 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
As a slight addendum looks like I still need to download a pile of dependencies for the Linux distribution as discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=951753.msg31932663#msg31932663error while loading shared libraries: libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
error while loading shared libraries: libqrencode.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
error while loading shared libraries: libdb_cxx-4.8.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Any chance we can get these compiled into the new Linux release before we come out of Alpha? It will save support questions / new user frustration in the long run if it just "works" out of the box... FR Hi FR, Well, we could compile these dependencies (static libs) with the Vault on Linux, but it's against the Linux philosophy. However, something we have to do is making a package (.deb, .rpm, etc...) for Linux distributions that would handle the magic of shared dependencies installation. If we have time to do it for an Alpha release we will do it for it, if not it will be for the official release. An other thing that should come out is a Docker container for the Vault Daemon, this will app SysAdmin to deploy our system fastly and securily and it will help us to reach new people as all the pain of the installation would be far away. OVA are also planned. Alex4J. |
|
|
|
That all sounds very cool! I am interested on how you intend to limit the number of BPNs active on the network at any one time? - that can't be easy as the information would have to gleaned from network consensus and not a local count as anyone could easy change the source and increase the number of BPNs online at any one time...
FR
Hi, You are correct. The whole system is implemented in the consensus of CBX, we are using Mutex Block, new kind of block that have new "proof" system (let's call it Proof-Of-Mutex if you want). These mutex blocks are containing extra datas that allow us to know the order of the BPN in the queue and its egibility at anytimes. In addition of mutex blocks, we are adding completly new rules in the consensus to detect if a BPN is still active or not. I insist on the fact that all of these new features are rules in the consesus, so it can still be validated overtime at anytime as it is the base of a blockchain application. No worries, we will prepare cool and badass WhitePaper to explain everything in details. Alex4J |
|
|
|
I have bought some CBX on Cryptopia but I can see their wallet has got 0 connections. As result my withdrawal is stuck.
Could devs contact them and help them solve the issue.
You should contact their customer support about it, they should help you and answer you pretty fast. If they need us they will then contact us, but first you have to contact them. |
|
|
|
Hi thankyou for the update.
Can you explain mutex in brief?
Hi, In our context we gonna use it as a lock. It's a kind of distributed lock that all peers gonna be aware of it's state. The purpose is to know how much lock is placed, each time a masternode start it is closing a lock and when the masternode stop it open the lock. There will be a limited amount of lock available. In order to have this distributed and sync through all peers, we will use a block to open and close lock. Usually mutex are used in multithreading environment to avoid having two threads editing the same variable address at the same time. |
|
|
|
I thought I saw some mention of anon being added?
what method of anon are we going for ?
just to ask this again... is this like dash mixing anon or something else like pivX zerocoin anon? Hello, It gonna be something like PIVX |
|
|
|
CBX2U update :
Hello, since 2 weeks i have problems by sending coins
Each time this happen when i try to send coins where i didn't get stake from 24 hours but where i got some stake before
I "checkwallet" before to send coins : all ok "wallet check passed" : true
I send coins via "sendtoaddress" : i got an error
I "checkwallet" again : "i see mismatched spent coins : 1" with the amount i try to send
I "repairwallet"
I send coins again : this time i got tx and the other wallet know it will receive coins then it worked but ...
I checkwallet again : "mismatched spent coins" again for the amount i sended
I "repairwallet" , i "getinfo" : coins are still in my balance
I stop the daemon and restart it , now coins show they are sended.
Dont know what happen. It is because i try with my linux stake wallet or perhaps it's because i have hardstake true ? idk ? ( but each time i got this problem, i see i did not get any stake since 24hours or more while i have more than 500 cbx mature in a tx )
My next step once i have time
-> I will send my coins to my windows wallet or to a paper wallet to keep them safe away since they dont stake enough to paid my server
-> I will try more transactions from my linux wallet to craptopia and vice-versa but this time with nostake
It gonna be fix in next release. |
|
|
|
|
I bought an account to this guy, good exchance.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your support everyone !
|
|
|
|
Hello
I see that CBX is trying to fight for life, but in my opinion, the value of an asset is also determined by its emission.
You are trying to add to your algorithm a masternode (PPN) system and thus increase the attention of users.
But at the same time, the overall inflation of this coin will become even more than 2% in theory and 6-12% in practice.
So what then is the meaning of such an asset as a means of accumulation?
I think you misreaded, maybe read completly all informations about it to have an idea of the real inflation |
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Just a little message to say that the new code base in good way.
I am working on implementing CBX rule on new code base so it accept the old blockchain.
When the new code base will be fully implemented, the masternode will be also possible and done.
There is still few parameters to adjust and adapt, but we are progressing really well.
|
|
|
|
Merci VonPass, topias etait bien mais maintenant je le considere comme de la marde meme si c'est le mieux des plus nuls (yoshit, ccex etc... ) Pour la Roadmap elle est superbe  Pour le prix pas besoin de monter mais effecrivement faut du volume, beaucoup pour les rejoindre et oui le prix peux faire du 100x et c'est effectivement le temps d'investir dedans c'est ce que j'ai fait mais avec mes moyens. J'espère revoir mes NMC un jour pour les revendre sans trop de perte et reprendre du CBX avec (enfin je n'y crois pas trop mais j'espère lol) Merci pour l'outil, je testerai si besoin, j'était parti via le bootstrap de decembre mais meme probleme, enfin pour le moment probleme resolu en me faisant un bootstrap a jour du dernier block via mon vps linux. Merci et ca fait plaisir d'avoir des op en francais Merci pour les bons commentaires pour la Roadmap; nous y travaillons Le développeur programmeur est Belge, et moi, Québécois... Bonne Saint-Jean! Yep, il y a toujours moyen de nous contacter en français, même si je passe moins souvent sur ce thread que sur celui en anglais. Au pire un MP et ça ira. Je suis désolé pour tes 100 CBX perdu, malheureusement, à moins d'avoir plus d'importance aux yeux des autres échanges c'est compliqué. Je sais que lorsque le prix était plus bas, il y avait moyen de faire des achats P2P, certaines personnes de la communautés faisaient beaucoup de trade comme ça. Je ne sais pas si il y a encore des personnes voulant le faire. |
|
|
|
so are you saying in other words, that you do not get a percentage for staking? but are in esence, competing for POS? I thought POS was like interest% not mining?
The idea about PosP is interesting but since there is competition between open wallet, those who have few coins cannot compete against those who have large stash. I believe this only benefits those who have huge bag of CBX. Not a small holder friendly. It is not participation but rather competition. Depends on how many CBX you have and how much competition is out there staking against you. After 1 hour online your CBX is eligible to stake and once you do get a block, another hour must go by before you are eligible again. How many are staking?
If they can address the issue of the competition but give an equivalent share of stake of the coins that are not currently staking to those open wallet would be awesome. Hello, Interesting point, but you are wrong, CBX wallet like all coins split your stake in half if they are higher than 1k cbx. It means biggest wallet only stake with maximum of 1k CBX. 500 CBX in a stake are completly ok and enough to stake, and it's pretty cheap nowadays, it's ~$20. It's still an amount of money, but you can stake with only 100 cbx too, it's just less common to have block but you still earn blocks very often and it's costing ~$5. So it's not a competition between big wallet, it's just an investment. |
|
|
|
Hey all Master nodes may work for CBX, however I would first focus on fixing the current blockchain so it downloads / synchronises in a reasonable amount of time / at all - the bootstrap file is a nice work around but it makes everything look somewhat broken / un-managed if you have to do anything but install it and leave it to sync. Connectivity is an issue for sure; master nodes will help here but the amount of CPU churn the wallet imparts on the hosting machine is crazy high - especially as the CBX network is currently processing a tiny fraction of the total number of transactions that it may one day be processed if CBX's profile raises considerably. I would highly recommend: Snapshot the current chain, hard fork, re-start the block index from zero, adapt the code base of one of the other POS coins in existence that synchronise correctly end to end (headers first certainly improved the bitcoin blockchain download) and re-implement PoSV2 on top. You will consolidate the source, gain all of the various security fixes and start fresh from a known good state. After all that we will have a fast, efficient syncing coin - supported by master nodes that anyone can download and synchronise without additional support FR Memory issue is still a big problem that I am working on. During these last few months I have been a bit unavailable and I am sorry about that. Anyway, CBX development will start back soon. Of course CBX use some CPU and RAM and it gonna be fix with updates of masternode because I plan to change the whole code base of CBX and keep it compatible with old blockchain. I am personnaly against a re-start to the block zero, that's against the blockchain philosophy |
|
|
|
The bootstrap is updated. You can use the CBX tools to update it or download it directly from: http://node.alex4j.cryptobullion.io/bootstrap.zipBy the way, our bootstrap is working like the snapshot I saw this thing is becoming a popular term. Well, our boostrap is in fact a snapshot for a long time because your wallet doesn't have to rebuild the whole block database from a single .dat file. |
|
|
|
i am trying to compile a headless unix but i got this error once i've tried make -f makefile.unix
Hello, Could you please take a screenshot of the issue or copy-paste me what you are getting in the console, thanks ! |
|
|
|
no premine launched ages ago solid network null inflation clean code nice website perhaps the most under valued POS BUT "Integrate CBX to a new, better, more equitable Crypto 2.0 blockchain" utter BS!  you can spin off all you like but SWAPs are scammy mkay  I have to agree and what happened to "focus on CBX"? CBX devs appear to have been busy with a new PoSP coin called PSB?  I am not developing the PSB, so no. I am just helping them when they have questions over the PoSP and CBX to do a correct crypto 2.0. I am just busy because I have alot of work these days, if any big problem or issues appear the cbx vault will be fix asap. Is there any updates regarding to this project i understand that spk is also part of this right how's the development between the two and if i read it correctly you are also helping psb team are we waiting for any updates that will bring this coin back in hype? I am helping them when they have integration question or transition question. Some updates are planned, but I don't know what do you mean by bring back hype ? Maybe a super-fancy-update-of-the-death, I don't know, if community suggest a good update yeah why not. We planned a cloud staking system for CBX, tools to fix troubleshootings, etc... I don't know if it's hype or not, but it's needed and wanted by our community and actually it's what it cares the most. no premine launched ages ago solid network null inflation clean code nice website perhaps the most under valued POS BUT "Integrate CBX to a new, better, more equitable Crypto 2.0 blockchain" utter BS! you can spin off all you like but SWAPs are scammy mkay I have to agree and what happened to "focus on CBX"? CBX devs appear to have been busy with a new PoSP coin called PSB? I am not developing the PSB, so no. I am just helping them when they have questions over the PoSP and CBX to do a correct crypto 2.0. I am just busy because I have alot of work these days, if any big problem or issues appear the cbx vault will be fix asap. Is there any updates regarding to this project i understand that spk is also part of this right how's the development between the two and if i read it correctly you are also helping psb team are we waiting for any updates that will bring this coin back in hype? Dude its right there. He told u hes not involved with PSB team and factually has no time to pay attention to what they do and how they carry out transition from cbx to bullshit 2.0. What he does is sort out questions. If u ask me both CBX and its 2.0 successor, both are crap. But we do not ask you, you are just posting random agression and bad words on all topics of BCT in order to have a better activity. "shit" is the word you used the most i think with this account. Go on other troll topic to get a better BCT rank, not here please. (don't take time to answer to my message please, the proof is in your history of forum message, no need to start a debate, I won't answer). I copy a post from the spark page.
VonSpass
3) CBX has the threat of 124000 CBX being dumped on the market looming, because of the Cryptsy fiasco - until this is resolved there is no way we can integrate CBX.
m33
Number 3 , simply make vote on it to burn or not to burn , god knows when that will be solve , it's already lost .
I do not know if this is possible.
Personally thanks to the advice of elambert I left the majority of my cbx are my wallet.
It should remain me only between 200 and 300 cbx on crypsy.
If I can not retrieve them I prefer they are burnt
Yes we could burn it, but it will lead to less block reward |
|
|
|
no premine launched ages ago solid network null inflation clean code nice website perhaps the most under valued POS BUT "Integrate CBX to a new, better, more equitable Crypto 2.0 blockchain" utter BS! you can spin off all you like but SWAPs are scammy mkay I have to agree and what happened to "focus on CBX"? CBX devs appear to have been busy with a new PoSP coin called PSB? I am not developing the PSB, so no. I am just helping them when they have questions over the PoSP and CBX to do a correct crypto 2.0. I am just busy because I have alot of work these days, if any big problem or issues appear the cbx vault will be fix asap. |
|
|
|
Send me the debug.log it could help me to find your issue.
Tried letting it completely resync from start...blows up. Here are the last 100 lines of debug.log Much easier and quicker to just use the Bootstrap Just restarted everything. Compiled a new copy of qt wallet and grabbed bootstrap. Things went fine till near the end. Here is the debug log where it went bad: SetBestChain: new best=c04072aba14fd2b52224 height=1605050 trust=2172038872580 134662 date=08/24/2016 18:16:58 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED received block b7e1d7f8649c60d40f8b Closed LevelDB successfully connect() failed after select(): No route to host Opening LevelDB in /wallets/.CryptoBullion/txleveldb Transaction index version is 70507 Opened LevelDB successfully SetBestChain: new best=b7e1d7f8649c60d40f8b height=1605051 trust=2172051860702 230272 date=08/24/2016 18:17:08 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED received block 0ca30993e775d27df58d Closed LevelDB successfully Opening LevelDB in /wallets/.CryptoBullion/txleveldb Transaction index version is 70507 Opened LevelDB successfully LevelDB batch commit failure: IO error: /wallets/.CryptoBullion/txleveldb/155078 9.ldb: Too many open files ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED received block 5acfca6624b88cd2a164 Closed LevelDB successfully Opening LevelDB in /wallets/.CryptoBullion/txleveldb Transaction index version is 70507 Opened LevelDB successfully LevelDB batch commit failure: IO error: /wallets/.CryptoBullion/txleveldb/155079 1.ldb: Too many open files ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED received block 90e54be20c845dce4498 Closed LevelDB successfully Opening LevelDB in /wallets/.CryptoBullion/txleveldb LevelDB read failure: IO error: /wallets/.CryptoBullion/txleveldb/1549059.ldb: T oo many open files Transaction index version is 0 Required index version is 70507, removing old database Opening LevelDB in /wallets/.CryptoBullion/txleveldb ************************ EXCEPTION: St13runtime_error init_blockindex(): error opening database environment Invalid argument: /wallets /.CryptoBullion/txleveldb: does not exist (create_if_missing is false) CryptoBullion in ProcessMessages() Seems like some kind of error on open files...any ideas? You used the wrong BDB version to compile it, you must use same BDB version if you want use bootstrap, if not used you must download from 0 |
|
|
|
I can't download CBX Bootstrap file to speed up syncing. Writes "The page isn't found". It isn't lucky me.
My server that host the bootstrap is down. We are working on an alternative to upload it on Github and avoid this problem in future. We have putted our best scientist monkey on this task, so it should be done fast as far as we have enough bananas for them. Thanks for your understanding |
|
|
|
|
