Bitcoin Forum
April 20, 2024, 01:02:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 248 »
961  Other / Politics & Society / Re: REEEEE: PussyGate, a Collection of Trump Investigations on: May 14, 2020, 12:36:20 AM
Update on Michael Flynn -- Federal Judge in his case isn't fully ready to toss the case againt Flynn, as he does have some discretion to prod a bit further on the reasoning. He's asking for input from (legal input) from DOJ, Flynn, other parties to see why exactly this is being done by the DOJ. Not sure what kind of legal discretion he has, but I know he is allowed to ask for input before fully accepting it.

I wouldn't call this breaking news, as some were expecting it to happen as this whole thing came out of left field. But I don't personally think this is going to go anywhere. If anything, he'll just end up getting a pardon from Trump as his base will probably now support that with ease.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/judge-flynn-case-takes-unusual-step-allowing-3rd-party-briefs-n1205811?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma

If the judge does not agree, Flynn can simply appeal the case. All the DOJ has to do to reach the desired outcome is to agree with the defendant's position in their first response.

Flynn wins appeal by summary judgement.



Honestly not sure on the legal side of things, you could 100% be right here and I honestly have no idea. Took some basic law classes, but I'm pretty sure most did that as well.

"Judge has asked a retired judge to oppose Justice Dept effort to drop Michael Flynn case and to help to examine if he commited perjury" - Washington Post right now (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/court-asks-retired-judge-to-fight-justice-dept-effort-to-drop-michael-flynn-case-and-examine-if-ex-trump-adviser-committed-perjury/2020/05/13/8c0deb0a-9567-11ea-82b4-c8db161ff6e5_story.html)

Seems like the judge wants to know if Flynn committed perjury because he pleaded guilty to a crime and now he is claiming to be innocent.

962  Other / Politics & Society / Re: REEEEE: PussyGate, a Collection of Trump Investigations on: May 13, 2020, 11:39:00 AM
Update on Michael Flynn -- Federal Judge in his case isn't fully ready to toss the case againt Flynn, as he does have some discretion to prod a bit further on the reasoning. He's asking for input from (legal input) from DOJ, Flynn, other parties to see why exactly this is being done by the DOJ. Not sure what kind of legal discretion he has, but I know he is allowed to ask for input before fully accepting it.

I wouldn't call this breaking news, as some were expecting it to happen as this whole thing came out of left field. But I don't personally think this is going to go anywhere. If anything, he'll just end up getting a pardon from Trump as his base will probably now support that with ease.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/judge-flynn-case-takes-unusual-step-allowing-3rd-party-briefs-n1205811?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma
963  Other / Politics & Society / Re: is there such a thing as healthy person? on: May 13, 2020, 11:14:14 AM
Is this going to be another one of those science-denialist threads that ignores the fact that healthiness is a continuum with no clearly defined upper bound and so there are always ways to improve it, and instead argues that the lack of any absolute standard means that the whole concept of "health" is meaningless and we should therefore just sit around eating chocolate ice-cream all day?



Because that's not really the best way to address the perceived shortage of healthy people. Undecided

Short answer: Yes.

Long Answer: Yes.

(plus merit for laugh)

Not sure exactly what the purpose behind this thread is, but I'm assuming it's just OP attempting to advertise for their Web Dev, Web Design, and so on work that people could buy from them. So pretty much just a sig spammer with no guaranteed money. I'd rather not hire someone who just constantly spams on this forum, so I doubt it'll work.
964  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin has just halved for the third time! A snaphot of various metrics! on: May 13, 2020, 10:23:44 AM
I found a nice article detailing how halving are implemented in the bitcoin code.
A nice read, even if you are not a programer (like me).

Dissecting the code responsible for the Bitcoin halving

Quote
n a few hours, the Bitcoin network will experience its third “halving”. So what is it and how does it work under the hood?

Let’s deep-dive into the nitty-gritty details. The fun stuff. 🤓


There is a nice paragrahp demystifing the legend the bitcoin protocol expectes 64 halvings.


Great compilation of data here man, +merited on both topics.

An amazing day for all of us involved in Bitcoin happy HODL'ing to everyone here and I hope all of you are staying safe and are hopefully getting by financially. Tough time for everyone, but at least we can all take a collective sigh of relief as we've yet again learned that code is much better at monetary policy then humans.
965  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Possible to day trade on a DEX? on: May 13, 2020, 10:12:11 AM
Advertising shill, another account spamming about Blocknet.

When you see someone talking about Blocknet in the Trading section, check out the post history of the user. You will notice they also post about Idex and Stakenet in almost all their posts (like @OP btw)
At this point you can be sure they're not interested to have a discussion, their only goal is to spam via different accounts trying to make people feel this project is exciting or revolutionary.

+1 to that, merited.

Can we talk about how shady this website is too? -- https://blocknet.co/ -- literally instead of explaining much on the first page of their website. They instantly go to 'DOWNLOAD' like yes, I'd love to download your very shady program in the wild west space of crypto. God... some people with their interesting projects.

Even if you (OP) is an advertising shill, I'll entertain it. Yes, it most likely is. You're going to have a good amount in fees eaten up, but that's something you'd have to keep in mind. While this may not work under your definition, I think the most profitable thing to do with DEX's (multiple, yes) is to do arbitrage with the many different prices on all of these -- keeping in mind liquidity and volume as well.
966  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Life will most likely never return to normal, or at least in a very long time on: May 13, 2020, 08:33:06 AM
I wouldn't use the term never, but it will take sometime until life is back to what we think of as normal. Most people aren't going to be too excited to be going out in a time like this, even if government restrictions begin to lax, I highly doubt that restaurants are going to fill up, or sports stadiums will fill up, and so on and so forth.

A large amount of offices are going to have people work from home while having people come to the office in shifts. I know this is pretty common right now for companies that need to have their workers in the office (and are deemed essential) and can't just work fully online for some reason.

People are going to want to wait for a vaccine, but they'll probably just settle for not having large events if the spread slows and deaths slow. Obviously older people and those that are at risk are still going to be at home though. Education is a tough one, and I expect for that to be online for at least the first half of the next school year. Going to be hard for schools (and really everyone) when flu season comes and its hard to differentiate who has Corona and who has the flu.



Yes, if the vaccine is already available to the public, I think it will start to return to normal. However, this will take maybe years but OP don't say never. And also, once the potent combination of medicines is identified, we will slowly trust ourself to go out. But still practicing social distancing and all. Outbreaks in our history had been surpassed so is this one.

I didn't include more about the vaccine in my post, which I should've, but I do think it is important for people to note that I do think a large amount of people are going to be sketpical of such a vaccine at least without much research occurring on it.

This isn't me saying that people are going to say that this vaccine is causing autism, because I'm not doing that (yes, some tards will do that, but that's not what I'm on about here) I'm talking about how people are going to have to make informed decisions about if the vaccine is worth it for them - meaning if the benefits of not getting the coronavirus outweigh the potential side effects of this vaccine.



As far as COVID, "vaccine" is a media pipe dream. COVID-19 like all these virii mutates rapidly. But every year, they'll have a flu vaccine that's better than no vaccine. That's the way it is.

Ugh, dont even remind me of the flu vaccine. Had it this year for the first time in awhile and still got the flu, pretty sure I'm just on a cycle of getting the flu every few years - regardless of a vaccine or not.

I know the vaccine does help to make it milder, but shit no one could convince me that the flu I experienced this year was milder. Actually -- I should get the Coronavirus antibody test to see if I had it, would be nice to know.
967  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Medical experts within the Trump Administration want a slow reoopening on: May 13, 2020, 01:55:35 AM

That's sort of where we start to disagree. You can't. You can ASSUME what someone's intentions may be, but you don't know. Assumptions are not facts.

It may sound trite, but someone's INTENTIONS might just be to talk. On international media.

Talk to any practicing doctor about the COVID matter. Someone who has been a government administrator for forty years does not speak for him.

I mean I can assume the intentions of another, but both of us are just going to be shooting in the dark here. I know that. I just think with this amount of time this guy has been in government, and the amount of praise that he has, would make it clear that his sole intention is to try to help people. Maybe if the guy had worked in the private sector for sometime to just make some $$$$, and if he'd only been here for sometime I'd think different, but that's just not the case.

I mean yeah the guy isn't a practicing doctor, but what in gods name could my physician tell me that would stop the spread of the coronavirus? Wouldn't you want someone with the background in infectious diseases to be the guy that is leading the charge here?
968  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Medical experts within the Trump Administration want a slow reoopening on: May 13, 2020, 01:28:43 AM
SNIP

Sure. You've made assumptions about the motives of people eg Fauci. I have a background in computer modeling. When he first started babbling about his "Models" I tuned him out as a complete idiot on the very subject he was purporting to advise as a medical professional. I'm qualified to say that. Make sense?

[/quote]

Oh, to be honest with you I didn't even pick up on this when watching through some of the testimony. Might be because I have no background in compute modeling.

But when I speak about someone like Fauci and their intentions, I'm saying that I think that as a medical professional and expert it is important to note that his advice on only that subject matter should be taken into account. I also don't think he should corrupt what he thinks about a particular topic with another variable - like the economy - as it has nothing to do with his background.

I do actually think the fact that he has been in government for so long, in the same position, as important - while others do not. This guy is not a politician, and isn't trying to be one. I don't see a reason for him to have some ulterior motives here. Guy has literally been under many different administrations, and has been doing the same thing all along.

If he was someone who was just picked under Obama, and there was a theory about him having it out for Trump because of x,y,z then I may have reason to look a bit further. But there's no reason to think this guy is just making Trump seem like a bad guy. At least IMO.
969  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Medical experts within the Trump Administration want a slow reoopening on: May 13, 2020, 01:17:37 AM
Not surprising to most people, but Anthony Fauci (and some other medical experts) testified remotely in front of the Senate panel for the Coronavirus and stated that they think that a slow reopening of the economy should occur, instead of rushing this. They warned that if we are to reopen too quickly, we're going to face death and illness that is unnecessary.

It's important to point out that when medical experts come to the Senate - and any body - to testify, the information they're going to provide is from a medical point of view. There is no reason for Fauci (or anyone in the medical community) to talk about the effects of this virus on the economy, they shouldn't change their opinion based on the economy. They should inform the public of what they think should be done from a medical point of view, and then we make a decision based on all of the other variables.....

As always: Use this to get around paywalls (https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome)

No to the above.

The reason is that because you have several assumptions there.

Fauci's been an administrator for 40 YEAR!!! Not a "medical doctor."



Not exactly sure what I've done wrong here, is there something in particular that you didn't like about my post or is there something that I've said that isn't factual here? Kinda want to make sure I know what you disagree with here before attempting to respond.
970  Other / Politics & Society / Medical experts within the Trump Administration want a slow reoopening on: May 13, 2020, 01:10:51 AM
Not surprising to most people, but Anthony Fauci (and some other medical experts) testified remotely in front of the Senate panel for the Coronavirus and stated that they think that a slow reopening of the economy should occur, instead of rushing this. They warned that if we are to reopen too quickly, we're going to face death and illness that is unnecessary.

It's important to point out that when medical experts come to the Senate - and any body - to testify, the information they're going to provide is from a medical point of view. There is no reason for Fauci (or anyone in the medical community) to talk about the effects of this virus on the economy, they shouldn't change their opinion based on the economy. They should inform the public of what they think should be done from a medical point of view, and then we make a decision based on all of the other variables.

I understand the fact that people want the economy to come back, but I think there is going to be a lot of infections and deaths if we go about this too fast.

Another piece of news: California State Colleges/Universities (23 California State Schools) have said that they're going to be online for the fall semester. I'm expecting places that were hit hard like NY to do the same.


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/12/us/coronavirus-live-news-updates.html

As always: Use this to get around paywalls (https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome)
971  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Life will most likely never return to normal, or at least in a very long time on: May 13, 2020, 12:47:50 AM
I wouldn't use the term never, but it will take sometime until life is back to what we think of as normal. Most people aren't going to be too excited to be going out in a time like this, even if government restrictions begin to lax, I highly doubt that restaurants are going to fill up, or sports stadiums will fill up, and so on and so forth.

A large amount of offices are going to have people work from home while having people come to the office in shifts. I know this is pretty common right now for companies that need to have their workers in the office (and are deemed essential) and can't just work fully online for some reason.

People are going to want to wait for a vaccine, but they'll probably just settle for not having large events if the spread slows and deaths slow. Obviously older people and those that are at risk are still going to be at home though. Education is a tough one, and I expect for that to be online for at least the first half of the next school year. Going to be hard for schools (and really everyone) when flu season comes and its hard to differentiate who has Corona and who has the flu.



Yes, if the vaccine is already available to the public, I think it will start to return to normal. However, this will take maybe years but OP don't say never. And also, once the potent combination of medicines is identified, we will slowly trust ourself to go out. But still practicing social distancing and all. Outbreaks in our history had been surpassed so is this one.

I didn't include more about the vaccine in my post, which I should've, but I do think it is important for people to note that I do think a large amount of people are going to be sketpical of such a vaccine at least without much research occurring on it.

This isn't me saying that people are going to say that this vaccine is causing autism, because I'm not doing that (yes, some tards will do that, but that's not what I'm on about here) I'm talking about how people are going to have to make informed decisions about if the vaccine is worth it for them - meaning if the benefits of not getting the coronavirus outweigh the potential side effects of this vaccine.

972  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Life will most likely never return to normal, or at least in a very long time on: May 12, 2020, 11:37:20 PM
I wouldn't use the term never, but it will take sometime until life is back to what we think of as normal. Most people aren't going to be too excited to be going out in a time like this, even if government restrictions begin to lax, I highly doubt that restaurants are going to fill up, or sports stadiums will fill up, and so on and so forth.

A large amount of offices are going to have people work from home while having people come to the office in shifts. I know this is pretty common right now for companies that need to have their workers in the office (and are deemed essential) and can't just work fully online for some reason.

People are going to want to wait for a vaccine, but they'll probably just settle for not having large events if the spread slows and deaths slow. Obviously older people and those that are at risk are still going to be at home though. Education is a tough one, and I expect for that to be online for at least the first half of the next school year. Going to be hard for schools (and really everyone) when flu season comes and its hard to differentiate who has Corona and who has the flu.

973  Other / Politics & Society / Re: should china be punished for Bullying Countries? on: May 12, 2020, 08:30:52 PM
Just to start off, I'd like to say that this is a solid post even if I don't agree with what you''re saying here, I do like the amount of thought that was put into this. Great to see.
Thanks - and for the merit. I know that in theory we are supposed to merit 'good' posts, even if we disagree with the content. However in practice this is a rare occurrence, and I for one definitely find it a challenge to give merit when I disagree... so thanks, appreciated, this is what we should all be doing more often.


I use the word opportunity because China telling the rest of the world doesn't guarantee that they're going to close down their borderes with China, just gives the chance for it to happen.
For me this is the crux of it. Yes China tried to suppress the outbreak initially, but I would argue that's not the reason for the huge number of deaths across the world.
If we look at the timeline, even back in January, the WHO was giving a risk assessment of 'high' at the global level (and 'very high' for China).

Here in the UK, our government didn't implement lockdown until 23 March... nearly two months later. Whose fault is it that the UK has thousands of deaths? Whose fault that the US has thousands of deaths? Why didn't the UK lockdown as soon as it became apparent what was happening in China? Why didn't the US lockdown as soon as it became apparent what was happening in Europe? These countries gambled the lives of their citizens against the chance of the virus not reaching them, all in order to prevent a bit of economic damage that would ensue from quarantining new entrants. And it would only have been small economic damage compared to what we have now, due to their failures to act.

Many governments around the world have managed this crisis very badly. Now they are trying the old political trick of trying to pin the blame on someone else. It's absurd.
Also look at the fact that the South China Sea stuff is suddenly back in the news... weird coincidence how this suddenly becomes a major issue at this time.


Smiley

But I'd have to agree with you, at least a little bit here. Yes, even though China could've warned people quicker -- it doesn't make them solely responsible for everything that happened after that. Though I do think that there is a good amount of blame to lay on their shoulders, as the opportunity to defend themselves earlier wasn't possible. Many countries didn't know that the disease was spreading in their own country, as the time where it began to be noticed was during / after flu season, which has mostly the same illnesses (minus the lethality for older people)

China is wrong as well as other countries are wrong for their inability to strike quickly, but China is the cause for some of this. They should be punished for that.
974  Other / Politics & Society / Re: should china be punished for Bullying Countries? on: May 12, 2020, 09:31:19 AM
In war the larger bully wins over the small bully.
War has nothing to do with good or bad. It's just the winners that manipulate the history book to save their faces.

This is the essence of it. Bigger countries bully smaller countries, whether by troops on the ground, trade embargoes, or more subtle influencing or coercion. More powerful groups bully less powerful groups. More powerful people bully less powerful people.

I have no idea why people are attacking China. The idea of 'punishing' China seems like an abrogation of responsibility. CV19 originated in China, and China's initial suppression of whistleblowers was a dereliction of duty and did cause an outbreak when a different type of government might have managed to contain the virus. However their actions since then, purely in terms of suppressing the virus, have been exemplary, particularly compared with the atrocious mismanagement we've seen from other nations.

The rest of the world knew what was coming, and chose to do nothing until it was too late. Certain prominent politicians around the globe now seek to blame China in order to hide their own failure to take action. If the US/UK/whoever had implemented 14-day quarantine procedures for people entering the country as soon as the outbreak in China became apparent, then the death tolls in these countries would be negligible or zero, and the economic damage would have been slight rather than extreme. Blaming China is the 'grown-up' equivalent of the kid in the playground who is caught out doing something bad, then they just point at another kid and say 'he started it!'. You can't just try to pin your own failing on someone else, particularly if you run a country. Governments act too slowly, and are reactive rather than proactive. They are interested in what might make them look bad right now, rather than what might make them look bad a couple of weeks down the line. Our fault as voters in democracies really, it is us who put these idiots in power.



And this thing about the South China Sea, I am not defending China's attempts to wrest control over the area, but... this has been going on for years, but suddenly now it is a huge issue? Ridiculous. The people who are suddenly outraged by China's behaviour there and are demanding retributive action need to ask themselves why they had zero interest in this topic prior to the CV19 outbreak.

Just to start off, I'd like to say that this is a solid post even if I don't agree with what you''re saying here, I do like the amount of thought that was put into this. Great to see.

But onto the topic here, I know why people want to attack China (in the sense of sanctions or some sort of global repatriations, calling out, etc) -- because China hid the fact that this virus was ravaging their nation until they were forced to come out and say it. If the Chinese would've said it earlier, the rest of the WORLD would've had the opportunity to be more proactive and more people would still have the opportunity to be alive.

I use the word opportunity because China telling the rest of the world doesn't guarantee that they're going to close down their borderes with China, just gives the chance for it to happen.

China did something horribly wrong here, and they should be punished for doing so.

As China may be a developed country they need to regulate everything within the world they're going to rule the entire world they need to require control of the planet economy as they need trade and commerce. But not every desk will ever accept it. Because the entire world has suffered such a lot due to China Their economy is hampered. Although China wants to be influential within the world, Japan, us, and Russia won't support them albeit they're their neighbors.

....what? spam
975  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Google and Facebook allows employees to work from home until 2021. on: May 12, 2020, 09:24:38 AM
I think this is the right step.
Although I think that the virus will be forgotten soon, because something new will appear.

I think that in the future everyone will have such work that gives a lot of free time for spiritual development, for some personal interests, for spending more time with family, etc.
But it will not be right away. We still have to get to this.

Spam. But at least these sentences were coherent.

Google one of the leading search engine platforms and Facebook the leading social media platform must always need to maintain their systems and keep up. Even they have a large company base still that are freely working on it, still, they need to follow their rules but having a huge responsibility still they need to work. Those large company does not want to waste a huge amount of money just like this pandemic outbreak still they need to maintain their systems up. Also because of this crisis, there is much more number, active users, because they are in their homes. The Google and Facebook decision on home base does bring more comfortable to their employees. It is a huge disaster if they stop their service.

Spam. Not sure what you're writing. Barely coherent.

Just quoting this to show to any potential campaign manager or whatever in the future. I understand that you're trying to be apart of the discussion here, and we all do appreciate having new faces, but it always stands true that most time the newbies that are posting in this section are just spamming out bulshit responses as you two are. Try to clean up this quality if ya could, would be nice.
976  Other / Politics & Society / Re: POK Prime Minister wants Pakistan to start a war with India on: May 12, 2020, 09:21:53 AM
What in gods fucking name does any of what you wrote mean. I literally understand nothing and had to take to google to figure out what was going on here.

I like that you take the time to summarize these stories for us Juggy, though I would recommend that you relax a bit with the amount of stories your posting everyday, and put a little bit more effort into the ones that you do post. Seems like the quality has diminished since we were first saying that you doing this (posting about news stories, and updating on them) was a good idea. I'm probably guilty of doing that as well, so don't think that I'm calling you out or anything like that.

Yet again, I appreciate the initiative and do think that you are a great member of this community. Stay safe!
977  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son on: May 12, 2020, 02:59:41 AM
"$3.5 Billion Missing, Obama Administration Covered Up"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zDzM9xYJKU

That's enough to build THE WALL!

Hm, this is interesting. Haven't seen it anywhere else. Seems weird that none of this has hit any of the news as it is already 3 months or so old, makes me question the fact that not even Fox News has even covered it. I mean Giuliani does say in this piece that this money was unaccounted for, not stolen. He alleges that SOME of it was stolen, some of it was this and that.

He also says that some of the money was going to left wing causes, which while despicable, I assume is the case for EVERY single administration.
978  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Google and Facebook allows employees to work from home until 2021. on: May 11, 2020, 11:08:05 PM
There are two things that people have to note about a decision like this:

1. Google and Facebook employees are going to be very happy with a decision like this. Their morale is going to go up as they see that their company care about their health, and the health of their families. Makes it a lot easier for people who have lung issues or have families that have these issues, so they're just going to be able to work from home without feeling like an outsider - as many are going to take up this opportunity.

2. This is going to MOST LIKELY save Google and Facebook a large amount of money -  They're not going to have to operate a large number of their extra facilities for their workers - such as their food court, and other amentities. They have to do all these things from home.

Also: This is a large scale test in if working from home can work well. If it does, and workers are found to be as efficient or more efficient when working from home, then they're going to be able to save money in the future by hiring more and more workers to just work from home all the time.
979  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Could Covid-19 Testing Kits Also Be A Part of The Hoax ??! on: May 11, 2020, 10:50:11 PM
I'll literally never understand people who think this is some sort of major conspiracy and that the government spread the Coronavirus and bleh bleh bleh more conspiracy bullshit. This is a virus that no one released for their own good, this is something that just happened and there's nothing that can be done to change that. Hundreds of thousands of people have already died globally, and it's not something that was bullshit, madeup, fake, etc.


Could the Chinese have done a better job in controlling this situation and informing other nations? Yes, without a doubt. This is a legitimate criticism.

Could the government have been more prepared for the Coronavirus (and other future and past pandemics)? Yes again. Another legitimate criticism.

Can the governments of the world do more now? Subjective, but I'd say yes. Yet again, this is another legitimate criticism.
980  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump is targeting Obama #Obamagate on: May 11, 2020, 10:44:49 PM
Just a technical note on the Flynn thing, he hasn't been acquitted yet. The DOJ has moved to drop the case against Michael Flynn, it's been rumored that this was a direct order of William Barr (AG who was appointed by President Trump.) People are criticizing that this was done based on the fact that a political appointee, Bill Barr and the attorney who was appointed by him, instead of a career member of the DOJ.

But yes, Trump is going to continue to go after the past admin based partly on the things they did wrong and the other part based on the fact that his supporters love it. Unites the base.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 248 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!