Decentralizeation comes with disadvantages and that's one of the challenges we are facing. A random person can create token out of no where and list on exchange without liquidity, you can only buy but cannot sell this tokens, it's ridiculous.

They sometimes mimic token that has been listed on exchanges just to lure investors and traders to buy their fake token in returns for Ether or Usdt. The only remedy to this cause is to check smart contract on market cap and Coingecko for confirmination before proceed with any trade.

Or not.  Stablecoins are comparably even further away from gold than Bitcoin is.  Those are more akin to an IOU.  And that's the charitable comparison.  Part of me just wants to dismiss all stablecoins as outright scams, as I'm yet to see much evidence to the contrary.

They won't get addicted if they have good guidance from their parents.
Parents should teach their kids on proper management of money.
But I don't always agree that if they play more & more on games like TopT3ns said, they will get addicted.
Mentioning my experience, my chiildhood was almost full of child gambling games, but I did not become addicted into it even on time that I'm winning too much.
I also experienced betting for our childplays, on on my gradeschool and Highschool days, I already betting and fighting others on games like DOTA( Dota 1 for gradeschool, Dota 2, on highschool to college).

So for me, the key is discipline
It's fine using money for gambling, but know your limitations.

The reason why children are also betting from their spiders is because of the influence of the adult. Hunting spiders is hard when you're gonna do it in a broad daylight, while in night, they're easy to hunt since they are in the middle of their web and all you need is flashlight. So they come up with the idea of selling it or let it fight and then put a bet on it.

And about your concern on how dangerous are those spiders, they are safe to play even if the children got bitten by it since it's just a orb Weaver spider.

Honestly hacks and stolen funds are the major reason why I'm so against dex exchanges, they give users way too much freedom to get away with any crypto crime, the only way this hacker can sell some stolen coins and tokens is through decentralized exchanges, it's a haven for criminal activities, I think Centralized exchanges are one step ahead decentralized exchanges in this part.

Apparently, there's a couple of ways to earn passive income in crypto whether you're you do so with tokens or you opt to do it using stablecoins. Also,  there's a new trend right now that also allows users to earn passive income called "yield farming" thanks to DeFi platforms.  Despite the risks involved, I've seen most crypto users who have actually earned from them.  For instance, majority of the people who participated in the recent UNI airdrop by Uniswap have been involved with DeFi, one way or another.

Places to earn passive income in crypto:

1. Binance Savings, Crypto.com earn, Nexo and Blockfi: These are standard platforms that offers interests for holding cryptos (Bitcoin and altcoins) on their platforms.
2. DeFi - It has been the trend for the last couple of months. Users can participate actively via yield farming or liquidity mining.
3. Staking: This is self-explanatory, you get to earn some rewards for holding tokens for a period of time. Best suited for long term investors.

---

Compared to stocks, I think crypto has more incentive to offer.

Just from changing rules and not giving what is required or said amount already shows that the project is not really that good to make it a big thing, that's the reason maybe it didn't attract many investors as the project may be not that useful or the team is not good enough to really succeed fast. Being true to words and considering the participants even the bounty hunter as part of the team or as investors may make their projects more likely to succeed if their good in managing and marketing.

It is difficult to believe these "stories". Can anyone be so dumb to actually hire a murderer for just $5,000? I still remember the case of Ross William Ulbricht. The FBI wanted to make sure that he remains behind bars for the rest of his life and it is being alleged that they created some fake web chats showing that he hired contract killers to take down his competitors. It is very easy to create fake web chats.

Well this is certainly not very surprising coming from Putin, a straight up dictator.  Dictatorships often want to completely control everything and no surprise they want to have complete oversight of a currency that is hard for them to controls.  I could easily see other countries doing this. I could even see the United States doing this..all governments desire control and power over citizens..this is just another way to do that.

Have you watch the video? Casimero calling Inoue Motherfucker, I don't think that's something not disrespectful.

Well, maybe Oilacris is right too, it depends on how we interpret it, but the word "Motherfucker" is not hard to interpret, lol.

Do they ? I have yet to meet a person who seriously believes he can beat Blackjack longterm or is already doing so.


No strategy "guarantees 100% profit", also not combining the 500 best ones. A positive result can be achieved, which would then be to minimize your losses. I wouldn't call it positive though, it's still negative, because you lose money. The improvement of losing less could be called a positive result otoh.


.....and the house always in the end