Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 10:08:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 204 »
821  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: January 08, 2015, 01:31:57 PM
root@antMiner:~# cat /config/cgminer.conf
{
"pools" : [
...
"bitmain-freq" : "7:200:0782",
"bitmain-voltage" : "0725",
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "1"
}


After the pools I have this:

Code:
,
"api-listen" : true,
"api-network" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:0/0",
"bitmain-freq" : "7:200:0782",
"bitmain-voltage" : "0725"
}


I'll probably try adding the queue setting and see what happens.

M
822  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: January 08, 2015, 11:52:42 AM
just add this line at the end of /config/cgminer.conf: "queue" : "1"
and if You want to set queue from shell use: /usr/bin/cgminer-api "setconfig|queue,1" (You can also let ssh do it remotely)
I did not find any difference between queue 0 and 1 in results and I do not use --lowmem

I'm guessing adding it to cgminer.conf would make the setting persistent across reboots? Definitely going to do that if so.
Files changed in /config are permanent across reboots. In the S5 there is a file /config/user_setting which has just
Code:
queue 8192
I'm not sure if the S4 is the same but if it is, that's all you need to modify, to say queue 1

user_settings doesn't exist on the S4.  There is a cgminer.conf there, but the queue setting is not there.  I may try adding it.

M
823  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: January 08, 2015, 01:26:02 AM
I'm so confused!!! According to the website, these come with SP35 units.  Either 17 or 36.  That's $.18/gh + a container.  If that's not a typo, I want one!!! or two!!! or three!!!

It looks like a scam to me.

If things look too good to be true, they probably are.  Hold tight to your BTC, some scammer wants it.

M
824  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: January 08, 2015, 12:35:50 AM
I'd like to report a bug with my SP20.

It's running outside, in my garage.  There's an S4 running there as well.  Otherwise, there is no heat source.  There is no insulation.

It's 3 degrees Fahrenheit outside.  Yet my SP20 insists the intake temperature is 0 degrees Celcius. 

I don't think it is aware that Celcius goes below zero.

M

825  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [CLOSED] SP20 - most efficient miner - ~0.5W/GH - 2 units min! on: January 08, 2015, 12:27:19 AM
Ok so there are 2.94 BTC to be donated. I was thinking of donating them like this:
- 1 BTC to the /r/millionairemakers winner (see: www.reddit.com/r/millionairemakers/comments/2q9ung/santa_is_real_thank_you_all_so_much_i_am_still_in/);
- 1 BTC to Hal Finney Bitcoin Fund for ALS Research (see: http://blog.bitcoinfoundation.org/join-teamhal-give100-wbitcoin-to-the-hal-finney-bitcoin-fund-for-als-research/);
- 0.5 BTC to ckolivas for cgminer and ckpool;
- 0.5 BTC to Armory.

Any complains/suggestions? 24 hours max.

I'd give a lot more to ck and kano.  Just about every piece of ASIC hardware out there uses cgminer.  That's for a reason.

M
826  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: January 08, 2015, 12:24:38 AM
Got 1 SP20 from a UK seller. Took advantage of the mining farm of 3 with free shipping, hopefully I'll receive it soon ! (UK based)

I would love to take advantage of the 15 sp20 farm deal but thats like 35btc (with the 15 required psus) all to make around 5btc a month

after electricity.

And with diff going up 12% next month it will make even less ROI is like six months lol.

Difficulty is going up in 4 days, not next month.

And I'm seeing 10.6%.  The increase percentage is decreasing, understandably so with the dip in BTC values.

M
827  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: January 07, 2015, 10:32:11 AM
Yep, they work perfectly with p2pool. Bitmain addressed the issue with the firmware they released on Oct. 16th, more or less. For slightly better results, it's best to use ck's firmware found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=796839.msg9242449#msg9242449

Not sure I'd say perfectly?  The still default to 8192 queue size and large amounts of stales.  I got mine down to about 3.4% stales, which is almost twice as bad as my SP20s at 1.8% stale.

Thanks for the ck firmware link, didn't know about that, will have to try it.

M

828  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: January 06, 2015, 10:10:30 PM
There is a minimum amount of hash power to expect a share in each block found, as the pool rate increases so does that minimum power requirement.

Right now I'd estimate around 500 GH/s as a safe minimum based on current active miners with payouts.

If you go to the global stats page, click on the active miners tab and sort by estimated hashrate you can get an idea of the minimum.

http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

I couldn't imagine mining on p2pool with 500 GH/s.  The variance would be horrid.

I've got about 5.7 TH/s on here, and my expected time to share is 2.5 hours.  Working backwards, that's about one share every 28.5 hours on average with 500 GH/s.

M

Agreed, it would be like a long visit to the dentist waiting for those shares, but you would expect to find one share for each block, here is an example of a miner estimated at ~500GH/s:

http://minefast.coincadence.com/miner.php?id=1LavTqNGUSwS4qHWK1d8ZRNQjCxU3bouYQ

To each their own!!

M
829  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: January 06, 2015, 10:06:25 PM
There is a minimum amount of hash power to expect a share in each block found, as the pool rate increases so does that minimum power requirement.

Right now I'd estimate around 500 GH/s as a safe minimum based on current active miners with payouts.

If you go to the global stats page, click on the active miners tab and sort by estimated hashrate you can get an idea of the minimum.

http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

I couldn't imagine mining on p2pool with 500 GH/s.  The variance would be horrid.

I've got about 5.7 TH/s on here, and my expected time to share is 2.5 hours.  Working backwards, that's about one share every 28.5 hours on average with 500 GH/s.

M
830  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: January 06, 2015, 09:48:00 PM
I'd appreciate any feedback on the node's performance. It's running on high end hardware, SSD, and is connect to the internet VIA a 175/175Mbps fiber optic connection.

That looks good to me.

Quote
Quote
The current design of p2pool has a fatal flaw.

The more hashpower it has, the higher the share difficulty gets, which knocks out "smaller" miners.
The less it has, the easier it is for smaller miners, but the longer it is from blocks.

Can't have your blocks and miners too.

M

That could be aided by big miners setting higher difficulty shares right?

It can help with very large miners, yes.  Doesn't seem like there are any right now.

M
831  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: January 06, 2015, 09:23:37 PM
Bitmain gave me 12 S5 coupons, I am still waiting to making decision what to buy.

How did you get S5 coupons? Smiley

M
832  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: January 06, 2015, 09:16:04 PM
Thanks for the chart. Sucks that they left p2pool, I wonder they did. Gotta figure out a way to get more power on the pool!

more reliable nodes ? spread the word, more support for each other & developments for p2pool

i have 2 myself & helped a buddy to make 1 on his own.

The current design of p2pool has a fatal flaw.

The more hashpower it has, the higher the share difficulty gets, which knocks out "smaller" miners.
The less it has, the easier it is for smaller miners, but the longer it is from blocks.

Can't have your blocks and miners too.

M
833  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S4 Discussion and Support Thread on: January 06, 2015, 06:46:13 PM
Please try setting the pool side DIFF to 2048 or +2050

You can try connecting to BTCGUILD.COM and see if x goes away or hashrate goes up to where it should.

The hashrate you see on the control panel and the poolside may varies due to many different factors.  Our guarantee is the machine side hashing rate


Thank you!

I suggested +2050 because 2048 causes the lastest share size not to show.

M
834  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S4 Discussion and Support Thread on: January 06, 2015, 06:43:52 PM

Was, as in past tense, and not any more?  It's certainly not a Windows app.  The files in it are:

am335x-boneblack-bitmainer.dtb
initramfs.bin.SD
MLO
omap3-mkcard.sh
readme.txt
u-boot.img
uEnv.txt
uImage.bin

There are no windows programs here.

The readme.txt says:

Code:
Operating in linux£º
1.Change to root mode using "su" cmd.
2.Insert SD reader with SD£¬linux mounts device automatically. Using "umount /dev/XXX" to umount device. XXX is device's name.
3.Using "fdisk ¨Clu" to check disk device in linux.Normal it is dev/sdb.
4.Copy omap3-mkcard.sh to linux system£¬add execute mode using "chmod +x omap3-mkcard.sh"£»"./omap3-mkcard.sh /dev/sdb" to part SD.
5.Go to /mnt directory£¬mkdir mmc1£»mount /dev/sdb1p0 mmc1.
6.Copy MLO uEnv.txt u-boot.img am335x-boneblack-bitmainer.dtb uImage.bin and initramfs.bin.SD to /mnt/mmc1 directory.
7.Umount /mnt/mmc1.
Only step 5, 6 and 7 are necessary, if SD is partitioned.

M
835  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: January 06, 2015, 05:22:07 PM
So if I would of just waited a few days before ordering I would of saved $405. basically a whole month of ROI

That is almost always true in this game, at any time, with any product.
In fact, products go from coveted to worthless in a blink of an eye.

With product usable lifetimes so short, who wants to pay the extra cost for an over-engineered product ?

If "over-engineered" means it "just works", count me in.

M

''Just Works" is useful. But if it means a metal case instead of a plastic case, I say save the money. Anything that can be done design wise to reduce the manufacturing cost of a product with an expected useful lifetime of less than a year is worth doing.

Plastic doesn't dissipate heat very well.  It also doesn't take too well to mishaps like accidental drops.

M
836  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S4 Discussion and Support Thread on: January 06, 2015, 05:13:28 PM
I am running 3 s4's since 3 weeks and have few doubts to be clarified by any experienced users. Our machines are hosted somewhere else.

In the beginning hashrate was very unstable and after upgrading to latest firmware, they became lil stable. I use p2pool.

-what does hard reset mean? In-detail please?

-1 of our miner has lower hash rates with 1 or 2 'x' asics failing always.After running it for sometime x starts appearing. Contacted bitmain and they said to test each blade and we did all troubleshooting stuff and they worked fine when connected to separate blades. Again after connecting all, 1 'x' appeared and hashrate is slow after 10hours compared to others.
For example on p2pool with default 200mhz,725v on p2pool with pseudo,actual difficulty set to /8192+8192, hash rates are as folllows after running them for 6days :
miner 1 : 1970gh
miner 2 : 1965gh
miner 3 : 1850gh ( which has asics failing issue)

All above stats are from antminer panel and p2pool graphs shows a different story. All 3miners work with same worker.
deadhashrate overall for 3 miners on pool is 270gh. shall i set difficulty to 4096 for a lower dead hash rate or is it something to do with pool?

- I am planning to overclock the frequency to 212.5mhz on 725voltage. Will that work or any consequences? I have seen people doing 225mhz with 725volt.

comments are appreciated. Thanks Smiley

Most Bitmain hardware since S1s do not function well "out of box" with p2pool.

You should be able just add "+2050" to your user names to take care of the low work size problem.

The other thing you can do to help is lower your queue size.  As far as I know the only way to do that is via SSH.  One way is:

/usr/bin/cgminer-api "setconfig|queue,0"

I think you may be able to change it in a config file as well... but I'm pretty sure, regardless how you do it, it'll get lost on the next power cycle or UI change. 

I'm currently using my S4 on p2pool locally, which makes it easier for me to set the queue size.  Once I move it to hosted I'm not sure what I'm going to do as I won't have SSH access.  I've discussed it with my host and they can set the queue size once a day.  I may end up just using something else besides p2pool.

M
837  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S4 Discussion and Support Thread on: January 06, 2015, 02:14:56 PM
For S4, if the miner powers up, the back light of the small LCD comes on but screen shows blank, highly likely it is the MicroSD card either got loose inside, or data on the microSD card got corrupted.

You will find the MicroSD card inside the case, behind the LCD panel and next to the PSU.  There is a Black Colored Beagle Bone Black and there is a little MicroSD card slot on it.  Lightly push the card and it will pop right out and push it back in.

Then please try to power it back on and see if it boots up.  If not, you may have to use this software to reimage (Write) the factory default data of S4.

Image Software (Windows):
https://bitmaintech.com/files/download/SD-partition-tool.zip

S4 Factory Default Image:
https://bitmaintech.com/files/download/initramfs.bin.SD-20141016.tar.gz

Any issues, please PM or contact our live support at 844-248-6246 Option 2

Thank you!

That link to Image Software doesn't appear to be a Windows app.

M

You can use http://sourceforge.net/projects/win32diskimager/ instead.

That's exactly what I'm using.  Bitmain needs to do a little more quality control on the info they give out.

M
838  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S4 Black Friday Deals 0.409USD/GH/s, FREE International Shipping on: January 06, 2015, 01:57:48 PM
For S4, if the miner powers up, the back light of the small LCD comes on but screen shows blank, highly likely it is the MicroSD card either got loose inside, or data on the microSD card got corrupted.

You will find the MicroSD card inside the case, behind the LCD panel and next to the PSU.  There is a Black Colored Beagle Bone Black and there is a little MicroSD card slot on it.  Lightly push the card and it will pop right out and push it back in.

Then please try to power it back on and see if it boots up.  If not, you may have to use this software to reimage (Write) the factory default data of S4.

Image Software (Windows):
https://bitmaintech.com/files/download/SD-partition-tool.zip

S4 Factory Default Image:
https://bitmaintech.com/files/download/initramfs.bin.SD-20141016.tar.gz

Any issues, please PM or contact our live support at 844-248-6246 Option 2

Thank you!

That link to Image Software doesn't appear to be a Windows app.

M
839  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: January 06, 2015, 02:37:24 AM
So if I would of just waited a few days before ordering I would of saved $405. basically a whole month of ROI

That is almost always true in this game, at any time, with any product.
In fact, products go from coveted to worthless in a blink of an eye.

With product usable lifetimes so short, who wants to pay the extra cost for an over-engineered product ?

If "over-engineered" means it "just works", count me in.

M
840  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: H/w Hosting Directory & Reputation on: January 05, 2015, 09:07:09 PM
I have two SP31 hosted with Toom.im and I am very pleased with their service.
Both machines were set-up straight on arrival. They really know SP very well and will assure you the best settings.

But they are nearly out of space for hosting so I would suggest to quickly contact them and see if there is any spot left for your project.

I first reached out to them a few weeks ago.  They responded quickly.  Since then, and now that I'm ready to ship out, they aren't responding as fast. Sad

M
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 204 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!