|
181
|
Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] Potential Sr. Member
|
on: March 13, 2016, 03:15:24 PM
|
|
Yes, posting a token from account-pricer would be nice.
Well your starting bid is already high to make successive increments.
You should have started with 0.01 and noticed how high it might reach.
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [NSFW] Erotic Art website accepting ONLY bitcoins
|
on: March 13, 2016, 03:06:38 PM
|
Thanks,
For each model I have a model release signed. About the possibility of purchasing photosets it depends, I had different deals with different models so if there is a particular set you like you can let me know and I will be able to tell you if I am allowed to sell it or not..
Another proof of authenticity is the raw images, I have the raw images which on average are 7 mb each, online you will only find watermarked images with average size of 300 kb
Thanks for your prompt reply. I have recently visited the site and have not explored all models in detail. Well if I am interested in buying some I will let you know the list in pm. Btw do I get those RAW images after I buy a package? |
|
|
|
|
184
|
Economy / Service Announcements / Re: ▶▶ XOtika.TV ◀◀ Adult Platform • Fully Powered by Bitcoin! ★★★★★
|
on: March 13, 2016, 02:55:19 PM
|
I have been enjoying the site for a long time now but recently I am seeing that some models are just becoming restless and is blocking as well as banning viewers if they do not send them tips soon after entering. We are not given time to complete a deposit before tipping either. And some of them are just blatantly setting up a goal like this:  I have no objection against any models out there but my main concern is that some of them should be given at least some training regarding the new payment gateway. Well different models have different styles of streaming a session. And yes, they might be facing some problems getting accustomed to bitcoin but I hope they will learn after repeated sessions. Comparing with other cam sites xotika has given the liberty to view live streams for free and some models may not like this, and that's why the fuss maybe. |
|
|
|
|
187
|
Economy / Service Announcements / Re: 6+ Letter Bitcoin Vanity Address Service - Vouch Copies Available!
|
on: March 05, 2016, 05:44:27 PM
|
But why people will trust you as i am seeing some negative rating in your trust ranking. I don't think people will even use those generated address from you in anytime. Sorry for my bad word man.
Split-Key vanity address generation is a process that requires basically no trust from any party. The main idea is, OP can create a vanity address without even knowing what private key it will actually belong to. Suppose you grab a random ECDSA keypair and save the private key for yourself. You can then issue a request for a vanity address to be created, by supplying the public key form that keypair, and mention your desired prefix. OP will then be looking for the vanity address by bruteforcing random ECDSA private keys and can get his corresponding public keys, add them to the provided public key, and proceed normally with SHA, RIPEMD and base58 until he receive the desired pattern. Then he will give the private key found to you. Then you can add the two private keys in order to get your vanity address. The best thing about it is that the person looking for the solution won't know what the resulting private key is! This means that you can outsource your vanity key generation without needing to trust anyone. |
|
|
|
|
188
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Escrow Partner got tricked
|
on: March 05, 2016, 04:39:45 PM
|
Indianacoin
What signed message? You realize that most persons don't have a staked address? Then I would have to get one address at the start of the trade only for the case that the account might be compromised and the hacker did not change the pass.
You know, I can offer that but I'm pretty sure either no one will do it or it will be a huge amount of time just to teach most of them that they learn how to sign messages, what a private key is, where to get it. I already had this alot. It is a mess to explain.
Well, if you really mean we now have to distrust every account that way then man, I would not like doing escrow anymore. It costs so much time already and pays practically nothing. Many big escrows already left because of the time needed and no reward.
I wonder if you ever tried to explain someone how to sign a message.
True. But you must keep Shorena's how to sign a message thread [1] handy from next time onwards just in case someone does not know about it. Yeah I know escrows are a waste of time if there is no reward for it. It would be better if you start escrowing with a minimum fee of 0.01 BTC just as OGNasty started doing it already. Heck I welcome every escrow providers to start at a base fee. This will be productive overall 
[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0 |
|
|
|
|
191
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Escrow Partner got tricked
|
on: March 05, 2016, 02:04:02 PM
|
|
Well this is a real twisted situation right there.
But although the seller is shady by noticing the nature of his reply in this thread.
@Seb next time you should ask both parties to confirm with a signed message (from their staked btc address) before releasing the escrow.
It will be a safer step for you.
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]
|
on: March 05, 2016, 01:58:19 PM
|
|
Since there is a high demand of generating vanity addresses I am wondering if there is any way to enable a split-key vanity address generation system on a VPS server.
I would work like this:
1. Installing vanitygen.exe on the server via SSH access.
2. Allowing it to run for finding an address with a particular prefix when someone inputs his part public key.
I am just skeptical on whether it will solve ESDA at a faster rate as graphics cards generally does.
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns
|
on: March 05, 2016, 01:50:12 PM
|
I noticed one free spot for full members on Crypto-Games.net signature campaign. So you may add them on the list of active signature campaigns. Op updated.
Just wanted to say thank you. It's a lot of work and the Op isn't a necessity but it's freaking useful. So thanks for your work <3 Thank Shorena as well! They have been helping me for months now. I just copy paste what they make. Yes, Shorena is doing a great job managing it and making the whole thread chaos free.  |
|
|
|
|
194
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: ▁ ▂ ▄ ▅ ▆ Cloudmining 101 (ponzi risk assessment) ▆ ▅ ▄ ▂ ▁
|
on: March 05, 2016, 01:09:36 PM
|
Likely Ponzi scams that have yet to collapse: bitcoincloudservices 1+2+4+5+6*+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi (+ founded by known scammer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=860400.msg9638868#msg9638868)
this is must move to : Ponzi's that have already collapsed as predicted bitcoincloudservices is scam in 2015 and no payout again. Thanks for mentioning that. Will edit in a few seconds time.
I have not yet listed Cloudminer.com since I am waiting for their proofs (if they have any) to what they were claiming before. Might add them in the next update. |
|
|
|
|
195
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Blocksize needs to be increased now.
|
on: March 05, 2016, 12:51:05 PM
|
 Just found... No Space left for the poor or any safety... This is a very insightful graph! And it is done solely based upon the current situation of transactions vs blockchain limit. If that is the case then I can highly presume that, Bitcoin might decline its glory when it either reaches to the PayPal level transaction processing or the Visa level transaction processing. But one thing for sure is shown wrongly on the graph is that failure will not be from 2016. Although this is based on probability but this is for sure it wont. |
|
|
|
|
196
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: ▁ ▂ ▄ ▅ ▆ Cloudmining 101 (ponzi risk assessment) ▆ ▅ ▄ ▂ ▁
|
on: March 05, 2016, 12:31:06 PM
|
--- UPDATED LIST (5/03/2016) ---
Please read OP thoroughly before studying the list below.Note: Use the "Find" function (Ctrl+F) on your browser and type the name of a cloudmining site you want to find from the list and research thoroughly before buying a contract from there.
Ponzi's that have already collapsed as predicted:bitcoincloudservices 1+2+4+5+6*+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi (* founded by known scammer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=860400.msg9638868#msg9638868)
bitcoinminersuk.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Lbtcl.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
bitknock.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
PBmining.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Lunaminer.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
coinsoncloud.eu 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Cryptomine.io 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
hashie.co 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
bitcoinlabmining.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
ltcgear 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
hashprofit.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
minethatcloud.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
CoIntellect.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
terabox.me 1+2+3*+4+5+6+7* => 7*/7 = Ponzi (pictures are not at all convincing, exit strategy involves 60+ days stall tactic)
chabatmining.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Ecrypto.co.in 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ confirmed scam, they are no partners of cex.io)
GenerateBTC.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
cloudminr.io 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
grmining.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
hashwar.co 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
bitrush.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
scrypt.cc 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Kryptologika 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Cryptsy MN 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi ( + no details on fee structure) (withdrawl problems noticed!)
Coolhash.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
Bitminr.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
MineProfit.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
SpecialMiner.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
Scryptsy.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
cloudhours.net 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
bitcoinmaker.ch 1+2+3+4+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
coince.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
fortacloud.co 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
hashocean.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
HourlyMine.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
cldmine.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
bitcoinmining.me 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Skycoinlab.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ organized by serial ponzi scammer: ?topic=583177.msg10298730)
btcslice.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ pays out in reversible paypal ?)
cloudmining.website 2+3+4+5+6+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi
eobot.com 1+2+3+5+6+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
nexusmining.com 1+2*+3+4+5+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi (Guy from Spondoolies says im wrong, but I can't score what I haven't seen and he seems to confirm they have no hardware)
minerslab.com 1+2+3+4+6+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi (+ selling hardware that doesnt exist + using purchased "legendary" account)
cloudmining.sg 1+2+4+6+7 => 5/7 = Ponzi (Founder's LinkedIn account deleted, Uses Weebly's free checkout platform)
hashcoins.com
and hashflare.io ~1+2+3+4+7 => 5/7 = (very) suspicious (user selectable pool requires fee, dc pictures show no miners, linkedin profile doctored, hardware sales very dubious,..) (*now owned by hashflare.io)
Zeushash 1+2+3+4+5 => 5/7 = (very) suspicious
Bitminer.eu 1+2+5+6 => 4/7 = Suspicious (+ Pictures of their miners might be Photoshopped)
Miningsweden.se 1+2*+5+7 => 4/7 = Suspicious (*will remove as soon as I receive confirmation from Bitmain)
genesis-mining.com 1+2+5+7 => 4/7 = Probably legit.
pow88.com 1+2+5 => 3/7 = Probably legit (preliminary assessment) (Suspicious referral bonus : 1% hourly !!!)
Bit-x.com 1+4 => 2/7 = Probably legit (preliminary assessment, partnership confirmed by Bitfury)
haobtc.com 1+2 => 2/7 = Probably Legit (investment based cloudmining company => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1023187.0)
bw.com 1 => 1/7 = Legit (1 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=878387.msg13605117#msg13605117)
Hashnest 1 => 1/7 = Legit (1 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=878387.msg13605117#msg13605117)
AMhash => 0/7 = Legit
KNCcloud 7 => 1/7 = Legit
Cex.io 4 => 1/7 = Legit
Cryptx PETAmine => 0/7 = Legit
Megamine.com 1+4 => 2/7 = Probably legit
GAWminers 1+4+5+~7 => 4/7*= Possibly/partially legit based on criteria set forth. Based on wider context: more suspicious than a nun squatting in a cucumber field
Tips are much appreciated for maintaining and updating the list periodically! Tip jar: 1SoumyadbsfCGsSekYdgAkWpGZM3WSaxtThanks |
|
|
|
|
198
|
Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Free Idea - Nintendo DS Bitcoin Wallet
|
on: March 05, 2016, 11:59:23 AM
|
|
Great idea to come up with an wallet of such sort.
But how will you deal with storage of the massive and ever increasing size of blockchain?
I think Bitcoin Core v0.12.0 might solve that problem since it supports pruning mode.
Just let me know if you are successful with the idea after careful implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Bitcoin trusted to put your real money
|
on: March 05, 2016, 11:52:43 AM
|
|
There is a simple principal if you want to invest yourself in this bitcoin ecosystem.
1. Buy bitcoin when you feel the price is cheap.
2. Hoard them in your cold storage
3. Sell them when you can notice a significant price rise.
4. Repeat.
~ And never invest in short term ponzis or "Get rich quick" schemes or you will start banging your head once you get scammed!
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: bitcoin will rise again
|
on: March 05, 2016, 11:41:27 AM
|
It might rise eventually, but not very soon. The price dropped 6% over the last few days? People are moving into Ethereum?
Just stop spreading lies unknowingly. http://preev.com/btc/usd - This should tell you the answer to why I stated that. It is rising as expected and will even rise exponentially after the next reward halving on July. And I dont see any future with Ethereum. It is just another pyramid scheme to me. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
