Your posts are written with increased size, in bold and red, that is disturbing, more than it is helpful.
Yes, you do want people to see your posts, but you can do so with a post that isn't annoying and a pain to read.

That's not quite true.
VIPs, global mods and admins can set/change their own custom titles, but everyone can display one (eg get one assigned to them by theymos).
An example for that would be Blazed, who's neither VIP nor involved with moderation, but holds the custom title "Casascius Addict".
Custom titles are also given when theymos does name changes, eg for BitcoinPenny (formerly CJBianco), who carries their old name as custom title "aka CJBianco".

tl;dr: Everyone can have a custom title, not everyone can set one for themselves.

---

Hilarious' "Lamborghini Member" and mprep's "Diamond Member" is poking fun at the Copper Member rank that was introduced a while back.
As you can see, custom titles show at the same place as the "Copper Member" text when people are posting (not on a users profile).
I would assume rickbig's "I'm not a member" is meant in a similar way.

Do we really need another thread about this or can't we stick to one of those already discussing the topic?

21 Block producer of EOS can freeze anyone's account

I've submitted a Domain abuse complaint with namecheap earlier anyway.
Previously done so with Giveawayethereum.win and it was handled quickly, though that was a more clearly cut case, as they were hosting an illegal ponzi scheme.
We'll see how/if they handle this case.

Bitmixcoin claimed toberichter would confirm they have repaid the 16BTC, yet there has been a post by toberichter today, and no such confirmation (quite the opposite, "Scam confirmed").
Everyone should realize by now that this has turned into an exit scam and any coins sent to bitmixcoin are lost forever.

It takes 3 persons to effectively freeze your ETH balance, as Ethermine, f2pool and Sparkpool have a majority right now (over 51% of the blocks in the last 24 hours).

What's your opinion of NEO?

Which just shows how desperate you were for one.
(You can give yourself another one for leaving feedbacks to your alt accounts, now that I have uncovered the ruse)

Wheelz, because clearly, you have a flat tire

So you admit to being a scammer & your only defense is that OgN supposedly is one as well?

To be fair, it seems my post was reflecting FJ in a way worse than they do deserve.
While those delays have happened in the past, they have been on the ball with this situation, yes, they needed a few days, and a part might still be unprocessed, but nowhere near months.
Hopefully for everyone playing at FJ delays like the ones I have quoted are something of the past now and all current withdrawals are getting processed in a timeframe like this one.
It is kinda unfair to hold old cases against them when they pledged to improve themselves and seemingly have done so.

That's not quite true, theymos also does manual name changes, though you are very unlikely to get one.
It's mainly if a company rebrands (for their forum rep account), or for high ranking/long standing users of the community.
The chances for a newbie or junior member getting one approved are infinitesimal small.

Which brings us back to:

To be fair, any combination of bitcoin mining pools with a hashrate of 51% and higher (which means currently a minimum of 3 pool operators) could be doing the same for your bitcoin address.
The block producers choose which transactions to include in their blocks,
and bitcoin block producers (miners) could likewise exclude certain addresses from getting their transactions included in blocks, thus effectively "freezing" funds in one address.

This might be included in EOS as a "feature", but EOS isn't the only network where something like this is possible.
The problem isn't that it's integrated as feature, however the way this is used could become a problem.
If it ends being problematic only the future can tell, should the power be abused, and the community not react in an appropriate way to that.

What I'd see as a way bigger problem is Article XV of the constitution, giving the network the right to confiscate funds from "dormant" accounts and redistribute balances.

So in other words, you do not want to honor this auction/the agreement you have made when you set the terms for it.

I'm sorry, is this the best "dirt" you could find on me?

A campaign where I did everything I could to secure a BTC payment for participants, since the ASC they were supposed to get was going to be worthless due to the screwup by the ASC team.
I did my part there. I promptly joined the discussion with the escrow team and coordinated further steps with them. Not for myself, but for the people I had enrolled.

Investors? Covered and fully repaid by the escrow team.
Signature Campaign Participants? Compensated in BTC, which they were all happy to accept and not one of them complained about.

To sum it up in one sentence:

---

Now do we see Wapinter out there busting his ass, trying to get a payment for the participants of his latest campaigns? Will those be covered, will the participants be paid in any way?

Moonie, stop spoiling my surprises.

Your account still is wearing a signature, so it's not permanently banned.

Given the recent password reset and email change, together with the feedback by numanoid, I assume it's been hacked and has been locked as a security precaution.
If the hacker changed the email, however, you will have to restore access via Cyrus or theymos, and with a signed message, as you are already attempting.

Theymos and Cyrus have not blocked PMs from newbies (or from you), if they would have, you would get an error message when attempting to send them one.
However, sending Cyrus daily PMs is a bit over the top.

Sending a signed message to recover your account once, and then resending it a bit later (maybe two weeks later) is sufficient, you do not have to bomb them with daily PMs, they get enough messages as it is.

Keywords there being one PM and two weeks.