Bitcoin Forum
September 29, 2020, 05:29:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: March 20, 2018, 02:30:58 PM
The price of the coin is very sad. Although .. judging by the schedule - it's time to buy for those who believe in it

True, it's been a crypto-bear market recently though so it's not surprising Veri is down (though we've seen up an uptick again, how long for who knows)

Fundamentals remain unchanged, though it gets frustrating at times to see BTC govern the price on so many projects that are very far removed!
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: March 19, 2018, 12:20:43 PM
I do not know if the problem is in my browser, but when I try to access the webiste https://blog.veritaseum.com/ formatting is a bit unconfigured, which would be the best browser to access the platform?
That's an old link. I believe all of the content has been migrated to: https://veritas.veritaseum.com/ve-blog



Looks like the certificate has expired,

"veritas.veritaseum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate expired on 18 March 2018, 23:59"
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: March 17, 2018, 06:23:40 PM
Wow. The fudsters have been been active here lately. Just ignore them all and scroll on by their messages. There are many reasons that they continue to post their drivel but as much as they try, I will keep my tokens and use them on the VeADIR platform.


Indeed, it's a waste of time to do so sadly, refute the point and another straw man is thrown in.
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: March 13, 2018, 06:25:47 PM
lol feel free to call it FUD if it makes you feel better but the hard statistics say it all. The current price is below the ATH achieved 8 months ago. And this is a scamcoin that has only 2% supply in circulation. If it was even remotely good, the price would have shot through the roof with such ridiculously low liquidity Smiley

I think it's fair to say that everything crypto is below an all time high achieved months ago.

We get it, you don't like VERI! Smiley
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: March 13, 2018, 02:05:40 PM
You guys still peddling this scamcoin? It seems nobody is buying your shit anymore. The price is still the same as it was 6 months ago lol.



16th August 2017 - $117
16th February 2018 - $280

 Roll Eyes

19th July 2017 - $222
13th Mar 2018 - $158

Great achievement guys!

A few of rookie mistakes revealing your agenda there Mr Fud,

1.) You've laughably chosen the peak (19th) for your July data point, at least wait until the 19th of this month and post it then.
2.) You've chosen the BTC high not the USD high to FUD from, the USD high was on the 23rd; I know the yellow line is higher, but work out what they mean.
3.) In massaging the figures to suit your agenda you've pushed your 6 month time frame out to 8.

Other than that though, top FUDDING Roll Eyes Cheesy
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: February 16, 2018, 06:34:34 PM
You guys still peddling this scamcoin? It seems nobody is buying your shit anymore. The price is still the same as it was 6 months ago lol.



16th August 2017 - $117
16th February 2018 - $280

 Roll Eyes
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: February 11, 2018, 08:55:39 PM
You need to learn to accept contradiction.
And then figure out through reason and logic whether that contradiction is justified and fair.
If you cannot decide if something is fair or otherwise, you should ask questions first, instead of coming into a conclusion right away.
You don't know everything in this world.
Those things that you don't know of, usually makes no sense to you at first.


This guy Roll Eyes Grin Cheesy
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: February 09, 2018, 06:05:08 PM

A lot of ICO investors are intellectually bankrupt and I am very confident that includes you too.




You're right, it must be everyone else in the thread outlining their reasons why they disagree with you, including now the project owner, that are "intellectually bankrupt"


I have a very hard time giving suggestions on how to improve the product.

I think you'll find you've just made your first statement that everyone will agree with unanimously, take a bow son.
9  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: February 08, 2018, 11:24:59 PM
Um, in the second quote in this message (taken from the previous page in this thread) you state that it is "more financially rewarding for token holders" if the supply is reduced. So if, by your very words the intent of reducing supply is to boost the price, how is that not price manipulation, and further, if we believe what you say why do you have nothing more to say?
Indeed, I have nothing more to say to those that does not understand.

Dorkie has nothing more to say because he clearly cannot refute the point, instead setting up straw men and resorting to ad hominem.

If VERI is not a security, then why relate it to the market cap?   <<< -- yeah, ignore answering this all you like
As answered elsewhere already, most would agree it stems from this https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/veritaseum/ and is an informal barometer for project growth.

Reggie compared VERI to Microsoft's licenses but Microsoft does not rent nor resell its licenses.   <<< -- yeah, ignore acknowledging this all you like
Microsoft also don't do pier to pier financial transactions, furthermore rather than waste more time with this straw man, you can put "rent microsoft license" and "resell microsoft license" in your search engine of choice.



A token burn could have worked, the time for it was immediately after the ICO, prior to making and setting up deals, doing it now or further down the line raises all the negative points previously highlighted.

Dorkie I wish you all the best in your token holding here, if you refuse to acknowledge there's a downside to a token burn so be it, regardless I think it's fair to say banging your token burn drum doesn't appear to be getting much traction.
10  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: February 07, 2018, 02:15:08 PM
"Oh, you don't have anymore token? Sure, I will just borrow from the renters. No big deal with that."

"Wow, $4,000 each? Make it $400,000 each. Problem? Ehhhh... I don't think so. As I am just going to get $8000 worth of exposure (from the initial price of $400 per VERI before it went up to $4,000 or even $400,000), I will continue to get $400 worth of VERI. What? It was $400 a piece and now it's at $400,000 a piece? Sure, I will just get 0.001 VERI for my $8000 worth of exposure. Thanks to high divisibility, you can't stop me with limited supply. Bwah hah hah haaa..."

Only stupid people fail to understand.

Update:
Sheep = "Burning unsold token is against capitalism, because Reggie says so."

This guy Roll Eyes

Veritaseum is a business looking to sell Veritasuem tokens for services, you cannot just change the parameters of the token in order to "get rich quick" a bunch of previous investors which you seem desperate to see, meanwhile expecting to be taken seriously going forward, remember all those FUD cries of "scam"? Well they'd be fully legitimised with your token burning, how can you expect anyone to have faith in the Veritaseum ecosystem if they mess about with the core principles?
11  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: February 06, 2018, 03:06:31 PM
If you're in the business of selling the token as the Veri team are, how would you explain a "token burn" to your next potential clients?

"Oh yeah, well we sold X amount to this company last week at $400 each, but now we've burned a load of the tokens, so it'll cost you $4,000 each"

 Roll Eyes
12  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: January 09, 2018, 10:34:54 PM
I was thinking earlier about old time gold rushes and how other than those who got in really early, the smart money wasn't being made trying to find the gold, but selling the tools and carts.

I think this applies here, Bitcoin is the goldrush, and Veritaseum the tools and carts.
13  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: December 21, 2017, 08:51:40 PM
Quick question, if etherdelta is currently inaccessible due to the hack - I mean we can access etherdelta but at our own risk. My browser is telling me (and I have metamask) that it is not good to access etherdelta right now as it is phishing. Where one can buy Veritaseum other than ED?
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/veritaseum/#markets

It's an impressive rise today given that Etherdelta is still currently stuffed.

This project really hasn't had the rub of the green! But importantly it keeps striding forward Cool
14  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: December 20, 2017, 05:45:18 PM
Reggie live on Youtube now with VeADIR demo...
https://twitter.com/ReggieMiddleton/status/943533951636951040


This is looking slick, REALLY slick.
15  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: December 04, 2017, 11:04:58 PM
Clif just predicted VERI moon on the December 3rd 3 Amigos earlier today ... even though all the cryptos will be going way up starting in late February his exact words were "VERI will dominate" and gave example of winners going up 10-12% per day ... at the same time VERI will be going up 30% PER DAY

 Cheesy

As I said at the end of the Veritaseum ico ... "see you on the Forbes List"

He also said VERI 18k in February or that VERI would do great in August... lol

They often have interesting discussions, but yeah what is with the web-bot malarky, why do so many people pay so much attention to it Huh Is there a verifiable track record of it being correct?
16  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: November 28, 2017, 10:55:39 PM
From Reggie Middleton 2 hours ago on Twitter.

Listen to what I've said 3 1/2 years ago https://youtu.be/4FBFnfsv0A8

Wait until you guys see what Veritaseum releases over the next few weeks or so. We will redefine the concepts if "game changer", "Autonomy" and "disruption."

Interesting times ahead as we're Veri much under the radar here still, the FUDDERS are still FUDDING https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/19/100-cryptocurrencies-described-in-4-words-or-less/ <- though I don't think it's an intentional hit job, I think the author is ignorant and a bit of a PUDDING Grin


If Reggie hits this out of the park as he's suggesting above the price will take care of itself and the fundamentals will be set for a solid long term hold. "Lambo" talk is crass and would, if you're familiar with the the objective of Veritaseum, be a potentially catastrophic misallocation of capital.

Read Reggie's statements RE multi generational wealth, that said, hell it's your money do what you want with it Lips sealed
17  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: October 25, 2017, 12:30:35 PM
Of course it's time consuming! Roll Eyes And if he bites, the FUDsters will keep on fishing.

Having watched Reggie doing livestreams, they're usually between meetings so he's making the most effective use of his time possible, the FUDsters didn't even bother to attend his last livestream despite the start time being announced in advance.

It is time consuming to those who are incompetent or have no will power.

Having participated in the ICO and ticking the box of making a small purchase (which went through fine) I'd like to hear more about this allegation.
Are you saying they refused or rejected ETH sent to the ICO address? Because we could check that using ethplorer or such.

I am not saying they refused or rejected ETH sent. I am saying if you contacted him or his team through email and/or phone during the ICO on how to make a small transaction, he would ignore you. At that time during the ICO, you can actually participate by sending directly to his personal addresses with BTC/ETH outside of ETH smart contract, whereby there will be few business days of processing time. Like I said, it was private and confidential. You can choose not to believe. But what the fuck, you can choose to believe all the good things about something and totally ignore everything else about it that is wrong. I don't care if Reggie is not financially humble. I don't even care if he is also dishonest with that. I only care if he does the right thing to make Veritaseum works and make me money. Don't give me the bullshit that he cares. Let's be professional.

If Reggie announces a killer deal in the near future would you still state he's "incompetent and has no will power"? Whether this happens of course remains to be seen.

Hell maybe your ICO stories happened, I'm not ruling it out, he's a busy guy and likely didn't have time to answer everyone mailing him direct.

Like I said I participated in the ICO with a small investment, you know what I had to do? Follow a step by step guide on the VERI website, a direct link to it was tweeted by Reggie more than once, sorry to hear those people couldn't follow simple instructions, perhaps they can join those in the salty corner who didn't invest due to the look of the website.

I only care if he does the right thing to make Veritaseum works and make me money

Well, Reggie currently defines "the right thing" as a route of action you're unhappy with, hopefully it'll still make you money, and by default everyone else here.

All the best.
18  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: October 25, 2017, 09:43:42 AM
If it wasn't time consuming they'd have already done it, if it was an effective usage of time above what they're dealing with now, they'd have already done it. They likely also realise that even if they refute everything from a FUDster they will just cook up more, why does it matter if a FUD company set up overnight "appears stupid"? It doesn't, they've effectively wasted the companies time and they can just create another account / domain / identity and start again with similar worded, but essentially the same old FUD.

It is not time consuming. It is just lack of will power.
Nobody here ever questioned why doing countless of Youtube videos are not time consuming.

Everything is easy when there is will power.

Of course it's time consuming! Roll Eyes And if he bites, the FUDsters will keep on fishing.

Having watched Reggie doing livestreams, they're usually between meetings so he's making the most effective use of his time possible, the FUDsters didn't even bother to attend his last livestream despite the start time being announced in advance.

I do not believe Reggie is financially humble. During the ICO, he wouldn't even bother to entertain people that want to do small purchases (he totally ignored such small-timer participants). I don't want to state the details as this is private and confidential that happens to more than 1 person.

Having participated in the ICO and ticking the box of making a small purchase (which went through fine) I'd like to hear more about this allegation.
Are you saying they refused or rejected ETH sent to the ICO address? Because we could check that using ethplorer or such.
19  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: October 25, 2017, 07:36:00 AM
I'd rather Reggie be out doing deals and what he thinks is best for the business, which makes sense given he runs it...

The VERI team could spend days putting together the most comprehensive FAQ, or full lengthy video refutations (which would mostly be going over old ground) the FUDsters wouldn't stop, if they're not disclosing who they are and why they're paying to spread FUD then they clearly have an agenda and won't stop regardless of circumstances. These FUDsters know very well that the order of magnitude to refute BS is much, much higher than it is to spread it, it's an effective tactic to waste a companies resources and time.

We all have to remember this is a private company, so unfortunately we can't be privy to everything going on, whilst it's possible we have good suggestions we'll never be able to see the full picture as opposed to those working on the inside, you either trust Reggie and the team to do what's best for the business with the resources at his disposal, or you don't.

If you have the will, you will find the way. Why do you think putting a comprehensive FAQ and a full length video to refute the FUD is a very costly and/or time-consuming thing to do? You are wrong. If the team is a fighter by quickly refuting any FUD, the FUDsters would quit. If you have already debunked their argument, they will not repeat the same FUD or else they will make themselves appear stupid. Waste company's resources? Reggie himself said his job is to talk. He should have spend more time countering all the FUDs more effectively and professionally.

If it wasn't time consuming they'd have already done it, if it was an effective usage of time above what they're dealing with now, they'd have already done it. They likely also realise that even if they refute everything from a FUDster they will just cook up more, why does it matter if a FUD company set up overnight "appears stupid"? It doesn't, they've effectively wasted the companies time and they can just create another account / domain / identity and start again with similar worded, but essentially the same old FUD.

I think Reggie is too overconfident to the point of ignoring all the limitations that continue to haunt the company, and may potentially cripple the company too if left continuously unattended.

Many followers here are so idiotic their comments are simply dumb. Their arguments are simply:
1. No whitepaper is necessary.
2. No website is necessary.
3. No FAQ is necessary.
4. No transparency of team is necessary.

All the above (and probably more) are unnecessary because Reggie says so.

You guys are banking entirely on Reggie's competency in closing deals.
Otherwise, everything would screw up.

Everyone is "idiotic and dumb" for not thinking the same as you? Including by your assertions the company founder who has refuted (with reasons) multiple times the needs for points 1 and 2, which is unfortunate for you because he runs the company, and you do not.

I don't think anyone here is going to argue against work needing doing on 3 and 4, and probably 2.
I agree that yes the FAQ could do with updating, yes team transparency could be better and yes the website could be slicker than it is. But, I also believe that Reggie is focusing his and the team efforts where he sees maximum value for the business, clearly this is not currently aligned with what you want to see and is irksome, especially if you have a large holding as you state.

I agree with you on the likely "price" action (ie tank) if there is a failure to seal deals such as the JSE and others, you raised this yourself, so I have to ask what do you want more? Deals closing, or your list of points to be addressed? Clearly there isn't the resources right now to do both.

All the best.
20  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD on: October 24, 2017, 04:17:30 PM
I'd rather Reggie be out doing deals and what he thinks is best for the business, which makes sense given he runs it...

The VERI team could spend days putting together the most comprehensive FAQ, or full lengthy video refutations (which would mostly be going over old ground) the FUDsters wouldn't stop, if they're not disclosing who they are and why they're paying to spread FUD then they clearly have an agenda and won't stop regardless of circumstances. These FUDsters know very well that the order of magnitude to refute BS is much, much higher than it is to spread it, it's an effective tactic to waste a companies resources and time.

We all have to remember this is a private company, so unfortunately we can't be privy to everything going on, whilst it's possible we have good suggestions we'll never be able to see the full picture as opposed to those working on the inside, you either trust Reggie and the team to do what's best for the business with the resources at his disposal, or you don't.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!