 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
 Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill. I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it. Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem. Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent. After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically. Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights. Are gun control laws constitutional? What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms? Cat's out of the bag, tightening existing gun control laws on ordinary law abiding citizens without first addressing proliferation of illegal firearms is ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
This type of nonsense is ridiculous. So much more so than fake oblivious op and their like spamming their 'russia being attacked by west' non sense in these forums.
Russians, you are fooling yourself if you think west is your primary concern. You got 1.3 billion rival on your borders who hate you on ethnic level - you have no room to mess around with petty concerns.
Also, RT is a propaganda arm of the kremlin.
|
|
|
|
This brain dead 1st world fool...
Learn some manners first. I had enough of your BS. Added to the ignore list. Now back to the topic. The CIA has decided to increase the frequency of drone strikes in Yemen. Recently, a top Al Qaeda militant, Nasser al-Wuhayshi was killed in the US drone strikes. He was the head of the Al-Qaeda in the Arabia Peninsula (Aqap), which is active in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Eastern Yemen. Better learn to watch that mouth of yours if you want decency from people. Respect is a two way street, something you disregard every time you open your hole  The level of ignorant bigotry acting the moral pillars LOL Pssy out and hit that ignore button  |
|
|
|
it doesn't even register on the scale of things - 325000 in 100 years? Try 3 million in 5 years - jewish pogrom and diaspora from arab nations? Arab muslims campaign of slavery against africans? Indians? Genocide of local population by mongols so much that genetic material of middle east was changed irreversably?
Exterminating 90% of the population is not genocide for you? And regarding the other facts pointed out by you: 1. Jewish pogrom and diaspora from Arab nations: True. But pales in comparison to the Holocaust. 2. Arab Muslims campaign of slavery against Africans & Indians: I think that most of the slave traders were European. But a sizable number was from Oman, Yemen and Saudi Arabia. 3. Genocide of local population by Mongols: Yes. This one was also a genocide. This brain dead 1st world fool... Arabs and muslims were the first slavers of black africans from ancient times, with arab slavers being the first 'white' slave masters across the african continent. Zanji rebellion - 'Black Rebellion' first occured in modern day iraq around 10th century specifically against arabs by blacks. Europe never got into african slavery seriously until 16th century, where as arabs were conducting slave raids from beginning of time, and even than the undocumented and even documented numbers of african slaves taken pale in comparison to arab and muslim slave trades during the same time frame. You foolishly embellish and exaggerate small supposed abuses with your primary motive being to villainize another, while real atrocities are made excuses for or even somehow you delude yourself into deflecting them by using HOLOCAUST? Maybe west should rightfully tell the world to fck off with their btching because china doesn't even acknowledge 5000 years of naked sinocentric han ethnic imperialism, indo racism that persists today, muslim and arab crimes against humanity that are never addressed, japanese extermination of ainu peoples, etc etc etc You are welcome to leave the west and fck off to whatever righteous country and culture you think is better at lying about being clean and blameless. The only real fault I find with the west is that they are too willing to allow their flaws to be exaggerated compared to others who are bent on harming the west on racial and cultural grounds, and giving fckin fools like you an idea that you can btch freely without consequence. |
|
|
|
It's high time now that USA gets a lady-President. And there seems no other choice better than Hilary Clinton. I suppose people can give her a chance at President's posts. I think she has done pretty good till now, she deserves to become the President
Hillary Charged Kid’s Charity $200,000 For SpeechHillary Clinton charged a kids’ charity $200,000 to speak — and she pocketed every dime. Clinton reportedly charged the Boys and Girls Club of Long Beach $200,000 for a speech earlier this year, according to new speaking disclosures made available on the Clinton Foundation website. Clinton spoke at a Boys and Girls Club of Long Beach fundraiser in California on March 3, reportedly speaking to 300 Long Beach “movers and shakers” at an event that was closed to the press. The event was marked by Secret Service security and bomb-sniffing dogs outside before Clinton got there. The Boys and Girls Club of Long Beach’s programs promote character, education, health, and sports and art involvement for children. When former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice spoke to the same group in 2009, she reportedly donated the nearly $60,000 they paid her back to the charity.http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/16/hillary-charged-kids-charity-200000-for-speech/Dude, alright!! I get it. I understand that the news you are publishing here makes her a bad person. But do you really think that this will be the case with only her. Is it like that there have been no other candidate till now (possible gone to become a President) had his/her share of controversy? This sort of news comes out only when there is a election. Otherwise people do not even care about this stuff. Anyhow, what I meant is to let her have the chance, let her be the President, let her take the decisions, then after her tenure we can decide if she has done right or wrong. 'We have to pass the law to find out what's in it' LOLOLOL can't believe anyone typed this sht Yea let someone take charge as president 'just to let her try it out' This is fckin insanity. |
|
|
|
Millions? LOL
You fools trying to hope that some fcking excuse to btch can come up if you talk large enough. I know what genocide is. I also know what war camps look like. This is nothing like that. Blah blah blah... you know this and you know that. So everyone should believe you. Not as simple as that. Take California for example. In the 1770s, when the Roman Catholic missionaries first started rounding up the natives to the war camps, there were some 325,000 of them. The population declined by 90% in just 100 years, as the missionaries engaged in torture, rape and murder. This is what I call genocide. Now coming back to the topic, give me an example of similar genocide conducted by the Muslims, or any other religions. LOLOL this btch it doesn't even register on the scale of things - 325000 in 100 years? Try 3 million in 5 years - jewish pogrom and diaspora from arab nations? Arab muslims campaign of slavery against africans? Indians? Genocide of local population by mongols so much that genetic material of middle east was changed irreversably? Yea you hate christians, but you haven't got the balls to btch at real slavers or genocidal criminals because you are easily swindled. 1st world btch material right here. |
|
|
|
I'm kinda leaning toward TECSHARE's opinion on this one. It just seems mighty odd to me that Obama didn't waste any time at all making some sort of passive-aggressive dig about gun control. Though I'm not truly surprised. I'm seeing this as more of a false flag type of event to rev up more racism talk and try once again to revive the failed attempts at gun control. I wonder how long it's going to be before the good "Reverend" Sharpton speaks his anti-white hatred?
One thing I find strange is that the whole gun control talk seemed to be aimed primarily at restricting or otherwise making it harder to jump through hoops for those who are willing to do so - i.e. relatively law abiding people who are more likely to face such restrictions and bow to them in the first place. Incidentally, white population is a large percentage of this, along with other law abiding minorities. On the other hand, why the fck would non-americans and criminals acquire guns legally? It really does seem like this is a campaign geared specifically against law abiding gun owners by magnifying each instances of 'mass murder' while dozens are mass murdered everyday in american cities by criminal elements, yet no one seem to be talking about them. Weak are left prey to the violent in those environments, yet no righteous gun control advocates dare broach the subject because it would be 'racist/insensitive' or some other sad excuse. At this point, it is increasingly getting to the point where either the government and specifically this president and gun-control crowd is incapable of dealing with real gun threats, or worse purposely ignoring the race based criminality and gun violence in favor of what they apparently believe are softer targets with an unspoken aim of disarming those who they don't like. The first issue that needs to be addressed before tightening any gun control law is going after the illegal small arms proliferation, one that are playing and spreading completely outside of the law. No amount of tightening gun regulations will keep guns away from those that cause the most damage on a daily basis and kill far more per year than these occasional nutjobs. It's indeed telling how a drug-induced patsy conspiracy theory actually starts sounding plausible compared to what's coming out of obama's mouth everyday. |
|
|
|
95% of the so called native americans were killed by disease way before their contact with europeans became significant. I bet you are stupid enough to believe in the pathetically selective 'blanket theory' too. Natives did much to exterminate themselves as much as any 'christian' did to them
OK. So you are saying that the Native Americans committed mass suicides, so that the Europeans could colonize the Americas. Great. I admire you for your colorful imagination. Then perhaps we should forget about the Roman Catholic extermination camps, which were set up for the natives, such as Mission San Gabriel Arcángel, where millions of them were tortured to death. Millions? LOL You fools trying to hope that some fcking excuse to btch can come up if you talk large enough. I know what genocide is. I also know what war camps look like. This is nothing like that. The entire study regarding that could easily be turned around against the so called natives. Ever heard of Iroquois Huron war? 'Millions tortured to death' - by same logic I can easily argue that every single mexicans, blacks, non-whites in US bear collective blame for daily crime activities that has killed more people than any period of 'colonialism', never mind how they exterminated, raped, kidnapped, and committed war crimes as per natural order of things according to their customs In fact, colonialism is a selective morality at its best that is a sad attempt at trying to villainize the west, while same thing is either ignored or selectively moralized by stupid fcks like you in non-western nations. The contact with the old world inhabitants caused a great epidemic among siberian-migrant populations such as aztecs and north american tribes. Get the picture? Now if you want to blame spread of germs on europeans, than I wonder how many chinese and slanty eyed people we have to kill for all the plagues that rose from the east asian region and spread across the world (black plague, avian flu, sars, list is endless - china for one is a fckin cesspool of disease origins)? In fact, mongols knowingly used biological warfare tactics on caffa, a genoses city in crimea that mongols KNEW to be a trading post with connections to lands beyond. They flung over plague ridden corpses while being fully aware that it would certainly spread beyond the city walls. Your complete lack of objectivity and flailing attempts at btching at others with imaginary self-righteous indignation is pretty damn cute for a 1st worlder |
|
|
|
So Bellathon, what are you doing to enact change for these causes you are so passionate for I'm afraid that's classified, citizen. Now return to your government assigned cube-housing immediately or pay the fine for violating curfew.  Big Gubermint is coming for you, conversatards. Do you mean conservatards? He quickly changed it lest the lack of spelling accuracy hurts his fragile sense of security |
|
|
|
So Bellathon, what are you doing to enact change for these causes you are so passionate for I'm afraid that's classified, citizen. Now return to your government assigned cube-housing immediately or pay the fine for violating curfew. Big Gubermint is coming for you, conversatards. Really, insulting someone, pre-judging its intention, not knowing its true motivation behind a simple question will not bring more soldiers under your bivouac...
>> I'm sure you'll learn a lot today, unless you're an intellectual coward piece of shit who refuses to expose himself to any information that contradicts his pre-established biases. There was no insult, merely a potential insult conditional upon the reader's choices. Prime example of wannabe smart/educated who hasn't got a fckin clue about what he's btching on -> 1st world problems. |
|
|
|
PASSERBY SCREAMS LIVE ON CNN: ‘WHITE PEOPLE ARE TERRORISTS,’ OBAMA AN ‘UNCLE TOM’Thursday while reporting on the tragic aftermath of the mass shooting live from outside the Emanuel AME Church in Charleston Don Lemon was yelled at by a Africa-American woman upset with the coverage. Right before Lemon is in introduced you can hear the woman off camera shout, “Report the real truth. We are angry. White people are terrorists.” Once lemon came on the woman went on camera and said several times “Are you angry Don?” Before they cut away she added, “The President is a puppet. Stop the Lies. He’s an uncle Tom too. President Obama is an Uncle Tom.” http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/06/18/passerby-screams-live-on-cnn-white-people-are-terrorists-obama-an-uncle-tom/ They do know blacks are killing dozens around the country on a daily basis, mainly in the innercity areas? They jump each other, get into lethal situations much more often than any other race, and represent a disproportionate percentage in national crime statistic, both reported and unreported. The whole fcking world knows this, in and outside of US. No amount of blame shifting, shuck and jiving, or running by your mouth will earn blacks anything other than contempt and derision from the world as long as they act in a racially motivated manner that raises aggression and hostility from majority of human population. It's a real shame that this shooter went after a peaceful church gathering however. Now, if he could only find a group of hood rats and gangbangers to ambush, that would have been written off as another gang related killing. Pointless killing. |
|
|
|
If muslims were forced to compensate for every killing they have done for the last 1400 years, there won't be a single muslim left on earth. Every strand of hair, every teeth and blood will be used to repay the world for their ignorance, bigotry, racism, slavery, and genocide.
The United States of America was created after exterminating the native American Indians who lived there for many thousands of years before the arrival of the Europeans. Christian missionaries played a large role in the extermination, and people such as the "blessed" Junípero Serra single handedly wiped out entire ethnic groups (such as the Tongva). Does that mean that some one should kill all the Christians using whatever means available? LOL 95% of the so called native americans were killed by disease way before their contact with europeans became significant. I bet you are stupid enough to believe in the pathetically selective 'blanket theory' too. Natives did much to exterminate themselves as much as any 'christian' did to them - and from what I recall there's nothing stopping them today from having more children or gaining rights the same as any other man in US - even more advantageous than a recent immigrant like myself certainly. They are certainly not required to pay special taxes or are forced to live somewhere. Your assertion that christian missionaries played an important role is like saying potato peel is at fault for being cut by a knife - no one was running away or afraid of missionaries, certainly not 'natives'. If the so called natives paid for their ignorance, bigotry, and racial attitude against others with their lives, isn't that justice? Or does your standard only apply on the EVIL white/west? Why not find blame with how the japs wiped out the native population before their mainstream ethnic group made japan? Why not china, india, russia? There isn't a single decent sized country on earth that didn't rise out of some conflict or another that resulted in a dominant faction taking over. The key difference is that there hasn't been a single significant movement or will for muslims to rectify their ways, as opposed to other peoples, and not only endorses the practice of racial and cultural warfare, but fully supports it with both silent consent and active reinforcement. When the hell was the last time a significantly christian country rose up to declare a crusade? Your pathetic attempt at trying to equivocate the supposed western 'sins' with that of an active rapist and murders speaks volumes about your ulterior motive and lack of independent thought  much bullshit, many idiocy. it's not even worth a reply. btw. it is just 75 years ago since the catholic church supported hitler and nazi germany  LOL I bet this btch doesn't even know muslims were actively supporting Nazis, unlike some sniveling conspiracy theory about catholic church 'supporting' the nazis (most likely meek ignorance, very slim splinter faction playing politics). Just tryin to find an excuse to btch and moan |
|
|
|
If muslims were forced to compensate for every killing they have done for the last 1400 years, there won't be a single muslim left on earth. Every strand of hair, every teeth and blood will be used to repay the world for their ignorance, bigotry, racism, slavery, and genocide.
The United States of America was created after exterminating the native American Indians who lived there for many thousands of years before the arrival of the Europeans. Christian missionaries played a large role in the extermination, and people such as the "blessed" Junípero Serra single handedly wiped out entire ethnic groups (such as the Tongva). Does that mean that some one should kill all the Christians using whatever means available? LOL 95% of the so called native americans were killed by disease way before their contact with europeans became significant. I bet you are stupid enough to believe in the pathetically selective 'blanket theory' too. Natives did much to exterminate themselves as much as any 'christian' did to them - and from what I recall there's nothing stopping them today from having more children or gaining rights the same as any other man in US - even more advantageous than a recent immigrant like myself certainly. They are certainly not required to pay special taxes or are forced to live somewhere. Your assertion that christian missionaries played an important role is like saying potato peel is at fault for being cut by a knife - no one was running away or afraid of missionaries, certainly not 'natives'. If the so called natives paid for their ignorance, bigotry, and racial attitude against others with their lives, isn't that justice? Or does your standard only apply on the EVIL white/west? Why not find blame with how the japs wiped out the native population before their mainstream ethnic group made japan? Why not china, india, russia? There isn't a single decent sized country on earth that didn't rise out of some conflict or another that resulted in a dominant faction taking over. The key difference is that there hasn't been a single significant movement or will for muslims to rectify their ways, as opposed to other peoples, and not only endorses the practice of racial and cultural warfare, but fully supports it with both silent consent and active reinforcement. When the hell was the last time a significantly christian country rose up to declare a crusade? Your pathetic attempt at trying to equivocate the supposed western 'sins' with that of an active rapist and murders speaks volumes about your ulterior motive and lack of independent thought |
|
|
|
I don't even know if you are being satirical or not. Not at all. The "check your privileged thing" saying is only used by tumblrites and the FAR left liberals. I'm a social anarchist / anarcho-socialist and anti-capitalist, so basically as far left as the spectrum goes. No one needs to "check their privilege", we are all humans
Wrong. That argument didn't hold up when they tried to use it to defend slavery, it certainly doesn't hold up now. The only difference is that rest of the world doesn't even acknowledge their privilege and discrimination, instead rationalizing and justifying them under various guises of ideologies, religions, etc. Any significant questioning of such status quo isn't rewarded with petty harassment and mean words. They are rewarded with gang rape, strict social ostacization, criminal prosecution in complete kangaroo courts, medieval tortures that exist not for the purpose of information extraction but maximum terrorization, pogroms, local exterminations and complete genocide that makes all the supposed 'sins' of the west a laughable joke in comparison. In fact, racism and discrimination as well as those 'privileges' that you complain about so much exist in far greater quantities in places you know nothing about and certainly dare not question for the fear of retribution from those who can be much more violent and radical than your 1st world revolutionary wannabe kiddy play. West tend to be much freer and tolerant of self-criticism - one reason why mouthy fool like you can even dare to spout this non sense and try to pass it off as some laughable pseudo-intellectual babble.Not that I expect a fcking spoiled 1st worlder like you to know anything about that. You know nothing of slavery, discrimination, or any kind of fake righteous cause you think you can latch on to in order to buttress your own lack of confidence and purpose in your own identity. Do yourself a favor and keep that mouth shut before the whole world realizes you are a pliable and easily manipulated clown. Too late probably. |
|
|
|
|
Hillary Clinton is ridiculous if she thinks her gender will win this election. Her lies are plain for all to see, and as election efforts rachet up, she will find that trying to bedazzle the public with so-called 'charm' will only be met with derision and contempt.
She is about as trust worthy as obama, which is to say, not at all.
|
|
|
|
|
If muslims were forced to compensate for every killing they have done for the last 1400 years, there won't be a single muslim left on earth. Every strand of hair, every teeth and blood will be used to repay the world for their ignorance, bigotry, racism, slavery, and genocide.
Gotta laugh my voice hoarse seeing all these muslim btches wailing and moaning about 'atrocities'. Just another reminder to the world why muslims must be exterminated down to the last seed.
|
|
|
|
Another false flag. We don't know about the true identity of the attacker. And from the slogans which he shouted before the attack, I believe that he is also from an Islamic background. And from the article, it is clear that the perpetrator suffered from acute schizophrenia. So it seems that the attack resulted from mental illness, rather than Islamophobia. I'm sorry but what you are stating here is wrong, As a French and since this case was big, it was impossible to miss any information about it, it was clearly an islamophobic attack. Also According to officiel and several organisation (in France), Islamophobia cases has skyrocketed after the Terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo I can list some if you want (there was an increase in antisemite act last year as well but that's another story). The other which I mentioned before is what you are exactly stating above ie Every attack done on a muslim is related to mental issues, but when it's a muslim doing them it's automatically terrorism which stupid. you don't believe that every cases done against any muslim is related to mental issue and excusable and statically it's impossible. Muslims are at war with non-muslims. Where there is such group pride and group identity, there is collective retribution. You made your bed. Now sleep in it. Wasn't aware of Indonesia or Turkey declaring war on us. Or most of the 1.5 billion Muslims in the world. Maybe you want to stop with the stupid generalizations? That's what happens when you have such collective pride and cohesion. I do not expect a fool like you to understand what that means. Gotta love these fckers with their high horse bullsht LOL Talk when you have any idea of what you are addressing. Otherwise, keep your mouth shut. |
|
|
|
Another false flag. We don't know about the true identity of the attacker. And from the slogans which he shouted before the attack, I believe that he is also from an Islamic background. And from the article, it is clear that the perpetrator suffered from acute schizophrenia. So it seems that the attack resulted from mental illness, rather than Islamophobia. I'm sorry but what you are stating here is wrong, As a French and since this case was big, it was impossible to miss any information about it, it was clearly an islamophobic attack. Also According to officiel and several organisation (in France), Islamophobia cases has skyrocketed after the Terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo I can list some if you want (there was an increase in antisemite act last year as well but that's another story). The other which I mentioned before is what you are exactly stating above ie Every attack done on a muslim is related to mental issues, but when it's a muslim doing them it's automatically terrorism which stupid. you don't believe that every cases done against any muslim is related to mental issue and excusable and statically it's impossible. Muslims are at war with non-muslims. Where there is such group pride and group identity, there is collective retribution. You made your bed. Now sleep in it. |
|
|
|
|
Title is misleading and outright false. APi has been up for a month at least, it's no news.
No announcement has been made regarding when gemini will launch, and no specific date was given during their fireside chat.
|
|
|
|
Another false flag. We don't know about the true identity of the attacker. And from the slogans which he shouted before the attack, I believe that he is also from an Islamic background. And from the article, it is clear that the perpetrator suffered from acute schizophrenia. So it seems that the attack resulted from mental illness, rather than Islamophobia. Well, someone with paranoid schnizophrenia could not be said to be acting from Islamopobia conditioning. I mean, crazy is crazy. But we'd have to extend that to Islamics who kill shouting Allah Akbar who are paranoid schizophrenics, too. You contradict yourself playing a pathetic devil's advocate. Islamics by definition belong to the relevant movement specifically and act in its purpose no matter the mental condition, while random crazed schizophrenics are just that - random and without affiliation other than voices in his own head. Dumb motherfckers trying to play word games always trip over themselves. |
|
|
|
|
