Please tell me this wouldn't affect paper wallets generated with bitaddress.org.

Could you elaborate on this, or kindly direct me to a post with the logic for this? 

Something like...

When I install cc 2.0, x% of my hashing power is used to fold.  Rewards are paid from the a stockpile the devs have?  Sigma is a different coin, but how will it benefit CC 2.0 holders?

Been looking at CC the last few hours.  I'm lost.  I'm trying to understand it mostly from the investment standpoint.


1) Why are there two coins;  CC and Sigma?

2) Are the numbers on coinmarketcap incorrect?  How many coins do the devs have?  They are getting 3% of newly minted coins, correct? 

How is this more fair than Ethereum?   11 MM reserve vs 12 MM?

It's strange that you guys paint the ico as something negative.  ICO investors take a lot of risk.  At current Ethereum price that'ss less than a 3x return.  I personally would not take that kind of risk for 3x with funds locked up for a year and a half.  Instead you guys use the code and claim it is somehow more fair?  Also, your 11MM reserve is much more of a percentage than ETH.  If you go POS after a year like ETH, most of the coins will belong to you.  Kinda like Ripple.

Anyway, I'm glad you guys are here as competition is good-- It' just asinine to call it more fair. 

I believe that anytime you issue something that pays a dividend, you are subject to SEC regulation-- even if it is non-dollar based.

I see how this will affect swarm, but not Bitcoin. 

Doc is true, but they probably changed the number of coins lost.

"Normal people" can actually buy again.

I see. So this is how many BTC it takes to make $1MM.  Looks like it's going to 1.

I've been reading up on it.  So, it essentially inserts data streams into the bitcoin blockchain. 

Question-- Why does it need a new coin for this? 

Sorry for the noob question.

I'm trying to send coins out of coinbase.com.  My last transaction broadcast fine, but took over an hour to get into a block because they didn't include a fee.  I see no option to include a fee when I send funds.  Am I missing something, or are they just not useful as a wallet?

Price is over $400 in China, but $345 on bitstamp.  WTF? 

The Chinese can get an $8 RC car for my kid to my doorstep and make profit, and we can't export a bitcoin?

Not to be confused with Funding Circle, which scored 37MM, and is also lead by Accel Partners. 

Anyway, I hope they make an actual exchange and not just a fullfiller like coinbase.

The third generation is indeed staking their claims.

http://www.finextra.com/Video/Video.aspx?videoid=513

Video interview of Richard Brown, executive architect, IBM. 


9:00 has some interesting comments about bitcoin and the internet of things.

Now this is the GOX I remember.

Another way to look at it is, the extreme cost of mining discourages miners from selling at lower prices. 

eewww.

Today, BTC acted like a real reserve currency. 

Over the past few days, BTC was clearly ignited by concerns over the dollar.  As soon as word of a debt deal was announce, we tanked. Whether or not a hyper inflated dollar would have had any real economic effect on BTC is irrelevant. The perception was there... and enough people familiar with bitcoin actuated a price movement.  I was one of them.

Most interesting, is that the media hasn't picked it up yet.  I've seen them connect dots that simply weren't there (Cypriot and Spanish financial crises), but this was real.  It looks like we get to do it all over again in a few months, so maybe the media won't miss it next time.

BTC is officially a safe haven.

It's only a matter of time before BTC is a safe haven.

Well, I may be down xxxx today, but it just may be worth it to see this.  Nice shark.

Wow. Reading this thread was like watching Gladiator.  Trade just tore right through them.  Thanks for the morning coffee entertainment.