How it is possible that Byteball is on Bittrex but not IOTA ?
The IOTA developers have said it is difficult. But you can see Bittrex listed Byteball without problems.
For sure, the IOTA devs have an exclusive agreement with Bitfinex. And if I see what Bitfinex do with their Tether-shit it is unbelievable how IOTA devs trust Bitfinex. For sure something is wrong between Bitfinex and IOTA and the whole IOTA-Exchange thing.
IOTA has no fucking exclusive agreement with anyone. Why do people talk about something they have absolutely no comprehension of? |
|
|
|
Not lucky, just experienced scammer.
And what is the goal of this "scam"? Bringing Tupac back to life |
|
|
|
|
Just be patient, it's all in our queue of tasks. While I hate to refer to it, I believe every single manual claimant is extremely happy with how things played out. The likelihood that you'd keep all of your iotas and wait for anything even remotely close to current market cap before selling is zilch, and we all know it. Because of this I feel like my words should bear sufficient gravitas when I tell you not to worry; the current value of your pending imminent iotas are DIRECTLY a cause of how we do shit, so let us do what we do, and soon you'll be EXTREMELY happy that you had no influence over our decisions.
|
|
|
|
As long as iota aren't distributed, the owners not only made 0 ROI but lost 100% of their investment and missed all other opportunities in crypto since 2015.
I will refund you your original amount in this case. Give me your bitcoin address. |
|
|
|
IOTA and its research proposal predecessor DagCoin don’t record any form of objective transaction finality (such as Byteball’s stability points) for the unsynchronized partial orders of transactions in the ledger! When the first sentence is a utter lie... IOTA came long time before DAGCoin... ugh, you're the lamest troll ever. DagCoin: a cryptocurrency without blocks September 11, 2015, 11:10:14 PM vs IOTA October 21, 2015, 06:06:02 PM I think September 11 happened before October 21 in 2015 like it did last year too and many years before that. How is it going David, have you turned off the Coordinator? Months seem to be confusing for you, it is August now, back in June you said the Coordinator would be turned of at "end of July". This August came after July as is tradition, the centralized Coordinator is still active. Ugh, even in our own damn whitepaper (which you clearly haven't read we reference the first ideas of using DAG in 2014 on a public forum, we discussed IOTA with numerous people in the crypto realm before August... We never said the Coo would be turned off at the end of July, we said it'd be optional, which it is, as explained in the Tranparency Compendium.... |
|
|
|
IOTA and its research proposal predecessor DagCoin don’t record any form of objective transaction finality (such as Byteball’s stability points) for the unsynchronized partial orders of transactions in the ledger! When the first sentence is a utter lie... IOTA came long time before DAGCoin... ugh, you're the lamest troll ever. |
|
|
|
|
Chill.the.fuck.out
Jesus, you have all got more reassurance than a kid who had a nightmare and jumped into their parents' bed.
We've made you the highest ROI in crypto history (yes, twice that of Ethereum) and you got the fucking gall to whine. Yes, read the T&C if you fuckedup.
This kind of borderline sociopathic narcissism on chronic display is not conducive to your goals... We got more important things to do than worry about some lazy self-entitled idiots who didn't care about the project until our blood, sweat and tears over 2 years suddenly made them 'hit the lottery'. Yea, I am not REMOTELY worried about reputation or any legal shit, I am prepared to go all the way if people piss me off sufficiently.
|
|
|
|
Looks like good news  But what is the snapshot for?  Does anyone know? the article doesnt say Snapshot is for the client update. |
|
|
|
|
Over the next week there will be several updates on technical progress and growth, as well as adoption, some of it will require active engagement by IOTA users, hence the unorthodox 'pre-announcement'.
|
|
|
|
I'm yet to receive my coins from the IOTA team.
Have you provided your full real life info? Thanks to JLP's threats we - as a legally registered company in Norway - now have to do duedil... JLP has not answered my requests in public or PM, so most likely he is forfeiting his iotas in order to retain his anonymity, which might be valuable to him in his insane ICOs. I just emailed you what you asked for. Thanks |
|
|
|
I'm yet to receive my coins from the IOTA team.
Have you provided your full real life info? Thanks to JLP's threats we - as a legally registered company in Norway - now have to do duedil... JLP has not answered my requests in public or PM, so most likely he is forfeiting his iotas in order to retain his anonymity, which might be valuable to him in his insane ICOs. |
|
|
|
Does not matter if troll or not. Imagine a random CEO of any well known company stating publicly to an upset costumer / troll "FUCK YOU and all of your kinds". This would be the end of his / her career. You are no drugged rockstars, you are (getting) public figures now which represent a "business" with hundreds of millions at stake. Better act accordingly, just my few cents.
This seems to be quite a prevalent but utterly false view of reality. I just can't get past how you feel entitled to be in any position to tell us how to act. I could be a pretentious asshole and simply say "you are all beneath me, you haven't achieved anything in life in comparison", but I don't. I engage you like I would anyone else. Also, IOTA is not a company, it's an open source project like Linux. Heard of the guy behind Linux, Linus Torvalds? Our 'controversial statements' pale in comparison, enjoy: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Linus_TorvaldsThis is what I mean. You always get into a very defensive position when someone critises your public behaviour. As those opinions rise about this communictation problem, independently there has to be something about it, don't you think? BTW: Linus Torvalds is an asshole and he lost a lot of supporters because of it, be better than Linus.. No, not at all. Would you prefer we treat people like peasants and only communicate with the community through pre-filtered artificial statements? That is a VERY naive understanding of what 'professional' is, nor is it conducive to fostering a open community. The fact that the founders and devs are available to the community is something much more valuable than us speaking through a communications executive. I realize that you mean no ill, but believe it or not you come off as incredibly arrogant when you presume to know how we should behave. Maybe it would be better to look at the empirical evidence I.E. the results of our work and behaviour, and accept that reality isn't as you have imagined it. Let results speak for themselves. We often get complimented by people in large organizations for being so upfront and blunt with trolls in fact, it's something we've had laughs about in meetings and conference calls more times than I can even count. The world isnt' as black/white as you seem to believe. |
|
|
|
Does not matter if troll or not. Imagine a random CEO of any well known company stating publicly to an upset costumer / troll "FUCK YOU and all of your kinds". This would be the end of his / her career. You are no drugged rockstars, you are (getting) public figures now which represent a "business" with hundreds of millions at stake. Better act accordingly, just my few cents.
This seems to be quite a prevalent but utterly false view of reality. I just can't get past how you feel entitled to be in any position to tell us how to act. I could be a pretentious asshole and simply say "you are all beneath me, you haven't achieved anything in life in comparison", but I don't. I engage you like I would anyone else. Also, IOTA is not a company, it's an open source project like Linux. Heard of the guy behind Linux, Linus Torvalds? Our 'controversial statements' pale in comparison, enjoy: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds |
|
|
|
Damn, this communication and attitute of the leaders and devs is very chilling. I still have confidence in the technological aspects but the leadership worries me a lot. This will harm the project long term and I am concinced it already has. You should hold back your huge egos and calm your temper on public communication. Those people have reasonable claims and should be treated accordingly. It is understanable that as it takes longer and longer, their patience shrinks which ultimatly results in anger. Don't respond with anger and arrogance, better find acceptable solutions. Be open to critique, also and especially in this case when it refers to your personalities. Absorb, reflect and grow with it. It will pay out long term, for your characters and the prosperity of the IOTA project. I'm still supporting and hope it will remain so along the journey How did this meme get started? Here are the dry indisputable facts: 1) Everyone had the opportunity to auto-claim, meaning this would not have been an issue at all. 2) People insult and accuse us of scamming them for simply being too busy to prioritize what is ultimately a result of their own laziness / negligence. 3) Most of the current (15 or so) manual claimants FAILED to follow the manual claims instructions, therefore it takes a lot longer. We are busy 24/7, lazy people who contribute absolutely nothing is not our priority, but they have already been provided assurance they will get their iotas. 4) We have given them a fairytale ROI, yet they show absolutely no respect whatsoever. Do you think that somehow because we are the leaders and devs we should just shut up and take it? And please don't come with the naive and stupid: "just rise above it", you can't just "rise above" fallicious claims and accusations of scam. This has nothing to do with egos, just basic common sense and common decency, which these idiots lack |
|
|
|
To be honest I have invested in IOTA based on the tech. Had I seen before-hand a petty argument over tokens and senior members of the company swearing, I would have thought twice.
Not too late to sell. Also IOTA Is a non-profit open source project, not a company. I absolutely love this argument: "If I had seen someone use 'bad words' it would have affected my decision" haha, love SJW snowflakes. |
|
|
|
I have to say, if this guy is the CEO of IOTA I am wondering how he can be taken seriously by cisco, bosch or any other company. Letting his developer insult people on the forum, letting him waste his time in this post just shows that these guys might be brilliant on a technical level ( I think everybody accepting that) but on a human level it feels like we are talking to a bunch of colleague graduates. I have invested with a group of people into IOTA and we hold it as a longterm investment, but had I seen this post before buying IOTAs I just might have waited the price to crash down and scooped it up at 50% of what I paid pre- Bitfinex listing.
@IOTA CEO And @IOTA DEV, stop fooling around and just give these poor fuckers their IOTA. you guys are so rich now, so why do you care in the first place about these peanuts.
JUST GET IT DONE, make a good PR story out of it and stop wasting your time in a forum full of trolls and nerds.
Being brilliant does not mean you have to be assholes. Get your shit together! I invested because I was seing IOTA at 20.000.0000.000 USD Valuation within 3 years, so go work on that instead of wasting your time here!
I find it immeasurably hilarious how people like yourself just talk shit, while we consistently deliver. Hahah, before it was "you guys will fail", then we make history and people are like "GO WORK FOR ME". Shortly: FUCK YOU and everyone like you. |
|
|
|
You could have handled all those emails easily by now.
I couldn't, not my expertise. just get it figured out. for a company with a 700.000.000 valuation you are doing a very shitty job in satifying your investors. sell some IOTA and get someone to do the PR work for you. Haha, we have provided the highest ROI in crypto history and we are doing a 'shitty job in satisfying our investors' because a handful of people were too lazy to follow proper procedures? The stupidity is palpable. Never change crypto, never change. |
|
|
|
|
Just as a reminder, ball has been in Jean-Luc's court for over a week now. As soon as he hands over the information he will receive his tokens. I even sent him a PM reminder earlier today.
|
|
|
|
... Looks like it was already answered: 99.9% of people have received their claims and we have repeated AD NAUSEAM that anyone that has claimed by July 11 will receive their iotas...
No, this is not answer, this is usual iotatoken's lie, and you know that it is a blatant lie. He said not "claimed by July 11" but "will receive tokens by July 11", and even "before we go on public exchanges": I have made 1 promise since day 1: every individual that claims their tokens by July 11th will receive it by then, and on top of that I also promise that they will receive their iotas before we go on public exchanges, if they claim in time.
they had followed the instructions, yes. It's obvious none of you got any experience running a project of the magnitude of IOTA with tens of thousands of people, hundreds of million of dollars and world leading companies and organizations involved, but I can assure you that if you did, you would have to make decisions on what to prioritize. Firstly, anyone that paid attention/cared could have auto-claimed and subsequently this would not even have been an issue. Secondly, I gave everyone a supremely simple 3 step procedure, yet about a dozen failed to follow it, therefore the delays. Finally, it has been stated publicly ad nauseam that those who have followed the right procedure prior to July 11th WILL indeed get their tokens. Now go back to 'contributing' to reality by spamming forums and stay out of the real world of progress, thanks. |
|
|
|
Today's the last day to claim iota from the token sale.
Anyone that has claimed and is pending is guaranteed, so no worries. To clarify, "claimed and pending" just means we've sent David the email with old address, old seed, new address we are good right? Even if we haven't heard back? Thank you. Yes. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
