Strategy in gambling only helps when it is applied in financial management or our playing limits but if it is to pursue winning it can be said to be impossible because all strategies only work for a moment and if continued for the long term it will only lead to losses. And you are right as humans emotions will control us even though we try to control it even in a winning situation we can be provoked into continuing to play especially losing is very likely to think about recovering losses

Yes, we must always protect our winnings so that we are not negatively affected, control is something that always appears in our lives for everything, not everyone is focused,  not everyone has that control, you can undoubtedly fail, that is what you should try to do, but it is very difficult to do it, you have to be very key when playing, here the only thing that affects is that you lose money and that is avoidable, there are many methods, we must use the one that best suits us and goes with our personality.

You are right, it is strictly an individual mindset to think or generalize that gambling is a short cut to poverty and considering the fact different people tend to approach gambling in different ways. However, it is not gambling itself that can make the road shorter for any one but rather the individual approach is exactly what could lead to poverty that is if the person in question is already rich and have chosen to approach gambling the wrong way, but come to think of it,  from the op concepts I think the only way gambling will be a short cut to poverty is only when the person in question is already rich and decide to spend most of it in to gambling without a return instead of investing.

There's no other way. You have to tell him directly, like to honor his promise about giving you 10% of his winning, but if its ok for you and he did not honor it, then you also have to directly tell him, because if you do not and he loses all the money he won, he will end up blaming you for not reminding him about your shares that he promised.
I experienced that myself and was blamed for not reminding the guy of what was promised to me. Gamblers have twisted minds when winning and losing it afterwards.

I really appreciate how you share your experiences lately with the community.
I wasn't addicted me myself but i witnessed some cases addicted to the activity of gambling and van't control their bihaviors.


From the beginning of my experience I was afraid of the idea of becoming a gambling addict, especially since I had a bad experience with alcohol addiction, which required me a great effort to get rid of. Then, by virtue of my knowledge of scientific research, I understood that behavioral addiction is one of the most dangerous types of addiction that can afflict a person.

It’s true, we can’t completely predict outcomes, but sports betting is really a numbers game. To have a chance at being profitable in the long run, discipline with bankroll management is key. Spotting those "trap games" and taking advantage of them can give you an edge. Sure, they don’t come often, but if you can get more picks right than wrong, you’ll be on the path to profit.

If your goal is to be profitable, it’s all about calculated betting, fewer bets, but with higher quality. It might sound boring, but that’s the reality if you’re serious about success. And as we know, chasing excitement often leads to losses, so stick to the smart plays.

Although it never harms the company or interferes with their work, it is still very risky to retain an addicted employee. However, there may be a special approach before deciding to fire him, such as whether he can change his addiction or not.
I have heard many cases where someone uses company money or uses money that is not theirs to gamble because of their addiction. Maybe at first it was okay when they still had money to play, but when their assets are gone, they will start to dare to use any money to gamble.

Whatever the reasons for closing the hub are legitimate and whatever the way people may view gambling (haram or sin), it cannot be ignored that these companies represent an important source of support for the budgets of countries. The taxes imposed on this type of service companies (entertainment gambling) may reach more than 50% of the total profits in some legislations and in my country the taxes withheld on the profits from betting and types of competitions reach 66%. This leads us to conclude whether it is really wise to close these companies for any reason and lose tax revenues in addition to what this will cause in terms of sending employees to unemployment. I am not saying that we should not hold accountable those involved in suspicious activities, but this can be done individually without having to shut down the service completely. I do not know the laws in the Philippines, but I am sure that some decisions need to be reviewed and amended.

That is the plus minus of relying on instincts when gambling, you will not know exactly how the results of your gambling will be and it will be entirely based on your luck alone. That's why when gambling one should use their instincts only at certain times, because it could be that what your instincts say is right and you win big, but if the opposite then you will lose. And always make sure that the risk is in line with our capabilities, because relying on instinct is uncertain and if the results are not what we expect, at least we understand the risks and are ready to accept it.

No. Rollbit is still promoting the project and what has been conveyed by users under your post is that it is a new rollbit promotion. So it's not wrong to follow their active social media platforms like their x social media.
You are not wrong in terms of their excellent management which is able to maintain the rollbit token as a gambling token that gets a lot of attention from users than other gambling tokens.

I understand your view and proposition but no matter how you try to suggest a solution, there will always be flaws. Fine, they can't be able to exclude the addict if they are true to their anonymity, but I see the same flaw in placing an IP ban on the gambler. This is even the simplest of it all if the addict is using a dynamic IP. It is as simple in my country as just putting your data off and on, the IP automatically change to another.

But I like your additional view, who knows, another customer without issues living in the same country will soon be a victim of the IP ban, so it's pointless.

I can't do anything but agree with what you said. However, I guess Jake Paul and Mike Tyson aren't the only ones who have done this. If I'm not mistaken, the first one to initiate events like this was Mayweather when he fought Conor McGregor in the boxing ring. The same goes for Manny Pacquiao, who has had many exhibition matches — if I'm not mistaken, he’s had about 3 to 5 matches, and all of those were surely for the money.

When we gamble, whether it is following our instincts or not, we must be able to protect ourselves by preventing emotions that can make things even more messy later. I am sure you yourself know what will happen when you gamble with unstable emotions, of course the results will only make things worse, right? Therefore, as much as possible when gambling, we must protect ourselves to stay in a safe condition.
I agree with you, if indeed to find something safer, then maybe it is better for us to gamble with real analysis such as in sports betting which does require sufficient skills and knowledge to increase the chances of winning.

It becomes something natural when someone goes to a casino to get profit, because even though someone says that they come to have fun but they will also definitely expect victory to come to them when they play. But the problem is how much they can control it, I mean they must be able to control so that the mind does not affect them completely. Because if they are carried away by their own thoughts, then they will become irresponsible gamblers, and when someone gambles irresponsibly then the result is that addiction may attack them.

I will agree with you that majority of people gamble for fun and majority of people also gamble because of generating revenue and surviving, while some people gamble because they see other person gambling, so we have different motive or objectives while we venture into gambling

But I do criticism people who make such utterance of gambling for fun, the objectives of every gamblers is to ensure that they make profit through their gambling, I stand to say anyone that says they are gambling base on fun it's obvious that they hiding something else...every objectives to participate in the gambling is to make money.

Yup, it is certain that all forms of action that lead to excessive aspects are mostly done because of the urge to win, or I mean the urge to get a big win like that produced by other gamblers and of course the obsession with winning can very easily lead a gambler to a cycle of addiction. You said something right that the more we think about winning, the more uncontrolled we will be in every decision we make, most likely most of our decisions will tend to be aggressive or impulsive, therefore because of this we are always advised to only make gambling a place of entertainment, none other than because when money is not our priority in gambling, it is unlikely for us to take various impulsive actions, meaning that the possibility of our loss will not be too great.

It is absolutely true that gambling gambling has been existed on before it gained popularity on casinos while the Crypto casinos was as end technology making gambling a more credible and viral in advancement.

Actually the uniqueness of the Crypto casinos on gambling is the format that players who chooses to play anonymously can as much play at their comfort zones, making deposits and withdrawing of their funds with the decentralized Crypto casinos.

This main reason why bettors are more interested in casinos that are not required with the KYCs