61
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Christianity is Poison
|
on: April 08, 2017, 02:06:11 PM
|
So, the best way we can help locked-in (won't change) sodomite unbelievers, and all locked-in unbelievers, is to execute them as fast as possible. Read the above quote from our in-house forum devil worshipper, then tell me again Christianity isn't poisionous (depending on the dosage of course). Good luck with that. As usual, you are so deceptive in the things you say. My whole idea was to save sodomites and other unbelievers from trouble and pain. Haven't you heard of mercy killing? This is the greatest form of mercy killing ever. It might be the only form that is right. If you believe your own density to be correct, you are coming closer to being like a locked-in sodomite. But your justification for execution isn't based on fact or even anything that comes even remotely close to fact. It's based on blind speculation. Nothing else. The world is sick and tired of people like you. Here's how you and your brethren work: 1) Create an imaginary threat. 2) Rush over to save people from the imaginary threat. 3) Claim you helping them. (When in fact it's the opposite). 4) KIll them, for their own good, from the imaginary threat. 5) Claim your actions were fully sanctioned from God and claim the moral high ground. 6) Rinse and repeat, until the good people of the world put a stop to your evil actions. The devil must be really please with you. Yes. It is a lot easier for you to stick your head in a hole, like an ostrich. It won't save you from your death and coming destruction, however. Ahh, following rule #1 I see. Let's hope you get what the devil promised you for saying these lies. Do you think he will?
|
|
|
63
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Christianity is Poison
|
on: April 08, 2017, 01:32:45 PM
|
So, the best way we can help locked-in (won't change) sodomite unbelievers, and all locked-in unbelievers, is to execute them as fast as possible. Read the above quote from our in-house forum devil worshipper, then tell me again Christianity isn't poisionous (depending on the dosage of course). Good luck with that. As usual, you are so deceptive in the things you say. My whole idea was to save sodomites and other unbelievers from trouble and pain. Haven't you heard of mercy killing? This is the greatest form of mercy killing ever. It might be the only form that is right. If you believe your own density to be correct, you are coming closer to being like a locked-in sodomite. But your justification for execution isn't based on fact or even anything that comes even remotely close to fact. It's based on blind speculation. Nothing else. The world is sick and tired of people like you. Here's how you and your brethren work: 1) Create an imaginary threat. 2) Rush over to save people from the imaginary threat. 3) Claim you helping them. (When in fact it's the opposite). 4) KIll them, for their own good, from the imaginary threat. 5) Claim your actions were fully sanctioned from God and claim the moral high ground. 6) Rinse and repeat, until the good people of the world put a stop to your evil actions. The devil must be really please with you.
|
|
|
64
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Christianity is Poison
|
on: April 08, 2017, 06:55:48 AM
|
So, the best way we can help locked-in (won't change) sodomite unbelievers, and all locked-in unbelievers, is to execute them as fast as possible. Read the above quote from our in-house forum devil worshipper, then tell me again Christianity isn't poisionous (depending on the dosage of course). Good luck with that.
|
|
|
65
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Talking about Atheism...
|
on: April 08, 2017, 06:48:51 AM
|
The stupid part of your lies? If you don't change, you will be tossed into the Lake of Fire in the judgment. EDIT: BTW, when you get there (the Lake of Fire) you won't be able to even think of blaming me for not working hard enough to get you to change. You'll be in too much pain to think of much of anything. *Chuckle* All courtesy of your "loving" god. LOL Thanks for providing yet more evidence that Christinity can be poisonous, so I can steer clear.
|
|
|
66
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Talking about Atheism...
|
on: March 30, 2017, 11:25:37 AM
|
Bible people are mixed up. This is what alcoholics would call "a moment of clarity". Yes BADlogic, you are very mixed up. Now you've accepted you have issues, (always the hardest part), let's move onto the next step and see if we can steer your ship towards the truth, instead of it's current collision course into an iceberg. Well done by the way, I think you're now ready for the next step. Don't let us down.
|
|
|
67
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Bitcoin is my currency.
|
on: March 29, 2017, 12:03:10 PM
|
So I understand that the onus is on me to prove that I am in fact a prophet of god.
Prophet of which God? There's thousands and thousands. You never specified which one? Not that it matters because... All prophets of God are false.All the popular ones that went viral, All the thousands you've never heard of that have come and gone, All the thousands yet to come from today. All share the same trait, they are ALL false. Same as you. Just another grain of sand on the beach with the other thousand and thousands of other grains of sand. Nothing to see here.
|
|
|
68
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you believe in god?
|
on: February 15, 2017, 10:45:38 PM
|
So you admit that if your god is real, then it is perfectly acceptable to give a child cancer and/or to let a child be raped by a servant of his?
Chuckles you are a sick and twisted individual.
As you continue to remain an enemy of God, you thereby uphold all the evil in the world. Taking the wise position of being an enemy of your (very obvious) evil false god is of little consequence. In fact, it's a good thing not succumbing to evil, as evil breeds more evil. You yourself have clearly demonstrated this when you publically announced non-believers (in your god) should be executed. However, enemies of the truth (such as yourself) creates all sort of problems. Start getting yourself on the side of what's good, wholesome and proper. Get yourself on the side of the truth. BADlogic, enemy of truth.
|
|
|
69
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you believe in god?
|
on: February 13, 2017, 11:05:39 PM
|
As you well know, God gave mankind freedom.
We don't even have free will. Then mankind listened to the devil, and brought imperfection into the world.
We don't even have free will. One of the greatest forms of imperfection is to not acknowledge the existence of God.
We don't even have free will. It is your desire for evil and wickedness that is helping to push the healing hand of God away.
We don't even have free will. Why not turn, accept God, and pray for His healing hand to come to you and all people.
We don't even have free will. He will listen, if you turn.
We don't even have free will. Turn, now, before it is too late for you.
We don't even have free will.
|
|
|
70
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Is science a religion?
|
on: February 04, 2017, 04:56:47 PM
|
The afterlife does not exist.
Really? Considering you haven't died yet to know this, how do you know? Your just guessing. You yourself say that the evidence of its existence is not. To believe this can only fanatics and children.
Afterlife I assume your talking about here. I never said this, I said nobody knows what happens after our death (if anything). Fanatics and children? What are you talking about? How can you abandon the goods of this life in the name of non-existent life.
Lost me on this one?
|
|
|
71
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Is science a religion?
|
on: February 04, 2017, 03:38:56 PM
|
Some scientists work on a specific science project for more than 30 years. And they still haven't found out if their project is accurate the way they hypothesize. Sounds like a lot of faith to me. Christianity has been around for centuries and Christians still haven't figured out if it's the truth yet, let alone agree with each other. All they can do is just say it's the truth, but not actually put anything solid on the table. Sounds like a lot of faith to me. Blind faith. In my understanding, blind faith is fanaticism. I wouldn't say fanaticism. I mean many people believe something will happen after they die (afterlife for example), I wouldn't claim this as fanaticism. Nobody knows what happens after our death (if anything), because we haven't died yet to find out. It's all blind faith.
|
|
|
72
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Is science a religion?
|
on: February 04, 2017, 03:32:58 PM
|
Mmm, lets dig deeper here. When scientists or anyone else believes that the things expressed by science theories are reality and factual, they have a religion going for themselves. So here your saying religion is a belief or set of beliefs that cannot be proved to be factual, right? That's your definition of religion. Of course, nobody knows for sure if these people believe the theories to be fact, or if they are simply liars when they treat the theories as though they were fact. Now your saying that people that treat theories as fact are liars, so the same rule must apply to religious people that treat their beliefs as fact, right? Stand to reason. Since you treat Christian mythology as factual, that means by your logic, you're a liar. To make matters worse, as we both know, theories are superior to mythology as theories are based on observations and experiments and mythology is based on blind wishful thinking, blind guess work and not forgetting a dollop of pseudoscience to keep the scientifically illiterate happy. Your words, not mine. Since I don't really know of any Christian mythology, you are wrong in your assumptions again. Whether or not I am a liar isn't what is important. More important is the fact that either you can't think very well, or you are extremely deceptive, or both. Well if you walk about with your eyes shut and fingers in your ears going "la la la", you will miss lots of things seen and heard in life. Whether or not I am a liar isn't what is important. Well for someone that claims they're speaking "The Truth", I'd say it vitally important. Seems to me there's "The Truth", and there's "BADlogics Truth". Some scientists work on a specific science project for more than 30 years. And they still haven't found out if their project is accurate the way they hypothesize. Sounds like a lot of faith to me. Christianity has been around for centuries and Christians still haven't figured out if it's the truth yet, let alone agree with each other. All they can do is just say it's the truth, but not actually put anything solid on the table. Sounds like a lot of faith to me. Blind faith.
|
|
|
73
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Is science a religion?
|
on: February 03, 2017, 09:06:46 PM
|
Mmm, lets dig deeper here. When scientists or anyone else believes that the things expressed by science theories are reality and factual, they have a religion going for themselves. So here your saying religion is a belief or set of beliefs that cannot be proved to be factual, right? That's your definition of religion. Of course, nobody knows for sure if these people believe the theories to be fact, or if they are simply liars when they treat the theories as though they were fact. Now your saying that people that treat theories as fact are liars, so the same rule must apply to religious people that treat their beliefs as fact, right? Stand to reason. Since you treat Christian mythology as factual, that means by your logic, you're a liar. To make matters worse, as we both know, theories are superior to mythology as theories are based on observations and experiments and mythology is based on blind wishful thinking, blind guess work and not forgetting a dollop of pseudoscience to keep the scientifically illiterate happy. Your words, not mine.
|
|
|
74
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is there truest religion?
|
on: February 03, 2017, 09:29:52 AM
|
There are many religions - But only one true faith and salvation in our Lord, Jesus Christ.
Our Lord??? Less of the our please. You can be quite certain your Lord has got nothing to do with me. Thank you very much.
|
|
|
77
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: I just want to shit on somebody.
|
on: February 01, 2017, 11:22:40 AM
|
Why not collect your excrement on a plate and then tip it on yourself, if your into that sort of odd thing. This is not about having fun, or receiving pleasure. This is about showing your dominance, letting your target know he is insignificant, inferior. Not if he grabbed hold of your nuts and squeezed. He'd be quite in control then.
|
|
|
78
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists?
|
on: January 31, 2017, 11:25:10 AM
|
Personally I think those trying to obtain scientific proof of the existence of god are approaching this from the wrong perspective, you believe in god proof or not proof.
+1 Spot on. It's called faith, a belief that is not based on proof. Science can never proof God, not now and never will, because science can only use empirical data. Anybody claiming or trying to obtain scientfic proof of God is: 1) Lying or plain ignorant of science. 2) Too much spare time on their hands. 3) Having some sort of faith breakdown. Ask yourself, why would somebody of faith need (or even seek) scientfic proof of God? Surely that's the whole point of faith? Seems to me, if someone does, they are in the middle of some sort of God faith crisis in their life. Pretending they have scientfic proof of God, is just a cry for help. 3) Because blind faith is never strong. It might be vocal, but it is not strong. Faith in God is faith in what He says. If you want to simply believe that He exists, your faith is rather blind. Get to KNOW that He exists, so you have opportunity to listen to what He says. Then you can believe in Him or not. But all religion is the definition of blind faith. People choose to believe stories in a book written years ago without ever seeing anything first hand. Claiming the bible (or any other claimed holy book for that matter) is the "word of God" is a circular argument based on 100% blind faith. In order to know if the bible is the "word of God", you would first need to check it against the "word of God" to make sure. (Assuming there is such a thing anyway.) Of course once someone claims something is the "word of God", then anything could be the "word of God". Am I speaking the "word of God"? Seems to me people just pick and choose what is the "word of God" is to suit themselves. Some dishonest people claim the bible must be the "word of God" because it's actual existance is impossible, so it's a miracle. Well what does that mean? Obviously it does exist, so it's not impossible. Now, once you open up the notion of miracles existing, then you have to accept that other miracles can happen, so then impossible things aren't impossible anymore. But, guess what..... They then claim that evolution is impossible, and go all funny when you say "well it must be a miracle". Blind faith is foolish faith.
|
|
|
|