Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 07:25:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 »
3341  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What is the greatest threat to Bitcoin? Some possible technical problem or gov? on: January 06, 2013, 11:22:44 PM
Locked bootloaders and DRM. Example Apple IOS (iPod/iphone/iPad), Windows 8 RT on ARM with UEFI locked bootloaders, locked Android devices where the end users does not have root access etc.  The security model of Bitcoin is based upon individual users having complete control over their computing devices in order to have a truly distributed network. Now if one turns over this control to a centralized authority in order to enforce DRM then this opens up the possibility for all sorts of 51% attacks by a centralized authority. For example the US Government instructing Microsoft, Apple and Google to use DRM to paralyse the Bitcoin network.

The best countermeasure is the GPL v3, and insist on root access for owner of the device. This means GNU/Linux and in mobile the new Ubuntu phone OS will be an excellent choice. I will go as far as to suggest using GNU/Linux over Microsoft Windows for Bitcoin mining and for running full Bitcoin nodes for this reason.
3342  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: FreiCoin (FRC) Fork WITHOUT 80% Of Coins Given To FreiCoin Foundation on: January 06, 2013, 01:59:24 AM
So I take this fork / 51% takeover of FreiCoin is now dead.
3343  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bank of Italy turns off Vatican credit cards and cash machines on: January 04, 2013, 05:12:26 PM
Well, that would be a strange ally.
I'm not so sure.  I guess it would be kind-of apt should a currency that has attracted so many scams and scammers in its short life be adopted by the biggest scammer in the human history!

We should make the Pope a bitcointalk account with the scammer tag

No. Bitcoin needs to be sold to the Catholic Church as a means to save a fortune in currency conversion and banking fees.
3344  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bank of Italy turns off Vatican credit cards and cash machines on: January 04, 2013, 05:18:50 AM
maybe they'll switch to using BTC ...

So during the collection one scans a QR code with one's phone.
3345  Bitcoin / Press / Re: NEW articles in Press Forum on: January 02, 2013, 06:35:26 PM
2013-01-02 Macleans.ca: Why Bitcoin is the banking industry’s newest, biggest threat

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=134351.0
3346  Bitcoin / Press / 2013-01-02 Why Bitcoin is the banking industry’s newest, biggest threat on: January 02, 2013, 06:32:48 PM
Macleans.ca: Why Bitcoin is the banking industry’s newest, biggest threat

http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/02/why-bitcoin-is-the-banking-industrys-newest-biggest-threat/
3347  Economy / Speculation / Re: Fiscal Cliff trade on: January 02, 2013, 06:38:13 AM
Well the Biden-McConnell deal passed the US House of Representatives so now the real fun begins over the next two months with the debt ceiling and spending cuts.
3348  Economy / Speculation / Re: Fiscal Cliff trade on: January 02, 2013, 03:36:41 AM
Where can one learn the background knowledge behind the things discussed in this thread?

I wish I knew what was going on.

Here is a good starting point http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_fiscal_cliff in addition to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_debt-ceiling_crisis
3349  Economy / Speculation / Re: Fiscal Cliff trade on: January 02, 2013, 01:04:17 AM

over the next few months?

I would say two months as the US has about two months before a default if they do not raise the debt ceiling. Furthermore the spending cuts are only blocked for two months in the Biden-McConnell deal. So on this level alone were are back to April of 2011 at best. and all of this is assuming the Biden-McConnell deal passes the US House of Representatives.

Bitcoin is still minuscule in the whole scheme of things and, it would only take a minuscule amount of the hot money in the markets to find its way into Bitcoin in order to trigger a buying panic similar to the one in 2011. So I see the risk for a BTC short to be very high at this time.
3350  Economy / Speculation / Re: Fiscal Cliff trade on: January 01, 2013, 11:45:01 PM
The more interesting question is what impact will the "Fiscal Cliff" politically manufactured fiscal crisis have on the BTC / USD rate. Even if the Biden-McConnell deal passes the US House of Representatives the US still has to deal with the debt ceiling and spending cuts. The last time the US went through this manufactured fiscal crisis was in April to August of 2011 and well all know what happened to the BTC / USD rate during that period of time. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_debt-ceiling_crisis

My take is that they will eventually muddle through this mess with some sort of deal that solves little and pushes the hard political choices into the future. In the meantime there will be a lot of uncertainty regarding the US economy while these politicians play their little games. I see a significant risk of a BTC buying panic similar to that of the spring of 2011, and consequently  I would not want to be caught short BTC while this unravels.
3351  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: New Bitcoin ODP (Open Directory Project) Editor on: January 01, 2013, 01:37:17 AM
That site looks awful.  It looks like a cybersquatting placeholder.  Are there any plans by the site owner to update the visuals?  How many people actually use ODP?

The  number of people that use ODP is very few, but that is not the point. It is literally the best human edited directory out there and the major search engines trust it highly when ranking  a site.
3352  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: FreiCoin (FRC) discussion (was FreiCoin (FRC) for TRC, PPC, LTC or BTC) on: December 31, 2012, 05:45:22 AM
So if you if you are a billionaire in CAD, USD or EUR terms sure Freicoin is the currency for you since you will be able to lend it out with minimal risk to offset the demurrage and preserve your wealth.

And who would you then lend it to? Whom other than the ordinary working guy who is today paying half of his net income in various forms of interest? And now gets his loans from the very same former USD billionaire for 0%.

Quote
By the way the poor are far more likely to using CAD, USD or EUR cash than the rich.

Yes, this is naturally when living from hand to mouth. And then a yearly FRC demurrage of 5% would not even be noticed.

The profit made by the former USD billionaire is the spread between his cost say 0-1% and the retail rate which can be as high as 30% or more. However this spread has nothing to do with whether the underlying currency is inflationary or deflationary or has demurrage or not. The key is that by doing nothing namely not participating in the first place the "ordinary working guy" can avoid the transfer of wealth to the rich person since a lot of the borrowing  by the "ordinary working guy" is to finance discretionary consumptive spending. The key difference here between Bitcoin and Freicoin is that Bitcoin encourages inaction on the part of "ordinary working guy" thereby preserving his wealth, while Freicoin encourages action on the part of the "ordinary working guy" that results in a transfer of wealth to the top 1%

The point that the yearly FRC demurrage of 5% would not even be noticed is in fact very true. What is critical here is that this kind of thing is precisely how the top 1% engineers the transfer of wealth from the remaining 99%. The top 1% literally nickels and dimes the remaining 99% in order to accumulate wealth.

When one takes the time to actually figure out how the top 1% accumulates wealth at the expense of the remaining 99% it becomes very clear why Bitcoin is a far better deal for the "ordinary working guy" than Freicoin.

3353  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] BitMinter.com [ASIC support: var diff, Stratum, GBT, rolllntime] on: December 31, 2012, 04:25:27 AM
I'm not too concerned about merged mining as namecoin is useless.

Last I checked namecoins give about 3% extra income.

Namecoins and transaction fees are much more important now after the reward halving.


Thanks for the updates. Namecoin is not useless. Ironically I was going to withdraw my Namecoins when the site went down. Any idea of when you will be able to get the site back up? 
3354  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: FreiCoin (FRC) discussion (was FreiCoin (FRC) for TRC, PPC, LTC or BTC) on: December 31, 2012, 03:47:44 AM
Stopped reading here:

« In fact, the unfair economic advantages of simply being wealthy are diminished with Freicoin. In the current system of money, including the U.S. Dollar, Euro, and other national currencies, money is and always has been used to store value–money seen from the point of view of the holders, the wealthy. Freicoin emphasizes instead the view to that of the producer, the proletariat, the 99%: money as a means of buying the goods and services necessary to sustain life, and the capital required to create improved living conditions. »

It's clearly a currency designed for communists or communist-friendly people.  Not sure they even try to hide it.   They should call it "redcoin".

Well, communists have the right to exist so I guess it would be a good thing if they had their own money.  But as far as I'm concerned, I don't want any part of this.

It is actually "richcoin" masquerading as "redcoin". The irony of Freicoin is that demurrage in a manner similar to inflation actually favors the rich over the poor. The theory that the rate of interest for a very low risk loan will essentially offset the demurrage rate is in fact correct if we assume the currency itself does not have deflation or inflation. The problem is that, as in the case of inflation, this form of low risk wealth preservation is only available to the rich. Why because the typical transaction costs make lending not cost effective for the poor. With Bitcoin on the other hand the poor can preserve their meager wealth by simply doing nothing and consequently not incurring any transaction costs.

So if you if you are a billionaire in CAD, USD or EUR terms sure Freicoin is the currency for you since you will be able to lend it out with minimal risk to offset the demurrage and preserve your wealth. On the other hand the remaining 99% are way better off with Bitcoin where wealth preservation does not require the payment of fees to the 1%.

By the way the poor are far more likely to using CAD, USD or EUR cash than the rich. If fact I would not be surprised if many members of the occupy movement actually have more cash than many billionaires.
3355  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [VIDEO] Expanding the Bitcoin Business Community on: December 29, 2012, 09:14:31 PM
No-chargebacks is a selling point for merchants (admittedly the target of the video), but consumers love chargebacks.  And there are ultimately far more consumers than merchants.

Jeff there is a big difference between a cardholder filing a dispute with a merchant, a cardholder using the dispute process to execute a scam ("friendly fraud"), and a cardholder having their account compromised with unauthorized charges.

To the merchants, all 3 of those scenarios appear the same, in the form of a chargeback.  However the account numbers being compromised are by far the major contributor to the $100B payment fraud.  Friendly fraud is also on the rise as people have learned how to abuse the system to commit shoplifting.

The legitimate disputes can be resolved by using an escrow transaction.

No argument.  But again, that is purely the merchant's view.

Consumers, at least here in the US, have been trained by well known consumer advocates such as Consumer Reports, Clark Howard, NACA members and the local news "consumer beat" that credit card purchases, in particular, have a level of consumer insurance built into them.  Every 5-10 years, a new layer of consumer protection regulations are added or updated as well.

The hurdles at the consumer level are twofold, assuming a future world where bitcoins see 1000x consumer and merchant acceptance (hey, 1000x is easily realistic in a few short years, given how small we are right now):

1) Education.  "Use an escrow transaction" is a foreign language, an alien concept to Aunt Tillie.  It is not realistic for average consumer use, unless the software tools and legal system both evolve significantly from where they are today.

2) Rational economic actor choices.  The current credit card system provides significant economic and legal protections to the consumer, while hiding the costs by making the merchants bury merchant fees inside the item price.  Buying an item sans merchant fees is not likely sufficient economic incentive to abandon the legal protections currently available, for average consumers.

Now, please, don't misunderstand.  What BitPay is doing is great -- I retweeted and promoted the video.  And it is a necessary step in bitcoin's evolution.

In an optimistic forecast, one could see bitcoin taking over the majority of hard-cash-like transfers.  I imagine merchants would prefer bitcoin over having to deduce whether or not a $20 bill is counterfeit, even using the latest ink tests and scanners one sees deployed at Wal-Mart, Target, payday loan and pawn shop locations.

But the huge amount of built-in consumer protections -- and associated consumer advocacy at all levels -- is an unquestionable hurdle.

It seems more realistic that bitcoin credit cards will arise, as an optional, supplemental layer on top of the base currency:  credit cards, with standard protections consumers expect, denominated purely in bitcoins.  Much like credit cards are an optional, supplemental layer atop the US Dollar right now.

That would at least be a familiar system to current consumers.


This post does raise a valid point in that if the consumer has a credit card and possibly a debit card attached to a bank account there is a significant incentive for the consumer to use the credit card over Bitcoin for an online payment. In my case I can use a credit card with 1% cash back. At the end of the year I receive a cheque from the credit card company which I promptly use to purchase Bitcoin, and conservatively my last "cash back" Bitcoin purchase has appreciated over 100%. So what is my personal incentive to use Bitcoin here?

The answer is that I am not the target demographic. The real target demographics are:
1) Those that do not have credit cards or debit cards attached to a bank account
2) Those that do not have credit cards.

These are the people that regularly use cash for in person transactions. It is not the myth of the senior living 50 years behind the times, but rather those that are young (teens and tweens), those that are poor, and those that have poor or no credit. I posted a thread on this back in February 2012 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63526.0 In the United States we have 29% of adults do not have a credit card and in over 7% of households there is nobody that has a bank account!

I really did enjoy the video and I must add that what was presented in the video is very accurate and well researched; however I still believe that the real incentive for an online merchant to accept Bitcoin is to sell to someone who is either 14 years old or has a FICO score of 350 or thereabouts. By the way this is a huge untapped market which the current banking system simply ignores.
3356  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2012-12-26 wired.com - Wired, Tired, Expired for 2012: From Stellar to Suck on: December 27, 2012, 02:51:31 AM
Quote
What countries can I use Venmo in?

Venmo can only be used in the U.S.
from: https://venmo.com/info/fees

Now why did WordPress choose to accept Bitcoin again? Enough said.
3357  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: FreiCoin (FRC) for TRC, PPC, LTC or BTC on: December 24, 2012, 12:06:52 AM
The problem I have with FreiCoin is that it actually favors the top 1% at the expense of the remaining 99% its origins in the Occupy Movement not withstanding. It does not punish large savers at all since they can cost effectively lend or invest out their Freicoin; however it punishes small savers. This is precisely the same problem with USD.

Consider the following. two cases:

1) Go to JP Morgan with say 100,000,000 USD to invest and say you need to beat the rate of inflation to protect your capital and they will easily be able to accommodate you.

2) Now repeat the above but with only 100 USD and you will be shown the door.

With FreiCoin or USD the person with the 100 USD suffers the ravages of demurage or inflation as the case may be, while the person with the 100,000,000 USD does not. On the other hand with Bitcoin both persons are in the same boat and are protected from demurage or inflation.

You are conflating money-as-store-of-value and money-as-medium-of-exchange. Which is understandable as nearly every monetary system in existence makes the same mistake.

With Freicoin we are purposefully making a system that people will not want to use as a store-of-value. If you're sitting on a pile of freicoins wondering what to do with it, the answer is simple: invest it in something else. That something else could even be bitcoins, which complement Freicoin as an excellent store-of-value (but terrible medium-of-exchange if you're anything other than an Austrian-school economist).

The problem with this argument is that it is not cost effective for the poor to exchange back and forth between Freicoin and Bitcoin while it is very cost effective for the rich to exchange between Freicoin and Bitcoin. So the net effect is that the poor will not be able to effectively hedge against the demurage while the rich will be able to hedge.

What we have with Freicoin is an effort by the Occupy Movement to make the top 1% richer at the expense to the remaining 99%, and why is Bitcoin such a poor medium of exchange especially for poor people in any case?
3358  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: FreiCoin (FRC) for TRC, PPC, LTC or BTC on: December 23, 2012, 09:49:34 PM
The problem I have with FreiCoin is that it actually favors the top 1% at the expense of the remaining 99% its origins in the Occupy Movement not withstanding. It does not punish large savers at all since they can cost effectively lend or invest out their Freicoin; however it punishes small savers. This is precisely the same problem with USD.

Consider the following. two cases:

1) Go to JP Morgan with say 100,000,000 USD to invest and say you need to beat the rate of inflation to protect your capital and they will easily be able to accommodate you.

2) Now repeat the above but with only 100 USD and you will be shown the door.

With FreiCoin or USD the person with the 100 USD suffers the ravages of demurage or inflation as the case may be, while the person with the 100,000,000 USD does not. On the other hand with Bitcoin both persons are in the same boat and are protected from demurage or inflation.
3359  Economy / Speculation / Re: A very long weekend? on: December 22, 2012, 08:49:37 PM
...

 - http://www.facebook.com/MtGox/posts/404075009676912

Too bad there isn't a payment network that is 24/7, and doesn't rely on humans.

Oh wait, ...

There is but it only works for the Bitbears and not for the Bitbulls in this case. This after all is the point of this thread.
3360  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker on: December 19, 2012, 06:54:59 PM
Just teasing you, I need to open a vertex account somehow. All you Canadians start mining in the winter and selling coins cheap!

Yes Virtex does trade a few % below the MtGox price almost all the time, and the economics of Bitcoin mining are very different when the temperature outside is -30 C than when it is 30 C.
Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!