|
1
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core 0.11.0 has been released
|
on: July 12, 2015, 08:37:53 PM
|
Any help with the following error I get on Debian 6 LTS when trying to build would be appreciated: In file included from bitcoind.cpp:11:
scheduler.h:14:35: error: boost/chrono/chrono.hpp: No such file or directory
In file included from main.h:14,
from bitcoind.cpp:9:
chain.h: In member function ‘bool CBlockIndex::IsValid(BlockStatus) const’:
chain.h:260: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
chain.h: In member function ‘bool CBlockIndex::RaiseValidity(BlockStatus)’:
chain.h:270: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
In file included from bitcoind.cpp:11:
scheduler.h: At global scope:
scheduler.h:45: error: ‘boost::chrono’ has not been declared
scheduler.h:45: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘t’
scheduler.h:70: error: ‘boost::chrono’ has not been declared
scheduler.h:70: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘&’ token
scheduler.h:74: error: ‘chrono’ is not a member of ‘boost’
scheduler.h:74: error: ‘chrono’ is not a member of ‘boost’
scheduler.h:74: error: wrong number of template arguments (1, should be 4)
/usr/include/c++/4.4/bits/stl_multimap.h:86: error: provided for ‘template<class _Key, class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Alloc> class std::multimap’
scheduler.h: In member function ‘bool CScheduler::shouldStop()’:
scheduler.h:80: error: request for member ‘empty’ in ‘((CScheduler*)this)->CScheduler::taskQueue’, which is of non-class type ‘int’
make[2]: *** [bitcoind-bitcoind.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bitcoin-0.11.0/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bitcoin-0.11.0/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 |
|
|
|
|
2
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core 0.10.1 has been released
|
on: May 04, 2015, 04:15:51 AM
|
Having a build issue on Debian Squeeze-LTS: CXX libbitcoin_util_a-util.o
util.cpp: In function ‘void ShrinkDebugFile()’:
util.cpp:636: warning: ignoring return value of ‘size_t fwrite(const void*, size_t, size_t, FILE*)’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
util.cpp: In function ‘void SetupEnvironment()’:
util.cpp:728: error: ‘imbue’ is not a member of ‘boost::filesystem::path’
make[2]: *** [libbitcoin_util_a-util.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bitcoin-core-0.10.1/bitcoin-0.10.1/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bitcoin-core-0.10.1/bitcoin-0.10.1/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 |
|
|
|
|
3
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core 0.10.0 has been released
|
on: February 21, 2015, 09:43:17 PM
|
Trying to build on Debian 6 LTS I get: helpers/memenv/memenv.cc:65: error: ‘SIZE_MAX’ was not declared in this scope Any idea how to remedy this? My guess is you are running on a version of GCC which is at least outdated by 4 years of hard work. But if you dont post more details, I cant tell you more. Think I fixed it, inserted the following at line 5 of src/leveldb/helpers/memenv.h and it compiles fine. #ifndef __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
#define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
#endif |
|
|
|
|
4
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core 0.10.0 has been released
|
on: February 18, 2015, 09:16:24 PM
|
Trying to build on Debian 6 LTS I get: helpers/memenv/memenv.cc:65: error: ‘SIZE_MAX’ was not declared in this scope Any idea how to remedy this? My guess is you are running on a version of GCC which is at least outdated by 4 years of hard work. But if you dont post more details, I cant tell you more. How about a gcc -v: Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.4.5-8' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.4 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.4 --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-objc-gc --with-arch-32=i586 --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8)
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Graet.Loan - Paying 0.05% interest daily
|
on: September 09, 2014, 12:48:49 AM
|
How long you guys going to wait for Graet to do absolutely jack shit aboutthis ?
almost been a year... longer you wait the less chance you have of getting anything.
Graet played you for fools... and he is winning.
take action peoples.... farking draw up legal papers..hit hm were it hurts... he has a family.. I assume his family needs money to survive...
or would you prefer your family suffers because Graet is to selfish to pay his debts ?
Oh well.... least Graet is having a good life at the expense of you sucker... .errr investors... farking makes me sick how nothng ever gets done.
Hate to piss off the person who owes you money incase *gasp* they choose to not pay you back.
the tme of being nice has come and gone... go collect what is yours. stop being pussies.
How very bold of you, how much does he owe you and how much do you want to chip in on the lawyers? |
|
|
|
|
7
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Graet.Loan - Paying 0.05% interest daily
|
on: September 03, 2014, 07:43:37 AM
|
If they have the wrong address on Bitfunder, how would he identify the owner of the loan units? If you no longer have the private key to the address, you're pretty much screwed.
One is e-mail. If not, then prove that you still has access to your BitFunder and Weex accounts. All the account data, account names, passwords and 2-factor from both is in hands of Ukyo and Graet, who is the director on Australian Weex. So don't give me this bullshit. Graet has access to all the data. Graet either doesn't give a shit or is just too lazy to verify account data. He's only indicated he has access to the list of Bitcoin addresses. Bullshit or not, you can't determine if he has more data than that. |
|
|
|
|
8
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Graet.Loan - Paying 0.05% interest daily
|
on: September 02, 2014, 11:53:54 PM
|
What about if someone has set wrong address on bitfunder and is now on vacation? Graet doesn't care about that? I thought a honorable man would do it the other way. He would wait for confirmation of the address from all creditors.
But Graet doesn't care, he will then blame his creditors if it happens.
If they have the wrong address on Bitfunder, how would he identify the owner of the loan units? If you no longer have the private key to the address, you're pretty much screwed. |
|
|
|
|
18
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Graet.Loan - Paying 0.05% interest daily
|
on: December 14, 2013, 07:18:50 AM
|
...
Until bitfunder closes and I get all of the information I cannot pay direct to peoples private addresses.
Looking at options to manage graet.loan after bitfunder closes
I have stated earlier in this thread that the goal was to have most of graet.loan repaid by mid 2014 this is still my goal - the changes at bitfunder hurt me too and i'm waiting to be repaid btc from several sources too - not a nice time.
I plan to stick around and honor my commitments
thanks for patience and understanding in these trying times
Graet
Now that bitfunder is closed, can you start sending the dividends to the private addresses? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
