|
183
|
Economy / Auctions / [RESERVE AUCTION] 50,000 XRP (and decimal change) Ripple wallet
|
on: March 03, 2018, 01:19:30 AM
|
The wallet: rME4iXc1wzG47nbFd8yZ71n6qxrGmnpARE Encrypted Reserve Amount (click here to learn how to decrypt when the pass is given at auction end): lDoS9cW3acbuGGNJeGPoAaXAsTpxS9AC1QGzEkA/GcPcv7g13p4ATJ0VRwzIgnu7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 - Bidding Currency: USD/United States Dollar
- Starting Bid: $500 USD
- Payment Currency: BTC, equivalent to the winning bid.
- Auction Ends: 0000 UTC the day after the reserve amount is met/exceeded.
There will be no warning before the end, so click 'notify' to enable notification of new replies for this topic & check your email inbox/spam/trash folders for notifications. - Payment Deadline: 8 hours from the time I PM my payment addresses (SegWit or standard, your choice) to you at auction end.
If you're unsure if you'll be able to pay between 0000-0800 UTC every single day of the year, then don't risk the... - Late Payment Penalty: Negative feedback, which will be removed after you pay 2x the amount of your winning bid's BTC equivalent. You will still get the 50,000 XRP (and decimal change) only.
- No terms or conditions (including by any other name) may be proposed or demanded (including by any other name) by any bidder.
Reply with bid numbers and a $ only, no text. - No one I've negatively rated may reply to this topic (irregardless of whether it's a bid or not), and anyone who does, implicitly agrees to be lifetime-banned from Bitcointalk.org.
So, read your ratings. And while you're at it, read my ratings here & everywhere if you think you're going to be able to be the first to con me (outside of an exchange). - I reserve the right to end this auction in case of my own incompetence, without liability for anyone, except...
- If you reply to this auction topic with something along the lines of "use an exchange" (in other words, "commit economic suicide"), you agree to receive & NOT complain about my negative trust rating of 21 million BTC (the amount to eventually be lost to economic suicides?) with this topic as reference URL showing you agreed to this. My rating will not be removed until you pay me the exact amount I lost when I did use an exchange - BTC1.84915808 - the only non-trivial loss of BTC I've ever suffered.
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: Petition for TheButterZone
|
on: March 01, 2018, 08:18:40 PM
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
Ooh, another (along with tarmi & EcuaMobi) attempt to conflate a term not violated with the actual term violated, for which you were fair-warned & rated accordingly: why don't you just sell it in a trading platform? - If you reply to this auction topic with something along the lines of "use an exchange" (in other words, "commit economic suicide"), you agree to receive & NOT complain about my negative trust rating of 21 million BTC (the amount to eventually be lost to economic suicides?) with this topic as reference URL showing you agreed to this. My rating will not be removed until you pay me the exact amount I lost when I did use an exchange - BTC1.84915808 - the only non-trivial loss of BTC I've ever suffered.
As it seems the anti-terms lynch mob's abject bullshit will never end... <disabled notifications for this topic>[/list] |
|
|
|
|
186
|
Other / Meta / Re: Trust spam report + suggestion
|
on: March 01, 2018, 04:10:31 AM
|
While less annoying than Moseas79, several other users intentionally add extra blank lines or leave spammy "previous versions" of left trust with repeated information with the sole intention of making it longer and use more real estate, like TheButterZone or Engg.Chaks did on my profile. Would you prefer I revise history, like you have perpetrated against me? Sites like archive.is can't access trust pages as they're behind registration wall, forcing reliance on forge-able screenshots/printing to PDF, but at least your revisionist ("instead of") history is easily disproved by looking at my sent negative ratings upon "those who are scammers or untrustworthy". Not more than 300 chars per feedback at most
Having an idea of how little you & your lynch mob think of clearly-violating fair-warned binding terms, I don't expect much, but... If you GPG-clearsign your consent, forfeit rating reciprocation on any/every platform, and agree to pay me BTC12.5 if you renege, I'll change my rating upon your Bitcointalk trust page to a 300 character max negative.  |
|
|
|
|
187
|
Other / Archival / [WTS] Karl Malone NBA merch
|
on: February 27, 2018, 06:03:43 AM
|
http://store.nba.com/Karl_Malone/I have many NBAStore.com / Store.NBA.com promo codes, will use one per proxy purchase. You'll pay BTC equivalent to the total in USD before my promo code is entered. If you don't want to pay with BTC (SegWit/standard), hit the road, jack. Any other terms? TBD. Please PM, IM (links under my QR code avatar), text 619-393-2253, or IRC me. Don't, if you won't prove that you have enough funds to pay immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone Removed From Default Trust
|
on: February 21, 2018, 05:15:11 AM
|
TheButterZone was removed from DT. Thanks philipma1957 As a result I've removed the counter feedback I left as it's no longer required. Thanks for supporting this everyone. Such mindsets do not belong on the DT list in my opinion. Agree. Nobody with a legal mindset should have to opt-out of the DT list when they never opted-in to all its adverse liability. The trust system is more of a liability or neutrality than an asset to me.
Liabilities:
Takes up too much of my time dealing with complaints about my level, contracts enforcement
Place for people to libel me in retaliation for citing their own words
People "buying ratings" and wanting me to give them a positive rather than a neutral, based on them having no others or what seem to be weighty negatives (and people wanting my positives to be removed based on subsequent allegations)
Neutrality:
Those who act like they want to trade significant amounts P2P/OTC ignore my ratings and/or won't cryptographically verify it's actually me who earned them
Asset:
?
Also in my opinion: any person who buys an account & libels others about their doing the same, does not belong on Bitcointalk, but I'm not the forum's majority stakeholder, so, meh. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2059051.0If you hadn't have brought it up, I wouldn't have known to look you up, baka. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd9muK2M36c<disabled notifications for this topic> |
|
|
|
|
191
|
Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone trust abuse and hostile auction conditions
|
on: February 21, 2018, 04:36:47 AM
|
Congrats, (...?) on everything except the actual term OP Ggddtt violated
So you agree on the other points? Not with points different from the one ibminer failed to validate, and irrelevant in your attempt to conflate, as ibminer's context carried a risked BTC advance warning & consequence, and your 2 points did not have the context of a risked BTC advance warning nor consequences thereof.
This: Proof of funds can be given to trusted escrow.
violated this: Auction Terms (should go without saying, but: if violated, negative feedback with risked BTC will be left)... - No terms or conditions (including by any other name) may be proposed or demanded (including by any other name) by any bidder.
So? Maybe it violated a local rule of yours, but it wasn't a scam attempt or produced any loss of money. Asking to get a trusted escrow involved is actually trustworthy. What could deserve negative trust is refusing. In any case, what we're discussing here is whether there was a scam attempt and, therefore, negative trust was deserved. "Trusted" - like the misplaced trust that you will ever actually read my posts & acknowledge what I wrote instead of poorly pretending to reply to them in good faith? Once again, Sgt. Schultz:
I didn't say force. But me & countless others who bought into that advocacy in various posts did commit that economic suicide, and lost untold millions if not billions in USD-equivalent BTC as a result. So fuck all of us AGAIN, and ONLY, for falling victim to shills? No, fuck the shills by every legal means necessary.
Again, if they're not forcing you to anything (which you agree they're not doing) then they're not scamming. Scams do not require an element of force. Why are you so insistent on shoehorning that term in? Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
You explicitly spam-posted this on my profile: I negatively rated them because I strongly believe that each of those terms violators were running a "scam" That doesn't make sense. They're not scamming and you know it. Don't try using SaltySpitoon's quote to try and justify your actions. Stop justifying the actions of those who induce to lead or move by persuasion or influence, as to some action or state of mind or otherwise contribute by any other name to financial loss. Inducing is an element of various crimes, and/or indefensibly unethical behavior.
Your wrongful interpretation of everything as a scam attempt is even more strange because most of your overpriced auctions and offers really look like jokes/trolling so joking replies would seem welcome. I posted once in one of your threads truly convinced it was a joke, but now I think you actually may have been trying to be serious! Not everything, nor overpriced compared to contemporaneous market prices. Not everything, agreed and sorry for the generalization. But a lot of things which are actually not scam attempts. And several threads of yours are definitely overpriced compared to rational market prices. Several of your threads do seem like jokes/trolling. I spend hours researching multiple, contemporaneous markets' prices & then rationally sync my prices with them, yet you still claim they are "definitely overpriced"? I'm physically sick of you & the anti-terms lynch mob's abject bullshit; you're ignored & my notifications for this topic are disabled. |
|
|
|
|
193
|
Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone trust abuse and hostile auction conditions
|
on: February 21, 2018, 03:43:15 AM
|
Inapt comparison. A person doesn't suffer significant economic loss from someone walking normally, wearing normal footwear, on unsecured, normal, grass that they do not personally own or have to maintain at their own significant expense.
Actually ibminer has a point. A person doesn't suffer significant loss either from someone posting a bid at market price instead of the requested minimum bid, you're free to just reject the offer; or from wrongly interpreting a rule (either accidentally or intentionally), you can just correct him so it's not "misinterpreted by others". Congrats, your service in the anti-terms lynch mob remains impeccable, by playing Sgt. Schultz from Hogan's Heroes on everything except the actual term OP Ggddtt violated, that I quoted in my rating, quoted in this topic, & will once again quote here for you to once again pretend you couldn't see, hear, or know. This: Proof of funds can be given to trusted escrow.
violated this: Auction Terms (should go without saying, but: if violated, negative feedback with risked BTC will be left)... - No terms or conditions (including by any other name) may be proposed or demanded (including by any other name) by any bidder.
Advocating exchanges = advocating economic suicide
Even if you think so, someone "advocating economic suicide" doesn't force you to commit that suicide. You can just ignore them. No money is lost because of that post. I didn't say force. But me & countless others who bought into that advocacy in various posts did commit that economic suicide, and lost untold millions if not billions in USD-equivalent BTC as a result. So fuck all of us AGAIN, and ONLY, for falling victim to shills? No, fuck shills by every legal means necessary, especially when they go & fuck themselves WHEN MORE EASILY AVOIDABLE THAN STEPPING INTO THE GRAND CANYON (from the Grand Mesa?). Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
Your wrongful interpretation of everything as a scam attempt is even more strange because most of your overpriced auctions and offers really look like jokes/trolling so joking replies would seem welcome. I posted once in one of your threads truly convinced it was a joke, but now I think you actually may have been trying to be serious! Unhelpful hyperbole in bold. Not everything, nor overpriced compared to contemporaneous market prices. |
|
|
|
|
194
|
Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone trust abuse and hostile auction conditions
|
on: February 20, 2018, 10:52:55 PM
|
You are probably just trying to make a point with the statement, but, asking for any financial incentive to have feedback removed is too close to extortion for me. Extortion does not come with fair warning. I gave fair warning - terms not to violate, and varying penalties depending on the term violated. Would you say this government sign in front of a school: "Don't murder here, if you do you will be put in prison for life, unless you pay a fine of 1 billion dollars to each of your murder victims' families." is "too close to extortion"? --snip-- May be irrelevant now, as I just saw philipma1957's post, but I saw this more like: a government sign in front of a school: "Don't walk in the grass or you will be expelled and a reference added to your student record which will blacklist you from other schools/colleges/etc. You can come back to school but in order to remove the reference on your student record, you will need to pay 20,000 dollars." This would be backed with a zero tolerance policy and no 2nd chances are offered, the only way to ever get your record corrected after walking on the grass is to pay the fee. To make this example a little more accurate to how I saw this, the fee & sign is created & enforced by 1 person at the school. Inapt comparison. A person doesn't suffer significant economic loss from someone walking normally, wearing normal footwear, on unsecured, normal, grass that they do not personally own or have to maintain at their own significant expense. Advocating exchanges = advocating economic suicide. Late payment=dissuading others from paying on time, if at all. Those are significant losses. Ggddtt didn't violate either of those terms, though, so they can only complain about a negative trust rating that will never be removed, as the term broken is part of what I strongly believe is Ggddtt's "scam" of pretending to be dyslexic/illiterate in order to sabotage my auction & gain sympathy from the anti-terms lynch mob. P.S. Fixed misquote of my post edited ~7 minutes before your reply. |
|
|
|
|
195
|
Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone trust abuse and hostile auction conditions
|
on: February 20, 2018, 10:36:00 PM
|
I took you off dt as requested
Thanks, now we'll test that "buying ratings" hypothesis, more than just looking at email forwarding server traffic logs to see who is actually using their forwarding vs who bought it not to use. If you want to prove that you're actively using my email forwarding service, sign this message inside the quotes with the BTC address in your contract & PM it only to TheButterZone: "I waive the right to privacy specifically limited to TheButterZone publicly posting only the dates from my email forwarding traffic log."
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone trust abuse and hostile auction conditions
|
on: February 20, 2018, 09:11:01 PM
|
If it will stop all this BS, again I say: I have no attachment to being on DT.
You can always ask philipma1957 to remove you. Already did, as I quoted in my previous post. You are probably just trying to make a point with the statement, but, asking for any financial incentive to have feedback removed is too close to extortion for me. Extortion does not come with fair warning. I gave fair warning - terms not to violate, and varying penalties depending on the term violated. Would you say this government sign in front of a school: "Don't murder here, if you do you will be put in prison for life, unless you pay a fine of 1 billion dollars to each of your murder victims' families." is "too close to extortion"? The proper way to deal with a DT member is the same as every member; don't violate their binding terms & hope the mob will get you out of the terms you agreed to in advance.
In other words, don't post if you're going to pretend you're dyslexic/illiterate. |
|
|
|
|
197
|
Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone trust abuse and hostile auction conditions
|
on: February 20, 2018, 08:28:45 PM
|
The proper way to deal with a DT member is the same as every member; don't violate their binding terms & hope the mob will get you out of the terms you agreed to in advance.
The term you violated in my OP is also quoted & specified in my rating. Kindly drop the false pretense that you're illiterate/dyslexic & should be allowed to sabotage my auctions with impunity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd9muK2M36cThis: Proof of funds can be given to trusted escrow.
violated this: Auction Terms (should go without saying, but: if violated, negative feedback with risked BTC will be left)... - No terms or conditions (including by any other name) may be proposed or demanded (including by any other name) by any bidder.
As Self-EscrowGate proved anyone can get away with a criminally-indictable offense more severe than simply being a ham sandwich & not even at a bare minimum get permabanned from BCT... I've noticed "self-escrowing" & escrows not keeping up/being able to keep up with their deals. I've noticed an escrow telling the victim terms for release, then when met, going back on them & not releasing, leaving it up to the perpetrator to authorize release.
If "I" ever accept or offer escrow services, assume my account is compromised.
That is not necessary.  The trust system is more of a liability or neutrality than an asset to me. Liabilities: Takes up too much of my time dealing with complaints about my level, contracts enforcement Place for people to libel me in retaliation for citing their own words People "buying ratings" and wanting me to give them a positive rather than a neutral, based on them having no others or what seem to be weighty negatives (and people wanting my positives to be removed based on subsequent allegations) Neutrality: Those who act like they want to trade significant amounts P2P/OTC ignore my ratings and/or won't cryptographically verify it's actually me who earned them Asset: ? If it will stop all this BS, again I say: I have no attachment to being on DT.
The fact that he's blocked PMs and makes you go to his own site to contact him is a bit weird too. That was because of this forum bug I'd reported earlier, which later seemed to have been silently patched. As soon as I noticed it had, I reverted to specific blocks of time-wasters, from block all. |
|
|
|
|
198
|
Other / Archival / Re: [RESERVE AUCTION] 50,000 XRP (and decimal change) Ripple wallet
|
on: February 20, 2018, 08:05:59 PM
|
The wallet: rME4iXc1wzG47nbFd8yZ71n6qxrGmnpARE Encrypted Reserve Amount (click here to learn how to decrypt when the pass is given at auction end): lDoS9cW3acbuGGNJeGPoAaXAsTpxS9AC1QGzEkA/GcPcv7g13p4ATJ0VRwzIgnu7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 - Bidding Currency: USD/United States Dollar
- Starting Bid: $60,000 USD
[/size] - Payment Currency: BTC, equivalent to the winning bid.
- Auction Ends: 0000 UTC the day after the reserve amount is met/exceeded.
There will be no warning before the end, so click 'notify' to enable notification of new replies for this topic & check your email inbox/spam/trash folders for notifications. - Payment Deadline: 8 hours from the time I PM my payment addresses (SegWit or standard, your choice) at auction end.
If you're unsure if you'll be able to pay between 0000-0800 UTC every single day of the year, then don't risk the... - Late Payment Penalty: Negative feedback, which will be removed after you pay 2x the amount of your winning bid's BTC equivalent.
- No terms or conditions (including by any other name) may be proposed or demanded (including by any other name) by any bidder.
- No one I've negatively rated may reply to this topic, irregardless of whether it's a bid or not.
So, read your ratings. And while you're at it, read my ratings here & everywhere if you think you're going to be able to be the first to con me (outside of an exchange). - I reserve the right to end this auction in case of my own incompetence, without liability for anyone, except...
- If you reply to this auction topic with something along the lines of "use an exchange" (in other words, "commit economic suicide"), you agree to receive & NOT complain about my negative trust rating of 21 million BTC (the amount to eventually be lost to economic suicides?) with this topic as reference URL showing you agreed to this. My rating will not be removed until you pay me the exact amount I lost when I did use an exchange - BTC1.84915808 - the only non-trivial loss of BTC I've ever suffered.
Why did you give me negative trust? The term you violated in my OP is also quoted & specified in my rating. Kindly drop the false pretense that you're illiterate/dyslexic & should be allowed to sabotage my auctions with impunity. |
|
|
|
|
199
|
Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone Removed From Default Trust
|
on: February 20, 2018, 07:45:22 PM
|
I only made a fair opening bid to have the auction going, this narcistic psycho immediatly gave me a negative trust rating, saying on plain sight on his topic he asks 1.8BTC to remove it.
As I PMed you, after you first made that clearly false claim of a term applying to you that doesn't: What's your issue with feigning illiteracy/dyslexia, thinking you can get away with violating my auction terms, and libeling me in retaliation for not letting you get away with it? And this removal term clearly doesn't apply to you: If you reply to this auction topic with something along the lines of "use an exchange" (in other words, "commit economic suicide"), you agree to receive & NOT complain about my negative trust rating of 21 million BTC (the amount to eventually be lost to economic suicides?) with this topic as reference URL showing you agreed to this. My rating will not be removed until you pay me the exact amount I lost when I did use an exchange - BTC1.84915808 - the only non-trivial loss of BTC I've ever suffered. Kindly cease your repeated libel, revisionist history & flame baiting, tarmi. And to all members of the lynch mob, read my sig. So you give me feedback stating that i commit 'economical suicide' on your post by placing an opening bid, next you tell me the term you put regarding economical suicide doens't apply to me? I could be wrong, but you saying you will leave neg trust rating, asking 1.8 to remove it, and effectively doing this is all in the same red line on your own topic. And if it does no apply to me, then this entire rule should not apply to me and you should not be leaving negative trust without any reason. Heck, you look the kind of guy that get's a thrill from punishing his kids. You are without any doubt a narcistic person. It's interesting that you libelously accused me (despite being able to ask me & my earliest counterparties details of our trades in a version of The Newlywed Game) of that which you are self-admittedly guilty.You're continuing to revise history to stir up a lynch mob against the victim of your sabotage (auction posts can only be moderated by forum staff/mods) & libel of my auction & me, respectively. Quoting what I put in your rating & quoted in the last post of my topic, this is your actual violation: Starting bid 168,500 USD.
Current market value: 56999 USD @ coingecko prices.
That won't work. I can make a starting bid of 40k to get this started if you accept it.
Term violated: Auction Terms (should go without saying, but: if violated, negative feedback with risked BTC will be left)... - No terms or conditions (including by any other name) may be proposed or demanded (including by any other name) by any bidder.
Reply with bid numbers and a $ only, no text.
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone Removed From Default Trust
|
on: February 19, 2018, 07:57:49 PM
|
I only made a fair opening bid to have the auction going, this narcistic psycho immediatly gave me a negative trust rating, saying on plain sight on his topic he asks 1.8BTC to remove it.
As I PMed you, after you first made that clearly false claim of a term applying to you that doesn't: What's your issue with feigning illiteracy/dyslexia, thinking you can get away with violating my auction terms, and libeling me in retaliation for not letting you get away with it? And this removal term clearly doesn't apply to you: If you reply to this auction topic with something along the lines of "use an exchange" (in other words, "commit economic suicide"), you agree to receive & NOT complain about my negative trust rating of 21 million BTC (the amount to eventually be lost to economic suicides?) with this topic as reference URL showing you agreed to this. My rating will not be removed until you pay me the exact amount I lost when I did use an exchange - BTC1.84915808 - the only non-trivial loss of BTC I've ever suffered. Kindly cease your repeated libel, revisionist history & flame baiting, tarmi. And to all members of the lynch mob, read my sig. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
