$62,000

15

From what I understand with the story, I conclude that THE PROBLEM IS YOU AND NOT YOUR FRIEND.

You called that as worst and ridiculous moment of yours just because your friend didn't end up covering the supposed weekend hangout?

The nerve. If you have a weekend hangout then, of course, bring some money as well. Why end up being called that worst just because he didn't fulfill his promise? If your friend isn't able to show up then still, invite him to come along and share the bills instead to boost his confidence and overcome his embarrassment about what he did.

There are ways to avoid such questions in the future and not put yourself into lots of related questions.

Just stick with famous and reputable bookies from now on. It might not be an assurance that you are 100% safe even using famous bookies but at least you will minimize the chance of being scammed by these sites as they are registered and centralized.

I wondered why there are users who still end up in illegal bookies despite several famous bookies today.

It's just the same as the usual sports analyst predictions - nothing special.

Supercomputers or what you call them, have no way to predict what's the "exact" thing that will happen since there are game scenarios that can happen in actual games. What they give as a set of predictions is just a product of their followed algorithm.

I'd rather stick with a real sports analyst that discusses the details of their prediction.

Didn't you know that "entertainment" is dangerous?

So much entertained by gambling that these people don't realize that they are now slowly reaching the level of gambler from casual, to regular, to heavy, and will end up addicted. Since they are gambling for fun therefore they want to continue that fun. Since it's gambling they will throw away money here just to make fun. I don't think these people will have good control over their emotions. Regardless of the purpose why they gambling, emotions are part of it, and no excuse. If these people who considered gambling for fun will win at some point, for sure they will continue. If they lose, for sure they will attempt to chase those losses. Not much different from those people who treat gambling for other purposes.

What do you mean by "problem" there?

Just because most players on the Lakers bench aren't that famous or popular, they are considered a problem. These guys are solid role players too.

They are just not getting enough playing time, since for now, the priority is to focus mainly on starters as they are catching up a nice spot in the post-season to avoid the hassle of play-in tournament. But this entire season, this second squad, when being executed properly by their coach, are all playing well.

Changing the game works but depends on how I looked at the difficulty of winning at those games per game provider.

There are games that after you've won a big amount, won't give you another taste of it even if you stay loyal to that game. There are games providers like that. In the case of games that I already experienced winning but am currently, on a bad losing streak, I will try my best to stick with it for a long since I already experienced winning big several times there despite losses on the way. Like it testing my patience lol.

In terms of reducing scams or being minimized, yes it's a good start to see casinos being licensed.

Just think of it, are you willing to play in an online casino that doesn't show the legitimacy of your business? Yes, it might not be an assurance that they won't do some dirty work in the future but likely they won't consider doing that kind of bad stuff since the whole identity of the people running the site is exposed once they apply for a license.

Real people's feedback/review + licensed casinos = should be one of the priorities to look at before using a casino

There's no reliable prediction since it's a prediction lol. Prediction is the same as forecasting.

What you might be looking for is a sports review that analyzes a certain pre-match. Whatever sports review websites you can encounter should do the work but remember that what is stated on those websites is purely analytical and doesn't guarantee that it will happen 100%.

Sports betting isn't that easy.

From the way you asked that question, it's like physical casinos are now doomed because of the growth of online casinos.

How can land-based casinos manage to hold their ground? In the first place, such a question isn't appropriate to ask since land-based casinos are continuously growing and becoming bigger. Just look at how big and active those physical casinos are at those popular gambling havens around the world.

Either online or offline gambling, as long as its gambling, expect it to become more big!

It's better to just give that person the benefit of the doubt and just let them do what they want. In the end, we are still the ones who will decide if we will continue to gamble or not despite lots of advice we will encounter. It might be annoying to hear advice from others saying that we should quit gambling just because they experienced worse but just take it as good advice.

Instead of making it a big deal, let's just understand the behavior of these people as they experienced really bad in gambling.

The movie scenario you mentioned is a product of fiction and might not likely be happening in reality. Since you referred to that UFC fighter as a reliable bet, it means the said fighter might be popular, therefore we can consider him as a big professional fighter.

If these professional players/athletes are involved in intentional loss, the cost of it is so huge, better than being a one-time millionaire just to win the high odds on the bookies. A player might faced sanction such as stripping the status of being a professional athlete with a lifetime ban on that sport, lose sponsorships, face a lawsuit, and many other worse things.

I doubt a professional fighter will be involved in that.

I can't imagine that the Rockets will be able to pass the Mavericks. They met a couple of times this season and although the Rockets were able to defeat the Mavericks at one of those meetups, the Mavericks didn't have Luka Doncic, Kyrie Irving, Daniel Gafford, and P.J. Washington in that game while the Rockets were playing at their full healthy lineup. The Timberwolves recently destroyed one of the top teams too, the Denver Nuggets, and they will be really a tough team to beat for the Rockets.

Confidence is not enough for the Rockets to win but as you said and I agree with, who knows?

If you are a risky bettor, you can put some extras betting on the Rockets' Moneyline and point spread. I'm sure the odds for them will be juicy.

Everytime I have spared funds after placing a bet on my preferred match, those remaining funds are risks on a football match parlay.

Mostly on football games that I don't even know or am familiar with, and my parlay is composed of several underdog odds and draw odds. Just a random pick as personally, I don't watch football games as it's not hyped here in our country. Til now, I haven't managed yet to hit my parlay bets as I understand that it's hard to win it all. Sometimes out of 6 bets, only 3-4 were being predicted correctly and no improvement til now. Not serious about that so it's fine.

You are right, the Kyrie we have known since then is more on solo play.

But here at the Dallas Mavericks, many have doubted that Kyrie isn't fit with Luka since they are both ISO players. I'm one of those doubters and want Kyrie to be traded instead as I think he will just destroy the chemistry of the Mavericks. But that was all changed and I think Luka gives way as a playmaker for Kyrie. Since teams knew that Kyrie always acted solo on most plays, he was sometimes doubled or tripled on defense, and that made other scorers of the Mavericks always free at the perimeter.


There is a personal issue between Lebron James and Kyrie Irving that's why the latter asked for a trade. But before that, their Cleveland Cavaliers championship year is great proof that if LBJ and Kyrie work together as a team, they are a threat.

He also had personal issues with the Brooklyn Nets (a crybaby lol) before that's why he didn't work well with Kevin Durant back then. Then later on, Durant also had an issue with the management there and the rest is history.

Don't jump into betting on random matches that we are not familiar with.

I'm sure lots of bettors are doing that because they saw someone getting profits from it. Maybe a few times we can insert betting on random matches but don't make it a habit. It's still comfortable to bet our money on a match that we know and are familiar with as our knowledge there can be used to make a good analysis. It's also more fun to watch our favorite team while having an active betting on them.

We can't call it gambling now if the winning percentage is high, either you go all-in or not. There's no manipulation but rather, the system was designed to give users more losses than wins and if you hit that big win, then you are lucky! You can't expect that luck is always on our side especially playing a luck-based game like Hi-Lo.

Just give it a time and you might hit that big win someday.

The Dallas Mavericks are really impressive in their recent games.

Last season, many speculated that Kyrie Irving was not fit for the Dallas Mavericks but that all changed this season.

It's also noticeable that Kyrie Irving has many dunks established this season which is unusual to him. I want to see the team reaching the Finals.

I know how to play some skill games like card games (pusoy dos, poker, lucky 9), sports betting, and some PVP games.

As well, I also hooked up on games of luck especially playing slots with my favorite providers Pragmatic Play and FC.

I don't have to pick one over one because both are interesting to play. There are also differences in winning rewards as in luck games, you can expect huge multipliers which is hard to achieve in skill games although of course pure luck is needed to hit that.