The price of bitcoin is very volatile, there is not necessarily a good or bad time to buy. It depends on the amount of investment you want to make, how long are you ready to "leave" that amount in BTC and the goal. Of course it is better to buy when the price is $3000, nevertheless it may be interesting to buy now and sell when the price will reach $20,000, $30,000 or more. It could come in 1 month, 6 months or in several years, but I think that someday the price of bitcoin will come and exceed these sums. You can use tools (Artificial Intelligence) to help you choose the best times to buy and sell. Go see IntelBit.io (it's free), there is an algorithm (artificial intelligence) that predicts the price of bitcoin; The price predictions are based on the K-nearest neighbors algorithm (KNN) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), a feedforward artificial neural network. The tool is armed with various time-span options, including daily, weekly, monthly and real time predictions. WARNING: No algorithm or artificial intelligence can give you 100% reliable results, you must analyze the market yourself and make the decision, but AI like IntelBit can help you and give you good technical indications |
|
|
|
|
If there are intelbit.io users share your comments and ideas regarding the bitcoin price prediction algorithm here.
Possible improvements or add-ons that could be useful for the platform and the IntelBit community.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Since its publication in the 2009 market, Bitcoin has shown the potential for creating a new concept of economy and money and heralded the arrival of a new real market sector: cryptocurrencies. Released by a figure known by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin has been talked about a lot, especially in regards to its value, which in ten years has grown exponentially. In 2010, at the first price of Bitcoin against the dollar was recognized as 1 USD = 1.309.03 BTC. Bitcoin reached a record high in December 2017. At the beginning of 2017, Bitcoin was less than $3,000, then it rose to about about $5,000 dollars in the middle of the year, and by the end of the year Bitcoin was worth $10,000. As of June 2019, the Bitcoin price is still rising. Experts predict that there will be a future rise in Bitcoin price that is similar to 2017's. Overall, the value of Bitcoin has had major rises and falls, and periods when the price fluctuated by only a few hundred dollars. Buying Bitcoin at the right time has become the goal of every lover and user of cryptocurrencies. The race to the highest resale has been happening for years, and most users refer to opinions on the web rather than numbers. No one is able to say with certainty what the upcoming Bitcoin values will be. Thus, many have created robots capable of giving approximate predictions, even selling predictions to other investors, but success has been scarce. The Bitcoin market is complex and dictated by many variables, and is often subject to unexpected factors. IntelBit has created an artificial intelligence with a futuristic algorithm that is able to consider all of these factors and accurately predict the future value of Bitcoin. Bitcoin Price Prediction Program – BETA (https://intelbit.io)
IntelBit launches its Bitcoin price prediction algorithm and the BETA version of its crypto trading platform after more than one year of research and development. The price predictions are based on the K-nearest neighbors algorithm (KNN) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), a feedforward artificial neural network. The tool is armed with various time-span options, including daily, weekly, monthly and real time predictions. Tests conducted in the last 10 months have shown that the algorithms have had a success rate of about 90% in predicting Bitcoin prices. Technical Analysis Widget
The Technical Analysis Widget is an advanced tool that displays ratings based on technical indicators. The gauge gives you a summary based on all indicators. All ratings are shown in real time. You no longer have to apply multiple indicators to analyze a financial instrument, since the widget does that for you. Live Trading
Get the most out of your live trading through well-grounded, informed decisions. Scroll through a library of data using history charts or use the market-sensitive buy-and-sell indicator. The Currency Strength Heatmap table lets you see how your currency ranks against other currencies traded against it. With these tools, timing your investment is easier than ever. Secure
Dealing in cryptocurrency has always required impeccable security, and IntelBit delivers. Backed by the renowned Google Authenticator Security, you’ll trade with confidence that your assets are in a safe place.
Every Currency
The platform lets users gather investments in one place while trading more than 2,100 cryptocurrencies in 85 independent currencies around the world.
News Hub
Following your favorite cryptocurrencies is key to a successful crypto-investing career. The dashboard of this new BETA release lets you view top news on your cryptocurrencies and scroll through a feed of recognized crypto outlets.
Stay Informed
Stay up-to-date on all your current ventures by receiving personalized notifications on all your favorite devices, synced so that you stay informed on relevant news and top stories within the industry. To take part in IntelBit’s new technology whilst simultaneously providing your Bitcoin wallet with its main benefits, sign up for the freshly launched BETA version over here. Furthermore, if you were to bump into any unexplored improvement areas, feel free to provide constructive feedback and thoughts to the creative team behind the new bitcoin price prediction program at intelbit@protonmail.chContacts: https://www.intelbit.io/ intelbit@protonmail.ch |
|
|
|
Two different books published under Satoshi Nakamoto’s name have recently appeared on Amazon. According to Amazon, both of the books — Wave and Ripple Design Book and The Official Bitcoin Coloring Book — are scheduled for release on June 28. The profile of the author makes it clear that he indeed claims to be the same Satoshi Nakamoto who created bitcoin (BTC). The author’s profile also states that “100% of his book royalties to support STEM and environmental education programs serving underprivileged youth.” The store descriptions of the books themselves seemingly contain inside jokes about the cryptocurrency space and the myth of Satoshi Nakamoto. Wave and Ripple Design Book, for instance, appears to hint at both the Japanese roots of the bitcoin creator’s pseudonym, as well as to Ripple (XRP): “A wonderful selection of wave and ripple designs curated by Satoshi Nakamoto. [...] Yuzan's designs were often used by Japanese craftsmen in the early 1900s to adorn their wares with wave and ripple patterns.” The second book, The Official Bitcoin Coloring Book, contains less subtle jokes such as stating that it has been “printed on a brilliant white paper.” The product page also displays editorial reviews by Ethereum creator Vitallike Buttering, J.P. Morgain CEO Diamond James, and billionaire investor and Chairman of the Bored Buffet Warden, all misspellings of individuals and organizations famous within the space. As Cointelegraph recently reported, many have claimed to be the mysterious Satoshi over the last 10 years, but their assertions have always been met with skepticism and have lacked any substantive evidence. At the end of May, a Chinese citizen residing in California claimed copyright to bitcoin’s white paper, claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto. This copyright claim came on the heels of an identical one by Craig Wright, who has long declared himself to be the inventor of bitcoin, despite public backlash and his own periodic slip-ups while maintaining that narrative. What is your opinion? You think that's the real Satoshi Nakamoto who wrote these books  ? |
|
|
|
What do you think of this analysis? Rather agree or not? I would like to know your opinion  |
|
|
|
|
While France is pleased with the new legal framework recently promulgated by the PACTE law, the European blockchain ecosystem continues to develop rapidly and faces ever greater strategic challenges. In a tribune, Nicolas Louvet, CEO of Coinhouse, explains how to reconnect with Europe of innovation thanks to the blockchain.
The relationship to money and financial assets is digitalized, starting with contactless payment and banking services now available on mobile. It is obvious that the blockchain is part of this movement. It changes the notions of custody, holding and transfer of any financial asset, allowing in particular better execution, both secure and at a lower cost. Many traditional finance players are interested, especially in the United States whether JP Morgan, Fidelity Investments or Goldman Sachs.
Despite the notable initiatives taken by the regulatory authorities, such as the AMF's optional visa for digital asset service providers ("PSAN"), the fact that the European ecosystem is lagging behind in this area is clearly . Of the eight largest companies in the blockchain in terms of valuation, which are also all trading platforms or mining companies, six are American and two Chinese. In this context, it seems more than ever vital to establish an environment conducive to innovation in order to allow the creation of major European players in this emerging sector.
Innovation stifled for lack of bank account
It is unfortunate to note the difficulties still encountered by some talented entrepreneurs to open bank accounts for their professional activities as long as they are part of this ecosystem, which is very promising. Even the Caisse des dépôts, initially planned as a last resort by the PACTE law for startups without a bank account, has refused to fulfill its role of public utility in this area.
I think it is high time that in the executive committees of European banking groups, the term crypto is no longer associated with money laundering or the purchase of drugs on the dark web, but a revolution on the edge of technology and finance. It is also unfortunate to meet "supervisors who are doing politics.
Funding both public and private remain very, or too shy. Few European venture capital funds (VCs) still invest in crypto-active companies. In France, the BPI (Public Investment Bank) has not yet succeeded in making an equity investment in projects that are among the most advanced in Europe. In China, the city of Nanjing has just launched a $ 1.5 billion blockchain investment fund. European players are therefore struggling to develop when their American and Asian competitors benefit from significant sources of funding.
We are in great need of a government that actively defends the interests of its entrepreneurs and a more ambitious European venture capital that is more attentive to projects related to PSAN's activities. This requires a profound cultural evolution on this theme that the United States and Asia have had no difficulty in accomplishing.
Europe, and France in particular, has companies that have already proven themselves in the blockchain ecosystem. The nugget Ledger, specialist in cryptoactive security, has capitalized on the expertise of the smart card to develop its portfolios in Vierzon. Bitfury, a European mining specialist, has set up in Norway with the support of the government to open a Bitcoin mining data center running on renewable energy! Coinhouse offers a real support for investing in crypto-assets.
In my opinion, the remaining obstacles must be removed as quickly as possible. It is essential that there is an awareness of our leaders of the significant potential of this sector and that measures are taken to prevent what happened with the Internet, now dominated by American champions (GAFA ) and Asian (BATX), is renewed with the blockchain. We have the know-how and the engineering necessary for European PSANs to radiate internationally and to be among the essential names of tomorrow. But for that, Europe must give us the means to succeed.
|
|
|
|
Just like electric cars, Libra will be a failure. All the hype from those MBAs and CAs who waste people's hard earned money promoting nonsense products.
See the real world out there.
Do you think Libra will be a failure? According to you, why? I am not sure about him but in my point of view, not only Libra any cryptocurrency or coming to market as the IEP nothing will stay at the top for life long. Automatically when this coin listed on exchanges volume movement my be strong for some months or days also. So trusting any new coins really a bad choice for the investor. If you are a trader then you might be use this situation. Your point of view is interesting, it should be debated |
|
|
|
Do you think Libra will be a failure? According to you, why?
There are talks going on in Indian and USA government for banning bitcoin. Can you share with us your sources about this information? |
|
|
|
Just like electric cars, Libra will be a failure. All the hype from those MBAs and CAs who waste people's hard earned money promoting nonsense products.
See the real world out there.
Do you think Libra will be a failure? According to you, why? |
|
|
|
|
The Libra, the cryptocurrency developed by Facebook, promises to be massively used from its launch in 2020.
However, this product is of little interest for Western investors.
This is a legitimate question that some people ask, while Bitcoin prices flirt with the threshold of 10,000 dollars per unit: should we invest very early in the Libra, the cryptocurrency presented by Facebook Tuesday, June 18? It must be said that those who believed in Bitcoin shortly after its creation in 2009 are now happy millionaires (for those who have not sold). But for the Libra the observation is different. Its mechanism is designed to ensure the stability of its course so that users use it in everyday life. This is the fundamental difference with bitcoins that are kept in the hope of future appreciation.
Once its reserves are set up (a billion dollars to start), Facebook will index its Libra on a basket of traditional currencies (dollar, euro, pound sterling and yen). Thus, the value of the Libra should remain relatively stable because these major currencies are the ones that fluctuate the least in relation to others in the world. It is therefore unattractive to invest in a cryptocurrency whose price should vary only marginally. But that will not be the case everywhere.
In some less developed countries, particularly in countries where there is exchange control or high inflation, I think citizens might have more confidence in Facebook than in their government.
They target in particular Venezuela where inflation should reach 10,000,000% in 2019 according to the International Monetary Fund.
Other serious candidates for the hoarding of Libra include Zimbabwe (73.4% expected inflation in 2019), Sudan (49.6%), Argentina (43.7%), Iran ( 37.2%), South Sudan (24.5%), Liberia (22.3%), Angola (17.5%), Turkey (17.5%), Uzbekistan (16.2%), , 5%), Sierra Leone (15.8%), Libya (15%), Haiti (14.9%), Egypt (14.5%), Turkmenistan (13%), Nigeria ( 11.7%) and Zambia (10.7%). Some citizens living in states like Cuba and North Korea could also find an interest if they manage to break the censorship of their Internet.
Moreover, many emerging countries are affected by inflation, devaluation, exchange control, authoritarianism and arbitrary state, Venezuela being an extreme and emblematic case. I even go further, I see in the Libra a competitor of importance for the state currencies. The public debt, the printing press and the disease of zero rates are gradually destroying the yen, the euro and the dollar, we can legitimately worry about these currencies and for their banking systems, there is too much debt, too much debt leverage in banks.
As long as the Libra remains indexed on a basket of traditional currencies, the euro or the dollar have little trouble to be made. On the other hand, I think that this formula could last only one time, as the credibility of the Facebook cryptocurrency asserts itself. Indeed, it is easy to imagine how an FBCoin could emancipate itself from its function of representing traditional currencies, and acquire its own value of use. it would be enough for Facebook to offer a set of services using this currency, as well as bridges with external services. Therefore, the FBCoin would de facto obtain a use value in a given community - that of its 2.3 billion users - instead of depending (only) on the price of traditional currencies.
So, it may be interesting to have some libras hidden under his mattress in anticipation of dark days. Or a handful of bitcoins because people will understand that the Libra depends on Facebook and that the rules of the game can change arbitrarily. This is not the case for Bitcoin which does not belong to anybody and that this one will see then its reinforced role.
|
|
|
|
The rumor had been swelling for several weeks. Facebook has just unveiled its cryptocurrency, the Libra, by dedicating a white paper to it. Designed as a true digital motto, Libra is under the aegis of an officially independent Geneva-based association. But there is no doubt that Facebook leads the boat: Calibra, one of the 27 members of the association, is the new banking subsidiary of the largest social network in the world.
Like most cryptocurrencies, Libra relies on a blockchain, a secure, distributed database that holds all transactions. Unlike most cryptocurrencies, the Libra is backed by a reserve of assets, which limits fluctuations in its price. The Libra association, "in charge of guiding the evolution of the ecosystem", acts as a currency board, the only one authorized to create and destroy Libra "coins".
This association comes out of the shadows with a "working group" of 27 members, who are responsible for finalizing a charter of operation, and will become the "founding members" of the Libra. For this first step, Facebook has surrounded itself with payment specialists and networks:
- Blockchains specialists: Anchorage, Bison Trails, Coinbase, Xapo;
- Payment networks: Mastercard, PayPal, PayU, Stripe, Visa;
- Venture Capital: Andreessen Horowitz, Breakthrough Initiatives, Ribbit Capital, Thrive Capital, Union Square Ventures;
- Telecom Operators: Iliad, Vodafone Group;
- Online sales: Booking, eBay, Farfetch, Lyft, Pago Mercado, Spotify, Uber;
NGO: Creative Destruction Lab, Kiva, Mercy Corps, Women's World Banking.
As the founding members operate validation nodes that ensure network security and transaction validity, applications must meet certain financial and technical requirements and may be blocked by existing members.
The association wants to quickly reach the hundred members, then go to an open blockchain model, whose governance would be completely decentralized. Iliad, the home of Free, speaks of an "internet of money". If Facebook recognizes that she plays a central role in the organization, she says she will let go of the reins next year.
But she keeps a foothold in the association Libra, headquartered in Geneva and locals in Silicon Valley, through Calibra. Entrusted to David Marcus, vice president of Facebook in charge of Messenger passed by the presidency of PayPal and the board of directors of Coinbase, this subsidiary is nothing other than the "Facebook bank".
There remains the question of trust. Calibra assures that it "will not share account information or financial data with Facebook" ... without your consent. But Libra will be located at the heart of Facebook products, which hopes to make some profit. Apple, Google, and now Facebook: finance is the new horizon of the giants of Silicon Valley.
What do you think of this new facebook project, is it a benefit or a disadvantage for cryptocurrency?
MY THOUGHT ABOUT LIBRA? IT WILL GIVE GREATER CREDIBILITY TO BLOCKCHAIN.
Personally I do not see Libra as a direct competitor of Bitcoin, even though many will (mistakenly) believe it is, or will be induced - because of misinformation - to do so. Those who buy Bitcoins want to get out of the traditional system, while Libra is replicating the current system, albeit in a more efficient manner. This is just a first step to shake up the banking system, the most obsolete technology on the planet that has slept on its laurels for centuries, enjoying secular privileges ... but from now on, every payment will go through the blockchain, and everything will be transformed. This will lead people to better understand the blockchain or, at least, trust it. They will understand that it is not as ridiculous a technology as they had painted it at the beginning ... and that it has incredible use cases. Once people understand what the blockchain is, then they will get to discuss why bitcoin is different from other traditional currencies. This is a very positive sign for bitcoin, even if at the beginning it will be ostracized and I do not exclude bearish maneuvers in conjunction with the launch or the first Libra tests, to obscure its immense power. Whether Bitcoin will fight against the current banking system or whether Libra will do it is not relevant. In the end, on the one hand we will have Libra, clashing against the current banking system ... and Bitcoin will be on another level, an elitist level, with its unique characteristics. The blockchain will make banks what the internet has done to the media. Libra will bring more credibility to the blockchain and this will bring new competition to the market. And competition is always favorable for consumers. |
|
|
|
|
The rumor had been swelling for several weeks. Facebook has just unveiled its cryptocurrency, the Libra, by dedicating a white paper to it. Designed as a true digital motto, Libra is under the aegis of an officially independent Geneva-based association. But there is no doubt that Facebook leads the boat: Calibra, one of the 27 members of the association, is the new banking subsidiary of the largest social network in the world.
Like most cryptocurrencies, Libra relies on a blockchain, a secure, distributed database that holds all transactions. Unlike most cryptocurrencies, the Libra is backed by a reserve of assets, which limits fluctuations in its price. The Libra association, "in charge of guiding the evolution of the ecosystem", acts as a currency board, the only one authorized to create and destroy Libra "coins".
This association comes out of the shadows with a "working group" of 27 members, who are responsible for finalizing a charter of operation, and will become the "founding members" of the Libra. For this first step, Facebook has surrounded itself with payment specialists and networks:
- Blockchains specialists: Anchorage, Bison Trails, Coinbase, Xapo;
- Payment networks: Mastercard, PayPal, PayU, Stripe, Visa;
- Venture Capital: Andreessen Horowitz, Breakthrough Initiatives, Ribbit Capital, Thrive Capital, Union Square Ventures;
- Telecom Operators: Iliad, Vodafone Group;
- Online sales: Booking, eBay, Farfetch, Lyft, Pago Mercado, Spotify, Uber;
NGO: Creative Destruction Lab, Kiva, Mercy Corps, Women's World Banking.
As the founding members operate validation nodes that ensure network security and transaction validity, applications must meet certain financial and technical requirements and may be blocked by existing members.
The association wants to quickly reach the hundred members, then go to an open blockchain model, whose governance would be completely decentralized. Iliad, the home of Free, speaks of an "internet of money". If Facebook recognizes that she plays a central role in the organization, she says she will let go of the reins next year.
But she keeps a foothold in the association Libra, headquartered in Geneva and locals in Silicon Valley, through Calibra. Entrusted to David Marcus, vice president of Facebook in charge of Messenger passed by the presidency of PayPal and the board of directors of Coinbase, this subsidiary is nothing other than the "Facebook bank".
There remains the question of trust. Calibra assures that it "will not share account information or financial data with Facebook" ... without your consent. But Libra will be located at the heart of Facebook products, which hopes to make some profit. Apple, Google, and now Facebook: finance is the new horizon of the giants of Silicon Valley.
What do you think of this new facebook project, is it a benefit or a disadvantage for cryptocurrency?
|
|
|
|
Laughing at roadmap: "Q1 2019 developing the development team". So your developers are kind of robot or thing that needs development? You need to improve a sentence and say like "developing development team for development of what needs to be developed". This way it will be looking even more smart.
Funny. it's just not a classic description of whitepaper. Better check the project - they already have working product and good idea. They do have a working project while they are also developing a development team! Not a gaurantee success but they are doing IEO which is going to be a relief. If they are going to do an IEO that means its also going to be in that exchange that this token will be listed. But right now they can't yet disclose this exchange. If talking about the guys ... yes, they need to refine a lot, a lot of things are unfinished. But at the initial stage of project development there is nothing strange or "wrong" in their position, bro. |
|
|
|
Laughing at roadmap: "Q1 2019 developing the development team". So your developers are kind of robot or thing that needs development? You need to improve a sentence and say like "developing development team for development of what needs to be developed". This way it will be looking even more smart.
Funny. it's just not a classic description of whitepaper. Better check the project - they already have working product and good idea. They do have a working project while they are also developing a development team! Not a gaurantee success but they are doing IEO which is going to be a relief. If they are going to do an IEO that means its also going to be in that exchange that this token will be listed. But right now they can't yet disclose this exchange. Dude ... You meen it would be better if they doubletalk than show the real thing? I never invest in projects that promise listing on TOP exchanges and a token of $ 9000 from the first day of its existence. How can you trust this, if in 99% cases this is crap. |
|
|
|
I voted for Yahoo.
The major reason why I love his campaigns is because of the high success rate. I've seen some of the campaigns he managed that yielded good profit for the participants. He doesn't just accept a deal anyhow like other BMs which I won't mention their names.
I will vote twice for him if possible.
Yahooo is also my favorite but newbies won't ever see how his legacy works at this moment. Things got ugly and the fomo has left us for more than a year that resulted into very less bounty campaigns that yahoo could've handled professionally. And now all the good to best managers are willing to get tagged negative just to get paid but not him. I dislike bounty campaigns, that's part of the reason I only take on a few a year. There are so many cheaters joining them, teams are not willing to pay good money to a BM, and the headache just isn't worth it in the long run. If I do take on a client I feel I only accept the best of the best. So far most campaigns managed by me in the form of a bounty campaign have been successful for all participants. Yes, most of the bounties managed Yahoo has been successful, of course, it will take time for the manager to choose the right one to manage. Still, there are many people who will a lot of interest in Yahoo's management once he launches the bounty campaign. Yes I do also agree that Yahoo is one of the best campaign manager out there. I participated some of his signature campaign in the past and what I say is he manage well and the payment is on time. |
|
|
|
|
If you're into dice game I recommend this following trusted gambling sites primedice, yolodice and stake.com.
Features:
Trusted long run in the business world of gambling.
1% House Edge
What I like about these site are the deposit and withdraw is instant.
|
|
|
|
|
Crawford dominated the fight in terms of speed and defensive style. Khan is absolutely out shape as he used to be, I think it's time to hang up his gloves and retire. I want to watch what will happen once they continue the fight but Amir's side concede due to low blow.
|
|
|
|
Paul George lead 32 points, Westbrook scored 14 points (5-21 shooting). And he missed his final 10 shots.
They can actually win if not with Westbrook's bad shooting, game 3 he is shooting well that's why they win. I don't understand why he does not adjust knowing his shooting is not good, this is not time for stat padding, it's playoff time and his team needs to win. I don't know what happened to Westbrook he got only 1 point in the entire 2nd half. This is not the time for Russel to make again a triple double on their upcoming 5th game that will lead to mockery of his career. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
