|
965
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Change my name! "I am __ Satoshi __."
|
on: July 17, 2016, 06:03:04 PM
|
When you finally manage to get this done share some photos from your licence or ID (ofc hide the other personal info & your pic)
Will do. How much you got until now? Or no one chipped it?
Any forward progress would have been added to the reserved post, #2. |
|
|
|
|
966
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: What's your opinion of gun control?
|
on: July 16, 2016, 05:03:23 AM
|
|
There can never be any actual barrier before access to a firearm. See: black market, human ingenuity
Any more laws at this point might as well say "we've infringed only you law-abiding, mentally-sound, sober people all the way just short of democide, now prepare to be executed".
|
|
|
|
|
967
|
Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Beware of PayPal and other reversible transfer services
|
on: July 15, 2016, 05:27:09 AM
|
Can you get chargebacked scammed with Skrill? I want to start trading  Yes, you can. Anything that's funded by credit card can be charged back. Are there any relatively popular payment gateways that actually prevent chargeback scamming? Yes, and they're all in the cryptocurrency world, where it's impossible to chargeback. |
|
|
|
|
970
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: What's your opinion of gun control?
|
on: July 09, 2016, 08:30:22 AM
|
For me it's all about freedom. The 2nd Amendment gives us the right to keep and bear arms. That right has been infringed upon enough. Gun control is a joke. How would you like to live in a society where only the police and criminals had guns ?
The human right to self-defense will never be infringed upon enough for those who tighten restrictions (like a noose) so tightly that everyone except violent criminals as always and forever, will have their guns taken from them as "a danger to themselves or others", solely determined by violent criminal safety advocates. Violent criminals simply cannot coexist in a world where the human right to self-defense is uninfringed by their beloved "gun control" laws. See the per capita violent crime rate of the UK, 3.31001528944831x that of the US, in 2011. One would think the US government, as it is controlled by violent criminal safety advocates, would have every reason to fudge its numbers even WORSE than the self-defenseless UK to do "whatever it takes to justify gun control", and the UK government, as it is also controlled by violent criminal safety advocates, would have every reason to fudge its numbers even BETTER than the US to shriek "OMG GUNS, this is proof their streets are rivers of blood and banning effective self-defense equals utopia!" Yet both governments are simultaneously "lying" in exactly the WRONG directions to prove "gun control works exactly as intended"?  |
|
|
|
|
973
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: What's your opinion of gun control?
|
on: July 07, 2016, 07:28:29 PM
|
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.
Having guns personally makes some people to feel saved especially if they live in areas with high level of criminal. How else to protect themselves if government can't do that? but most of the people are keeping it just for fun and just for showmen t. it in turn create problems. it can make a person more emotional. and in very minor issues it make people to use it. it is a fact that the use of gun is too easy to use. but when you use it against one one then it becomes beg issue to control it. Bullshit projection. |
|
|
|
|
976
|
Economy / Games and rounds / Re: [Primedice.com] The Great Primedice Giveaway 4 Everyone!
|
on: July 04, 2016, 08:31:58 PM
|
US & UK now fucked?
Same behaviour as before afaik - there are legal reasons to prevent those countries from gambling (other than the free version), I guess. Never seen that notice from the first time I joined PD in 2014-2015 (I think I deleted my account and rejoined in 2015), until today. |
|
|
|
|
977
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: What's your opinion of gun control?
|
on: July 04, 2016, 08:30:39 PM
|
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.
Having guns personally makes some people to feel saved especially if they live in areas with high level of criminal. How else to protect themselves if government can't do that? The pen is stronger then the sword. Just talk out conflicts, not shoot them out. The gun is stronger than the pen. Often people won't accept what is written.  Mass murders only successful in "gun-free zones". "Gun-free zone" signs work perfectly. I dont think this is strictly true, there was a piece on radio 2 some time ago just after the shooting in California or wherever it was and they spoke and asked if there have actually ever been any times when a mass shooting has been stopped by a gun holder and no one phoned in to say there had. the only thing ive ever read about a legal gun holder stopping a mass shooting was the article baddecker posted earlier. Maybe it just never actuall makes the news. I suspect that such events are downplayed. The narrative pushed is gun control, and these events work in the opposite direction. https://www.buzzfeed.com/RYANHATESTHIS/10-POTENTIAL-MASS-SHOOTINGS-THAT-WERE-STOPPED-BY-SOMEONE-WIT?utm_term=.cn0YEv7yA#.lspDgKpEGIt's supposedly a big problem in science; the null set (when the simpler explanation is purely malicious revisionist history/malpractice/feigned innumeracy on the part of the vast minority of researchers who've focused on self-defense pros and cons). I'm not sure if this story is true since I heard it multi-hand away from the source, but: The other Manhattan Project during WWII was a building or condo in Manhattan, where the world's greatest minds were gathered, so government/military officials could ask them advice. One of those minds was a statistician. He was presented with an exhaustive compilation of all the places on planes that had been struck by enemy bullets, and asked where the best place to put armor was. He answered immediately: all the places where the bullet holes aren't. Because all the planes that had been downed in enemy territory and unable to be recovered for analysis, had obviously been hit in those places. For the planes that were able to be studied for bullet hole locations, the pilot/copilot might have been hit, but they survived long enough to fly their plane back for analysis. It's not a "mass shooting" if no mass (of people) was shot, only the first 3 or less victims, and possibly the intended mass murderer themself (either self-inflicted as is wont to happen when they see a gun pointing at them, or by a Good Samaritan aka "gun nut"). The most important thing is stopping a mass murderer instantly, so emergency medical aid/transport can be rendered. Most GSWs are survivable as long as those aren't delayed. |
|
|
|
|
979
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: What's your opinion of gun control?
|
on: July 04, 2016, 06:04:48 PM
|
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.
Having guns personally makes some people to feel saved especially if they live in areas with high level of criminal. How else to protect themselves if government can't do that? The pen is stronger then the sword. Just talk out conflicts, not shoot them out. The gun is stronger than the pen. Often people won't accept what is written. Mass murders only successful in "gun-free zones". "Gun-free zone" signs work perfectly. |
|
|
|
|
980
|
Economy / Services / Re: 0.2btc for hints sending sound through a wall
|
on: July 04, 2016, 06:42:24 AM
|
If there's ever a time when nobody's in your apartment and your neighbors are sleeping, you could get a WiFi smart switch, plug a radio with the bass turned up into it, and turn it on remotely. I would have said a jackhammer or some loud tool, but IDK if there's a smart switch with that much output power.
The trouble with leaving a device in your own home that is left playing loudly (and the neighbors are clued in that you are not home) is that they can then report you for having loud noise. It's about the flat next to me. The crack addicted neighbours turn their music and TV so loud my children can't sleep well. Talking with them didn't change anything. Police doesn't care.
Even if they did, point IP cameras where the police are likely to be seen, and turn off the WiFi smart switch when they arrive. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
