|
981
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who have right and which is the best?
|
on: February 01, 2016, 03:05:25 PM
|
Challenge? Do you even know how to code in BTC++?
How about we just make the challenge in terms of Bitcoin "raw transactions" (surely that should be trivial for you)? I'll post a raw tx and you explain it to everyone to show that you can understand it. How about you publicly admit you have no clue about coding in BTC++, hmm? That you still use x86 assembler HTML3 and Perl scripts C++? I see - so you have already caved in and admitted you can't do Bitcoin raw txs.  Better luck next time troll! Yeah, I'll tell you about row transactions after you answer my riddles three: 1. If you're so smart, what was Ty Warner eating when he solved the BTCeanie Propagation Problem? Go! No Googling! |
|
|
|
|
982
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who have right and which is the best?
|
on: February 01, 2016, 03:01:22 PM
|
Challenge? Do you even know how to code in BTC++?
How about we just make the challenge in terms of Bitcoin "raw transactions" (surely that should be trivial for you)? I'll post a raw tx and you explain it to everyone to show that you can understand it. How about you publicly admit you have no clue about coding in BTC++, hmm? That you still use x86 assembler HTML3 and Perl scripts C++? |
|
|
|
|
984
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who have right and which is the best?
|
on: February 01, 2016, 02:52:31 PM
|
...
I wouldn't worry too much about it as the miners are not so likely to want to kill their own income by causing Bitcoin to fragment into several alts.
You are worried tho, it's all you ever talk about. Good... Actually - no - I tend to post more about things like doing raw transactions (something you wouldn't even understand). The worry is simply that the Bitcoin experiment will fail (but my own project will continue regardless of that outcome). Lol @ "something you wouldn't even understand." Do I rub in the fact you don't know the arcana of BTCeanie BTC BTCabies codebase? No I do not. Hell, you probably didn't even bother reading a line of it, did you? And yet I'm civil enough to not rub your total ignorance in your face. Nice diversion tho. You're scaird shitless. |
|
|
|
|
987
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal!
|
on: January 31, 2016, 04:03:25 PM
|
Pretty much, yes. If not "more", then a huge chunk of the influence.
-snip-
So what would your proposal be (if we disregard the "alternative implementations"), remove commit access, ban them from working on the code due to Blockstream? How do you reduce this "influence" that you claim is present? There has to be a way of reverting it else you're the one who's being closed minded about this and not me, right? ... Do you concede that there is, indeed, possible conflict of interests, and we're onto discussing the mechanics of mitigating it? |
|
|
|
|
988
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin goes to 1200-1300 (within a month?)
|
on: January 31, 2016, 03:35:27 PM
|
no of course its not going to that price at least now, i think we will have to wait a little bit for seeing such numbers
Get your Bitcoin now, because the price will be up sharply soon. You mean to 1200-1300 within a month? |
|
|
|
|
989
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: January 30, 2016, 11:18:50 PM
|
worst trolls on side of big blockers ... easy to see who's losing and attracts the agent provocateurs to keep the division raging, sadly they are welcomed into their ranks by the pretenders. Trolfi and notlambchop now honorary members of fraud cypherdoc's goon squad.
Who are they enlisting next to the Free Shit Army ... the Buttcoiner Brigade?
So you're like a less eloquent version of iCEBREAKER now. I liked you better before the war. :- War. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing. Nations destroyed. Lives ruined. Shoes lost.  |
|
|
|
|
990
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Absolutely nothing backs Fiat paper its completely worthless
|
on: January 30, 2016, 11:13:21 PM
|
...
Also, if miners stop mining btc, then mining btc becomes more profitable, and it atracts other miners... no?
A whole mess of variables. -Usually, miners point their rigs at the most profitable coin. So "stopped mining" actually means "pointed their rigs at a more profitable coin (or fork)." (all the new miners flock to the new coin/fork until its profitability equals Bitcoin) -Could stop mining due to a bad actor, e.g. Chinese government seizing/buying (to mine their own crypto)/criminalizing the mines. -The miners are paid in BTC, not fiat. This means that if BTC price falls by 50%, mining becomes more than 50% less profitable until even more miners leave. -The halvening (block reward cut in half) is coming this summer, etc., etc. |
|
|
|
|
991
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Absolutely nothing backs Fiat paper its completely worthless
|
on: January 30, 2016, 10:16:12 PM
|
You clearly don't understand what "backed" means, let me educate you:
[Backed currency is a form of money] whose value has a direct correspondence with the value of a commodity (such as gold), whether or not it is redeemable in that commodity on demand.
that was the old definition, you still live under a rock, no money is backed by gold anymore, money can be easily backed by other factor, such as the usage, the more it is used the more value it acquire everything that make the asset more valuable can be consider a form of backup That's the current definition of "backed currency". I didn't travel back in time to give you that link. And if you feel that everything contributes to an asset's backing, how is fiat toilet paper unbacked? It is "backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. a government (or, as you would put it, Jackbooted Gubermint Thugs)." Bitcoin? Miners fork off to a better alt, and *POOF!* No moar backing  This process is not that fast, and the community would not jeopardize it's own assets like that. Remember that a hard fork needs to have the majority adoption. Why would the majority want to their assets become dust all of a sudden? No. A hard fork simply needs *one* miner to start mining it. How long it lives (how many blocks) is another story. As far as "majority" goes, this "majority" doesn't include people who are hodling (not trading/using) their coin. Only the coins currently in play (on exchanges) & fiat (people willing to buy mined coins) are a part of this "majority." TL;DR: Miners will mine whatever they can sell, most of their assets are in gear/real estate housing that gear, don't necessarily hold BTC, Can you see how their interests might not coincide with the hodlers? |
|
|
|
|
993
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers)
|
on: January 30, 2016, 05:28:36 PM
|
You accused me of an ad-hom when calling you out for labeling anyone who questions core as an uninformed fool. Yet you still failed to adress any technical issues raised. I'd class responding to a post with less than usefull content as a form of trolling. Its a matter pf perspective.
I said no such thing. This is the classic manipulation from forkers. You manipulate things so that they suit your arguments. You have raised nothing, you just linked to an article that someone else wrote. I [..] am definitely more informed than people of your caliber I think this statement summarizes your attitude perfectly. My attitude is rational. People who resort to ad hominem deserve nothing better. ... TL:DR: Questioning of my self-evident superiority and undeniable expertise is an ad-hominem attack. Which is illogical. Thanks for further reinforcing my [already dim] view of people of your caliber. |
|
|
|
|
994
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ...and THIS is why I prefer to use Bitcoin.
|
on: January 30, 2016, 03:59:53 PM
|
Wendy's was just hacked and the hackers made off with an unknown number of credit cards. But noooo, Bitcoin is the preferred currency of criminal financial activity, amirite? Due to anonymity of bitcoin transaction,it can be used for illegal activities but blaming bitcoin for this is like blaming fire if someone got burnt.It is the use that you put something to that is wrong or right Another iteration of "guns don't kill people, people kill people." Sure, AK47s with nanner' mags don't kill people by themselves, but sure come in handy in case you ever wanna do it. |
|
|
|
|
995
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The "interblocknet" (a possible future of the service industry)
|
on: January 30, 2016, 03:35:36 PM
|
...
Well failsafe could be good, but then Bitcoin and Bitcoin Backup would be almost 1:1 copies so if there's some fundamental flaw, both would suffer from it.
The way I see it we have Bitcoin, the strongest kid on the block, and the rest are fads.
... Fail-safe != 1 fail-safe. You can spawn a single young, like dumb cow, and waste time to nurture & protect it. Or you can be like the glorious toad, and lay thousands of eggs in gorgeous gelatinous strings in the water, later to hatch out into expandable tadpole minions! "Quantity has a quality all of its own." --J.S. |
|
|
|
|
998
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi Nakamoto is 100% a US/UK government agency collaboration
|
on: January 30, 2016, 03:22:45 PM
|
What part do the aliens have to play in it?  That's the sweetest part of the whole bitcoin black-ops project. Now aliens can get their hands on US dollars without actually having to sneak into the country to get them. It was the main focus of the project....to decentralize the currency so that the aliens could get it without trespassing. It all makes perfect sense now! Must reduce blogsize to aid decentralization -- Saurian miners at disadvantage due to due to poor & Great Galactic Firewall. |
|
|
|
|
999
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers)
|
on: January 30, 2016, 03:17:47 PM
|
So your answer is ad hominem?
It's perfectly reasonable to reply with an ad hominem when you talk down to the community like that. You threw logic out of the window when you went down that path. Bro, how can he not talk down to this ignorant community when the yokels refuse to deffer to his [albeit only self-proclaimed] expertise? Do you even Gaem Theorie? |
|
|
|
|
1000
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The "interblocknet" (a possible future of the service industry)
|
on: January 30, 2016, 03:13:01 PM
|
What is the "interblocknet" and why does it matter?
The revolution that Bitcoin has started with money will continue with services but as we know Bitcoin will never scale to handle all of the world's transactions so how will this be managed?
IMO we are going to end up with many blockchains (most likely one blockchain per major service or even company) that allow for specific service payments which will remove the "middle-men" (i.e. websites currently who are instead replaced with "miners"). ...
It is possible that these will be "side-chains" although I think it might be wise to have more than one "core blockchain" (in case of systematic failure).
Potential promo material:   |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
