..
Am ready surprised that you are saying all this, because we have watched both teams, an we can both testify that they are not doing that well. I agree with you that Liverpool might be doing better than Chelsea but they are not special at all, because their new manager is still trying to implement his playing system at the club, just as xabi Alonso is trying to do with Chelsea, so even though Liverpool looks like the favourite in this game, I wouldn't be ruling out the chances of Chelsea, because they have the firepower upfront to do a lot of damage to this Liverpool team in this game coming up. Both clubs are currently managed by coaches who are experimenting, making it difficult to determine whether their current results should be considered a success. I still expect more from both Chelsea and Liverpool. Of the five matches played so far, Liverpool has fared slightly better than Chelsea, yet I remain convinced that Chelsea still has plenty of room for improvement. I agree that it is still too early to make a strong judgment on either team, especially with both managers trying to establish their own systems. Five matches are not enough to show the full picture, and consistency will probably matter more than a few early results. Liverpool may have the slight advantage right now, but Chelsea's attacking options mean they can punish Liverpool if they find the right balance. I think this match could come down to which team adapts better during the game rather than simply which squad looks stronger on paper. |
|
|
|
I know that it can be frustrating to have to wait a long time for your money, but as long as the withdrawal eventually gets processed and the casino isn't trying to find a reason not to pay, I wouldn't consider it a deal breaker. Every person is different, so what's ok for me might not be ok for you. I am generally more patient. I have had self transfers of bitcoin take 7-10 days to confirm at times lol. I am not the type of guy who will bite his nails and check his wallet every 5-10 minutes, wondering why the transaction hasn't confirmed and what's going to happen with my coins. I know it eventually will or I will speed it up.
Experienced users of a casino and new users of the same casino will have very different feelings with pending withdrawals. You already had experience with JP and you can feel calm without panic if your withdrawal is pending for hours or days. It's still inconvenient but you at least are not panic. However it is different with new users of JP, they lack of experience with JP and withdrawal processing, so they will have more reasons to feel fearful and panic that they will lose their coins and money. In general, this withdrawal procedure needs to be improved by JP for both current and new users. I agree that experience makes a difference, but a casino shouldn't rely on users being patient just because they have withdrawn successfully before. New players judge a platform by their first experience, and unclear withdrawal timelines can quickly damage trust. Even if every withdrawal is eventually paid, providing estimated processing times and updates when delays occur would help reduce uncertainty. Transparency is especially important in crypto gambling because users can easily compare platforms and choose one that offers a smoother withdrawal experience. |
|
|
|
I also had this kind of perspective of yours that at the end it will not be fair on the players if they are really innocent. but the big question is are the players involved also innocent? I heard rumours that some players are also bought more that its shown to the public and we cannot say the players aren’t part of those backdoor deals.
Let the punishment be served. I believe the EPL has punished for ever offence and it will be just if those punishments are being applied just as it should be.
I don’t support unfair decisions or judgement, but I also frown at Cheating a system. Manchester should face the consequences.
The truth is, I don't know about that whole player involvement thing. I imagine some of them have their own side businesses, but I don't think they'd go as far as doing shady under-the-table deals. They all earn serious money, so why would they get involved in something crooked that ruins their reputation? It would expose them to public backlash and tarnish their entire career. I agree that if the club is found guilty, they should face severe punishment. However, stripped titles feels way too harsh. The players fought on the pitch, suffered through matches, and put in all the physical sacrifice. Taking those titles away just like that doesn't make sense—and honestly, awarded titles don't carry any real value for the team that gets them default-style. Relegating them to the second division and banning them from the Champions League for a few years, similar to what happened with Juventus, would be more than enough punishment. I think we should separate the club's responsibility from the players' involvement. Unless there is evidence against individual players, it would be unfair to assume they were part of any wrongdoing. At the same time, punishment should reflect the seriousness of the proven offences, not public anger. Relegation or a European competition ban might sound reasonable, but the final decision should follow the rules and established evidence. Stripping titles is controversial, yet allowing a club to keep trophies gained through proven financial violations could also undermine fair competition. |
|
|
|
|
Higher interest rates can increase the cost of financing a war, but I doubt they are enough to end one. Governments may prioritize military spending even when it means borrowing more or cutting other budgets. Also, commodity prices depend on actual supply disruptions, not only on traders' long and short positions. One interesting point is that higher rates can benefit stablecoin issuers holding interest-bearing government debt, so the effect on USDT is not as straightforward as the original post suggests.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe people invest in Bitcoin for different reasons, but its limited supply and decentralized nature are what make it interesting to me. Some people focus on long-term growth, while others value financial freedom and having greater control over their money. However, beginners should remember that Bitcoin's price can fall significantly, and profit is never guaranteed. Before investing, I think it's important to understand the technology, learn how to secure your private keys, and avoid investing money needed for everyday expenses. Belief in Bitcoin is one thing, but understanding the risks is equally important.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree that financial discipline plays a major role, but I don't think we should assume that every long-term holder will make a profit or that every trader will lose money. Bitcoin's volatility affects everyone differently depending on their entry price, time horizon, and risk management. Even long-term investors can face significant losses if they invest more than they can afford to hold through a downturn. In my opinion, the key is not simply holding or trading, but understanding the risks and making decisions without letting greed or fear take control.
|
|
|
|
|
One practical solution is to set a fixed risk limit before entering a trade and never increase it just because the last few trades were profitable. A winning streak doesn't prove that the next trade has a higher chance of success. Keeping a trading journal can also help reveal when position sizes start increasing after wins. The important test of a strategy is not only whether we follow it during losses, but whether we still follow it when confidence is high.
|
|
|
|
|
The hardware wallet itself is not the main thing I would worry about in a crowded house. Someone finding or even stealing the device does not automatically give them the Bitcoin; the recovery backup is far more important. I would keep the hardware wallet and recovery backup in separate, discreet locations and avoid telling people where either one is kept. An alarm can provide an extra layer of awareness, but it does not solve the main problem if the seed is exposed. For larger holdings, a properly managed passphrase or multisig setup can also reduce the risk of a single backup being enough to access everything. Privacy is probably the simplest security layer here.
|
|
|
|
|
One thing I would add is that comparing the final amount alone can be misleading because the purchasing power of the money also changes over 25 years. An investment can show a large nominal return while giving a much smaller real return after inflation, taxes and fees are considered. That is why I think the useful question is not only “which asset made the most money?” but also “how much purchasing power did the investment actually preserve or create?” Looking at both numbers would make this kind of financial literacy exercise much more useful.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk username: impulse709
SCORAS user ID: 425918721
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sell few accounts. If anyone needs them, please contact me
full member 35$
sr.member 65$
hero member 100$ (sold out)
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, I've successfully logged into all 16 of my accounts and started posting on the forum again. Let's see how they're going to give negative trust to my new accounts this time. And if anyone is interested in buying accounts, feel free to contact me. I still have more than 200 accounts available.
|
|
|
|
|
hosemary FinneysTrueVision icopress remember I will come back again in a terrible form. 4 accounts have gone I am coming with 16 accounts so be ready.
|
|
|
|
Maximum win should not be capped on the Bankroll size, because it will appear that only those with the highest bankroll can also stand a chance of having high winning potential. Still, things don't work like this in most cases in gambling, and that is why everyone is presented with equal opportunity based on the level of risk we are going to take. If you can accumulate odds or stake high, you could also stand the chance of having a max win from the bet you are taking, along with the risk and odds factors altogether.
It seems that you misunderstand the main point of this topic, it is not about limiting max win based on player's bankroll but based on casino's bankroll. No matter how much the bankroll of the players, they have the same chance to hit the max win cap set by the casino. Max win cap/limit set by the casino is must thing to have as it is how the casino manage their bankroll to avoid getting bankrupt in a single bet or few bets only. I agree, that a maximum win is a tool used by the casino to manage their bankroll and not an individual player. If a player hits that desired result, he or she still has the same chance to achieve it. If there are no reasonable limits, a small or medium-sized casino might go bankrupt following a single exceptional pay off. However it's important that this is made known ahead of time to a player before they place a bet. Trust is also crucial. And hidden or disproportionately low win limits can negatively affect trust and lead to a sense of being deceived among players. |
|
|
|
The government of each country sees Bitcoin differently, some countries see Bitcoin as illegal, and some countries consider it illegal. But in countries where Bitcoin is legal, such as El Salvador, they know that Bitcoin is a legal currency and the people of their country will benefit from it. To be honest, I also think that people benefit from Bitcoin, but why does the government prevent it? Of course not for tax reasons. Basically, the Bitcoin trend is so that no illegal money is circulated from their country. However, apart from Bitcoin, people are circulating their money in other countries in various ways, which are illegal, so why is the government only thinking like this in the case of Bitcoin?
Different countries have different perceptions of Bitcoin. Some view it as illegal and some countries look at Bitcoin as illegal. However in countries where Bitcoin is legal they know it is a legal currency and people in their country will benefit from having it. I do believe people benefit from Bitcoin, but why is it that the government is stopping this? Of course not for tax reasons. In a nutshell, the purpose of the Bitcoin craze is that they do not allow any unlawful money to circulate in their nation. However, apart from Bitcoin, people are circulating their money in other countries in various ways. Which are illegal, so why is the government only thinking like this in the case of Bitcoin? |
|
|
|
So I'm still asking, how long do you think it's going to take to get the basic knowledge needed to start investing in bitcoin, you keep making it look like it's something that's going to take alot of time but as far as I'm concerned getting the basic knowledge needed for investing in bitcoin can be done in a matter of hours (and this long is just to give everyone the benefit of the doubt) if you are planning on taking days to get basic knowledge then you are looking for more than just the basic knowledge needed to start investing. It depends on the person's intellectual quotient (IQ) to read and understand it's research analysis in bitcoin, someone who's smart and highly intelligent can comprehend it within a short period of time..while someone who have low intellectual quotient (IQ) it will take it a long time before it will comprehend the basic things of bitcoin before embarking into the investment..Actually everyone have different principles for investment...but for a safer side, anyone who wants to invest in bitcoin, should research properly or else, it will be disappointed, many people who has invested in Bitcoin has been disappointed because of lack of knowledge... You have made a fair point but I would still argue that getting the knowledge needed to be able to start accumulating bitcoin will take long at all for someone who actually wants to start buying bitcoin, even if I raise to a day, 1 day dedicated to learning the basics about bitcoin and the person will find out at the end of that day that they've even learned more than rhe basic, of course having that knowledge isn't bad, it will always be a good thing to know these kinds of things but to say you need to know so much before you can start investing is wrong. The basics of Bitcoin don't need an advanced understanding to get started with. If you're interested in the basics you can learn them in a day or two, and start investing with a small amount of money. The difference is not IQ, it is the attitude to continue learning and being disciplined. A lot of investors make trouble due to their emotional investing rather than investing in the long term. Use a safe wallet, learn about the risks, invest as much as you can afford and keep learning as you gain experience. |
|
|
|
I have never be that lucky of turning my welcome bonus into a real money because i have tried so many times in turning my welcome bonus into a real money anytime i come across bonus on my bet account but i still end up not succeeding after all, this thread just reminded me the day i come across gamblers discussing on how they were able to be lucky in turning their casino welcome bonus into a real money without stressing themselves, so after i heard all they have discussed, i just concluded that turning welcome bonus into real a money can't be favourable to all gamblers all the times, so any gamblers that were able to to turn their welcome bonus into real money are very lucky.
I do agree that not all players will get to enjoy the 'cash back' aspect of a welcome bonus. Of course, luck is a major part of it, but the bonus terms make a huge difference, as well. With the high wagering minimums, maximum bet limits and game restrictions, it becomes difficult for the wagerer to secure the successful rollover. It is possible to do, but the players who have done it are usually of the type that are patient, play eligible games and don't take unnecessary risks. A welcome bonus is not a guaranteed prize. But rather an additional chance to win. If it becomes real money. That's a wonderful reward but not always |
|
|
|
Most casinos will always have some similarities especially in the interface because why go for something completely different when the previous designs have been working well with bettors, and most bettors are used to the interface, humans at times don’t want certain changes because they feel it will just make the whole gambling process more complex, even the developers won’t want something completely abstract, every developer will definitely have a pattern/template from which they are designing from and that have been working for them over time, it is just few changes they would make from the previous casino designs, though some casinos still have certain peculiarities.
I feel the main reason for the similarity of most casino interfaces is because they follow designs which players are familiar with. Having the lobby, wallet, promotions and games readily available to the user will make it easier for the user to enjoy without confusion. If you use a different layout, it may appear different. But it may also be confusing to the frequent players. Even if they're not offering anything new. Casinos can still stand out in the pack by providing faster loading times. Smoother navigation. Exclusive features. And better performance. In my view, it is more beneficial to enhance the usability of the current interface than to overhaul it for the sake of "uniqueness.I believe that usability is a more useful change than an interface that is totally different. |
|
|
|
Large time gap, but in the same day right? The danger for me is not gambling in a day, but when you consecutively gamble every day on every game of the World Cup, you are slowly building up a habit even without your knowledge.
The FIFA World Cup runs for 39 days, and it takes 21 days to build a habit, so it means any gambler who has been gambling on all the games is at danger of addiction. You have to be cautious with gambling; gamble responsibly. Addiction is an illness; it's not something people catch easily. A person who starts betting on sports during the World Cup, betting on one game in the morning, then betting on another game at night, spends most of their day at work, then enjoys time with family, then watches TV. The next morning they bet on a World Cup game, and at night on another game, but during the day they were at work, then had fun with friends, and then watched TV. For this person, betting on games is just entertainment; they don't expect to make a big profit, they don't bet large sums, they don't put in money they can't afford to lose. Therefore, this person will not become addicted to gambling. This person spends little time in the casino each day, something like less than 10 minutes, which is the time it takes to place a bet. I don't believe you can judge someone's addiction by the number of days that they've been alone. Making a habit is far more complicated than doing something for 21 days. The top indicators of a gambling addiction are chasing losses, betting more, neglecting responsibilities. And not being able to stop. Someone who only gambles for a few minutes. Waylaying bets during the World Cup and keeping to a strict budget does not mean that they necessarily have a gambling problem. Responsible gambling isn't simply about how often you place a bet. It's a matter of self-control and discipline. |
|
|
|
I strongly believe that every casino would confiscate the deposit in this case. You have violated the terms 3 times by creating 4 accounts in total. You will continue doing the same thing in bad faith if they return your deposit. Because you will expect to get your money back every time you are caught. Now you will think twice before violating the terms at any other casinos because of this deposit confiscation.
I don't know if he's new to online casino that he doesn't know that opening more than one account violates the casino ToS. It's always clearly written on their ToS. In fact, that was the first thing I took note the moment I started gambling online. His funds have be confiscated and that was his own fault so, let him stop acting as if he is innocent of his actions. I have seen two different people using the same PC that their account got confiscated because they're both using the same casino. What will he say about this. I do agree that multiple accounts is a serious breach of rules as it gives a player an unfair advantage and puts an unnecessary risk on the casino. But it's unrealistic to pretend that you don't know that every reputable casino has a policy that only one account per person is allowed, which is why it is ineffective to say that you don't know. Nevertheless, casinos are advised to investigate carefully before taking action. In other situations, there were valid instances in which a family member or roommate used the same device or internet connection as the other person and was wrongly identified. But, if they are clearly seen to be multi-accounting, then the player has to face the risk of losing their bonuses and even deposits. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
