The developer said mining was fine from the start. Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair. It's not my fault the chain went funny.
So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair. Or just update the chain.
I could except the pull request if submitted again withe the block size increase but keep transaction size at 60 Bytes I want to see if that would work. I'm in middle of testing some stuff out. Since original tasty has the hash power he could mine a bunch of coins and send them to you but the wallet has to be redone. It's a whole process cuz I lost control too early but I rather it happen early so you and others don't waste anymore time because I don't have the hash power to protect the network. It's up to them so it's a test to see if the network can regulate itself because it will be needed. People have to try not to use too much hadhi g power and let people get coins or start sending coins to addresses to other miners to add to whatever they have. If not then I'm going to have to start a new chain and block people from forking in till things settle the network needs to grow grassroots I can only mine about 200 or more without the big hashing power but only maybe 25 with it. It's crazy. That's why I'm curious to what y'all using some transparency would help. Like I said if not then I have to block people from forking.but that probably won't stop others from finding away around. The project might be ruined because the fork I don't understand why someone would fork like that.that was selfish to just takeover we need unselfish miners with big hashing power to help secure the network from others. I know what this coin could do if the network can come together. It's about allocation. Anybody trying to mine without donating or spreading the coins to other less powerful miners shouldn't be here. That's what makes the network secure no one person should have the majority you have to regulate yourselves. Everybody doesn't have the same tools BE FAIR this sh!t won't work. It's like a computer hashing war. If you have a basic laptop pull it out dust it off and use it. And if you see something funny going on in the network you pull out ya big guns and get to hashing to gain control. New people will come in and do the same so it's a hashing war. stop so much history and get a coin in conditions, the tests do them yourself do not use people to do your own tests, publish a code in conditions and an explorer and stop so much history, the crypto world is full of boring people like you F u I'm bored of u mf sh!ting on new coins go fuccv off somewhere else if you don't like it GET!!! I have already realized that you are a child who kicks for not having a lollipop, you are very stupid and your coin will not get anywhere Yo get lost sucker and the explorer? haven't you seen the tutorial yet? you waste your time here hahaha Ya momma wasted her time when she had you. You moving to fast without fully thinking things out. your chain moves fast too but what a pity that the coins are worth nothing or will be worth hahah |
|
|
|
no worries friend this is the first shitcoin of the year, there are still many more but yours is the first congratulations  |
|
|
|
The developer said mining was fine from the start. Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair. It's not my fault the chain went funny.
So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair. Or just update the chain.
I could except the pull request if submitted again withe the block size increase but keep transaction size at 60 Bytes I want to see if that would work. I'm in middle of testing some stuff out. Since original tasty has the hash power he could mine a bunch of coins and send them to you but the wallet has to be redone. It's a whole process cuz I lost control too early but I rather it happen early so you and others don't waste anymore time because I don't have the hash power to protect the network. It's up to them so it's a test to see if the network can regulate itself because it will be needed. People have to try not to use too much hadhi g power and let people get coins or start sending coins to addresses to other miners to add to whatever they have. If not then I'm going to have to start a new chain and block people from forking in till things settle the network needs to grow grassroots I can only mine about 200 or more without the big hashing power but only maybe 25 with it. It's crazy. That's why I'm curious to what y'all using some transparency would help. Like I said if not then I have to block people from forking.but that probably won't stop others from finding away around. The project might be ruined because the fork I don't understand why someone would fork like that.that was selfish to just takeover we need unselfish miners with big hashing power to help secure the network from others. I know what this coin could do if the network can come together. It's about allocation. Anybody trying to mine without donating or spreading the coins to other less powerful miners shouldn't be here. That's what makes the network secure no one person should have the majority you have to regulate yourselves. Everybody doesn't have the same tools BE FAIR this sh!t won't work. It's like a computer hashing war. If you have a basic laptop pull it out dust it off and use it. And if you see something funny going on in the network you pull out ya big guns and get to hashing to gain control. New people will come in and do the same so it's a hashing war. stop so much history and get a coin in conditions, the tests do them yourself do not use people to do your own tests, publish a code in conditions and an explorer and stop so much history, the crypto world is full of boring people like you F u I'm bored of u mf sh!ting on new coins go fuccv off somewhere else if you don't like it GET!!! I have already realized that you are a child who kicks for not having a lollipop, you are very stupid and your coin will not get anywhere Yo get lost sucker and the explorer? haven't you seen the tutorial yet? you waste your time here hahaha |
|
|
|
|
STOP CRYING AND BEFORE PUBLISHING ANYTHING TEST IT ON YOUR STUPID ACCOUNT!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
The developer said mining was fine from the start. Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair. It's not my fault the chain went funny.
So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair. Or just update the chain.
the developer is an amateur following a youtube tutorial, do not expect much, nor did he realize that the transactions in the 1 wallet did not work a disaster in every way, do not waste any more time  , there is no discord channel, there is no explorer he did not make the windows wallet so it contained viruses, some clever trying to steal some coins or btc You can say amateur but you can't deny this is a good idea I don't care about discord but the block explorer for sure. People are just moving too fast like I said before. I'm still learning but I ain't gone let none of y'all shit on my shit. Foh where's your coin at? This is the first of it's kind. I do not make any coin because I do not want to, nor do I feel like making a coin without meaning because I do not do it, I have the necessary knowledge to make it but I really pass You can say what you wanna say but I ain't gone let u come in here throwing people off. Because u feel Superior to new people trying to help the community. I only ben in since 2017 but started trying to develop my own ideas a couple months ago. So I'm doing pretty fine and the network will be fine without you soon as I get it up and you fast ass cats get lost it ain't even been 2 weeks up. Damn y'all some hatin ass mf lol 2 months of experience loool you have stunned me I am amazed with you |
|
|
|
The developer said mining was fine from the start. Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair. It's not my fault the chain went funny.
So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair. Or just update the chain.
I could except the pull request if submitted again withe the block size increase but keep transaction size at 60 Bytes I want to see if that would work. I'm in middle of testing some stuff out. Since original tasty has the hash power he could mine a bunch of coins and send them to you but the wallet has to be redone. It's a whole process cuz I lost control too early but I rather it happen early so you and others don't waste anymore time because I don't have the hash power to protect the network. It's up to them so it's a test to see if the network can regulate itself because it will be needed. People have to try not to use too much hadhi g power and let people get coins or start sending coins to addresses to other miners to add to whatever they have. If not then I'm going to have to start a new chain and block people from forking in till things settle the network needs to grow grassroots I can only mine about 200 or more without the big hashing power but only maybe 25 with it. It's crazy. That's why I'm curious to what y'all using some transparency would help. Like I said if not then I have to block people from forking.but that probably won't stop others from finding away around. The project might be ruined because the fork I don't understand why someone would fork like that.that was selfish to just takeover we need unselfish miners with big hashing power to help secure the network from others. I know what this coin could do if the network can come together. It's about allocation. Anybody trying to mine without donating or spreading the coins to other less powerful miners shouldn't be here. That's what makes the network secure no one person should have the majority you have to regulate yourselves. Everybody doesn't have the same tools BE FAIR this sh!t won't work. It's like a computer hashing war. If you have a basic laptop pull it out dust it off and use it. And if you see something funny going on in the network you pull out ya big guns and get to hashing to gain control. New people will come in and do the same so it's a hashing war. stop so much history and get a coin in conditions, the tests do them yourself do not use people to do your own tests, publish a code in conditions and an explorer and stop so much history, the crypto world is full of boring people like you F u I'm bored of u mf sh!ting on new coins go fuccv off somewhere else if you don't like it GET!!! I have already realized that you are a child who kicks for not having a lollipop, you are very stupid and your coin will not get anywhere |
|
|
|
The developer said mining was fine from the start. Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair. It's not my fault the chain went funny.
So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair. Or just update the chain.
the developer is an amateur following a youtube tutorial, do not expect much, nor did he realize that the transactions in the 1 wallet did not work a disaster in every way, do not waste any more time , there is no discord channel, there is no explorer he did not make the windows wallet so it contained viruses, some clever trying to steal some coins or btc You can say amateur but you can't deny this is a good idea I don't care about discord but the block explorer for sure. People are just moving too fast like I said before. I'm still learning but I ain't gone let none of y'all shit on my shit. Foh where's your coin at? This is the first of it's kind. I do not make any coin because I do not want to, nor do I feel like making a coin without meaning because I do not do it, I have the necessary knowledge to make it but I really pass |
|
|
|
The developer said mining was fine from the start. Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair. It's not my fault the chain went funny.
So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair. Or just update the chain.
I could except the pull request if submitted again withe the block size increase but keep transaction size at 60 Bytes I want to see if that would work. I'm in middle of testing some stuff out. Since original tasty has the hash power he could mine a bunch of coins and send them to you but the wallet has to be redone. It's a whole process cuz I lost control too early but I rather it happen early so you and others don't waste anymore time because I don't have the hash power to protect the network. It's up to them so it's a test to see if the network can regulate itself because it will be needed. People have to try not to use too much hadhi g power and let people get coins or start sending coins to addresses to other miners to add to whatever they have. If not then I'm going to have to start a new chain and block people from forking in till things settle the network needs to grow grassroots I can only mine about 200 or more without the big hashing power but only maybe 25 with it. It's crazy. That's why I'm curious to what y'all using some transparency would help. Like I said if not then I have to block people from forking.but that probably won't stop others from finding away around. The project might be ruined because the fork I don't understand why someone would fork like that.that was selfish to just takeover we need unselfish miners with big hashing power to help secure the network from others. I know what this coin could do if the network can come together. It's about allocation. Anybody trying to mine without donating or spreading the coins to other less powerful miners shouldn't be here. That's what makes the network secure no one person should have the majority you have to regulate yourselves. Everybody doesn't have the same tools BE FAIR this sh!t won't work. It's like a computer hashing war. If you have a basic laptop pull it out dust it off and use it. And if you see something funny going on in the network you pull out ya big guns and get to hashing to gain control. New people will come in and do the same so it's a hashing war. stop so much history and get a coin in conditions, the tests do them yourself do not use people to do your own tests, publish a code in conditions and an explorer and stop so much history, the crypto world is full of boring people like you |
|
|
|
no exchange no pool is what do you think is the point of hard and other if there are no 2 main components
there is nothing lool, non-functional source code, no explorer, no pool, no discord, no interest from the amateur developer haha  |
|
|
|
The developer said mining was fine from the start. Some of us worked hard to mine it and that was fair. It's not my fault the chain went funny.
So I see no reason why a 1 to 1 exchange is not fair. Or just update the chain.
the developer is an amateur following a youtube tutorial, do not expect much, nor did he realize that the transactions in the 1 wallet did not work a disaster in every way, do not waste any more time , there is no discord channel, there is no explorer he did not make the windows wallet so it contained viruses, some clever trying to steal some coins or btc |
|
|
|
Send me an address privately and I will give a few coins, take it as a gift from kings, do not post here, close the thread  P9QMMU5Se32pxX6QyMmwsJzoyAGmSjiZjv DELETE!!! post I already have you in my wallet |
|
|
|
Send me an address privately and I will give a few coins, take it as a gift from kings, do not post here, close the thread |
|
|
|
I'd suggest a 1:1 exchange. Not many have mined. I hope it wasn't a waste of time.
1:1 is possible thats possible definitely not a waste of time just have to regroup i dont know what kind of computers ya'll working with be im curious. we have to work together and follow a guide thats important in order for this to work. because the coin was forked and a lot of Pieces were mined very quickly. small home quantum computer is online , why don't you create a discord channel? |
|
|
|
ai1DCeJFKTTco2zGMWMzcFZq7yhJdJWKHQ thanks coins airdrops and discord channel not working |
|
|
|
|
other shitcoin , take money and run away another bored life
|
|
|
|
scrypt shitcoin? what year is this 2014? LOL
It seems |
|
|
|
|
another mentally retarded
|
|
|
|
anny new for ltc or insane pump  |
|
|
|
ltc soon 90-100$ price
what do you think guys
Could be next month or next year. Who knows... Ltc to 1000$. Next month. you smoke much I think to pump! you will need many millions of dollars to get that and surely you are not within reach of that  |
|
|
|
The launch of the coin is shit.
The dev, didnt publish source code, and doesnt tell how to mine his coin as setgenerate and generate commands dont work in the wallet.
But someone is mining. And the dev dont answer on questions how to mine his coin/
Scum
stop complaining, you're obviously a newbie, How to mining? , Open Console - generate 100 99999 ENTERClose your damn thread, we all know that this is another scam, more people like you are destroying this exciting world, by the way put the source code in you ass, nobody wants it , Ah, keep hitting people in discord to see if you are left alone |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
