 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
If you havent found solution yet I might have a way with a big Pool that already confirmed me that could work it out.
Sent you a DM
Hi,I ran into the same problem. Can you tell me how to solve it？Thanks. How is that possible? Please explain. |
|
|
|
I just deposited some cash to try and hit 95 on Striker and it hit on my 6th try on Betnomi casino.
Round#: 1118482
User: imturksoy
Game: striker
Hit: 95 (62.75x)
You have been credited 150$ for your roll hunt hit. That was pretty easy lol. Good luck Yeah, a little suspicious actually of how easily I won - I ran up this $150 winnings to $700. How long does it take to withdraw usually? I'll definitely be back |
|
|
|
|
I just deposited some cash to try and hit 95 on Striker and it hit on my 6th try on Betnomi casino.
Round#: 1118482
User: imturksoy
Game: striker
Hit: 95 (62.75x)
|
|
|
|
Just to be clear, any and all bets under 5 count that are $0.1 or above?
Correct, if you win on it you are good to go!
5 is included?
If you bet on under 5 and win, the number you win on won't matter  Ok, that wasn't so clear. So the multiplier must be 19.8x and say "roll under 5 to win" and it must be a winning bet to count, correct? |
|
|
|
|
Just to be clear, any and all bets under 5 count that are $0.1 or above?
|
|
|
|
I really can not understand why are you trying here broadcast the transaction through simple pushtx services. The issue is in bitcoin address creation, as the TC used uncompressed public key for segwit address creation (it was said here several times).
That means that broadcasting the transaction to different nodes will not work in this case. They use the same protocol and can not accept the non-standard transaction.
So what is the reason for pushing tx to bitcoin network through different nodes?
Certain nodes not running Bitcoin Core allow for non-standard transactions. Although the odds of one of these nodes mining a block is incredibly slim, it's still worth taking a shot at since the BTC sum here is considerable. So, it's not impossible/pointless, just very unlikely. |
|
|
|
The problem with this logic is that as the price of BTC continues to increase, so does the value of a block with transaction fees. And since the issue is mining pools being unwilling to change settings due to fear of losses, the economics of risk might not change until OP's transaction fee (+ the reward) surpasses the value of a block reward with transaction fees. We're more than one halving away from that.
All right, but what if you look at the problem from a marketing point of view? Alternatively, OP must enlist the support of one of the well-known members of the crypto community, so that he, in turn, on Twitter challenges one of the mining pools. Let's say that such a person can become Charlie Lee, aka @satoshilite / Forum username Coblee. He has almost a million Twitter followers and I would characterize Charlie as a very responsive person. I do not think that the binance/pool or anyone else will ignore the public appeal. If you present information from the right angle, then this can be a good news lead for them "we are the ones who solved a non-standard problem" (It's about mining pools or companies that represent them). As I've seen so far, not a single person out of the dozens I've contacted has given a single shit about my funds, even with what I think is a compelling reward for such an easy task. |
|
|
|
The total value has now surpassed 6 figures USD and I still cannot get in touch with a miner who will have no trouble mining this non-standard transaction.
Who knows, may be this stuck due to incorrect public key will make for you a good investment decision to hold bitcoin during its jump up to 100kUSD per 1 BTC. And later during its jump from 100kUSD up to 500kUSD per 1 BTC your issue will be resolved. It is like an external factor forcing you to hold bitcoin and not change it to fiat... In some sense, yeah that is true. It's definitely gone up since I sent it into the address by alot. On the other hand, I could have invested it into altcoins or projects that would have multiplied the USD value even further. It isn't all too bad... but I am worried that BTC/USD price will drop significantly before I can get the BTC out so at this point I am doing my best to put it into my own full control. |
|
|
|
I hit total of 7 bonuses on my account: leventturksoy
Any sort of proof you could share?
Just one more day until this one ends! Join now before it's too late. Sure here is a screenshot: https://gyazo.com/97de4c20b450141b5585986e7dc8c562I can't screenshot the game history itself because I keep getting an error for some reason, but I was betting on the bonuses only. |
|
|
|
|
I hit total of 7 bonuses on my account: leventturksoy
|
|
|
|
 User: leventturksoy |
|
|
|
|
The total value has now surpassed 6 figures USD and I still cannot get in touch with a miner who will have no trouble mining this non-standard transaction.
|
|
|
|
hi i have put your transaction in accelearation with my private method
7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd
we will see if work
if work i will wait for the bounty
Hi, thanks for finding interest in helping me. However, unless you can explain what you are doing and come to an agreement with me beforehand, you cannot partake in this bounty. For example, I offered Timelord a $1,000 bounty if the transaction he is re-broadcasting on Blockcypher gets confirmed. I offered to help you with this issue long time ago. But i was told by someone that i could not do this... It's somewhere in the early pages of this thread. Now i have one question. How are you planning to identify the one that pushed it through ? Right now if the transaction that is continually broadcasted on Blockcypher is mined, Timelord receives the agreed bounty. I am not in need of anyone else to do what Timelord is doing at the current moment, but if Timelord gives up, I may talk to you privately. Edit: As @nc50lc said, it's not a problem to figure out who mined it - and I'm not offering an extra bounty besides the transaction fee to any miners unless they contact me directly beforehand. |
|
|
|
|
Honestly this looks quite good. I think it would be helpful to include more information though.
|
|
|
|
Not convincing at all. The max wins are also fractional of other casinos. Roobet is selling nothing more, it is simply hiding the massive house edge by not displaying it in the open, this is not transparent, and in my opinion, that is untrustworthy.
I think Roobet is doing so good with marketing everywhere, especially Twitch (aka Xposed and co) that has been attracting new and un-educated gamblers who are too naive to know that there are better alternatives.
I share my honest opinion.
Simple, if you feel you don't like playing on roobet because their House Edge too high, don't play and move to other casino.
That's was the deal T&C *ticked*, those many casino or dice site with big House Edge than Roobet.
AFAIK there is only 1 site which has higher than roobet, and its freebitco.in has 5% house edge. Most of casino or sites have 1% House edge Yes I will not be playing on Roobet. I leave my opinion here so that management may potentially see and consider it. |
|
|
|
I signed up for an account on Roobet. 2.5% house edge on dice? I laughed my head off all the way to the little round x at the top of my browser.
That's was the deal T&C *ticked*, those many casino or dice site with big House Edge than Roobet. There's many of casino with good House Edge and felt like fair, but might Roobet has selling something more.. like guarantee the payout/withdrawal. Not convincing at all. The max wins are also fractional of other casinos. Roobet is selling nothing more, it is simply hiding the massive house edge by not displaying it in the open, this is not transparent, and in my opinion, that is untrustworthy. I think Roobet is doing so good with marketing everywhere, especially Twitch (aka Xposed and co) that has been attracting new and un-educated gamblers who are too naive to know that there are better alternatives. I share my honest opinion. |
|
|
|
|
