Bitcoin Forum
October 15, 2019, 11:02:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 ... 832 »
3521  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 04, 2017, 12:32:33 AM
is this yours??



    
Bitcoin Discussion       10632
Service Discussion       345
Speculation                326
Off-topic                   225
Altcoin Discussion         214

10632 vs 214

also i havnt posted in altcoin in years

have a nice day


is this yours
Bitcoin Discussion       728
Altcoins (Ελληνικά)       513

728 vs 513
3522  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 04, 2017, 12:18:16 AM
and for sure you are new here and you dont even understand how blockchain works. Even the beloved from BU supporters Ethereum system collapse before two days after heavy load of onchain transactions or better smart contracts. Now Vitalik talk about scaling through  Lighting network.
If you want to break bitcoin follow the opinion of the ppl that have no idea about tech as is Roger Ver, Jihan Wu and every charlatan around bitcoin that pump their ridiculous ideas.
If you have time try to find the post history of every person that is against bitcoin developers and pump this ridiculous tech ideas like BU or whatever.
You will be surprise when you find that all of them are also shitcoin supporters or worst scamcoin supporters.
My advice is for you to wake up.

gmax -  monero in his profile
DCG - zcash, ethereum, litecoin investors
bobbylee(BTCC) - litecoin lover
segwit support pools - merge mining altcoins

but the real thing i find funny is that while only a third of the community want segwit..
hell even the pools that pushed litecoin to adopt segwit are not even using sgwit keypairs for their block rewards..

these segwit 'lovers' are the people that repeat the same buzzwords
"jihan/bU/riger" as if only 2 people are against segwit...
anyone who's buzzwords jihan/bu/roger are just reddit script readers of fud. who lack doing real research and probably have not read a single line of segwit code to understand what 'promises' will actually be met.


anyway..
if anyone really wants to know why Luke JR loves the "just pay more" mantra.
if anyone really wants to know why Luke JR loves the "if you dont like the roadmap f**k off mindset

his income comes from fee's and merge mining altcoins
3523  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: cryptocurrencies are not just stores of value, they are networks on: June 04, 2017, 12:07:58 AM
This is where I get a little confused. I thought the beauty of block chain, was that events like Mt.Gox wouldn't happen.

well the beauty of gold is that things like hackers cant scam your credit card..  but if you put your gold into a storage box and not care who has the key.. then someone can steal it.

the point of bitcoin is not to use things like mtgox!!!

i have never been victim to exchange hacking. my hoard has remained in my sole control. the only time it leaves my control is when spending it. but then its not my problem anymore, its the recipients.

bitcoin is not about using online wallet. but some people cannot look passed the fiat mindset, to be in self control.. so end up being lazy and "trusting" others to hold their value because its all they have ever known
3524  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 11:37:01 PM
The network will never be " entirely cripled " with ~50$ average fees. Because, by then, bitcoin will either massively scale both onchain and offchain or die/ be replaced.

@franky1 i've seen you really trying to "fight" for btc. Do you really risk everything hoping bitcoin will eventually scale, or are you diversified ?

i never been interested in altcoins. last time i touched them was probably 2013.

my business, my hoards are in bitcoin. and when travelling i talk about bitcoin, not the crap coins.
though im highly invested in bitcoin. i can see rationally passed my own 'value' and see things from the prospective of third world countries and i do see and respect their objections they find when they try using bitcoin.

too many people compare bitcoin to the most expensive western service they can think of..
rather than the standard everyday things people use around the world.
EG do you think that developing countries pay $2 for every time money changes hands.. no
does it actually cost $2 for every time money changes hand in any country.. no
but stupid fools will still find the most expensive use-cases and try to say bitcoin is better than X
even while they ignore A-W which is cheaper/free



i also see the positioning of certain cartels and see where things could end up steering towards if things continue down blockstreams one way street
(litecoin seems to be the direction flow (coblee->coinbase)(DCG->coinbase)(merchant tools->coinbase->ltc) seems more obvious than others)

yea we have gmax with his monero adoration. but i dont see that being next in line.
yea we have many cartel with zcash adoration. but i dont see that being next in line.

worse comes to worse ltc replaces btc as the 'merchant' accpting currency which ends up changing the paradigm.
but i still feel we shouldnt just let blockstream and barry silbert(dgc) cartel lead bitcoin down the one way street they have been since 2014

and we shouldnt give in to people who want splits and altcoins
and we shouldnt give in to fools who just shout "just f**k off"
3525  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 11:10:34 PM
Agree.
Agree depending on the ATM.
Disagree as transaction cost are added on the cost of good/services. One pays indirectly... sorry, playing semantics here.

the 'transaction costs are added on the cost of goods and services'

lol actually you will finds this to be an OLD misconception.
by the way if you think Visa charge 2.5% tx fee to merchants. you have been reading the fud. of try to find the most expensive examples of jst smal user cases and exaggerate it into sounding like every usercase.

things like paypal and applepay are not Visa. so yea using paypal will cost people money. but im talking about using FIAT not these middle men crap

same goes for ATM's... the ATM's that charge are not bank ATM's they are middlemen serviced ATM's.  but im talking about using FIAT not these middle men crap

but basically.. paying $2 just t buy anything.. is expensive.
and dont turn it into "not if your buying a lamborghini" argument..

$2 is 40 hours labour in some countries. yep a bitcoin tx is more expensive then someones weekly wage in many countries
3526  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 10:25:34 PM
so that means we can not trust  bitcoin anymore, right? we should move on to the new cryptocurrency or something that can replace bitcoin as a new type of online payment and online currency. Am I correct?

"move on" - no...
we should kick out the dev's that are trying to ruin bitcoin..
but soo many people are ass kissing devs.. because devs are offering false promises of discounts, and false promises that one day nodes can get paid. that nodes are being sheep herded into the wolfs pen and not realising they have been led astray.

false promotion one (retail analogy)
walmart: " in 6 months we are going to do a 75% discount on icecream... "
reality: month 1-5 increase icecream by 2000%. and then the offer at the 6th month becomes 500% instead of 2000% of old prices

false promotion two
use our loyalty debit card service and get cashback just for using it instead of paying cash
reality: lots of people put funds into the loyalty debit card and are charged a 500% transaction fee eachmonth to keep the card active.. and find out that the 'cashback' is only available on bulk items that only a select few people get to grab.
3527  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 10:15:09 PM
To say PoW is more secure than PoS is quite a stretch. The security of PoS completely relies on how many  Bitcoins would be staking and there's no way of telling who would stake. What we can say though, is that staking can be done on any pc, even on raspberry pi's, each of them securing a full node. You don't even need that large a percentage to make a stake attack completely untenable. 

For your argument to work you'd need way too many people saying no to that juicy 1% to 5% (the fewer stake, the more rewarding staking gets) dividend. 

the value of an address does not suddenly change the security of an address!!!!

if you think the ECDSA security becomes magically stronger if someone has 0.1btc compared to someone else who only has 0.001btc. is foolish
ECDSA doesnt become more secure the more value you add

..

PoS is less about security and more about "i wanna get paid to keep my computer on"

the way people should be thinking of is. "if i secure the blockchain by validating blocks, i get rewarded by my holdings value increase"

in short you can hope to turn 0.1 into 0.1001 by ding PoS .. but if that system is not as secure.. that 0.1001 Value can decrease even if the count of satoshis increase
3528  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 09:48:35 PM
Why would a secretary be paid more than a boss, especially for doing work that a boss could simply automate? Where's the logic in that?

Miners aren't doing any important work. That's an illusion created by the difficulty arms race they're caught up in. A few individuals with industrial scale gear having a complete monopoly on a whole currency. Those aren't secretaries, they're  more like the Federal Reserve.

firstly.. in the real world
a boss sits in a leather chair and gets others to do work. a secretary does the hard work of organising the bosses workload, communicating out memo's etc. and securing the papers in the companies safe(block)..
 in a fair world the boss would not earn as much as the secretary. but its the boss in the end that decides what is good or bad work and can trash any work done even if it took alot of money to produce said work. the boss can throw the safe(block) full of tx data out the window and make the secretary start again


take any industry..
for instance sports.
would you say the football manager deserves to get paid more than the trainer or the footballer. morally no...

yeh a trainer is the guy that makes players get in line, do certain formations, but the boss can still sack them even if the trainer has put years into its work on the team.

..
why nodes feel they deserve to get paid more then miners because without nodes the miners could falsify records and thats why they want PoS.. purely to get paid... thats why they want LN so that nodes get paid.

but that then weakens the security of the system
PoS is NOT as secure as PoW. LN is not as secure as PoW
so in bitcoins symbiotic relationship removing PoW just to pay nodes has its down sides too

...
if we go down that route of nodes getting paid. next the devs who will want to be paid... which then makes other issues too..
BUT.

howver if you take away "who deserves to get paid" from the argument and just concentrate on the security symbiotic relationship of pools, nodes, devs.. bitcoin works better than PoS

..
if you want to talk about the "who deserves to get paid".. then think about this.
owning a share(coin) of a company for 5 years goes from $6 - $2400 purely because of how the bosses have so far ensured a good reliable system without any fraud being allowed through via any nasty secretaries. you start to see that those running nodes are usually the ones with larger stakes 'shares' holdings. that want to secure their holdings and maximise their holdings.

so in my eyes bosses are getting paid by their 'share value' increase. and dont need to take a weekly salary.

..
what could or should change to avoid devs going on strike or devs refusing to listen to the community is 'feature bounties'
imagine it like if the community want feature X. a bip is created with a bitcoin address and the community donate what value they feel thy want to give devs to see that feature occur.
thus crowd funding development.




anyway this has veared off topic...
so reigning it back in.

bitcoin has become more expensive than fiat.
3529  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 01:55:29 PM
We can mince words about how to define 'the community'.   

'Miners' and 'users' are two different groups of people and their interests are completely contrary to one another. 

Proof of Work is perverse. Bitcoin is the fat bloated canary in the coalmine and when it dies the miners move on moving on to throttle the next coin they can mine, control and suck dry, like a swarm of locusts. 

Why do you think so many coins are desperately trying to move to Proof of Stake?

consensus, when actually acknowledged and utilised properly, works
but devs avoid consensus.

also those wanting PoS dont care about longevity/security. they just hope for a slice of the reward pie without doing any work. EG they dont want to be the boss validating secretaries/ reviewing devs work and they dont want the secretary to be paid better than the boss. instead they just want to be share holders getting weekly dividends, all for the cost of signing a piece of paper
3530  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 01:48:22 PM
Superb, this is where you got cornered

You have just given the miners a perfect reason to loudly and vocally scream about virtually anything. Since the community is everyone (and don't forget about his mangy dog) but no one will ever be happy with everything, the miners can safely claim whatever they want about how much they care for Bitcoin and everything, and then go on squeezing profits as per usual without any fear that their proposals will ever get implemented for real. BU is a glaringly conspicuous example of just that, no one meant it to kick off for real

you seem obsessed about miners

lol

if you were to imagine bitcoin as a company.. miners are just the secretary. they just get paid for collating the data in a certain format.
nodes are the bosses who decide what is acceptable and devs are the employee's that make the product that the bosses want

yes we the users are the bosses, we verify the secretaries work and trash the secretaries work thats not right. we decide what should happen to bitcoin and the devs (employees) listen and do what the bosses say

but right now the devs are on strike. they want to take bitcoin in a new direction. refusing to make products we want and only wanting to make what they think is best.

they tried to bypass the bosses consent thinking that if they got the secretary to sign off on the paperwork that the devs/employees could take over the company.. but no..

now the devs are trying to sack the secretary by trying to sway the bosses to presume the strike is the secretaries fault.. and then to give into employee(dev) demands to change the companies product into what the devs want to produce. but that wont really work either.

the ultimate solution is the obstructionist devs should just go get another job for another company(coin) and the the bosses(nodes) can find other employee's to make the products the bosses want.

...
we should not be treating devs as gods. they are temporary and yes miners are temporary too..
many devs hav moved onto other projects and many more will in the future.. blockstream dont care about bitcoin. they just want to fill their C.V with certain work history to impress their next boss (hyperledger). they are even willing to jump over to competing companies(litecoin). but that should not mean we give into their whims just to keep them around a few months longer. especially with their actions that have caused issues over the last 3 years.

yes devs removed fee control mechanisms, ignored orders to make real bigger blocks, ignored orders to truly get txsigops under control, they just done some cludgy math workaround patches rather then real clean work.

segwit is not a solution. its still a patchwork of cludge to send bitcoin in circles with the same empty HOPE of 7tx/s with no actual promise/guarantee of achieving.
while leaving the backdoor open to mess with bitcoin more. doing all of that while pointing their fingers at the secretary(pool)..

its time bitcoin remembers its manifesto/ethos and purpose for existing.. and let the blockstreamist devs go. rather then promote them into bing the boss
3531  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 12:05:25 PM
until you understand what consensus is. because its not about miners. its about nodes and miners in a symbiotic relationship. so telling miners to do X while the nodes can only do Y is not consensus.

No problem with that

But it just proves that you don't see my point altogether. Basically, you say that nodes (which seem to be representing community) don't agree to what miners are allegedly screaming so loudly about (at least, that's what some dudes here are asserting). The latter necessarily means that what these miners are saying and claiming is not in fact as urgent as they want it to look. That pretty much proves that their real intents and purposes are different from what they claim (which is what my point essentially revolves around). As I said before, you can't have it both ways

nooo

the community is everyone.

its not just miners screaming for more tx capacity.. please stick with reality.

pools cant just make big blocks because user nodes are not set to accept them.
users nodes cant accept big blocks, because half a dozen devs wont get their head out the sand and code a clean version for users and pools
3532  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 11:58:38 AM
LOL

the bait of the 'cheap segwit'

2015 - blockstream: WE promise you 75% discount
... blockstream remove fee control mechanisms, raise price 200x (2000%)
2018 - blockstream: WE promised you 75% discount, but never promised you 75% cheaper than 2015's prices

3533  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 10:50:46 AM
And so what?

You already said that the community had voiced the problem. You didn't say that someone from that community complained about something (which wouldn't count as a "majority report"). As to me, that pretty much counts as consensus. Basically, the community tells miners that they should fix the problem and they already have their agreement. Other than that, you still ignore my major point, i.e. if there is a real problem as severe as some claim here (a question of life and death, so to speak), there shouldn't be any issues with reaching the consensus you talk about so much

there is a problem..
there have now been 3.. yes THREE 'agreements' of a consensus... but then the blockstreamist cartel go and rip up that agreement.

also
your obsessed about miners!!
until you understand what consensus is. because its not about miners. its about nodes and miners in a symbiotic relationship. so telling miners to do X while the nodes can only do Y is not consensus.
3534  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 10:44:25 AM
Did any of you even read the comment you are supposedly outraged over?

Quote
Then use fiat. Pretty sure they'll charge you more than 0.5% for the same service.

Someone complains about the fee their wallet is assessing for a 71 input transaction-- one as large as 40 or so median sized transactions.

Luke suggests that they'd get charged more if they used fiat instead.

You can happily debate if Luke is write or wrong there (esp. if you consider the value preservation of the currency... Tongue ), but it's incorrect to say that he's just telling someone to use fiat.


Gmaxwell your the one that removed many of the fee controls.. so shut up and go make some new fee priority formulae's instead of the blockstream mantra 'just pay more or go play with fiat'

in the UK i can wire transfer money to family at NO cost!! and guess what else they receive it in seconds.
i can access funds at an ATM at NO cost!!
i can buy stuff at a grocery store at no transaction fee cost!!

yep. people buying bitcoin via localbitcoins wire transfer are not being charged "0.5%" by banks in the UK. so get your head out the sand stop trying to make bitcoin become fiat. and make bitcoin better than fiat
3535  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 10:12:58 AM
community voices a problem.. blockstream solution: cut off tongues until no problems can be voiced. then announce that all problems must have been solved due to no one voicing problems anymore

devs should be coming up with solutions to problems not fairy tale hopes of solutions with promises of dreams coming true if everyone just goes to sleep for a couple years

Okay, community voices a problem, miners can solve the problem, as simple as it gets. So what the fuck are you talking about consensus here? And whose consensus miners need, that of developers or that of community after all? Make up you mind finally. If it is community, then you can't possibly say something like "community voices a problem" since that essentially means they are giving miners their consent to fork Bitcoin while the latter don't do anything. Or should I thus conclude that this is not what miners actually want?

And they in fact don't want to solve the problem voiced by community?

you dont understand consensus

consensus is about making BITCOIN grow in a way the community can unite around..

your posts about miners do x.. is just "well miners can just F**K off and go play in another sandbox"
thats not a community growth.. thats tribal conflict.

native indian: 'you no like chief maxwell, go move herd of horses to other side of mountain'
3536  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Russia Reveals Plans To Make Its Own National Cryptocurrency on: June 03, 2017, 10:02:41 AM
They understand everything

And they are not really going to create any government backed coprocoin. These are just words, empty words, which lost their meaning long ago. Mark Twain said it over 100 years ago that you shouldn't believe anything of what you hear (and half of what you see). The Russian economy is stagnating at best now (even according to official reports), and Putin's regime (or should I rather say clique?) consisting mostly of oligarchs should get themselves busy with solving more mundane issues that the country is going to face in the nearest future (and is already facing). The best they can do is just go away

seems you may not know much of russia.
you do know russia has many trade deals with the west.
yep
you can get iphones, computers, cars, kids toys,
yep kids in russia are playing with 'fidget spinners' (current western craze), hoverboards, and everything else the west plays with
yep russia has mcdonalds, KFC and many other western food outlets
if you think america hates russia, your wrong.. america is actually paying russia to send astronauts into space (taxi to international space station)

i find it strange how people compare russia to north korea. i guess it may be due to the fox news hypnotism and reddit regurgitation of fud

but with all that said. thinking that many countries governments wont bother using blockchain, is like the titanic thinking the iceburg wont do any damage.

its better to know the real situation, than to pretend there is not a problem. especially bad when you see people hide a problem using quotes of people who have not been alive for the last few years, decades, century and them taking such quotes out of context.

mark twains context is. dont take things on face value.. do your own research beyond what you see or hear

if you really want to do some research into what governments are doing in regards to blockchain.. here is a key word to start your research 'hyperledger'

have a nice day
3537  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 09:41:52 AM
This is something I am worried about, if this continues and there is no suitable direction, the bitcoin may be left behind, and the other altcoin throne. Currently, bitcoin is in the development process, it should not get into any trouble. Conversely, altcoin is growing so quickly, it surprised me.

firstly, dont worry about price.. or market cap drama. thats all just ups and downs that will always occur, anyone can make an alt with 5 trillion coins premined, sell 1 coin on an exchange for just $1 and cause that altcoin to get a $5trillion market cap.

devs can be ass-hats.. the sooner they change their ways the better. i just wish blockstream would hurry up and jump ship to hyper ledger so the real bitcoin passionate devs can get on with improving bitcoin without the puppet strings holding them up

what does concern most and can significantly change the paradigm is if bitpay/coinbase switched their merchant tools from bitcoin to something else.. which many of the DCG cartel are thinking litecoin would be the option if it came down to it.

in short if you can no longer buy real world items from the thousands of merchants that accept bitcoin currently, because it all switched over to another coin.. then bitcoin will get affected
3538  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Russia Reveals Plans To Make Its Own National Cryptocurrency on: June 03, 2017, 09:20:43 AM
ok.. guess some people need to check sources
in short nothing new.

1. aurora coin was not government created it was citizen created and tried to get mainstream adoption..
2. russia and all other government based efforts to get into 'blockchain' are done via hyperledger.. yep that includes russia.

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/russias-biggest-bank-joins-hyperledger-blockchain-project/
3539  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [SHOCK] Core dev and Blockstream employee tells bitcoin users to use fiat! on: June 03, 2017, 08:55:33 AM
Why are you laying yourself out to evade addressing the dilemma I pointed out?

You can call that coin an altcoin or whatever, but this doesn't change anything. If things are as bad in respect to blocksizes as miners are claiming them to be (not actually miners but some dudes here that are pretending that they are), then, as I said, forking Bitcoin (making an altcoin, in your speak) would be inevitable, and it would be welcomed by virtually anyone (since the situation was dire and no longer tolerable or acceptable). If it is in fact "evitable", then the miners are lying, or the dudes who are telling that the miners "have been screaming for years about the blocksize increase" are lying. So who is lying here?

i am not evading anything.
you are evading the drama of the last 2 years+
all the REKT campaigns by the blockstream fanboys.
the censorship army

all the crap to surpress the need and desires of many for more tx capacity onchain(without the cludgy half baked promises of blockstream devs)

EG
community voices a problem.. blockstream solution: cut off tongues until no problems can be voiced. then announce that all problems must have been solved due to no one voicing problems anymore

devs should be coming up with solutions to problems not fairy tale hopes of solutions with promises of dreams coming true if everyone just goes to sleep for a couple years
3540  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What do we call Bip148 if it breaks away from the network and its the minority. on: June 03, 2017, 01:39:09 AM
call it the BS coin

abbreviation of
BlockStream or Barry Silbert..(they are the same group after all)
after all they want it, they own it they can have their minority coin
Pages: « 1 ... 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 ... 832 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!