1301
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Please can I get some help
|
on: September 11, 2017, 09:40:05 AM
|
In your Armory datadir, grab armorylog.txt and dblog.txt and post these here. Then give me a brief summary of what your issue is and how far you've got.
|
|
|
1302
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Using Armory on the BCH chain
|
on: September 11, 2017, 09:36:35 AM
|
Files: blocks/rev*.dat Folder: blocks/index Folder: chainstate
Everything here but the blk files are created on the fly during sync. That stuff will be overwritten if it doesn't match the state of the blk files. For instance, just deleting blocks/blk*.dat files from 930 and onwards, and then launching "./bitcoind -datadir=<new dir with deleted files>" of Bitcoin Classic UAHF gives me "Error loading block database, Do you want to rebuild the block database now?"
Same thing goes with the chainstate db. It's the processed state of the blk files. If you change the blk files, you need to reindex the chainstate. Files: banlist.dat, db.log, debug.log, fee_estimates.dat, mempool.dat, peers.dat, wallet.dat
These are not relate to the blockchain, you can ignore them.
|
|
|
1306
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Using Armory on the BCH chain
|
on: September 10, 2017, 10:50:05 PM
|
How do I spend the remaining 2.0 BCH? Can I safely follow the same steps except with 2.0 BCH instead of 10.0 BCH
You screwed yourself here. You basically need a fully validated BCH chain now for Armory to be able to see the tx that created that 2 BCH output, for you to be able to now spend it. I'm probably stretching it now, but any chance you could zip and upload somewhere the BCH blk files from 950 until today? I tried running Bitcoin Classic (it's supposed to be able to re-use Bitcoin Core blocks from before Aug 1) but unfortunately it failed... so I may have to download the entire 150 GB chain :S Copy your BTC chain, delete block files up to the fork point and let a BCH node sync against that.
|
|
|
1307
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Using Armory on the BCH chain
|
on: September 09, 2017, 09:45:22 PM
|
How do I spend the remaining 2.0 BCH? Can I safely follow the same steps except with 2.0 BCH instead of 10.0 BCH
You screwed yourself here. You basically need a fully validated BCH chain now for Armory to be able to see the tx that created that 2 BCH output, for you to be able to now spend it.
|
|
|
1309
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96.2 is out (SegWit enabled)
|
on: September 07, 2017, 06:42:23 PM
|
For the new wallets, not the legacy stuff.
So, if I create a new wallet right now with 0.96.2, I will be able to sweep compressed privkeys. Won't I? Will this also work with import compressed privkeys? Thanks goatpig!! :-) No, this stuff only acts as a proxy to interface the python wallets with the new signer. It does not touch private assets. What you want is for 0.97.
|
|
|
1316
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Using Armory on the BCH chain
|
on: September 06, 2017, 09:39:00 AM
|
Hmm, in what sense do you not trust it?
Your question was akin to: "do you vouch for this code?". No I don't, nor do I want the responsibility. Also, ABC devs went out of their way to obfuscate their changeset. This is like a manufacturer advertising that you shouldn't trust their product. Alright then, I won't. There is a whole community running BCH nodes with almost religious fervor. I am sure they would have noticed if it installed malware or stole wallets.
I do not believe these developers are malevolent. I certainly think they are incompetent. Whether you get screwed intentionally or by negligence, the end result is the same.
|
|
|
1320
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Using Armory on the BCH chain
|
on: September 05, 2017, 11:50:50 PM
|
I'm starting to get it, thank you! Just a few more questions if you don't mind: 1) What broadcasting website did you use? Others have reported http://blockdozer.com/insight/tx/send Have you tried that one? They don't use HTTPS which worries me. 2) I normally use https://bitcoinfees.21.co to check what BTC fees I should be using. What fees do you recommend for BCH? The faster I can dump, the better 3) Let's say I have a total of 2 BTC in various utxos in the Armory wallet. And let's say I'm transferring it all at once (to some BCH exchange address). Let's say I want to use the fee 0.001 BTC. Isn't it then just a matter of selecting all the utxos and transferring 1.999 BTC using a 0.001 BTC fee? I'm almost 100% sure this is correct, but I thought I'd make sure just in case. 1) I sync'ed a BCH node. Blockchair uses SSL, but I don't know if they have a send API. One thing you need to know if you're going to push through a 3rd party: Armory RBF flags by default, and RBF is disabled on the BCH chain. This doesn't mean RBF flagged transactions are invalid on the BCH chain, but that second RBF won't be broadcasted (first RBF flags potential replacement, second RBF is replacement). However, people have reported 3rd party chain explorers won't broadcast RBF flagged tx on BCH, therefor I suspect they went for the idiot patch and reject anything sequence flagged as a whole (how do they deal with OP_CSV?). 2) Last I checked, you could get first block inclusion with as low as 20 sat/B atm. I expect it's cheaper now 3) Pick all the eligible utxos in the coin control UI (don't bother if you want to move the whole wallet balance), then check the "MAX" box and pick a sat/B fee (force a flat fee).
|
|
|
|