Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 09:47:24 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: "Bitcoin is Dead" - Mike Hearn on: February 10, 2016, 04:00:15 AM
This is daily variation. confirm this: Today the world economy was not good, tomorrow Bitcoin show a trend up


understand: if Bitcoin to be weak would not be a viable escape for days of bad economy . When the economy improves , exist something better than Bitcoin to invest.

Realized that 9-Feb the bitcoin started at $ 377 and ended the day at $ 379 ? Bad day for the world economy , Increases Bitcoin value .
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: "Bitcoin is Dead" - Mike Hearn on: February 10, 2016, 12:15:25 AM
This is daily variation. confirm this: Today the world economy was not good, tomorrow Bitcoin show a trend up


understand: if Bitcoin to be weak would not be a viable escape for days of bad economy . When the economy improves , exist something better than Bitcoin to invest.
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: "Bitcoin is Dead" - Mike Hearn on: February 09, 2016, 07:53:02 PM
Follow the world economy, when world economy coming down Bitcoin rises and vice verse. Note that Jan-14 the economy was glad of an oil rise and other details. Bitcoin is a place where investors go when the economy is bad, but fled as soon as the economy improves.
4  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Do any large players still solo mine? on: December 24, 2015, 01:28:36 AM

The reason or reasons I can think of are fresh, never moved coins. With "fresh" coins you are the original owner, there is no chance that those coins were used in anything that could be seen as risky and no one had possession of the coins prior to you, the coins were generated then sent directly to the collectors physical bitcoin. There are probably other reasons as well.

It makes perfect sense that. I would like to buy bitcoin miners always, without past, clean coins. I would also sell bitcoins always good person.

No one knocking on my door asking why I negotiated with suspicious people.

Bitcoin is not anonymous and would not want to be in the middle of the hunt  trail  for a villain.

This vile world, a bitcoin transaction carries on his shoulders more than a bitocin value, but also the reputation of your origin and destination.

If it were not so, there would not exist bitcoin mixing services with the frank intention washing.

paranoid, but good idea.

5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 10:14:23 PM
I want to Be Wrong, I want to be Convinced Of this, but I fear What are YOU IN too delighted with the Bitcoin to See THIS centralization is Forming.
Why do you say I am delighted? Stop putting words in my mouth. I see that there is centralization, there inherently is. There absolutely is no way to have complete and absolute decentralization. But it isn't on the scale or level which you claim it is.

Okay, you're right. However , it was exactly what I wanted , the total decentralization.
I believe I'll have to accept friendly centralization.

Thank you again for your patience
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 10:03:45 PM
When I spoke of exponential increase in rate hash, i don't  suspect of attack , but that has  big betting in Bitcoin.
I didn't believe in Increase hash rate now, because we are Close to see the reduced Reward to 12.5 BTC.

I think I'm calmer now
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 09:29:39 PM
I want to Be Wrong, I want to be Convinced Of this, but I fear What are YOU IN too delighted with the Bitcoin to See THIS centralization is Forming.
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 09:09:59 PM
I disagree with this statement. It is very clear the develoeprs do not have a sceptre in their hands, from the recent blocksize debate. Also do not forget the developers cannot push changes as they want, if the miners do not agree no change is made. Bitcoin is decentralized and without consensus they are powerless.


How many bitcoin players are Required To have consensus? 3 miners, 4 exchange (or wallet) and 5 programmers? If 1,000 of us , running full node , complain , we will be heard?

Case the group of 12 (3 miner, 4 exhange and 5 developer) had accepted the XT , the thousands of claims against would have been heard?
9  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 01:51:21 AM
The hash power began to rise exponentially again.
Why, if before was almost linear.

https://blockchain.info/pt/charts/hash-rate?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

Why this new trend of super rise?
10  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 01:36:53 AM
Although developers and miners hold power (which I feel it is deserved due to their work for Bitcoin) users still can dislike what they do running away from Bitcoin, or showing their conformity by holding on to Bitcoin. I do not see reason for worries.

If Bitcoin becomes too controlled there are thousands of alts too... I know they are not worth much right now, but that is because users (not developers) chosed Bitcoin, and can chose other if they think Bitcoin is not providing what they want.

Of course, but what big players want to bitcoin, will be the same we want?
11  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 01:29:32 AM
Right, only those who actively use Bitcoin and don't just hodl. They are the people who actively participate in the economy and they are the ones that can exert influence.....

Do you think They are caring against centralization? Or they only think of profits

I really want that not going on the move to centralization.
12  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 01:15:19 AM
We is the users of Bitcoin. There are many users of Bitcoin who, like me, actually give a shit and research things. If we (technologically savvy and actually caring about the code and technical details) are aware of changes being made that could be disastrous, we would let everyone know. And most people who use Bitcoin now are not ignorant and many people do care. It will be the people who join later if/when bitcoin goes mainstream that don't care and are ignorant.

Nobody read gavin say "who really rules the Bitcoin"? I only reader?

Only Those Who invested a lot of money is what important, others can scream have been ignored. I was sad, but  It's always been like that and this will always be so.

13  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 12:51:45 AM

your name says it all..


KKKKKK

pensei que a brincadeira iria passar em branco... (Did not understand?)

Now , three miners = 62 % , in few year, how many hash Percentage of the F2Pool ? >51?Huh I don't now.
14  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 20, 2015, 12:06:46 AM
I don't remember where I read gavin andresen say that small full nodes are nothing in terms of consensus against greater wallet online, he said that power was the big investors (big $user$ bitcoin), but besides these were the big miners and big wallet have force.

We seize the new more professional stage. Probably a sort of BC will be developed. bitcoin will remain strong, but centralized.

human should like powers centralized. Most major bitcoin depositors just want anonymity, they don't care centralization.

I hate it, but so is do.

I execute a full node... Still

Wake up !!
15  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 19, 2015, 11:55:03 PM
RealBitcoin is rigth!

Franky1 say: "ith mining in china, iceland, canada, uk, and europe.. i dont see mining as centralised."

See: https://blockchain.info/pt/pools
F2Pool 25%
AntPool 22%
BitFury 15%
together 62% power mine > 51%...

i see mining as centralised and Wallet too.
16  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin becoming centrally planned: Communist on: December 19, 2015, 11:03:44 PM
The Satoshi's dream is Over!! RealBitcoin is right, bitcoin now is centralized in few miners and few greater wallet online (coinbase, blockchain wallet, ...)

Bitcoin  is centralized now
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!