|
So anyone ran a parallel side-by-side comparison between clevermining and middlecoin?
Also, has vardiff been re-enabled yet?
|
|
|
|
|
So what other crypto exchanges is adding pandacoins? Just cryptorush so far?
|
|
|
|
|
panda wallet password is: sGJ2HqK45VC4owXe
|
|
|
|
3 bil/500k = 6000 blocks * 2.5 = 15000 mins / 1440 = 10,41 days to get equal amount of mined coins vs premined coins.. aka premine 50% after 10 days.
Isn't the reward schedule 1,000,000 for the first 50k blocks? |
|
|
|
because PPLNS sucks. PROP pools is the only way to go.
Care to explain? PPLNS is more hop resistant than PROP. |
|
|
|
Pools list? I do not see a definitive one on the website, or PG1 Edit of the ANN of this coin. I would like to see who is offering this as far as pools go, so I can make a decision on if I will mine this or not. Thanks in advance. ( would prefer a pool list by the dev team and not random pool advertisements )
The closest consolidated list I could find is in the reddit pandacoin section here: http://www.reddit.com/r/thepandacoin/comments/1xswf2/pool_compilation/. |
|
|
|
|
Well one idea is, why don't we just fork the genesis block and invalidate the premined branch and build on a branch that is completely free of premining? If all the pools cooperate I can see us having enough network hashing power to overtake the original branch.
|
|
|
|
We soon stopped recruiting participants
But you haven't stopped it yet correct? Did I get in? |
|
|
|
Sorry but, 12 PM ? Can someone just tell me how many hours from now on ?
I think 15-16 hours from now. |
|
|
|
|
Why call it initial public offer when it's not really public? I mean how many of us actually had a chance to buy-in on this IPO?
|
|
|
|
|
Count me in. Will the source for the alpha release be available for code review?
Edit: Just to make sure I understand things correctly, to get an initial stake in NXTL we just need to reply to this thread with an account that's at least 2 weeks old or send some nxt or btc as a fee for accounts newer than that. Is this correct?
|
|
|
|
|
Just wondering, has the vardiff been re-enabled yet? Last I heard, that feature was turned off and set to static share diff 512 for diagnostic purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
How do you request a payout or is there a scheduled payout for balances < 0.01?
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to see your own share/hasrate at the statistic in the future?
now u only see the top 5 share/hashrate.
... What about shares submitted for the round and approximated earnings? Right now the only way to see your miner shares is if you're in the top 5 contributors list -- which is not helpful to say the least.
Hate to bug you about this again but any chance you can add this feature in in the near future? Also can you lower the initial vardiff when a miner first connects to something like 64 or even 32? This will make it more friendly to less powerful hardware. Beefy miners can always have their vardiff readjusted depending on rate of share submission. |
|
|
|
|
Any new updates on the profitability testing so far?
|
|
|
|
|
There's a lot of discussion on this thread about nxt arguing both for and against it but yet no one is really explaining its technical merits about what makes it so special and innovative.
Now from reading around, it sounds to me that "transparent forging" algorithm is what makes Nxt different from the other PoS offerings out there. My question is, how exactly does this algorithm work? I can't find any resource or reference out there that describes it in a transparent understandable way.
Has the Java source been code reviewed and vetted by the community? Any threads, either in this forum or elsewhere, that has done some critical intense scrutiny of the code? If so where?
|
|
|
|
|
Same issue -- my other rigs are still connected but new connection attempts fail. Been trying for the last couple of hours with the same result. Why does this keep happening? Is this going to be a regular thing?
|
|
|
|
|
This suggestion is probably a bit late to the game but what if you actually require new stakeholder buy-in's to provide a cell# for you to send an SMS to? This is the technique commonly used by various online services and sites to provide legitimacy.
This approach seems like a reasonable compromise -- those that want to buyin bigger stake for their loved ones can do so assuming they have a valid cell number. On the other hand, users with sockpuppet accounts are unlikely to go through the trouble of creating multiple unique cell# since there is now a real associated cost.
On another note, you should really require buy-in's to include a valid cryptographic signature of some sort using the private key that signed the transaction id. Otherwise, anyone can claim someone else's transaction id if no proof of ownership is required.
|
|
|
|
|
The ledger section "payout" column doesn't show correctly on first loading when you click on it. Clicking on any the page arrows or drop-down select seems to fix this though.
Also the dashboard chart crashes chrome tabs when you hover over the line/bar chart enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
