Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 10:50:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 202 »
41  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Ho ho ho! Santa is in the house. Give me your cookies! on: December 26, 2017, 12:55:43 AM
The one I wanted sold out after 22 seconds but i will only tell you the name (I lie) if i can
sit on you knee

The bankers are all over us and whats left is bones

Well you already paid your entrance fee by putting some cigarettes or booze in the donation bucket for charity, didn't ya?

Go ahead and sit on my knee then! See if I care...
42  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Ho ho ho! Santa is in the house. Give me your cookies! on: December 26, 2017, 12:46:12 AM


Come on in and share with me which is your biggest bag (or crap coin or cryptocurrency or token or kitten... whatever you kids are calling them these days).

I will tell you if it has been naughty or nice.

Ho. Ho. Ho.
43  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: CryptoHunch: A tradable blockchain asset card game based on deceit on: December 24, 2017, 06:00:47 PM
We now have a website and a Twitter account:

Website: https://www.cryptohun.ch/
Twitter: @CryptoHunch

The new website provides additional clarity to the idea and the project including how to play the game.

The game is already in development, but an alpha is not yet ready. Just putting the finishing the matchmaking algorithm now...

Happy Holidays!
44  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: An Open Letter to The Bitcoin Community on: December 16, 2017, 04:00:32 PM
thank you.
But personally, I think there is a very small chance that this open letter will be adopted by almost all developers now focus on wealth.
If the core team continues to sink, BTC bifurcations will be more and more.

Yes, I agree that there is a small chance that would happen. I am not anyone famous enough to have enough influence. If this were to happen it would take many people pursuing the effort. A grassroots movement like no2x. Most people will probably never read the letter unless others help share. There are also financial adversaries now that have invested into Bcash, who have financial incentive to make sure something like this doesn't happen, such as Bitmain with ASICBoost and BCH Stakeholders.

Increasing blocksize is the wrong thing to do in my opinion.

Alternative coins are beneficial for Bitcoin, hopefully, they will remove all the dust services like faucets, micro-gambling, and scammy/spammy sig campaigns. This will allow Bitcoin to get on with its real purpose, which is a store of wealth.

Who are we to decide what purpose Bitcoin exists for? The store of wealth property of Bitcoin's utility is nice, but being able to transfer it cheaply (or semi-cheaply) is also a nice property of Bitcoin's utility. We can and will likely have both with the Lightning Network, but that will take a lot of time to be implemented with all websites, services, and wallets... even if it is released into the wild soon.

In the meantime, the easiest and safest way to correct the congestion on the Bitcoin network is to increase the block size. A store of wealth is not worth to most of the population if it is really expensive to send and receive. Bitcoin is almost making gold look like a more economically efficient way of transferring wealth is ridiculous because Bitcoin is electronic. It will become a store of wealth for rich people and entities only due to the fees. If you think transaction fees are high now then just wait until the price keeps going up the parabolic curve, because there will be no relief until the LN is ready and implemented everywhere... it will happen slowly, like Segwit implementation.

Once normal average and below average income type people learn how expensive the fees are, then Bitcoin's reputation with most common people is going to be permanently tarnished. First impressions are key. It is these types of people that the traditional banking/investment industry is built off on- controlling, storing, and transferring common people's wealth. Banks can do both the storing and transferring fairly cheaply- so should Bitcoin. They can use LNs when they come out, but in the meantime, Bitcoin is becoming a harder sell with the costs of transaction fees.
45  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: An Open Letter to The Bitcoin Community on: December 16, 2017, 03:28:16 AM
Up
46  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / An Open Letter to The Bitcoin Community on: December 16, 2017, 02:16:46 AM
I just wrote an open letter to the Bitcoin community. Please share it to spread the word. I would appreciate it- thanks in advance! 🙂

You can retweet it here: https://twitter.com/DecentralizTech/status/941853909613711361

Quote
Dear Bitcoin Community,
Wow. Who would have imagined Bitcoin would be where it’s at today 5+ years ago (when I first entered the community)? As a community of users, philosophers, speculators, businesses, miners, and developers… we should all be very proud of ourselves. The amount of work it took to get here was quite an astounding amount, but it is nice to see the tremendous success of which we have all collectively worked for. Now the mainstream media, your family, and friends are all talking about Bitcoin more and more. It is truly on the cusp of being a mainstream phenomenon.

However, with such success breeds complications. Bitcoin is effectively software, and scaling software to millions of users online has historically been a challenging subject in computer science. Both hardware and software considerations need to be considered. It is obviously a challenging problem to face, and Bitcoin should be proud that it is making headway with Segwit implementation complete.

Lightning Networks will start popping up in the very near future because they are all effectively competing against each other to be first to market. However, it will take a long time for all services and wallets to implement it. There is still a lot of testing that needs to be done. Knowing Bitcoin’s security conscious developers, there will be many tests before anything goes live at all. Point is that it could take a year or more for all wallets and services to implement LNs.

Because of the network effect, Bitcoin has to scale… and it has to scale fast. Every day Bitcoin takes to do so is another day that at least SOME capital goes into an alternative cryptocurrencies' markets instead of Bitcoin's. It is hurting all of the Bitcoin community participants in the ecosystem because some capital is leaving Bitcoin for other alternative cryptocurrencies both from old Bitcoin stakeholders and new community members. Bitcoin fees are already reaching all-time highs, and with the way adoption is going parabolic, expect transaction fees to go parabolic in the short-to-mid-term too.

Although Bitcoin has had a lot of success, it still has many adversaries to conquer, including nation states that may or may not choose to onerously regulate Bitcoin, bankers that will compete for market share on their own centralized solutions, and alternative cryptocurrencies that are competing for market share. There also exists the possibility that all three of those entities (nation states, bankers, or other alternative cryptocurrencies) will try to kill it via many attacks (51%, spam, ddos, political, social, etc) … if they aren’t already…

Bitcoin is already under attack. We can’t control nation states or banker attacks… they will happen regardless of how we proceed. However, I posit that we can do something about the Alternative cryptocurrencies are trying to kill it economically, socially, and politically. Bitcoin Cash has been the main benefactor of the congestion on the network, but other alternative cryptocurrencies are getting an inflow of capital too from what would have otherwise been capital in Bitcoin. It benefits everyone in the Bitcoin community including users, developers, miners, and companies if that capital stays in the Bitcoin ecosystem rather than shifting over to the alternative cryptocurrency’s ecosystem. Bitcoin’s network effect is under attack, and do not underestimate the power of its adversaries. Things will only get worse from here as all adversaries start to ramp up their attacks.

I think there is one solution that you can implement that will kill the value proposition of Bitcoin’s main competitor... the one alternative cryptocurrency the that the “big blockers” have rallied behind: Bitcoin Cash. The supporters of this resistance have been relentlessly attacking Bitcoin in an attempted coup by claiming they are better, and the “real” Bitcoin- among other things. However, the only advantage it has is that it has a higher 8 Mb block size, and is a lot less popular, which brings its transaction fees down substantially. I know Bitcoin’s plan is to scale via Lightning Networks and I support it, and I also realize that scaling purely by raising the block size infinitely eventually leads to a centralized network. However, at the same time, I would like to ask that the Bitcoin community please consider doing one small increase to Bitcoin’s block size to 8Mb, because Bitcoin’s capacity will be greater than that of Bitcoin Cash’s transaction capacity with the block size increase (plus the efficiencies Segwit affords us).

This will provide temporary financial relief from transaction fees for users and businesses until the Lightning Networks are fully working and implemented into most of the websites, services, and wallets. This will also kill the value proposition of big block solutions because at that point their marketing slogan would be an obvious lie if Bitcoin had the same or cheaper transaction fees. The capital would stop bleeding out of Bitcoin, and stay within the Bitcoin ecosystem. Due to the Network Effect, it is paramount that we retain all of the new users the most current “hype wave” (which people usually call a bubble) is bringing us because the quantity of new users and capital is orders of magnitude more users than the last hype wave.

Again, for emphasis, please consider raising the block size for temporary relief. Even if Lightning Networks are fully implemented, we might still have to increase the block size in order to increase the settling capacity of the network. As Bitcoin garners more and more utility through software innovations, the payment channel settling capacity might need to be scaled similarly to how the transaction capacity has had to with transactions. Also, 8Mb blocks are not really that much bigger than 2Mb blocks. It will hardly affect the decentralization of the network. No one is running full nodes on their phones, modern low-cost desktops and servers can efficiently process 8Mb blocks, and network bandwidth and network latency both are not an issue for most modern ISPs either with only 8Mb blocks.

I understand and totally get that you wouldn’t accept a group of companies’ attempts at doing so (Segwit2x), but surely, we can come together socially in order to come to an agreement. An agreement of which that is made out in the public in between almost all of the community members- not an agreement made behind closed doors by a limited portion of the community (like the Segwit2x agreement was formed). I think that is possibly the main contention the No2x crowd had against Segwit2x… is that it was an agreement formed behind closed doors by a few parties, and not necessarily the concept of a small rise in block size. Let’s test that theory?

Please swallow your stubbornness and pride, admit that there is a problem with high transaction fees, and then take the bull by its horns to fix the problem. Let’s raise Bitcoin’s block size to 8Mb.

A concerned community member,

William Connatser aka. CoinHoarder

Originally posted here: https://www.decentralized.tech/blogs/bigblockers-an-open-letter-to-the-bitcoin-community
47  Economy / Speculation / Re: Will BCH kill BTCSegWit while reinstating BTCSatoshi? on: December 15, 2017, 08:56:37 PM
Well there are still advantages to using crypto for transactions, but yes I guess if you hoard BTC/BCH, then you need so keep some on an exchange so that you can convert to a more usable coin when you need to transact.

I sold some BTC during the ATH last week and had to pay incredibly high fees to get my coins moving (more than 200€ in fees). No regrets though as I really did sell at the top, and sold enough to recover 100% of the fiat I've ever invested into crypto (including fees).

I'm not saying high transaction fees aren't a problem (because they are... a problem that will be solved eventually), but if you spent 200 euros on transaction fees then you probably aren't using Bitcoin properly.

1. Use wallet/services that have implemented Segwit.
2. Use a wallet where you can specify what fee to use because most wallets currently suck at estimating fees.
3. Use https://estimatefee.com to estimate the fee you need
4. Try to plan ahead.. because the quicker you need your transactions confirmed the more you can expect to pay.
48  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA on: December 13, 2017, 06:34:30 AM
So, basically, IOTA "universe" doesn't offer more privacy or anonymity than Bitcoin by default, but if the users decide or ask for, some operations will not be "shared and recorded" excepted by some few specific nodes, interresting.

Frankly saying, this feature is not unique to Iota. It's based on the idea of payment channels (http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/file/716b955c130e6c703fac336ea17b1670/duplex-micropayment-channels.pdf) invented for Bitcoin. When Bitcoin adopts the changes required for payment channel realization is another question.

Revisiting this question now that they seem inevitable...

How do BTC/LTC/etc. with LN payment channels stack up?
49  Economy / Speculation / Re: Will BCH kill BTCSegWit while reinstating BTCSatoshi? on: December 12, 2017, 05:36:45 AM


Who cares about making transactions via cryptocurrencies, really?

Quite a lot of people, which is why silicon valley poured money into creating apps that interfaced with business checkouts.

The whole fee debacle caused Steam to stop bitcoi payment because of the fees:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42264622

The race is now on for Bitpay to enable BCH (and perhaps other alts) - and if they can then win Steam back as a customer, we are set for bitcoin being excluded in payments but alts being enabled. Which should boost alts a lot.

My point was that people wanting to spend a highly appreciating asset are a large minority amongst people looking to hoard it.

Especially when 9 out of 10 times they can just use a depreciating asset like FIAT.
50  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: December 12, 2017, 05:30:35 AM
Who runs Moneropool.com??

I know the price of Monero will fluctuate, but at current prices, the 0.5 XMR minimum payout is a little much IMO. That's almost $150 nowadays, and a lot for people that aren't running a powerful rig (or more than one rig)... more than 2 or 3 weeks inbetween payments.

High minimum payout amounts are part of the reason there was $60M stolen in the NiceHash hack last week. They also had a $150 minimum (0.01 BTC technically).

I don't think the pool has that much funds, but there probably still is a decent enough chunk of change sitting around to make it a potential target for a hack. A $150 minimum payment just exacerbates the problem.
51  Economy / Speculation / Re: Will BCH kill BTCSegWit while reinstating BTCSatoshi? on: December 10, 2017, 11:46:24 PM
Meh, I don't know why you insisted on dragging me back into this debate...

I don't care for having the last word.

Okay then you were attacking Roger Ver in your comments, but in the following video he articulates a very compelling and simple reason why BCH is superior:

https://youtu.be/cJAAMtqXc5I?t=181
Roger Ver is a scam artist that stole the Bitcoin brand name to springboard his Bcash altcoin. That is why he gets so offended when people take the word Bitcoin out of the name because it takes the power away from the "bait and switch" scam. My criticisms of Roger Ver have nothing to do with the non-"superiority" of BCH.

There are also many ALT coins have the same "superior" properties that are being argued in support of BCH (big enough blocks that are empty enough which results in cheaper transaction fees). Yet, here you are championing Bitcoin Cash. Why are you not championing any alt coins too?

He said Bitcoin no longer has transactions "basically for free", but such transactions are unsustainable. There is no such thing as free transactions. They must be paid for with transaction fees, or paid with inflation. He is living in fantasy land if he thinks "basically for free" transactions are sustainable. Once the block subsidy decreases enough let's see how his "basically for free" transaction fee model works...

And anyways... on-chain Bitcoin transactions are still really cheap. I sent a transaction the other day with a $0.50 transaction fee. The only thing that isn't cheap is if you want your transaction confirmed really quickly. But Bitcoin is not ideal for such transactions anyways (IE. buying coffee). See below...

The question is just when do they get pushed over the cliff. For Europe, that is coming very soon. For SegWit, maybe not until 2019 or so.
A lot can and will change between now and then. Looking that far into the future (especially with how fast things move in the crypto world) is useless. It is a possibility that the market will have effectively killed BCH by then, and killing Bitcoin would be financial suicide by the miners. Thinking everyone will just cut their losses and switch to BCH after such an attack is wishful thinking on your part. Bcash is just an ALT coin, and whose to say another ALT coin will not be the main benefactor? You certainly can not tell the future, and cannot argue so with speculating on what MAY happen in the future.

They’ve committed to being the scaling coin, so they don’t anticipate political problems with increasing the block size. Of course if true, that means it’s centralized, but so is every coin. Who cares about the future. Everything will change. Here and now, BCH has lower fees (and doesn’t have the one confirmation block period slowing down to MUCH higher than 10 minutes, irreparably for more than two weeks).

It’s the only exact Satoshi protocol blockchain (except for the larger blocks) with major miner support.

If you really want to talk about the HERE and NOW....

Who cares about making transactions via cryptocurrencies, really? They are a speculation vehicle based on their future utility once major adoption occurs. No one wants to buy their coffee in a neutral-inflation (or deflationary) cryptocurrency when they can buy it with the inflationary capital they have. Inflationary capital (FIAT) of which is necessary to own in order to survive. It doesn't make any economic sense to spend an asset that is rapidly appreciating in value (cryptocurrency) when you can spend an asset that is slowly depreciating in value (FIAT). Try to live off of cryptocurrency only for a while and tell me how that works out. Hint: using a debit card or other service that converts crypto to FIAT is not living off of only cryptocurrency.

Only Bcash FUDsters want to buy their coffee with cryptocurrency. That is the HERE and NOW. And as you said in your own words... no use in worrying/caring about the future because everything will change. The HERE and NOW is that Bitcoin's Network Effect will reign supreme in the short term. Bcash holders that want to buy their coffee with cryptocurrency will miss out on the huge gains Bitcoin will receive due to the Network Effect. The Bcash "idealists" have effectively already spent their war chest pumping Bcash from $300 to $1500. Notice it has been effectively stagnant since...
52  Economy / Digital goods / Re: [accepting offers] Crypto Domains and Websites on: December 09, 2017, 09:47:16 PM
bump
53  Economy / Speculation / Re: Will BCH kill BTCSegWit while reinstating BTCSatoshi? on: December 09, 2017, 08:32:09 PM
I’m very busy trying to beat EOS to launch, so please stop.

Let’s both go quiet and work. We’ll observe what happens.

You can have the last word for now.

I don't care for having the last word. I think both of us have explained our thoughts on the matter thoroughly. We are effectively just wasting time here, but this is historically how I have learned everything I know since I joined the crypto world in 2012... by debating intelligent and knowledgeable individuals like yourself. So thank you for that. I have learned some things, started considering some things that I hadn't before, and have adjusted my thoughts accordingly. Admittedly, the latter takes a while for me because I am somewhat stubborn (and smarter than most people I debate... but probably not you), but I usually come to a realization eventually if I am wrong on something.

You are correct that we both have better things to do, such as working on our own projects. Good luck with everything- I'm sure we will be debating something or another sooner or later again.  Wink  Cheesy
54  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CryptoHunch: A collectible blockchain asset card game based on deceit on: December 09, 2017, 07:44:07 PM
.
55  Economy / Speculation / Re: Revisiting a Facebook Post of Mine from December 6th, 2013 on: December 09, 2017, 06:46:31 PM
So you are saying that we will be in a long term downtrend till say 2019 or even 2020? Cause thats what I am seeing.

That is a likely possibility because as the massive correction occurs, the FUD will increase. The "Bitcoin is a bubble" crowd will be "correct", or at least it will look like they were correct to most people that are not enlightened (which is practically almost everyone... this forum being the 1% exception).

With each hype wave, Bitcoin grows its brand and userbase exponentially. Therefore, it is hard to call the top. We could go to $100k in 2018 without a correction. I feel quite certain a large correction will happen in less than a year from now. Much much quicker if the price keeps quickly going parabolic.

Last time it took 3 years for the market to rebound. Next go around it will take less, because there are more people chomping at the bit to get in, but are scared to do so at the current value. I expect at most a year or two bear market. Possibly less...
56  Economy / Speculation / Revisiting a Facebook Post of Mine from December 6th, 2013 on: December 09, 2017, 06:21:42 PM
I know a lot of people around these parts also predicted the future quite accurately, and I am no one special, but I thought I'd share this Facebook post that I wrote on December 6th, 2013:

Quote
The following post was written by me on Facebook on December 6, 2013...

It is crazy how I had everything practically all figured out 4 years ago. Unfortunately, I should have believed in myself more, and put more of my money where my mouth was. I would be a billionaire right now. I am unfortunately nowhere close to such... due to my own stupidity and a few occurrences of bad fortune. I guess I had a hard time believing in myself when no one (or not many at least) believed in Bitcoin back then. I am done with that line of thinking though. The wolves take the candy from the sheep. Not the other way around...

The only thing wrong with this post was that the market took about 2 or 3 years to rebound- not a few days. That ended up being wayyyy too optimistic. When the current "hype wave" corrects itself from $18k, I am expecting it to take less time to rebound though due to Bitcoin gaining in popularity and legitimacy. There are a lot more people chomping at the bit to get in, and a correction will accelerate that. It still won't take just a few days to rebound (unless this is a bear trap), but I can't see it taking 2 or 3 years like it did last time. Maybe a year or two at most- possibly much quicker.

Some of my understanding as to the potentials of the technology has changed a lot since this post too. I am extremely more bullish because now I realize that the technology will disrupt many more industries than it simply being a worldwide payment system.

^^^ hindsight ^^^

The actual FB post from Dec. 2013 here: https://www.decentralized.tech/blogs/retrospect-revisiting-a-facebook-post-of-mine-from-december-6th-2013
57  Economy / Services / Re: Earn $10 USD: I need help with a collectible card game design on: December 08, 2017, 05:13:35 PM
I have also created a new card category temproarily named "Power Cards"  that's not on the current version of the game's PDF. I'm at work, so I can't update it now. All names and such are temporary, fyi.

Double Down – Power Shard generation x 2 for one turn only

Triple Down – Power Shard generation x 3 for one turn only

Expected Value – Power Shard generation x 3.5 on your next turn only

Power Source Upgrade – Power Shard generation x 1.5 for the rest of the game. Only playable once Rank 2 is reached in every power type.
58  Economy / Services / Re: Earn $10 USD: I need help with a collectible card game design on: December 08, 2017, 02:12:42 AM
There are 2 winners of $10 each so far. I updated the OP with the current game design. Thanks for ya'lls help!!!
59  Economy / Services / Re: Earn $10 USD: I need help with a collectible card game design on: December 08, 2017, 02:11:55 AM
https://image.ibb.co/hWx2cm/tt2.jpg
To be honest, I am not interested in graphic design right now. Only critique of the game design..

From my understanding, in that time there is a Civil war between the Miners and the shareholders, the press, developers as I visualized above in the picture.

Yes, you are correct

Backstory :
it's great story, but how about adding something thing like aliens who came to earth with Advanced technology, and some bad guys used to destroy bitcoin, the good guy who already won first round. Now he have to save our beautiful currency ( BTC ). the reason why I suggest this, because when the first player reached full power, the game is one, so we need to give him a new challenge.

Once someone reaches full power, you can always start another game. There won't be multiple missions... it is a player versus player strategy game. Once a game ends you replay the same game with the same rules, and slowly everyone forms a better strategy. Smiley

I do like your idea for there being aliens with advanced technology. I needed an idea for a 4th expansion anyways so there can be 1v1v1v1v1v1v1 games!! This way anywhere from 2 to 8 players can play in individual mode. What is your Bitcoin/ALT coin address, I will give you $10 for the idea


I'll read ur document later and give you more suggestions.

Thanks, I hope that you do!!!
60  Economy / Services / Re: Earn $10 USD: I need help with a collectible card game design on: December 08, 2017, 02:07:49 AM
Hi, i'll give my opinion based on what i have understood, if i made a mistake, avoid offensive comments and make constructive criticism. The categories...? that i haven't spoken is because i agree

Game Modes:

  • Individual (up to 4 players), although i see you want to add more players per game, it's illogical to fight with someone of your same faction when both want the same result

In Team Mode, power is accumulated for each power type together. +100 Hash power adds 100 Hash power to the team's collective mining power (all players on the same team contribute to the same power source). However, on individual mode... +100 Hash power only adds the 100 power to the player's mining power alone, and each player collects power separately. In team mode, players do not fight other players that are in the same faction, but instead they play together.

Rules & Dynamics:

Everyone should stay in the same Power Shards (Rank 1), because with these ranges you turn the strategy game into a game of luck

For example:

First and second turn: Me, 5 and 5 (1000), another player, 2 and 3 (500)
Third turn: Me, 1 (+ 500000 = 501000), another player, 6 (+ 600 = 1100)
Fourth turn: Me, 1 (+ 500000 = 1001000), another player 6 (+ 600000 = 601100)
Fifth turn: Me, 1 (+ 250000000 = 260010000), another player 6 (+ 600000 = 1201100)

I think it explains itself

I think this is a great idea!!! Although the randomness creates more of a Hearthstone-type game that is fun for casual players, you made me realize that this game type is not ideal for hardcore gamers. I have created two modes... one "Standard Mode" where the 60 sided die is used, and another "Hardcore Mode" where each player receives the same amount of Power Shards each turn!!!!

Since you inspired this change, I will pay you $10!!! Please post your Bitcoin address and I will make it happen ASAP!!


Gameplay:

Choose one character card, and one faction card, each turn the character will generate 100 Power Hash, Satoshis, Subscribers, Lines of codes

Win Power Shards to exchange them for Hash Power, Satoshis, Subscribers, Lines of codes

Yes, exactly!!

Change Hash Power, Satoshis, Subscribers, Lines of codes, by generators (Miner, Faucet, Youtuber, Programmer), will give an X amount of Power Hash, Satoshis, Subscribers, Lines of codes per turn

I think I may like this idea, but I need to think about it more. I was already thinking of some cards that boost power shard production for turn-specific power shard generation. IE. Someone has two 100% power shard boost cards that they can play at any turn they like throughout the game, or a two 100% and one 200%, or one 100% and two %150%... etc.

However, your idea is different. Like in starcraft or similar games, you are saying to have the ability to upgrade the the amount of power shards a player gets each turn permanently for the rest of the game? There is already a similar idea in the design if you read about power shard ranks... as you go up in rank, the power shard multiplier gets bigger.


Prepare your defensive and offensive strategy

Win the game!

Exactly, you got it!!!

(This is an example, everyone can make their own style of play)

To be continued if...



Questions:

How exactly can we know the faction of the other player?, we can't use the Collectible Utility Cards because we don't know the faction of the other player or should we try 1 negative cards of each faction?

It is a game of deception. There is no way of knowing which faction someone is playing for sure. To play the best strategy, you will try to make your opponents think you are playing for a different faction than you actually are while slowly powering up your actual faction's power sneakily. Or perhaps you try a "hiding in plain sight" strategy where you only power up your faction's power because you think your opponents will not think you'd be so brazen. If your opponents figure out which faction you are fighting for, then they can play counter cards to slow down your power accumulation for that faction, but if they do not... then you are more likely to win because they won't (unless they are lucky) play the proper utility cards to slow you down.

What cards will appear in the Started Pack?

The actual cards and deck design is very pre beta. There will be cards added and cards eliminated. For now, the only cards I know will be included are the 4 character cards and the 4 faction cards. All other cards are up for debate!

I will not continue with the other categories, because i don't know if the person or persons involved in this are in agreement with my opinion. I also apologize for my bad english Grin (i use a translator)

Despite the obvious language barrier, you provided really goo feedback and I hope you continue to do so!!! Post a Bitcoin or ALT coin address and I will send you $10 asap. Smiley
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 202 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!