It is unfortunate but this the way it is, very few trust trading PayPal/Dwolla/ACH for non-reversable BTC. Because of a handful of scammers reversing transactions after receiving BTC it inhibits newcomers from easily entering the economy.

Right now Paxum is the one up to bat, downside is the time it takes to get funds into them and extreme ID verification (necessary).

I wasn't sure you were serious, now it seems you are. TH policy as you listed above reads something like:

If you initiate a wire transfer request at or before 2:00p EST the wire transfer from our account to yours will be initiated on our end within the day of the request (by 5:00p EST). A wire transfer request after 2:00p EST will be initiated on our end the following business day (by 5:00p EST).

Apparently you initiated a wire transfer request yesterday at 3:00p EST (after their 2:00p EST cut-off time). Your wire transfer will be initiated on TH side by 5:00p EST today.

You may have other delays related to your bank.

Did I miss something?

No, you don't want to solo mine with 1 5770 (or 10). You may think you do but you really don't.

Yea, as a shareholder in IBB I have been asked on occasion to give a thumbs up or thumbs down on a project. I like to see original ideas/projects but as important is a business plan that makes sense from an investment point of view. I don't think we want to throw BTC at every project that comes along. This is in reference to joint venture investments, loans are a different matter and are very short term and maximum of 5 BTC IIRC.

Another successful trade with BitcoinExchange. He performed precisely to terms and am satisfied with exchange.

Just to clarify with the spelling corrected, is your statement:


And does this actually mean that once funds are sent to Jack there is no way possible that those funds will be taken back from Jack ever, period, end of story, regardless of fraud on the sender side? With the exception of course if Jack was part of a/the fraud.

I just want to be clear on this because I sense many folks believed this to be the case with Dwolla and obviously were quite surprised when it was not.

It does make sense to me that this is indeed possible to guarantee with additional tx charges and extreme verification methods.

+1 to Paxum if this is their position.

Did you mention that aticonfig also doesn't allow you to set mem clock to where you need it? I don't recall if you mentioned this or not.

That seems odd. I can't confirm or deny as I don't have 69xx cards.

Just for kicks, try the following (after reboot/reset and running full load) and report what you find:


Also, Andre has been extremely helpful with resolving issues with glakkeclock. I believe his email is in the header of source code. I contacted him some months ago with issues and we worked together via IRC to resolve issues and clean up some code.

ahh, I haven't seen that Generic Error before. Try using the command I listed and see what happens. And try just doing mem itself and the core itself before doing both in one call.

If your card(s) are supported then the following will set your mem clocks to 300 for adapter 0:


Remember you have to issue this command while the card is under full load (PP mode 2 I believe) else you will be adjusting the values for the idle mode or whatever mode the card is currently operating in. Alternately you can specify the PP mode to apply values to (-cpl I believe) but I have never tried that so I am not sure.

Tickers are free according to the fees page.

Sorry, that should have been:

You can open README.md with a text editor. You will need the AMD ADL SDK also. It should go something like this:

You have a signed NDA with AMD? Or am I assuming incorrectly?

Yea, screenshot ain't faked. But those generated coins listed definitely weren't from 2009 or 2010...or 2011.

Edit: Well I guess that data set could be from today. That would make sense then. 128364 + 9437...ok, I need more coffee. I assumed dataset was from 2009. Sorry Maria.

It would have been much more believable if it had been 2010 and a LOT less confirmations. Else as is that would put genesis back into 2007 or so wouldn't it?

Duh, I missed that, good catch.

It must not be mainnet, but even testnet wasn't around until mid 2010 IIRC. Maybe I have my dates mixed up. Is today 2009?

It's not the difficulty that doesn't make sense, it's the date that doesn't seem correct.

I don't see how that is possible. Is your date wrong? Different network?