Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 02:54:21 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 »
221  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA miner monitoring RPC linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 3.12.0 on: February 01, 2014, 08:50:46 PM
Hey Con, you're missing the git tag for the 3.12.0 release.

roy
222  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitcoinAverage.com - independent bitcoin price on: January 30, 2014, 09:25:36 PM
Hmm, I see what you mean now.
I think "closing price" here would be not really fair, as any particular time you'll pick up for this calculation will be inevitably favoring some markets that fit their daytime trading activity nicely and neglect others.
A volume-weighted average over last 24h seems much better to me here. Because it will include activity on all global markets, which ranges and differs a lot during the day, and won't favor particular markets above the others, but will consider trading volume only, which is measurable and unbiased parameter. And it can be shot at any time during the day, particular time is not important in this case. Midnight by GMT would be handy reference point probably.

Closing price is what Coindesk does, but I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense for a market that doesn't close.  It you had to pick a single time for a daily pricing 'fix' then noon would make more sense IMHO.  Personally I think a 24hr average, midnight-to-midnight, would make a lot of sense (and midnight GMT is as good a choice of midnight as any, although I don't care that much).

I'm not really wedded to details here; I'd just like to see more people publishing tables that say Bitcoin was worth this much on this particular date.  (If multiple such sources emerge I will probably just use a simple average of the published indices unless/until one emerges as the de facto standard.)

roy
223  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Mt Gox as a payment processor on: January 30, 2014, 12:09:14 AM
Do their merchants have the same difficulty withdrawing fiat that their regular exchange customers do, does anyone know?

roy
224  Economy / Service Discussion / Mt Gox as a payment processor on: January 29, 2014, 11:51:00 PM
Has Mt Gox always offered merchant payment processing services a la Bitpay, or is this a new departure for them?

https://www.mtgox.com/merchant

Never noticed it before, but maybe I just wasn't paying attention...

roy
225  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitcoinAverage.com - independent bitcoin price on: January 29, 2014, 11:01:44 PM
Hmm, this is a good question actually. We're using their API tickers, which provide trading volumes separately for different currencies. I assume they do calculations right and not provide doubled volumes through their API, however I couldn't find this explicitly stated anywhere. I'll approach them directly and find out. Will update you when I'll know more.

I'd naturally expect that summing the currency volumes would double-count the cross-currency trades.  Will be interested to hear what you find out.
226  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitcoinAverage.com - independent bitcoin price on: January 29, 2014, 10:01:12 PM
Volume weighted averages would be a very good addition.

This is exactly what we are doing since very beginning. Or did I misunderstand you?

Volume-Weighted Average Price (VWAP) normally refers to the average price of some security or commodity based on trades over some period of time, calculated in the 'obvious' way (i.e. what we were talking about above).  I agree it seems slightly odd to refer this as 'volume weighted' but I suppose it means as opposed to the doing the completely insane thing of just calculateing the simply average of the 'price' column in your spreadsheet of trades without paying any attention to the quantity the trades were for.

ETA: I suppose it could be in contrast to a time-average...

roy
227  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitcoinAverage.com - independent bitcoin price on: January 28, 2014, 09:00:15 PM
Historical data - hmm, we're saving data daily, but it's not available online, only by request. I can get it for you if you need, just ask. It will be daily per-minute CSVs, but it's not going to long in the past, as we've started tracking global averages not so long ago.

Ah, that's way more detail than I want.  Ok, let me take a step back and explain what I'm really looking for...

I would like to see a daily indicative Bitcoin price for each calendar day (ideally both published on the web site and accessible by an API).  There is often a need to determine the market value of an asset for tax or accounting purposes.  For pragmatic reasons, in many circumstances it is adequate to calculate the market value using an indicative price for the asset on the day in question; for shares, published daily closing prices are often used for this purpose.

Currently the only published indicative daily prices for Bitcoin are Coindesk's published 'closing prices' for their Bitcoin Price Index.  I don't find their methodology ideal for a number of reasons, but that's a separate discussion.  For now, what I'd like to see is more providers publishing such pricing data.

I don't have a strong feeling how the daily price index should be calculated.  Volume-weighted average over the day?  Midprice at a particular time of day?  (Noon?  End-of-day? i.e. midnight.)  Nor do I have a strong feeling for what timezone is used to define 'day'.

It would be great to have more options for getting data like this than Coindesk's current data...

roy
228  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitcoinAverage.com - independent bitcoin price on: January 28, 2014, 08:41:56 PM
[We do not consider MtGox as "valid price source", as for me - none of the individual exchanges are. But as long as they are not faking their ticker figures and someone is still willing to trade there even considering fiat withdrawal problems - we should count it in as one of the market players.
Since MtGox volume is not decisive anymore even for USD market (not to mention global averages) - we don't see the need to exclude it. It exists and works, it is a part of the global landscape, whether we like it or not, and we have to include it.

Alex at BitcoinAverage.

Could I just check with you.... when computing Mt Gox's volume for a currency, do you make sure only to inlcude primary transactions as returned by the Mt Gox API?  If not, you will end up, the global average will end up double counting transactions that are cross-matched between, e.g. the EUR and USD orderbooks (which Mt. Gox.'s multi-currency ordermatching will do if it's still the best order on the orderbook, taking into account the Gox currency conversion fee).

roy
229  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 28, 2014, 06:02:48 PM
Hashrate: 17,490,240 GH/s   Shocked  Shocked  Shocked

Why?
Our miners, not yet "made​​" and Hashrate increases at a breakneck pace???

I guess they do Mining on them for a long time!  Angry

Unlikely.  If you want to go down the conspiracy theory route, could be any vendor (Bitmine, Hashfash, Cointerra, BFL), but that seems pretty far fetched.

Most likely the hash rate increase is down to some secretive manufacturer(s) like 21e6 who only mine for themselves and don't sell miners.  What's the betting there aren't a few more operations out there like that who are so secretive we don't even know their name?

roy



Occam's razor does not agree with you.
It is way more likely that the people who are known to be building this equipment are simply maximizing their profit with it than that a secret manufacturer exists who is throwing all this juice into the network.
Your theory is way more 'conspiracy' based.


It's not a conspiracy theory - we know 21e6 exist and are well funded.  They are choosing not to disclose anything about their plans and progress in public.  Unlike ASICminer, I suspect 21e6 have a pretty small number of shareholders, who are all major investors.  So even if they give progress reports to their shareholders, it's fairly easy to keep it from the rest of us.
230  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] KRK Rokit 5 Studio Monitors & PreSonus USB Interface [SOLD] on: January 27, 2014, 10:27:40 PM
Oh well... but glad you got a buyer Smiley
231  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] KRK Rokit 5 Studio Monitors & PreSonus USB Interface [SOLD] on: January 27, 2014, 10:24:19 PM
Might well be interested if they haven't gone yet but am in the UK, so shipping costs might be prohibitive.... Also unless you have original shipping material I'd be rather nervous about damage in transit....

roy
232  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 27, 2014, 09:23:32 PM
The last update on their website was a month ago, I know that they posted an update here about the test of a new board revision, but this silence worries me..... today is the start of the week and I am really curious if they made any progress and when they will start the production/shipping of Batch 1

On the other hand, the behaviour of the community has made it pretty much impossible for any vendor to report on a problem, even a minor one, until they've fixed it.  If you report on a problem, you'll instantly be called a scam.

Actually, you'll be called a scam whatever you do, but if you report on a problem it's probably worse...

roy
233  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 27, 2014, 08:47:35 PM
Hashrate: 17,490,240 GH/s   Shocked  Shocked  Shocked

Why?
Our miners, not yet "made​​" and Hashrate increases at a breakneck pace???

I guess they do Mining on them for a long time!  Angry

Unlikely.  If you want to go down the conspiracy theory route, could be any vendor (Bitmine, Hashfash, Cointerra, BFL), but that seems pretty far fetched.

Most likely the hash rate increase is down to some secretive manufacturer(s) like 21e6 who only mine for themselves and don't sell miners.  What's the betting there aren't a few more operations out there like that who are so secretive we don't even know their name?

roy

234  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BTC Withdrawals on MtGox on: January 26, 2014, 11:32:40 PM
I have the same problem, now 48 hours.  I decided to investigate and pulled all the TXs from https://data.mtgox.com/api/0/bitcoin_tx.php - i found my receiving address in there.  I then transmitted all of the transactions to the network.. the outputs on mine and over 200 other ones have already been spent, and the network rejects them immediately.

Seems like a problem with double spending, which would imply a race condition within their code, so no kind of locking in place to prevent this happening.

Pretty sure this has been discussed in the past, and the concensus is that when a transaction becomes 'stuck' for some reason that's not clear to me (bug?  fee too low?) and never makes it to the block chain, then Gox will invalidate the stuck transaction (by creating a 'pay-to-self' transaction using the same outputs) before trying again.
235  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: MtGox vs Bitstamp on: January 26, 2014, 09:50:22 PM
How many days does mtgox take to withdraw?

the difference is incrasing and now is 200$!! arbitrage could be very profitable..

I'm thinking where I should sell my bitcoins gained from mining..

Last time I tried it took 10 days, withdraw on 6th Jan, got it 16th.
The time before it took 7 weeks, that was in november.

What kind of withdrawal was that?  EUR withdrawal via SEPA?  JPY withdrawal to a Japanese bank account?

roy
236  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: MtGox? on: January 26, 2014, 09:12:43 PM
Rumor has it that they also double spent in the last couple of months.

AIUI the apparent double spends were pay-to-self transactions used to invalidate a transaction that for some reason never made it to the blockchain in a timely manner.  So they resent those same coins back to themselves (the 'pay-to-self' transaction) and then made a new withdrawal transaction.

TL;DR The whole apparent double spend scare turned out to be nothing to worry about.
237  Economy / Exchanges / Re: MtGox withdrawal delays [Gathering] on: January 26, 2014, 09:03:44 PM
The spread between Mt. Gox and the other exchanges is around 22% today.  This may be an all-time high. We've seen 20% a few times, but above 20% has been rare. The spread has been climbing slowly for weeks.  (Is this charted somewhere?  "bitcoincharts.com" doesn't chart it, but they're run by Mt. Gox.)

It's a slow day. This isn't due to volatility. This is purely the penalty for using Mt. Gox.

That number is getting into the range where a run on Mt. Gox is likely.

A disconnect between markets is hardly surprising, given the delays in JPY withdrawals (previously the only fast withdrawal route) means arbitrage is going to be far less effective at making Gox track other markets.  (I wonder if the JPY withdrawal delays are in turn caused by an increasing number of arbitrageurs making use of this route.)

roy
238  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitcoinAverage.com - independent bitcoin price on: January 26, 2014, 05:51:45 PM
Great site! Smiley

Any plans to add more (possibly all from site) currencies to API?

We have released API for global averages at https://api.bitcoinaverage.com/ticker/global/*. You now have all possible world currencies available in the API.
Also this explanation chart tells how all these global averages are calculated.

Alex at BitcoinAverage

Is there any way to get historical data going back more than 24 hours?  I found https://api.bitcoinaverage.com/history/USD/per_minute_24h_global_average_sliding_window.csv but am really looking for data going further back (daily would be fine).

ETA: Actually, I can't make sense of the URL above.... the "USD global average" column seems to be blank unless LibreOffice messed up the CSV import...

Thanks

roy
239  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Where can I get cgminer sources from? on: January 23, 2014, 11:53:45 PM
The git repo is at https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer
240  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 13, 2014, 07:19:17 PM
We had discussed if the current chips were to be used for production of the devices for customers...
There is a hint:
Remember that these are from a pilot run of the IC packaging, our guys in China have done several further optimizations in the meantime like the glue and the wires used inside the IC, also we did tweak some parameters with the foundry for future wafers, so the chips are going to be definitely much better in production run (coming probably next week already) than these samples.

Yes, you're right.  I had forgotten that they are using a custom package.  So it sounds like they probably have production wafer(s) from the foundry, but the pilot packaging run sounds like it is not considered a production run.

roy
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!