The reason is that in both cases you trust them with the same funds and each one is capable of restoring and emptying the wallet.
OP said that the seed phrase A will be in location A, seed phrase B will be in location B and the master public keys will be in location C. Therefore, if someone has seed phrase A/B and that's all they have, they will be still unable to spend the fund. you know one of the two private keys and address of multisig. you do createrawtx after this dude  sign it with your key , broadcast it and funds are gone. unlike previous moron who'd posted here before you you don't invoke first instruction via debug console inside multisig wallet so node wont append multisig redeem to rawtx |
|
|
|
'The will is supposed to be filed with the court for "safekeeping" and is a public record. However, if there was also a trust, the will is likely to give everything to the trust . This is called a pourover will. As a named beneficiary, you were entitled to receive a copy of the trust, and it sounds like you have. There is no requirement that these documents be signed on each page, but the will (unless holographic) needs to be witnessed, and the witnesses names and addresses appear on the last page. The trust does not need to be witnessed but is often notarized, especially if the trust contains real estate. If you think there was undue influence, or that he was incapacitated at the time, you can ask a court to determine the validity of the documents. You will need an attorney to bring that action.' https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/are-wills-and-trust-filed-in-california-if-so-wher-284090.htmlyou can put private key into trust. (you can see above it'll be copied and this stuff) But it's easy to find a way based on this say two activated cards from tangem wallet will work. With nothing more, no phone no pins no codes, nothing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnhDZE22KLI(how to restore wallet from a card, it mentions some code but you can restore latter having two cards with no codes at all) |
|
|
|
it's required to be included to the signed raw transaction.
A client/wallet will not be able to sign by having only the private key of a single signer without the redeem script or cosigner's public key to reproduce it.
no, it doesn't. it'll be able.  think for yourself if it's true or not checking the replies. https://github.com/bitcoinjs/bitcoinjs-lib/issues/1034 |
|
|
|
|
in your plan they already know you have big cash that's why they came. how i understand you have no plans to be involved in firefight or so means you'll take a hot shower (law and disorder in jo-burg) so you'll have somewhat new mindset you know
|
|
|
|
these pubkeys may only have something to do with redeemscript (which you'll not have with electrum anyway). anyone who knows private key and wallet address(which you wont know from that private key) can do createrawtx , signrawtx , then broadcast it . https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/51366 |
|
|
|
|
you've read this right. wallet has a single cosigner. either you or that guy can perform this duty
|
|
|
|
|
check address on send. can be changed during copy-paste
|
|
|
|
|
with my cpu tool #67 shows e+9 years to go. how did they found latter ones? what can be that fast?
|
|
|
|
Given that every derivation path step after m/ can have 231 unhardened and 231-1 hardened branches, it's better to know quite specifically where and what to search for, otherwise as I wrote earlier the search space blows up quickly.
2 8 may be? idk how non-standard it goes but i never seen m/0'/319'/0'.... kind of stuff |
|
|
|
|
really what you have is cold wallet with some btc on it. i use 'sweep' in coinomi for this kind of stuff. Just do not like electrum interface and sweep is more clear than import for me.
|
|
|
|
if you'd lost money on aml several times like i did you more or less know when tx made to you may trigger it. And you're really screwed up after you'd seen this. If you need cash you have no options. Either you'll lost money or dude who agree to do p2p . These coins once will be landed into cex anyway. So i just do not use btc any more. just a record of those cases: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5392940.0 |
|
|
|
|
it doesn't look like you have a clue about that what this code contains.
so why you're presume addresses should be correct? and why you'd concluded they're incorrect?
|
|
|
|
As you know, the master private key is derived from the seed phrase
what a blond girl mindset. wallet soft doesn't generate words , it generates 32 random bytes . based on this it then makes both key and phrase . He wasn't wrong in his statement "As you know, the master private key is derived from the seed phrase". As for your statement, first the wallet generates entropy, it can use 32 random alphanumeric bytes as a base, based on this, it creates the BIP39 recovery phrase and then the normal flow. https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/keys/hd-wallets/mnemonic-seed/yeah it turns out they're literally use words as hash source in bip39. like in brainwallet before. So that what i've told applied to them not to that guy. where my scheme is used in electrum and other wallets like this |
|
|
|
|
what i don't understand in vanity mania: you have a bot that catches all addresses that have human-readable part. So at this point you already know it's generated with this stuff. 'if this dude could generate this i can too' . then you have his private key very fast . ofc you(dude that first generated it) have random part in address and hope it's unique but i really doubt about this. we already have vanitygen(search)eth-gpu-whatever example where all those wallets was cracked at once.
|
|
|
|
|
results of this base58 will be plain wrong ofc
missed one line.
|
|
|
|
As you know, the master private key is derived from the seed phrase
what a blond girl mindset. wallet soft doesn't generate words , it generates 32 random bytes . based on this it then makes both key and phrase . |
|
|
|
-snip- use -1 or so and you'll see a huge difference (from bad to worse)
You mean -par=-1? set process priority to exact value. winapi |
|
|
|
/LOW does nothing. use -1 or so and you'll see a huge difference (from bad to worse) disk access requires a CPU core as well.
there's dma thing on stage and it may be not so. Say you can burn cd on single core with no freezing of other stuff
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
