|
aaah.. equilibrium feels so good. hashpower distribution in the last days:
33% zpool.ca
33% Fred
33% the third one with changing addresses
|
|
|
|
UNINTENTIONAL CHAIN SPLIT REPORT
While monitoring the Crown blockchain we encountered multiple chains that seem to be the result of unintentional fragmentation.
We are closely monitoring the situation and will update you all with a fix as soon as we can.
For now, please refrain from making transactions or setting up new Masternodes/Systemnodes.
Thank you for your patience while we resolve this issue,
The Crown development team Unintentional? Lets call it by name: The network is under contant 95% attack.. since a whole year there is one miner mining all of the coins. he changes his address several times a week - but he mines nearly all blocks, all in a row. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/crw/#@difffour days ago he maybe had a problem - then real pools again had a chance and mined blocks. now he is back on track.. this big hashrate fluctuations probably cause confusion in the network. i don't really see a solution.. so maybe POS is a good idea.. or 5 algo mining like DGB/XVG/MYR ? Fred |
|
|
|
Also thought they are scammers ( One month vacation.. ticket system closed.. wtf? ) but i now got a big amount of CRW back. they have been freezed for like 2 month.. but now withdrawal was possible  |
|
|
|
how can i tranfer zWGR back to WGR? doesnt work on linux daemon.. what is the correct command? i also tried it on windows, wagerrd-qt .. it just crashed when creating the command.. spendzerocoin 500 error: {"code":-1,"message":"spendzerocoin <amount> <mintchange [true|false]> <minimizechange [true|false]> <securitylevel [1-100]> <address>\nOverview: Convert zWGR (zerocoins) into WGR. \namount: amount to spend\nmintchange: if there is left over WGR (change), the wallet can convert it automatically back to zerocoins [true]\nminimizechange: try to minimize the returning change [false]\nsecurity level: the amount of checkpoints to add to the accumulator. A checkpoint contains 10 blocks worth of zerocoinmints.The more checkpoints that are added, the more untraceable the transaction will be. Use [100] to add the maximum amountof checkpoints available. Tip: adding more checkpoints makes the minting process take longer\naddress: Send straight to an address or leave the address blank and the wallet will send to a change address. If there is change thenan address is required"} spendzerocoin 500 false false 1
error: {"code":-4,"message":"CoinSpend: Accumulator witness does not verify"}
spendzerocoin 499 false false 1
error: {"code":-4,"message":"Need address because change is not exact"} spendzerocoin 500 false false 1 Wi9zZT1PmbFoWnEEaaDaHthnreHWaCNsku
error: Error parsing JSON:Wi9zZT1PmbFoWnEEaaDaHthnreHWaCNsku |
|
|
|
so where is my money? i have the newest wagerr wallet from github.. 24 hours ago i requested my wagerr from waves ( this manual: https://news.wagerr.com/how-to-swap-from-waves-to-wagerr-mainnet/ ). i think block 6261 seems to be the correct number now.. so when will my funds arrive? wagerr-cli getinfo
{
"version": 1043400,
"protocolversion": 70916,
"walletversion": 61000,
"balance": 0.00000000,
"zerocoinbalance": 0.00000000,
"blocks": 6261,
"timeoffset": 0,
"connections": 8,
"proxy": "",
"difficulty": 1527572.642442127,
"testnet": false,
"moneysupply": 198360467.46974875,
"zWGRsupply": {
"1": 69.00000000,
"5": 105.00000000,
"10": 470.00000000,
"50": 1050.00000000,
"100": 3200.00000000,
"500": 12000.00000000,
"1000": 61000.00000000,
"5000": 85000.00000000,
"total": 162894.00000000
},
"keypoololdest": 1518877617,
"keypoolsize": 1001,
"paytxfee": 0.00000000,
"relayfee": 0.00010000,
"staking status": "Staking Not Active",
"errors": ""
}
|
|
|
|
|
i have 1684977 blocks:
addnode=173.212.202.33:9340
how can i help, what to upload?
|
|
|
|
Scrypt....
but quite high diff.. didn't expect it for this coin.. ( maybe good target because of inactive devoplers? ) |
|
|
|
every bock hit at bcc.coin-miners.info is coming out orphaned, with no exception. Its never been like this. What the fuck is going on? the Chinese are fucking with the chain, guess it's time to dump BCC. Turning out to be just like Bitmark was, mine a bunch of blocks, then the Chinese peers re-connect with a few hundred blocks making the chain re-organize and invalidate everyone elses blocks. yes. i think this is the end of this chain. |
|
|
|
since some hours, multipool is down ( website and stratum ) what is the new reference? |
|
|
|
|
thank you for the information here.
no hardfork please.
please give us addnodes for the correct multipool.us chain.
other wise this pool has an unfair advantage / 51% attack.
|
|
|
|
./configure --disable-tests yes, it now works. thank you! |
|
|
|
The new code doesnt compile. any ideas? CXX test/test_test_crown-rpc_tests.o
CXX test/test_test_crown-sanity_tests.o
test/prevector_tests.cpp:12:31: fatal error: test/test_bitcoin.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c table/table.cc -o table/table.o
make[2]: *** [test/test_test_crown-prevector_tests.o] Error 1
Makefile:6476: recipe for target 'test/test_test_crown-prevector_tests.o' failed
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c table/table_builder.cc -o table/table_builder.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c table/two_level_iterator.cc -o table/two_level_iterator.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/arena.cc -o util/arena.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/bloom.cc -o util/bloom.o
util/bloom.cc: In member function 'virtual void leveldb::{anonymous}::BloomFilterPolicy::CreateFilter(const leveldb::Slice*, int, std::__cxx11::string*) const':
util/bloom.cc:50:26: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
for (size_t i = 0; i < n; i++) {
^
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/cache.cc -o util/cache.o
At global scope:
cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option '-Wno-self-assign'
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/coding.cc -o util/coding.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/comparator.cc -o util/comparator.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/crc32c.cc -o util/crc32c.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/env.cc -o util/env.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/env_posix.cc -o util/env_posix.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/env_win.cc -o util/env_win.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/filter_policy.cc -o util/filter_policy.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/hash.cc -o util/hash.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/histogram.cc -o util/histogram.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/logging.cc -o util/logging.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/options.cc -o util/options.o
util/logging.cc: In function 'bool leveldb::ConsumeDecimalNumber(leveldb::Slice*, uint64_t*)':
util/logging.cc:58:40: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
(v == kMaxUint64/10 && delta > kMaxUint64%10)) {
^
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/status.cc -o util/status.o
g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c port/port_posix.cc -o port/port_posix.o
At global scope:
cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option '-Wno-self-assign'
rm -f libleveldb.a
/usr/bin/ar -rs libleveldb.a db/builder.o db/c.o db/db_impl.o db/db_iter.o db/dbformat.o db/dumpfile.o db/filename.o db/log_reader.o db/log_writer.o db/memtable.o db/repair.o db/table_cache.o db/version_edit.o db/version_set.o db/write_batch.o table/block.o table/block_builder.o table/filter_block.o table/format.o table/iterator.o table/merger.o table/table.o table/table_builder.o table/two_level_iterator.o util/arena.o util/bloom.o util/cache.o util/coding.o util/comparator.o util/crc32c.o util/env.o util/env_posix.o util/env_win.o util/filter_policy.o util/hash.o util/histogram.o util/logging.o util/options.o util/status.o port/port_posix.o
/usr/bin/ar: creating libleveldb.a
make[3]: Leaving directory '/root/crowncoin/src/leveldb'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/root/crowncoin/src'
Makefile:6836: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/crowncoin/src'
Makefile:570: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
|
|
|
|
|
so.. when will you finally release the software? and when will you distribute the coins? no update for a long time..
|
|
|
|
|
to the pool ops/devs:
how can i mine this coin? when i use the common getblocktemplate i get an error:
{"method":"getblocktemplate","params":[{"capabilities":["coinbasetxn","workid","coinbase/append"],"rules":["segwit"]}],"id":7}
->
{"result":null,"error":{"code":-8,"message":"Invalid mode"},"id":7}
i can do
{"method":"getblocktemplate","params":[],"id":7}
->
{
"version" : 1,
"previousblockhash" : "000000000000011d6f5b0d86a83fdcf639669f1049640b65c921854f088a109f",
"transactions" : [
],
"coinbaseaux" : {
"flags" : "062f503253482f"
},
"coinbasevalue" : 1429710000,
"target" : "00000000000002ee6b0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"mintime" : 1505916857,
"mutable" : [
"time",
"transactions",
"prevblock"
],
"noncerange" : "00000000ffffffff",
"sigoplimit" : 20000,
"sizelimit" : 1000000,
"curtime" : 1505918556,
"bits" : "1a02ee6b",
"height" : 17378
}
but, when i submit the block i get again
{"result":null,"error":{"code":-8,"message":"Invalid mode"},"id":148}
|
|
|
|
so i tried https://github.com/jtoomim/p2pool - it worked ( although the invalid share rate was higher, sometimes 100% cpu usage.. ) now i switched back to https://github.com/p2pool/p2pool/ . but here the network is only 0.5 PH big ( 3 PH in the other version ) so am i an the wrong network, or are miners just frightened of the transition? will soemone join me? Hello, The network hash rate for the main branch (forrestv-veqtrus version) is indeed currently only 0.5 PH. It fluctuates a bit throughout the day. Since the split between the jtoomim and main branch the hash power in the main branch has decreased drastically, however, it is now again a bit higher compared to a few days ago. Before the split it was around >2PH on average (this fluctuated also a lot) if I remember it correctly, but even then P2pool was a very small pool. The reason of the decline (this is just my assessment of the situation) is on the one hand the fact that the network has split, and on the other hand the confusion in the P2pool community during the transition to segWit, and the not so straightforward way (through github) to get the segWit compatible version of P2pool main branch. This has now changed. Forrestv has updated the links on http://p2pool.in/ and veqtrus has merged his segWit compatible p2pool with the main branch on github. I expect that this will result over time in a higher hash rate for the p2pool main branch (I hope). okay thank you.. is there a possibility to combine the two branches again? it seems to be very uselesss to split this very small pool in two even smaller, separate networks.. |
|
|
|
so i tried https://github.com/jtoomim/p2pool - it worked ( although the invalid share rate was higher, sometimes 100% cpu usage.. ) now i switched back to https://github.com/p2pool/p2pool/ . but here the network is only 0.5 PH big ( 3 PH in the other version ) so am i an the wrong network, or are miners just frightened of the transition? will someone join me? Pool: 518TH/s Stale rate: 9.1% Expected time to block: 85.2 days
P2Pool: 17358 shares in chain (10809 verified/17362 total) Peers: 23 (16 incoming)
Switchover imminent. Upgraded: 77.655% Threshold: 95.000%
|
|
|
|
so can you tell me if i got this right: if i now use this version: https://github.com/jtoomim/p2pool/commits/1mb_segwit and mine on my own node, the following 3 conditions are fulfilled: 1) i join the network with 1.4 PHash visible here: http://p2pool.org/stats/2) it is not possible to create orpahn blocks,as every node will signal segwit support 3) it will be possible to mine blocks in around three weeks, when there are normal tx as well as segwit tx in the bitcoin network. ( and get fees from both ) |
|
|
|
Can you please publish the network? The coind does not find any nodes. You are premining all scrypt coins.UpdateTip: new best=582d6f2a6e73028321aa4131ec04491a62d6f37db1518268b281dd69805e31d9 height=0 version=0x00000001 log2_work=20.000022 tx=1 date='2017-05-26 14:51:17' progress=1.000000 cache=0.0MiB(0tx)
{
"version": 130200,
"protocolversion": 70015,
"walletversion": 130000,
"balance": 0.00000000,
"blocks": 0,
"timeoffset": 0,
"connections": 0,
"proxy": "",
"difficulty": 0.000244140625,
"testnet": false,
"keypoololdest": 1497733220,
"keypoolsize": 100,
"paytxfee": 0.00000000,
"relayfee": 0.00000002,
"errors": ""
}
connect() to 151.80.61.106:10946 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
connect() to 5.189.181.124:10946 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
Next week will be uploaded what is missing to see the complete network. The sculpture itself is mining the currency each time a coin falls, when this happens a trigger is activated and then 2 raspberry pi 3 begin to mine inside the mill.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
