|
82
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Confused: Is BTU coin an option still?
|
on: July 22, 2017, 01:49:02 PM
|
|
Curious, I have seen a few fork options mentioned already, Bitcoin cash, Bitcoin Unlimited etc but I am confused if they are all the same people behind each or what?
Is Ver still pushing BTU?
Who is behind BTCC?
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin and the miracle of decentralization failure
|
on: July 16, 2017, 09:47:12 PM
|
|
Satoshi and "his or their" silence shows that he truly cares less what happens to bitcoin.
Makes me think more and more it was just a project that grew to an experiment and never anything more. The man has their data now on how this theory would play out without centralization and are smiling.
The joke is on all of us here.
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The "Satoshi Risk"
|
on: July 03, 2017, 11:13:59 PM
|
|
It's possible his retaining of 1M or more BTC is his form of a kill switch.
His dying and leaving them to others is a huge risk, even if he didn't how are we to know and have peace?
Bottom line, his coins are a distraction, risk and will stop bitcoin from going main stream for fear of collapse.
Satoshi MUST reveal himself, distribute coins to a charity or research and move on.
At this moment he is like a drug king pin sitting on tons of fiat and no where or way to spend it, his coins are virtually worthless to him so why not do a selfless act.
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Using Bitcoin as down payment funds to purchase a new home with a mortgage...
|
on: July 01, 2017, 10:27:03 PM
|
This has got to be the stupidest thread I have seen in months. They sold their BTC for cash then used the cash to get the loan, period. BTC NOT incorporated into loan approval or used as down payment, you the OP offer NO service to this community the average broker who doesn't know what BTC would.
Your thread makes ZERO sense in what you are trying to say was accomplished, end of story you did nothing thousands of brokers not do everyday for everyone else.
Goodbye
Do you own a home? Have you gotten a home loan in the United States in the past two years? I'm assuming you haven't otherwise you would understand the process of verifying earnest money deposits for the initial deposits, and you would also understand the process of having to verify all transaction histories for the most recent two months of account statements for ANY account associated with the down payment OR the initial deposit. If bitcoin was converted into cash within the last 60 days it would be disqualified from useable down payment funds. You think I've done nothing, fine. Lol. You obviously have ZERO knowledge of the lending environment that we are in right now. If you don't believe me apply to buy a home, sell bitcoin and immediately try to use it as a down payment right away and watch your offer fall right out of escrow So they only got the loan because they owned bitcoin and not cash LOL Youre clearly misguided or naïve, no point in arguing with a fool. |
|
|
|
|
86
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Using Bitcoin as down payment funds to purchase a new home with a mortgage...
|
on: July 01, 2017, 09:10:59 PM
|
|
This has got to be the stupidest thread I have seen in months. They sold their BTC for cash then used the cash to get the loan, period. BTC NOT incorporated into loan approval or used as down payment, you the OP offer NO service to this community the average broker who doesn't know what BTC would.
Your thread makes ZERO sense in what you are trying to say was accomplished, end of story you did nothing thousands of brokers not do everyday for everyone else.
Goodbye
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Litecoin is the better Bitcoin because Charlie is Satoshi!
|
on: June 22, 2017, 04:07:44 PM
|
At this stage LiteCoin is closer to what Satoshi might have envisioned for Bitcoin, because it can be used as a alternative "cash" payment network, because the fees are much lower and the transactions is much faster. They saw the potential in SegWit and they went for it and it looks like it is paying off now. I cannot see LiteCoin becoming the de facto Crypto currency, but it will work as a "Cash" payment network.  So it's fair to say it is superior but because it came second...the impact was less thus we see that in the price? By all comparisons LTC should be in a perfect world where ratio's made sense, see a $900 LTC. |
|
|
|
|
90
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BIP148 Coin/Token?
|
on: June 15, 2017, 11:43:15 PM
|
Interesting so bitmain owns viabtc? Wow learn something new everyday. That gives food for thought.
they're probably not gonna admit to outright ownership, but it is well known that they're 'backed' by bitmain. i wonder what influence they have that we don't know about. So their decision to call it the 148token had nothing to do with Bitmain or does it lol I suppose even if backed by Bitmain they still operate independent. |
|
|
|
|
92
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BIP148 Coin/Token?
|
on: June 15, 2017, 10:59:07 PM
|
It looks like now that viabtc is offering futures and likely we will see a new coin the question is if BIP148 works out, what is THE name of the coin?
BIP148Coin
BIP148Token
148Coin
148Token
do they give premined Btimain coin to ? I think the name of that coin is settled on, not interested. |
|
|
|
|
94
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / BIP148 Coin/Token?
|
on: June 15, 2017, 09:04:52 PM
|
|
It looks like now that viabtc is offering futures and likely we will see a new coin the question is if BIP148 works out, what is THE name of the coin?
BIP148Coin
BIP148Token
148Coin
148Token
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is this State important to uncovering Satoshi
|
on: June 10, 2017, 03:49:10 PM
|
I do hope your thinking skills have improved since you wrote this: From what I recall from the pyramid the vast majority of all BTC is held by a tiny group. This fact makes bitcoin use a joke, while the idea of BTC is good the vast amounts held by small numbers is a huge flaw. The only way to get it worth using world wide by billions is a huge unrealistic price increase. That in turn makes those few at the top uber wealthy. If someone can find the pyramid it would be nice showing it. It's sad but ultimately Satoshi must return and distribute all his coin or he is no better than the world rulers we have now. So ranking holders is laughable because the vast amounts at the top are all that matter. Not updated but you get the idea why a small group could mean BTC is nothing but a Ponzi that will end harshly one day. http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1009You would do well to learn from the great writer and engineer Stanislav Datskovskiy. I wonder now with this thread of yours if you are a liar, or worse, a socialist. Some of my views the last year plus have changed, correct. Some of my reasoning like distribution remain correct and being anti establishment would mean Satoshi distribute or donate his coins, my belief in that is firm only because of the communities foundation of anti establishment (banking). Not because I am a socialist, far from it but because of what Bitcoin supposedly stands for or used to stand for. Will it end harshly, maybe yes maybe no, time will tell but I am not the only one who feels distribution in some form will help, not hurt. Can I now rule out ponzi, yes and no, always a chance it didn't start out that way of course. We are all human and as humans on whatever intellectual scale we sit we are subject to greed. |
|
|
|
|
100
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is this State important to uncovering Satoshi
|
on: June 10, 2017, 03:53:10 AM
|
I see, well, I guess Ill keep it to myself, nothing good by revealing what I know any ways, right?
Son of a gun, I cannot even share this with friends or family, do you guys really think he would be 100% against someone finding him or at the least naming him/friends?
What we all forget in the myth is it was still a person, a person who needs to apply for, register for and use everyday things that require ID, no one is a ghost, no one. His name IS recorded, maybe not where everyone can see it but it is. I would imagine if anyone he would understand this.
If you are tracking a person actually named Satoshi Nakamoto, it isn't him TIME magazine already tried this years ago. I know, in fact that name Satoshi had NOTHING to do with what I first noticed, researched, confirmed and concluded. In fact Japan played zero factor for me. Remember I saw a pattern and connected dots, lots of dots that most did not even focus on who he is/was. Then there was the other stuff but alas I am in a dilemma. Will think hard about this for 24-48 hrs. May even make one more call or wait for a call, he/they see this thread, balls in their court. To summarize I know about NE, I know this name (Satoshi) was not the only name used that did not "belong to you", important letter is "J" and hint at the NOW/THEN "Democracy" that is all. I KNOW I am very close and if uncomforting they will let me know. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
