty-handed just because of where it happened to end up. When considering who you want to trust to hold and distribute these funds, consider the behavior of the involved parties so far. I don't think you'll need to look far to realize who has been forthright with us, engaged us, and given us reasonable answers, and who has told us nothing and made demands that make little sense if the intent were to actually repay users, but make lots if sense if the intent is to abscond with all of the user funds. Maybe some other depositor can trace their funds to find this supposed 4000-8000 BTC address, and see if they are in fact still unspent. Or maybe someone who is inherently privy to this knowledge can just post the address. :hint: :hint: Felt your post needed to be unburried from the bottom of the page |
|
|
|
|
currently running 11.12 driver version, is a 12.X + 2.6 version gonna get any better performance that just using the 11.12 + 2.6
Thanks for the response
|
|
|
|
|
Is anyone familiar with the openCL versions and whether the ATI Stream 2.1 is compatible when scrypt mining with cgminer? Would a later version of the APP/SDK be better suited?
Running some 5830's on Win7 and on one machine with multiple sdk's installed, when switching SDK platforms to 2.4 I seem to get a little further in getting it to successfully run. Any time I use the 2.1 platform it comes back with the same errors that the other machines show that only have the single 2.1 SDK installed.
Appreciate any knowledge or experience others may have concerning this. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Is anyone familiar with the openCL versions and whether the ATI Stream 2.1 is compatible when scrypt mining with cgminer? Would a later version of the APP/SDK be better suited?
Running some 5830's on Win7 and on one machine with multiple sdk's installed, when switching SDK platforms to 2.4 I seem to get a little further in getting it to successfully run. Any time I use the 2.1 platform it comes back with the same errors that the other machines show that only have the single 2.1 SDK installed.
Appreciate any knowledge or experience others may have concerning this. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
on the next box run win7 and see the difference in the ease of getting it right
|
|
|
|
post from newbies section reposted here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=109887.0I'm following The Complete Guide To Mine Bitcoin on Xubuntu 12.04, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gw7YPYgMgNNU42skibULbJJUx_suP_CpjSEdSi8_z9U/edit?pli=1, which so far looks promising. My difficulty comes in Section VI, Install CGMiner of the guide. It says to wget http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/cgminer-2.7.5-x86_64-built.tar.bz2 ...but I shouldn't do this because I have a 32-bit system. The directory does not show a built version for 32-bit systems. However, it does have cgminer-2.7.5.tar.bz2, but this is not a built version. The instructions from this point forward assume a built version. I have the unbuilt cgminer-2.7.5.tar.bz2 but I don't know how to build it. Any help with building this would be very much appreciated. Ok...I managed to get this far: I did ./configure and that ran. But, at the end of the process, I got this message: curses.TUI...........:FOUND: ncurses
OpenCL...............:NOT FOUND. GPU mining support DISABLED That can't be good. I downloaded the ati catalyst package and that works. I thought it was supposed to install OpenCl. Does anyone know where I can get OpenCl? I have a Radeon HD 6570 on an Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit system. Thanks! Be better off posting your questions in the main CGMiner development thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.0Kano wrote a guide which is he has linked in his sig, but his was for a previous version which I believe he still prefers. He is a developer of cgminer and currently seems the most active in helping with questions/problems posted there. I will repost this for you untill you get out of the newbies section.
|
|
|
|
I'm following The Complete Guide To Mine Bitcoin on Xubuntu 12.04, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gw7YPYgMgNNU42skibULbJJUx_suP_CpjSEdSi8_z9U/edit?pli=1, which so far looks promising. My difficulty comes in Section VI, Install CGMiner of the guide. It says to wget http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/cgminer-2.7.5-x86_64-built.tar.bz2 ...but I shouldn't do this because I have a 32-bit system. The directory does not show a built version for 32-bit systems. However, it does have cgminer-2.7.5.tar.bz2, but this is not a built version. The instructions from this point forward assume a built version. I have the unbuilt cgminer-2.7.5.tar.bz2 but I don't know how to build it. Any help with building this would be very much appreciated. Ok...I managed to get this far: I did ./configure and that ran. But, at the end of the process, I got this message: curses.TUI...........:FOUND: ncurses
OpenCL...............:NOT FOUND. GPU mining support DISABLED That can't be good. I downloaded the ati catalyst package and that works. I thought it was supposed to install OpenCl. Does anyone know where I can get OpenCl? I have a Radeon HD 6570 on an Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit system. Thanks! Be better off posting your questions in the main CGMiner development thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.0Kano wrote a guide which is he has linked in his sig, but his was for a previous version which I believe he still prefers. He is a developer of cgminer and currently seems the most active in helping with questions/problems posted there. I will repost these 2 post there untill you get out of the newbies section. Reposted it here for you. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg1195019#msg1195019 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
