583
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] μ - Bitcoin Venture Capital (Asset ID "MU")
|
on: May 30, 2012, 07:32:27 AM
|
I like what you are doing with this fund and enjoy your updates Thank you very much for your appreciation. We think till now the biggest advantage of choosing our fund, is that we provide a nice option for people who want nice return rates without directly or indirectly involved in Pirate -- In spite of being away from Pirate, our return rates are not bad at all. We did buy some PPT.x bonds before, but we just quickly sold them off within hours and reduced the risk to a very low level. We are even less unlikely to do that again in the future. So we are moving from "almost-Pirate-free" to "totally-Pirate-free". So we suggest people to buy our shares if they want diversity. We probably could never make 7% a week as Pirate does, but our financials are public, and we only invest in businesses of which the business models are open.
|
|
|
584
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] μ - Bitcoin Venture Capital (Asset ID "MU")
|
on: May 30, 2012, 06:01:26 AM
|
Weekly Financial Disclosure
Time: 13:31 AM, Beijing time Date: May 30, 2012
Funds of Last Week: 104.036BTC Number of Total Shares in Circulation: 5000
Assets:
BitBond Original: 401shares 243.808BTC Bought in: 0shares 0.000BTC Average Holding Price: 0.608BTC Sold: 0shares 0.000BTC Average Selling Price: N/A Holding: 401+0-0=401shares 243.808BTC Net Gain: 0.000BTC Dividends Paid: 3.524BTC
BDK Original: 10shares 0.660BTC Bought in: 0shares 0.000BTC Average Holding Price: 0.066BTC Sold: 10shares 1.850BTC Average Selling Price: 0.185BTC Holding: 10+0-10=0shares 0.000BTC Net Gain: 1.850-0.660=1.190BTC Dividends Paid: 0.000BTC
JLP-BMD Original: 1618shares 405.530BTC Bought in: 0shares 0.000BTC Average Holding Price: 0.251BTC Sold: 48shares 14.400BTC Average Selling Price: 0.3BTC Holding: 1618+0-48=1570shares 394.070BTC Net Gain: (0.3-0.251)*48=2.352BTC Dividends Paid: 11.452BTC
Cognitive Original: 300shares 155.700BTC Bought in: 0shares 0.000BTC Average Holding Price: 0.519BTC Sold: 200shares 119.800BTC Average Selling Price: 0.599BTC Holding: 300+0-200=100shares 51.900BTC Net Gain: (0.599-0.519)*200=16.000BTC Dividends Paid: 0.277BTC
TEEK.B Original: 70shares 66.500BTC Bought in: 0shares 0.000BTC Average Holding Price: 0.950BTC Sold: 70shares 72.660BTC Average Selling Price: 1.038BTC Holding: 70+0-70=0shares 0.000BTC Net Gain: (1.038-0.950)*70=6.160BTC Dividends Paid: 0.000BTC
YABMC Original: 1149shares 329.763BTC Bought in: 200shares 54.108BTC Average Holding Price: (329.763+54.108)/(1149+200)=0.285BTC Sold: 10shares 3.200BTC Average Selling Price: 0.320BTC Holding: 1149+200-10=1339shares 381.615BTC Net Gain: (0.320-0.285)*10=0.350BTC Dividends Paid: 15.867BTC
Holding Funds= 104.036-0.000+0.000+3.524-0.000+1.850+0.000-0.000+14.400+11.452-0.000+119.800+0.277- 0.000+72.600+0.000-54.108+0.320+15.867=290.018BTC
Total Net Gain= 0.000+3.524+1.190+0.000+2.352+11.452+16.000+0.277+6.160+0.000+0.350+15.867=57.172BTC
Calculated Dividends: 53.735*35%=20.010BTC
Usable Funds: 290.018-20.010=270.008BTC
Actual Dividends: 20.010BTC
NAV: 270.008+100*0.593+401*0.625+1570*0.267+1339*0.299=1399.484BTC Weekly NAV Growth: (1399.484-1355.138)/1355.138=3.272%
|
|
|
585
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOORE: Mining Bond Beating the Moore's Law
|
on: May 30, 2012, 05:25:01 AM
|
1st Payment
Calculation time: May 30, 05:07:33 forum time
For compensation of my delay of IPO, the first coupon is calculated with a full week instead of six days.
Number of difficulty change: 1 Number of block reward change: 0
Time interval before difficulty change: Starting from: May 23, 05:07:33 Ending at: May 24, 18:10:29 Total time: 133754s Difficulty: 1,733,207.51
Time interval after difficulty change: Starting from: May 24, 18:10:29 Ending at: May 30, 05:07:32 Total time: 471046s Difficulty: 1,591,074.96
Hashrate of this week: 1MH/s
coupon/share = (1*10^6)/(2^32)*(133754*50/1733207.51+471046*50/1591074.96)=0.0043449
Number of Shares: 5437
Total Payment: 23.6232213
|
|
|
586
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] Mining Company Operating with 4.05 GHash/s - JLP-BMD
|
on: May 28, 2012, 02:54:21 PM
|
That was a mistake on my part. I had clicked the pay divided button but it didn't respond for a minute. So I clicked it again and apparently it sent out twice.
I am covering my mistake so everyone enjoy the free divided!
In fact I'm enjoy your timely and regular reply more. Hope you could keep being more active than the last several weeks.
|
|
|
588
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOVETO.FUND - MoveTo Growth Fund
|
on: May 28, 2012, 05:54:17 AM
|
Assume the average coupon/face rate of mining bonds at this moment is 1.4% per week. Then MOVETO.FUND could have the expected return rate of 1.4%*2-0.75%=2.05% per week by just holding a bunch of mining bonds and do no trading at all. If you decide to be more risk tolerated and do some trading, it could be much more.
However, it all depends on how MOVETO.BOND sells. BDK.BND pays 1% per week and is issued by a forum member who already established his fame. Its current market cap has not exceeded 3,000 BTC. If I were you, I will consider 1,000 BTC by selling MOVETO.BOND to be very very lucky, because both the interest rates and existing credits of BDK.BND are better than MOVETO.BOND.
So: Are you OK with starting small? Could you still operate well without a fully deployed 2x leverage? If MOVETO.BOND doesn't sell well, then MOVETO.FUND will probably also not, because investors know that your fund relies on leverages.
I guess you have considered them all already. But I still hope my questions could help you with a something like a plan-B if things don't turn out to be perfect.
|
|
|
589
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] μ - Bitcoin Venture Capital (Asset ID "MU")
|
on: May 25, 2012, 06:37:55 AM
|
Update
The MU index is a hobby-like project at this moment. Its frequency and authority is not guaranteed.
We will evolve it to a much regular and professional index based on a fixed formula to evaluate performance and decide which assets to contain, when we have enough time.
|
|
|
590
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] μ - Bitcoin Venture Capital (Asset ID "MU")
|
on: May 25, 2012, 06:33:56 AM
|
The MU Index for GLBSE
60.32 (kBTC) 309.31 (kDollar)
BTC Price: 5.128$
TyGrr-Bot Category: Long Term Bond Business: Arbitraging Shares in Circulation: 7326 Avg Price: 0.971BTC Total Value: 7113.546BTC Total Value in Dollar: 36478.264$
PureMining Category: Perpetual Bond Business: Mining Shares in Circulation: 10000 Avg Price: 0.438BTC Total Value: 4380.000BTC Total Value in Dollar: 22460.640$
GigaMining Category: Perpetual Bond Business: Mining Shares in Circulation: 20000 Avg Price: 1.504BTC Total Value: 30080.000BTC Total Value in Dollar: 154250.240$
Cognitive Category: Stock Business: Mining Shares in Circulation: 5000 Avg Price: 0.583BTC Total Value: 2915.000BTC Total Value in Dollar: 14948.120$
FPGA.contract Category: Stock Business: Mining Shares in Circulation: 6000 Avg Price: 0.373BTC Total Value: 2238.000BTC Total Value in Dollar: 11476.464$
BFLS Category: Stock Business: Mining Shares in Circulation: 4210 Avg Price: 1.600BTC Total Value: 6736.000BTC Total Value in Dollar: 34532.208$
BMMO Category: Stock Business: Mining Shares in Circulation: 6931 Avg Price: 0.326BTC Total Value: 2259.506BTC Total Value in Dollar: 11586.747$
SS Category: Stock Business: Fund Shares in Circulation: 610 Avg Price: 2.172BTC Total Value: 1324.920BTC Total Value in Dollar: 6794.190$
MU Category: Stock Business: Fund Shares in Circulation: 5000 Avg Price: 0.650BTC Total Value: 3250.000BTC Total Value in Dollar: 16666.000$
|
|
|
592
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOORE: Mining Bond Beating the Moore's Law
|
on: May 25, 2012, 04:42:09 AM
|
Looks like some more investors need to be found...
I have processed in total of more than 5,000 shares of bulk purchase till now. That's about 1/4 of the total IPO size. But I agree with you. The amount of invested BTC so far is still far away from the capability I could handle. And I will need more investments to get enough funds to enjoy the wholesale price of FPGAs. Thanks for your interest.
|
|
|
593
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOORE: Mining Bond Beating the Moore's Law
|
on: May 24, 2012, 11:18:02 AM
|
How the issuer hedges its obligations with mining hardware or otherwise is a matter for the issuer.
Well in fact it's not. It makes difference in risks, therefore the difference in the return rates. One of the reasons why mining bonds (of which the return rate is lower than lending) are still interesting at this moment at all, is that the investors know that there are real hardware always working to produce Bitcoins and therefore more confident about investing.
|
|
|
594
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOORE: Mining Bond Beating the Moore's Law
|
on: May 24, 2012, 11:02:21 AM
|
Are you a mining company who will utilize the funds directly, or are you using the proceeds to purchase other mining bonds?
As said in the OP, we will do both at the start, but quickly turn to a portfolio composed mainly by real hardware to reduce both my cost and my risk. Thanks. The IPO has already been started. I'm very sorry for the delay. Paying out dividends/interest from deposits is also known as a "Ponzi" scheme. What fraction of initial deposits are we talking about and how "quickly" will you start real mining with at least the hash rate you are paying out? I won't touch a single share until then... When I replied the question of BrightAnarchist, what " utilize the funds directly" in my mind was " using the funds to buy hardware", because the context was " a mining company". This is also our OP implied. Unfortunately it could also be read as " paying out from deposits", which I didn't realize before, and I will never do this. So what I said " do both at the start" means that the coupons will initially come from the current hardware in my control, and the coupons from other mining bonds. But the portion of the latter will decrease as we get new hardware. Relying on too much other mining assets for too long a time increases my risks and reduces my potential profits. Therefore the direct answers to your questions are: 1. What fraction of initial deposits are we talking about? Answer: 0%. We will not pay the capital. 2. How "quickly" will you start real mining with at least the hash rate you are paying out? Answer: I will start real mining immediately (in fact the current hardware already mined for a long time), but if the mining power in my control (10GH/s) at this moment couldn't support the coupons, I will invest on some other mining bonds. The expansion will be done in 4-6 weeks. After that, most capital from other mining assets will be switched to real hardware. Thank you for your question and hope my answers could help clarify. Very sorry for the confusion I brought.
|
|
|
595
|
Economy / Securities / Re: Motion Passed! Starting a new FPGA mining farm/contract! Cognitive on [GLBSE]
|
on: May 24, 2012, 05:41:07 AM
|
Actually, the first thing I considered was buying back shares with extra capital, but I thought it would be better for the GLBSE economy to reinvest into others. I will raise a few motions soon regarding the extra funds, the one with the best yes/no ratio will be put in to effect.
Are there any other suggestions?
I would suggest 1-2 additional GPUs, or collect a little more BTC to buy another FPGA board.
|
|
|
596
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] Mining Company Operating with 4.05 GHash/s - JLP-BMD
|
on: May 24, 2012, 04:56:28 AM
|
The third 7970 is scheduled to arrive today, and will be installed later tonight.
Great to know this. Thank you. We have also sold all outstanding shares and I would like to thank all shareholders for that.
We had a suggestion to purchase Lancelot FPGA boards with the remaining funds instead 2 Radeon HD 7990s. If there is interest in this I will raise a motion, otherwise I will follow the plan laid out earlier.
We disclose that we are behind both of these. In fact everybody could see from our financials about the first one. Finally, I would like to apologize for the sudden absence of myself from the discussions here and on the M.ETF thread. I should have made some mention that I was having some troubles but I did not, and you all suffered for it.
It's OK. But could find some trustworthy guy when you are absent. She/he doesn't need to do too much. Just paying out the dividends in time would be a very good thing to us.
|
|
|
597
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] μ - Bitcoin Venture Capital (Asset ID "MU")
|
on: May 24, 2012, 04:27:41 AM
|
Update
The second round of public offering has finished. All the 1,200 public and 700 private shares are all sold out, much more quickly than we thought. The CEO permanently gives up his fee and takes 100 shares as his compensation, as was passed by the motion.
Thank to all new and old investors. We've successfully expanded to a larger scale now. Towards great value and growth we are coming!
That's an interesting idea. If you had 1 bitcoin dividend among 95 shares with a 5% management fee, each share would receive 0.01 bitcoins dividend. but if you had 100 shares (but you owned 5 of them) then each share would still, obviously, receive 0.01 bitcoins dividend. In fact I like that idea a lot as it eases the accounting to a great degree. You're a smart guy, I don't think I ever would have thought of that. Well I think it's quite a standard way of compensation for managers. Cognitive, FPGA.contract and TyGrr did that long before. I'm not sure that's correct about TyGrr. From memory, Goat kept a majority of the company based on his own assets put in, but the management fee comes out of the dividends. I checked the main thread of TyGrr Tech again. I guess you are right. We used the fee structure before, though we never really took any fee during that time. Later we passed a motion to give the CEO 5% of the new shares whenever we do expansion ( https://glbse.com/vote/view/21).
|
|
|
598
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOORE: Mining Bond Beating the Moore's Law
|
on: May 24, 2012, 02:46:43 AM
|
Are you a mining company who will utilize the funds directly, or are you using the proceeds to purchase other mining bonds?
As said in the OP, we will do both at the start, but quickly turn to a portfolio composed mainly by real hardware to reduce both my cost and my risk. Thanks. The IPO has already been started. I'm very sorry for the delay.
|
|
|
599
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] μ - Bitcoin Venture Capital (Asset ID "MU")
|
on: May 24, 2012, 02:44:55 AM
|
Update
The second round of public offering has finished. All the 1,200 public and 700 private shares are all sold out, much more quickly than we thought. The CEO permanently gives up his fee and takes 100 shares as his compensation, as was passed by the motion.
Thank to all new and old investors. We've successfully expanded to a larger scale now. Towards great value and growth we are coming!
That's an interesting idea. If you had 1 bitcoin dividend among 95 shares with a 5% management fee, each share would receive 0.01 bitcoins dividend. but if you had 100 shares (but you owned 5 of them) then each share would still, obviously, receive 0.01 bitcoins dividend. In fact I like that idea a lot as it eases the accounting to a great degree. You're a smart guy, I don't think I ever would have thought of that. Well I think it's quite a standard way of compensation for managers. Cognitive, FPGA.contract and TyGrr did that long before.
|
|
|
600
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOORE: Mining Bond Beating the Moore's Law
|
on: May 24, 2012, 02:00:17 AM
|
Update
I sincerely apologize for the confusion of time I made. I am online each day for a long time, but not from day to night. I couldn't get access to internet within a certain time interval every day. Very sorry for the late.
There are 20,000 shares for sale at the first round. 5,000 are for IPO sale and the rest are for bulk purchase.
I will be in no way hauled away by the Chinese government in a foreseeable time. It likes to intervene with everything, but there are much more things other than Bitcoin-related stuff that are interesting to them. Maybe 5 years later, the market cap of Bitcoin exceeds Apple and we finally catche its eyes, but not now.
|
|
|
|